Public Participation GIS: A Method for Identifying Ecosystem Services

Society and Natural Resources

Volumn 25, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 633-651

  Brown, Greg ^a   Montag, Jessica M ^b   Lyon, Katie ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

Author keywords

ecosystem services; GIS; public participation

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GIS; LAND COVER; LAND USE; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH;

COLORADO; GRAND COUNTY [COLORADO]; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84861520495     PISSN: 08941920     EISSN: 15210723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2011.621511     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Alessa, N., A. Kliskey, and G. Brown. 2008. Social-ecological hotspots mapping: A spatial approach for identifying coupled social-ecological space. Landscape Urban Plann. 85 (1): 27-39.
2. Beaumont N. J., M. C. Austen, J. Atkins, D. Burdon, S. Degraer, T. P. Dentinho, S. Derous, P. Holm, T. Horton, E. van Ierland, A. H. Marboe, D. J. Starkey, M. Townsend, and T. Zarzycki. 2007. Identification, definition and quantification of goods and services provided by marine biodiversity: Implications for the ecosystem approach. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 54 (3): 253-265.
3. Beverly, J., K. Uto, J. Wilkes, and P. Bothwell. 2008. Assessing spatial attributes of forest landscape values: An Internet-based participatory mapping approach. Can. J. For. Res. 38 (2): 289-303.
4. Brown, G. 2003. A method for assessing highway qualities to integrate values in highway planning. J. Transport Geogr. 11 (4): 271-283.
5. Brown, G. 2005. Mapping spatial attributes in survey research for natural resource management: Methods and applications. Society Nat. Resources 18: 1-23.
6. Brown, G. 2006. Mapping landscape values and development preferences: A method for tourism and residential development planning. Int. J. Tourism Res. 8 (2): 101-113.
7. Brown, G. 2008. A theory of urban park geography. J. Leisure Res. 40 (4): 589-607.
8. Brown, G., and C. Raymond. 2007. The relationship between place attachment and landscape values: Toward mapping place attachment. Appl. Geogr. 27 (2): 89-111.
9. Brown, G., and P. Reed. 2000. Validation of a forest values typology for use in national forest planning. For. Sci. 46 (2): 240-247.
10. Brown, G., and P. Reed. 2009. Public Participation GIS: A new method for national forest planning. For. Sci. 55 (2): 166-182.
11. Brown, G., and D. Weber. 2011. Public Participation GIS: A new method for use in national park planning. Landscape Urban Plan. 102 (1): 1-15.
12. Bryan, B. A., and N. Crossman. 2008. Systematic regional planning for multiple objective natural resource management. J. Environ. Manage. 88 (4): 1175-1189.
13. Carpenter, S. R., E. M. Bennett, and G. D. Peterson. 2006. Scenarios for ecosystem services: An overview. Ecol. Soc. 11 (1): 29.
14. Costanza, R., R. Arge, R. de Groot, S. Farberk, M. Grasso, B. Hannon, K. Limburg, S. Naeem, R. O'Neill, J. Paruelo, R. Raskin, P. Suttonkk, and M. van den Belt. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387: 253-260.
15. Cowling, R. M., B. Egoh, A. T. Knight, P. J. O'Farrell, B. Reyers, M. Rouget, D. J. Roux, A. Weiz, and A. Wilhelm-Rechman. 2008. An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105 (28): 9483-9488.
16. Couper, M. P., and P. V. Miller. 2008. Web survey methods. Public Opin. Q. 72 (5): 831-835.
17. Daily, G. C., ed. 1997. Nature's services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press.
18. Daily, G. C. 2000. Management objectives for the protection of ecosystem services. Environ. Sci. Policy 3 (6): 333-339.
19. Daily, G. C., S. Polasky, J. Goldstein, P. M. Kareiva, H. A. Mooney, L. Pejchar, T. H. Ricketts, J. Salzman, and R. Shallenberger. 2009. Ecosystem services in decision making: Time to deliver. Front. Ecol.7(1):21-28.
20. Ehrlich, P. R., and A. Ehrlich. 1981. Extinction: The causes and consequences of the disappearance of species. New York: Random House.
21. Ehrlich, P. R., and H. A. Mooney. 1983. Extinction, substitution, and ecosystem services. BioScience 33: 248-254.
22. de Groot, R. S., M. A. Wilson, and R. Boumans. 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol. Econ. 41: 393-408.
23. Hunt, L. M., D. Gonder, and W. Haider. 2010. Hearing voices from the silent majority: A comparison of preferred fish stocking outcomes for Lake Huron by anglers from representative and convenience samples. Hum. Dimens. Wildl. 15 (1): 27-44.
24. International Long Term Ecological Research Science Agenda Committee. 2008. Interactions among ecosystem services, ecosystem dynamics, and human outcomes and behavior.http://www.ilternet.edu/research/ecosystem-services-assessment/esa-project-files/Interactions%20between %20ecosystem%20services.pdf/view (accessed 9 July 2010).
25. Jaffe, M. 2008. Current affairs on state water: Utilities cross the Divide to start negotiating water-moving plans. Denver Post, 5 October. http://www.denverpost.com/ci_10635332 (accessed 4 September 2011).
26. Kumar, M., and P. Kumar. 2008. Valuation of the ecosystem services: A psycho-cultural perspective. Ecol. Econ. 64 (4): 808-819.
27. Landscape Values Institute. 2010. Landscape values & PPGIS Institute: Advancing knowledge about values and special places for land use planning. http://www.landscapevalues.org (accessed 9 July 2010).
28. Maskey, N. 2008. Investing in ecosystem services: Opportunities and challenges for Shivapuri National Park, Nepal. Lund, Sweden: Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies.
29. Manfreda, K. L., Bosnjak, M., Berzelak, J., Haas, I., and V. Vehovar. 2008. Web surveys versus other survey modes. Int. J. Market Res. 2008, 50 (1): 79-104.
30. Martin-Lopez, B., E. Gomez-Baggethun, P. L. Lomas, and C. Montes. 2009. Effects of spatial and temporal scales on cultural services valuation. J. Environ. Manage. 90 (2): 1050-1059.
31. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2003. Ecosystems and human well-being: A framework for assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press.
32. National Research Council. 2005. Valuing ecosystem services: Toward better environmental decision-making. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
33. Ninan, K. N. (ed.). 2009. Conserving and valuing ecosystem services and biodiversity: Economic, institutional and social challenges. Sterling, VA: Earthscan.
34. Peterson, M. J., D. M. Hall, A. M. Feldpausch-Parker, and T. R. Peterson. 2009. Obscuring ecosystem function with application of the ecosystem services concept. Conserv. Biol. 24 (1): 113-119.
35. Pfueller, S., Z. Xuan, P. Whitelaw, and C. Winter. 2009. Spatial mapping of community values for tourism planning and conservation in the murray river reserves, victoria, Australia. Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia: CRC for Sustainable Tourism.
36. Pocewicz, A., R. Schnitzer, and M. Nielsen-Pincus. 2010. The social geography of southern Wyoming: Important places, development, and natural resource management. Lander, WY: The Nature Conservancy.www.nature.org/wyoscience
37. Raymond, C. M., B. Bryan, D. MacDonald, A. Cast, S. Strathearn, A. Grandgirard, and T. Kalivas. 2009. Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ. 68 (5): 1301-1315.
38. Raymond, C., and G. Brown. 2006. A method for assessing protected area allocations using a typology of landscape values. J. Environ. Plan. Manage. 49 (6): 797-812.
39. Rowe, G., and J. Frewer. 2000. Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 25 (1): 3-29.
40. Satterfield, T., and M. Roberts. 2008. Incommensurate risks and the regulator's dilemma: Considering culture in the governance of genetically modified organisms. New Genet. Soc.27(3):201-216.
41. Sawicki, D., and D. Peterman. 2002. Surveying the extent of PPGIS practice in the United States. In Community participation and geographic information systems, ed. W. Craig, T. Harris, and D. Weiner, 17-36. London: Taylor & Francis.
42. Sieber, R. 2006. Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 96 (3): 491-507.
43. Tyrvainen, L., K. Makinen, and J. Schippperjin. 2007. Tools for mapping social values of urban woodlands and other green areas. Landscape Urban Plan. 79 (1): 5-19.
44. Willemen, L., P. H. Verburg, L. Hein, and M. E. F. van Mensvoort. 2008. Spatial characterization of landscape functions. Landscape Urban Plan. 88 (1): 34-43.