Comparing spatially explicit ecological and social values for natural areas to identify effective conservation strategies;Comparación de Valores Ecológicos y Sociales Espacialmente Explícitos de Áreas Naturales para la Identificacíon de Estrategias de Conservación Efectivas

Conservation Biology

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 172-181

  Bryan, Brett Anthony ^a   Raymond, Christopher Mark ^b   Crossman, Neville David ^a   King, Darran ^a  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Biological diversity; Conservation planning; Environmental values; Landscape; Policy instruments; Spatial prioritization

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL LAND; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONSERVATION PLANNING; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; PRIORITIZATION; PROTECTED AREA; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; HUMAN; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SOCIAL VALUES; SOUTH AUSTRALIA;

AUSTRALIA;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 78751664795     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: 15231739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01560.x     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Alessa, L., A. Kliskey, and G. Brown 2008. Social-ecological hotspots mapping: a spatial approach for identifying coupled social-ecological space. Landscape and Urban Planning 85:27-39.
2. Armitage, D., et al. 2009. Adaptive co-management for social-ecological complexity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7:95-102.
3. Ban, N. C., and C. J. Klein 2009. Spatial socioeconomic data as a cost in systematic marine conservation planning. Conservation Letters 2:206-215.
4. Ban, N. C., G. J. A. Hansen, M. Jones, and A. C. J. Vincent 2009a. Systematic marine conservation planning in data-poor regions: socioeconomic data is essential. Marine Policy 33:794-800.
5. Ban, N. C., C. R. Picard, and A. C. J. Vincent 2009b. Comparing and integrating community-based and science-based approaches to prioritizing marine areas for protection. Conservation Biology 23:899-910.
6. Berkes, F. 2009. Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management 90:1692-1702.
7. Brown, G. 2005. Mapping spatial attributes in survey research for natural resource management: methods and applications. Society and Natural Resources 18:17-39.
8. Brown, G., C. Smith, L. Alessa, and A. Kliskey 2004. A comparison of perceptions of biological value with scientific assessment of biological importance. Applied Geography 24:161-180.
9. Carpenter, S. R., et al. 2009. Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106:1305-1312.
10. Cash, D. W., W. C. Clark, F. Alcock, N. M. Dickson, N. Eckley, D. H. Guston, J. Jäger, and R. B. Mitchel 2003. Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100:8086-8091.
11. Cast, A., D. Hatton MacDonald, A. Grandgirard, T. Kalivas, S. Strathearn, M. Sanderson, B. A. Bryan, and D. Frahm 2008. South Australian Murray Darling Basin environmental values report. CSIRO, Adelaide, Australia Available from (accessed April 2010).
12. Connor, J. D., J. Ward, and B. A. Bryan 2008. Exploring the cost effectiveness of land conservation auctions and payment policies. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 52:303-319.
13. Cowling, R. M., B. Egoh, A. T. Knight, P. J. O'Farrell, B. Reyers, M. Rouget, D. J. Roux, A. Welz, and A. Wilhelm-Rechman 2008. An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105:9483-9488.
14. Crossman, N. D., B. A. Bryan, and D. A. Cooke 2010. An invasive plant and climate change threat index for weed risk management: integrating habitat distribution pattern and dispersal process. Ecological Indicators DOI:.
15. Ferrier, S., and B. A. Wintle 2009. Quantitative approaches to spatial conservation prioritization: matching the solution to the need. Pages 1-15 in A. Moilanen, K. A. Wilson, and H. P. Possingham, editors. Spatial conservation prioritization: quantitative methods and computational tools. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom
16. Goodchild, M. F. 1986. Spatial autocorrelation. Catmog 47, Geo Books, Norwich
17. Gruber, J. S. 2010. Key principles of community-based natural resource management: a synthesis and interpretation of identified effective approaches for managing the commons. Environmental Management 45:52-66.
18. Justus, J., and S. Sarkar 2002. The principle of complementarity in the design of reserve networks to conserve biodiversity: a preliminary history. Journal of Biosciences 27:421-435.
19. Janssen, R., H. Goosen, M. L. Verhoeven, J. T. A. Verhoeven, A. Q. A. Omtzigt, and E. Maltby 2005. Decision support for integrated wetland management. Environmental Modelling and Software 20:215-29.
20. Jepson, P., and S. Canney 2003. Values-led conservation. Global Ecology & Biogeography 12:271-274.
21. Kati, V., P. Devillers, M. Dufrêne, A. Legakis, D. Vokou, and P. Lebrun 2004. Hotspots, complementarity or representativeness? Designing optimal small-scale reserves for biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation 120:471-480.
22. Keeney, R. L., and H. Raiffa 1976. Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. John Wiley & Sons, New York
23. Klein, C. J., A. Chan, L. Kircher, A. J. Cundiff, N. Gardner, Y. Hrovat, A. Scholz, B. E. Kendall, and S. Airame 2008. Striking a balance between biodiversity conservation and socioeconomic viability in the design of marine protected areas. Conservation Biology 22:691-700.
24. Knight, A. T., and R. M. Cowling 2007. Embracing opportunism in the selection of priority conservation areas. Conservation Biology 21:1124-1126.
25. Knight, A. T., R. M. Cowling, and B. M. Campbell 2006a. An operational model for implementing conservation action. Conservation Biology 20:408-419.
26. Knight, A. T., et al. 2006b. Designing systematic conservation assessments that promote effective implementation: best practice from South Africa. Conservation Biology 20:739-750.
27. Knight, A. T., R. M. Cowling, M. Rouget, A. Balmford, A. T. Lombard, and B. M. Campbell 2008. Knowing but not doing: selecting priority conservation areas and the research-implementation gap. Conservation Biology 22:610-617.
28. Knight, A. T., R. M. Cowling, H. P. Possingham, and K. A. Wilson 2009. From theory to practice: designing and situating spatial prioritization approaches to better implement conservation action. Pages 249-259 in A. Moilanen, K. A. Wilson, and H. P. Possingham, editors. Spatial conservation prioritization: quantitative methods and computational tools. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom
29. Larsen, F. W., A. H. Petersen, N. Strange, M. P. Lund, and C. Rahbek 2008. A quantitative analysis of biodiversity and the recreational value of potential national parks in Denmark. Journal of Environmental Management 41:685-695.
30. Lindenmayer, D., et al. 2008. A checklist for ecological management of landscapes for conservation. Ecology Letters 11:78-91.
31. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, D.C
32. Margules C. R., and R. L. Pressey 2000. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405:243-253.
33. Margules, C. R., and S. Sarkar 2007. Systematic conservation planning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom
34. McIntyre, N., J. Moore, and M. Yuan 2008. A place-based, values-centered approach to managing recreation on Canadian crown lands. Society and Natural Resources 21:657-670.
35. Moffett, A., and S. Sarkar 2006. Incorporating multiple criteria into the design of conservation area networks: a minireview with recommendations. Diversity and Distributions 12:135-137.
36. Moilanen, A., K. A. Wilson, and H. P. Possingham 2009. Spatial conservation prioritization: quantitative methods and computational tools. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom
37. Naidoo, R., A. Balmford, P. J. Ferraro, S. Polasky, T. H. Ricketts, and M. Rouget 2006. Integrating economic costs into conservation planning. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21:681-687.
38. Perman, R., Y. Ma, J. McGilvray, and M. Common 2003. Natural resource and environmental economics. 3rd edition. Harlow, Essex, United Kingdom
39. Phua, M. H., and M. Minowa 2005. A GIS-based multi criteria decision making approach to forest conservation planning at a landscape scale: a case study of the Kinabalu area, Sabah, Malaysia. Landscape and Urban Planning 71:207-222.
40. Portman, M. E. 2007. Zoning design for cross-border marine protected areas: the Red Sea Marine Peace Park case study. Ocean and Coastal Management Journal 50:499-522.
41. Pressey, R. L., and M. C. Bottrill 2008. Opportunism, threats, and the evolution of systematic conservation planning. Conservation Biology 22:1340-1345.
42. Raymond, C.M., and G. Brown 2006. A method for assessing protected area allocations using a typology of landscape values. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 49:797-812.
43. Raymond, C. M., B. A. Bryan, D. Hatton MacDonald, A. Cast, S. Strathearn, A. Grandgirard, and T. Kalivas 2009. Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 68:1301-1315.
44. Regan, H., F. Davis, S. Andelman, A. Widyanata, and M. Freese 2007. Comprehensive criteria for biodiversity evaluation in conservation planning. Biodiversity and Conservation 16:2715-2728.
45. Saaty, T. 1980. The analytical hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York
46. Samu, F., P. Csontos, and C. Szinetar 2008. From multi-criteria approach to simple protocol: assessing habitat patches for conservation value using species rarity. Biological Conservation 141:1310-1320.
47. Sterner, T. 2003. Policy instruments for environmental and natural resource management. RFF Press, Washington, D.C
48. Tyrväinnen, L., K. Mäkinen, and J. Schipperijn 2007. Tools for mapping social values of urban woodlands and other green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning 79:5-19.
49. Wilson, K. A., M. Cabeza, and C. J. Klein 2009a. Fundamental concepts of spatial conservation planning. Pages 16-27 in A. Moilanen, K. A. Wilson, and H. P. Possingham, editors. Spatial conservation prioritization: quantitative methods and computational tools. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom
50. Wilson, K. A., J. Carwardine, and H. P. Possingham 2009b. Setting conservation priorities. Year in Ecology and Conservation Biology 1162:237-264.