Public Participation GIS: A new method for national park planning

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 102, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-15

  Brown, Greg ^a,b   Weber, Delene ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Environmental impacts; Indicators; Park experiences; PPGIS; Public participation GIS; Standards

Indexed keywords

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; INDICATORS (INSTRUMENTS); MAPPING; STANDARDS;

CULTURAL RESOURCES; DECISION SUPPORTS; PLANNING STUDIES; PPGIS; PUBLIC PARTICIPATION; VICTORIA , AUSTRALIA; VISITOR EXPERIENCES; VISITOR PERCEPTIONS;

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

ALPINE ENVIRONMENT; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; GIS; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; MAPPING METHOD; NATIONAL PARK; NATIONAL PLANNING; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT;

AUSTRALIA; VICTORIA [AUSTRALIA];

EID: 79957947756     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Alessa N., Kliskey A., Brown G. Social-ecological hotspots mapping: A spatial approach for identifying coupled social-ecological space. Landscape and Urban Planning 2008, 85:27-39.
2. Anderson D., Lime D., Wang T. Maintaining the quality of park resources and visitor experiences: A handbook for managers 1998, University of Minnesota Tourism Center, St. Paul, MN, TC-777.
3. Australian Bureau of Statistics Internet activity, Australia. Report # 8153.0 2010, ABS, Canberra.
4. Beverly J., Uto K., Wilkes J., Bothwell P. Assessing spatial attributes of forest landscape values: An internet-based participatory mapping approach. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2008, 38:289-303.
5. Brown G. A method for assessing highway qualities to integrate values in highway planning. Journal of Transport Geography 2003, 11:271-283.
6. Brown G. Mapping spatial attributes in survey research for natural resource management: Methods and applications. Society & Natural Resources 2005, 18:1-23.
7. Brown G. Mapping landscape values and development preferences: A method for tourism and residential development planning. International Journal of Tourism Research 2006, 8:101-113.
8. Brown G. A theory of urban park geography. Journal of Leisure Research 2008, 40:589-607.
9. Brown G., Koth B., Kreag G., Weber D. Managing Australia's protected areas: A review of visitor management models frameworks and processes 2006, CRC for Sustainable Tourism, Gold Coast, Queensland.
10. Brown G., Raymond C. The relationship between place attachment and landscape values: Toward mapping place attachment. Applied Geography 2007, 27:89-111.
11. Brown G., Reed P. Validation of a forest values typology for use in national forest planning. Forest Science 2000, 46:240-247.
12. Brown G., Reed P. Public Participation GIS: A new method for national forest planning. Forest Science 2009, 55:166-182.
13. Chilman K., Foster D., Everson A. Updating the recreational carrying capacity process: Recent refinements. Managing America's enduring wilderness resource 1990, 234-238. University of Minnesota, St. Paul. D. Lime (Ed.).
14. Clark R., Hendee J., Campbell F. Depreciative behavior in forest campgrounds: An exploratory study. USDA Forest Service Research Paper PNW-161 1971.
15. Clement J.M., Cheng A.S. Using analyses of public value orientations, attitudes and preferences to inform national forest planning in Colorado and Wyoming. Applied Geography 2010, 31:393-400.
16. Dillman D.A. Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method 2000, Wiley & Sons, New York. 2nd ed.
17. Driver, B. L., & Brown, P. J. (1978). The opportunity spectrum concept and behavioral information in outdoor recreation resource supply inventories: A rationale. In G. Lund, V. LaBau, P. Folliet, D. Robinson (Tech. Eds.), Integrated inventories of renewable natural resources. General Technical Report RM-55. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
18. Graefe A., Kuss F., Vaske J. Visitor impact management: The planning framework 1990, National Parks and Conservation Association, Washington, DC.
19. Hall T., Shelby B., Rolloff D. Effect of varied question format on boaters' norms. Leisure Sciences 1996, 18:193-204.
20. Hof M., Lime D. Visitor Experience and Resource Protection framework in the national park system: Rationale, current status and future direction. Proceedings-Limits of Acceptable Change and related planning processes: Progress and future directions, USDA Forest Service General Technical Report INT-371 1997, 26-29. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT. S. McCool, D.(Cole (Eds.).
21. Lime D.W., Anderson D.H., Thompson J.L. Identifying and monitoring indicators of visitor experience and resource quality: A handbook for recreation resource managers 2004, Department of Forest Resources, St. Paul, MN.
22. Manning R. Parks and carrying capacity: Commons without tragedy 2007, Island Press, Washington, DC.
23. Manning R., Graefe A., McCool S. Trends in carrying capacity planning and management. Proceedings of the fourth international outdoor recreation and tourism trends symposium 1996, 334-341. University of Minnesota, St. Paul. J. Thompson, D. Lime, B. Gartner, W.(Sames (Eds.).
24. Martinson K., Shelby B. Encounter and proximity norms for salmon anglers in California and New Zealand. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 1992, 12:559-567.
25. McCool S., Cole D. Experiencing limits of acceptable change: Some thoughts after a decade of implementation. Proceedings-Limits of acceptable change and related planning processes: Progress and future directions. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report INT-371 1997, 20-22. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT. S. McCool, D.(Cole (Eds.).
26. McIntyre N., Moore J., Yuan M. A place-based, values-centered approach to managing recreation on Canadian crown lands. Society & Natural Resources 2008, 21:8.
27. Nielsen Internet usage statistics. Nielson Market Report, August 2009 2009.
28. Parks Canada Visitor activity concept 1991, Parks Canada, Ottawa.
29. Parks Victoria. (2009). About us. Vision, purpose, values. Accessed 01.03.11. http://www.parkweb.vic.gov.au/1process_content.cfm%3Fsection=17%26page=18.
30. Parks and Wildlife Service Tasmania Walking track management manual: Environmental and planning issues 2003, Department of Tourism, Parks, Heritage and the Arts, Hobart, Australia.
31. Pocewicz, A., Schnitzer, R., Nielsen-Pincus, M. (2010). The social geography of southern Wyoming: Important places, development, and natural resource management, The Nature Conservancy, Lander, WY, 16 pp. Available from: Accessed 01.03.11. http://www.nature.org/wherewework/northamerica/states/wyoming/files/science_mapping_social_values_2010.pdf.
32. Pfueller S., Xuan Z., Whitelaw P., Winter C. Spatial mapping of community values for tourism planning and conservation in the Murray River Reserves, Victoria, Australia 2009, CRC for Sustainable Tourism, Gold Coast, Queensland.
33. Rambaldi G., Kwaku Kyem A.P., Mbile P., McCall M., Weiner D. Participatory spatial information management and communication in developing countries. EJISDC 2006, 25:1.
34. Raymond C., Brown G. A spatial method for assessing resident and visitor attitudes toward tourism growth and development. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 2007, 15:520-540.
35. Reed P., Brown G. Values Suitability Analysis: A methodology for identifying and integrating public perceptions of forest ecosystem values in national forest planning. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2003, 46:643-658.
36. Roggenbuck J., Williams D., Watson A. Defining acceptable conditions in wilderness. Environmental Management 1993, 17:187-197.
37. Sawicki D., Peterman D. Surveying the extent of PPGIS practice in the United States. Community participation and geographic information systems 2002, 17-36. Taylor & Francis, London. W. Craig, T. Harris, D. Weiner (Eds.).
38. Sieber R. Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework. Annals of Association of American Geographers 2006, 96:491-507.
39. Stankey G. Wilderness carrying capacity: Management and research progress in the United States. Land Resources 1980, 5:6-11.
40. Stankey G., Cole D., Lucas R., Peterson M., Frissel S., Wasburne R. The Limits of Acceptable Change (LAC) Systems for wilderness planning. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report INT-176 1985.
41. Tulloch D. Public Participation GIS (PPGIS). Encyclopedia of geographic information science 2007, SAGE Publications, Accessed 01.03.11.
42. TOMM. (2006). Kangaroo Island Tourism Optimisation Management Model. Accessed 01.03.11. http://www.tomm.info/indicators/index.aspx.
43. Vaske J., Graefe B., Shelby B., Heberlein T. Backcountry encounter norms: Theory, method and empirical evidence. Journal of Leisure Research 1986, 18:137-153.
44. Weber, D. (2007). Personal benefits and place attachment of visitors to four metropolitan and regional protected areas in Australia. Unpublished thesis. University of Queensland, School of Social Science.
45. Wilkinson T. Crowd control. National Parks 1995, 69:36-40.
46. Williams D., Roggenbuck J., Patterson M., Watson A. The variability of user based social impact standards for wilderness management. Forest Science 1992, 38:738-756.
47. Young J., Williams D., Roggenbuck J. The role of involvement in identifying users' preferences for social standards in the Cohutta Wilderness. Proceedings of the 1990 Southeast Recreation Conference, USDA Forest Service General Technical Report SE-67 1991, 173-183.