Rehearsing the state: The political practices of the Tibetan Government-in-Exile

Rehearsing the State: The Political Practices of the Tibetan Government-in-Exile

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 1-221

  McConnell, Fiona ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84982899301     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781118661192     Document Type: Book

References (545)

1. Abrams, P. (1988). Notes on the difficulty of studying the state (1977). Journal of Historical Sociology 1, 58-89.
2. Addy, P. (1994). History: economics and ideology. British and Indian strategic perceptions of Tibet. In R. Barnett (ed.), Resistance and Reform in Tibet. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 15-50.
3. Adey, P. & Anderson, B. (2012). Anticipating emergencies: technologies of preparedness and the matter of security. Security Dialogue 43(2), 99-117.
4. Agamben, G. (1995).We refugees. Symposium 49(2), 114-119.
5. Agier, M. (2002). Between war and city: towards an urban anthropology of refugee camps. Ethnography 3(3), 317-341.
6. Agnew, J. (1994). The Territorial trap: the geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy, 1(1), 53-80.
7. Agnew, J. (1998). Geopolitics: Re-visioning World Politics. London: Routledge.
8. Agnew, J. (1999). Mapping political power beyond state boundaries: territory, identity and movement in world politics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 28(3), 499-521.
9. Agnew, J. (2005). Sovereignty regimes: territoriality and state authority in contemporary world politics. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 95(2), 437-461.
10. Aiming, Z. (2011). The liberation of Tibet is a splendid chapter in the unification of the Chinese nation: an interview with Mr Zhu Weiqun, Vice Minister of the United Front Work Department of the Central Government of China. China's Tibet 2011.3 Vol. 24, 4-13.
11. Aldecoa, F. & Keating, M. (eds) (1999). Paradiplomacy in Action: The Foreign Relations of Subnational Governments. Portland, OR: Frank Cass.
12. Alexander, J.C. (2011). Power and Performance. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
13. Allen, J. (2003). Lost Geographies of Power. Oxford: Blackwell.
14. Amrith, S. (2011). Migration and Diaspora in Modern Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Anand, D. (2000). (Re)imagining Nationalism: identity and representation in the Tibetan diaspora of South Asia. Contemporary South Asia 9(3), 271-287.
16. Anand, D. (2002). A guide to little Lhasa in India: the role of symbolic geography of Dharamsala in constituting Tibetan diasporic identity. In P.C. Klieger (ed.), Tibet, Self, and the Tibetan Diaspora:Voices of Difference. Leiden: Brill, pp. 11-36.
17. Anand,D. (2003). A contemporary story of 'diaspora': the tibetan version. Diaspora 12(2), 211-229.
18. Anand, D. (2004). A story to be told: IR, postcolonialism and the discourse of Tibetan (trans)national identity. InG. Chowdhry & S. Nair (eds), Power,Postcolonialism and International Relations: Reading Race, Gender and Class. London: Routledge, pp. 209-224.
19. Anand,D. (2006). The Tibet question and theWest: issues of sovereignty, identity and representation. In J.T. Dreyer & B. Sautman (eds), Contemporary Tibet:Politics, Development and Society in a Disputed Region. London: M.E. Sharpe, pp. 285-304.
20. Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
21. Anderson, B. (2006). Becoming and being hopeful: towards a theory of affect. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 24, 733-752.
22. Anderson, B. (2010). Preemption, precaution, preparedness: Anticipatory action and future geographies. Progress in Human Geography 34(6), 777-798.
23. Anderson, J. (1996). The shifting stage of politics: new medieval and postmodern territorialities? Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 14(2), 133-153.
24. Anghie, A. (2002). Colonialism and the birth of international institutions: sovereignty, economy, and the mandate system of the League of Nations. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 34(3), 513-633.
25. Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
26. Appadurai, A. (2001). Deep democracy: urban governmentality and the horizon of politics. Environment and Urbanization 13(2) 23-43.
27. Arakeri, A.V. (1980).Tibetans in India:The Uprooted People and their Cultural Transplantation. New Delhi: Reliance Publishing House.
28. Ardley, J. (2002). The Tibetan Independence Movement:Political,Religious and Gandhian Perspectives. London: Routledge Curzon.
29. Ardley, J. (2003). Learning the art of democracy? Continuity and change in the Tibetan government-in-exile. Contemporary South Asia 12(3), 349-363.
30. Arendt, H. (1958). The Human Condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
31. Arendt, H. (1976). The Origins of Totalitarianism. San Diego, CA: Harvest.
32. Aretxaga, B. (2000). A fictional reality: paramilitary death squads and the construction of state terror in Spain. In J.A. Sluka (ed.), Death Squad: The Anthropology of State Terror Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 46-60.
33. Aretxaga, B. (2003). Maddening states. Annual Review of Anthropology 32, 393-410.
34. Armstrong, H.W. & Read, R. (2000). Comparing the economic performance of dependent territories and sovereign microstates. Economic Development and Cultural Change 48(1), 285-306.
35. Arpi, C. (2009). India Tibet relations 1947-1949: India begins to vacillate.Paper presented at the International Conference on Exploring Tibet's History and Culture. Delhi University, 19-21 November 2009.
36. Ashley, R.K. (1988). Untying the sovereign state: a double reading of the anarchy problematique. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 17(2), 227-262.
37. Bahcheli, T., Bartmann, B. & Srebrnik, H. (eds) (2004). De facto States: The Quest for Sovereignty. London: Routledge.
38. Barfield, T.J. (1989). The Perilous Frontier: Nomadic Empires and China. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
39. Barker, R. (1990). Political Legitimacy and the State. Clarendon Press.
40. Barkin, J.S. & Cronin, B. (1994). The state and the nation: Changing norms and the rules of sovereignty in international relations. International Organization 48(1), 107-130.
41. Barnett, C. (2005). Ways of relating: hospitality and the acknowledgment of otherness. Progress in Human Geography 29, 5-21.
42. Barnett, R. (2001). "Violated specialness": Western political representations of Tibet. In T. Dodin & H. Räther (eds), Imagining Tibet: Perceptions, Projections, and Fantasies. Somerville, MA: Wisdom, pp. 269-316.
43. Barry, A., Osborne, T. & Rose, N. (1996). Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo- Liberalism and Rationalities of Government. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
44. Bartelson, J. (1995). A Genealogy of Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Bauman, Z. (1991). Modernity and the Holocaust. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
46. Bauman, Z. (2002). In the lowly nowherevilles of liquid modernity: Comments on and around Agier. Ethnography 3(3), 343-349.
47. Bayart, J.-F. (2007). Global Subjects:A Political Critique of Globalization. Cambridge: Polity Press.
48. Beckwith, C.I. (1993). The Tibetan Empire in Central Asia :A History of the Struggle for Great Power among Tibetans, Turks, Arabs, and Chinese during the Early Middle Ages. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49. Beer, C. (2008). The spatial accommodation practice of the bureaucracy of the Commonwealth of Australia and the production of Canberra as national capital space: A dialectical and prosaic history. Political Geography 27, 40-56.
50. Beier, J.M. (ed.) (2010). Indigenous Diplomacies. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
51. Beker, M. & van Oordt, R. (1991). The Palestinians in Lebanon: Contradictions of State- Formation in Exile. Amsterdam: Middle East Associates.
52. Bell, C. (1924). Tibet Past and Present. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
53. Benhabib, S.,Waldreon, J., Honig, B., Kymlicka,W. & Post, R. (2006). Another Cosmopolitanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54. Bentz, A.-S. (2012). Symbol and power: the Dalai Lama as a charismatic leader. Nations and Nationalism 18(2), 287-305.
55. Bernstein, A. & Mertz, E. (2011). Introduction - bureaucracy: Ethnography of the state in everyday life. Political and Legal Anthropology Review 34(1), 6-10.
56. Bhabha, H. (1984). Of mimicry and man: the ambivalence of colonial discourse. Discipleship: A Special Issue on Psychoanalysis 28, 125-133.
57. Bickers, R. (2012). The Scramble for China: Foreign Devils in the Qing Empire, 1832-1914. London: Penguin.
58. Biersteker, T. & Weber, C. (1996). State Sovereignty as Social Construct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59. Billig, M. (1995). Banal Nationalism. London: Sage.
60. Blitz, B.K. (2011). Statelessness and environmental-induced displacement: Future scenarios of deterritorialisation, rescue and recovery examined. Mobilities 6(3), 433-450.
61. Blomley, N. (1994). Activism and the academy. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 12(4), 383-385.
62. Bodh, A. (2011). 25-yr-old first Tibetan to be Indian citizen. The Times of India, 20 January. Available from http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/25-yr-old-first-Tibetan-to- be-Indian-citizen/articleshow/7323090.cms?referral=PM (accessed 22 October 2012).
63. Boudreau, J.-A. (2001). Strategic territorialisation: the politics of Anglo-Montrealers. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 92(4), 405-419.
64. Bourdieu, P. (1994). Rethinking the state: Genesis and structure of the bureaucratic field. Sociological Theory 12(2), 1-18.
65. Bradatan, C. (2014). The wisdom of the exile. New York Times, 16 August. Available from http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/2008/2016/the-wisdom-of-the- exile/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=2011.
66. Brah, A. (1996). Cartographies of Diaspora: Contesting Identities. London: Routledge.
67. Brass, P. (1990). The Politics of India since Independence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Bratsis, P. (2006). Everyday Life and the State. London: Paradigm Publishers.
68. Bratsis, P. (2006). Everyday Life and the State. London: Paradigm Publishers.
69. Brenner, N., Jessop, B., Jones, M. & MacLeod, G. (eds) (2003). State/Space: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.
70. Brubaker, R. & Cooper, F. (2000). Beyond "Identity". Theory and Society 29(1), 1-47.
71. Burkett, M. (2011). The Nation Ex-Situ: On climate change, deterritorialized nationhood and the post-climate era. Climate Law 2, 345-374.
72. Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge.
73. Butler, J. (1992). Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. London: Routledge.
74. Buzan, B. (1991). People, States and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
75. Cadman, L. (2010). How (not) to be governed: Foucault, critique, and the political. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28(3), 539-556.
76. Camilleri, J. & Falk, J. (1992). The End of Sovereignty? The Politics of a Shrinking and Fragmenting World. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
77. Campbell,D. (1992). Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
78. Candea, M. & da Col, G. (2012). The return to hospitality. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 18(S1), S1-S19.
79. Caplan, J. & Torpey, J. (eds) (2001). Documenting Individual Identity: The Development of State Practices in the Modern World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
80. Carrasco, P. (1959). Land and Polity in Tibet. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
81. Caspersen, N. (2012). Unrecognized States. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
82. Caspersen, N. (forthcoming). Degrees of legitimacy: Ensuring internal and external support in the absence of recognition. Geoforum.
83. Cassidy, F. & Bish, R.L. (1989). Indian Government: Its Meaning in Practice. Lantzville, BC: Oolichan Books.
84. Castells, M. (1996). The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell.
85. Castoriadis, C. (1987). The Imaginary Institution of Society. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
86. Chakrabarty,D. (1999). Adda, Calcutta: dwelling in modernity. Public Culture 11(1), 109- 145.
87. Chapman, F.S. (1938). Lhasa: The Holy City. London: Chatto & Windus.
88. Chatterjee, P. (2004). The Politics of the Governed: Reflections on Popular Politics in Most of the World. New York, Columbia University Press.
89. Chatterjee, P. (2005). The nation in heterogeneous time. Futures 37, 925-942.
90. Chatterji, J. (2007). 'Dispersal' and the failure of rehabilitation: Refugee camp-dwellers and squatters in West Bengal. Modern Asian Studies 41(5), 995-1032.
91. Chaturvedi, G. (2004). Indian visions. In D. Bernstorff & H. von Welck (eds), Exile as Challenge: The Tibetan Diaspora. New Delhi: Orient Longman, pp. 72-86.
92. Chellaney, B. (2011).Water: Asia's New Battleground.Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
93. Childs, G. (2008). Tibetan Transitions: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives on Fertility, Family Planning, and Demographic Change. Leiden: Brill.
94. Childs, G. & Barkin, G. (2006). Reproducing identity: Using images to promote postnatalism and sexual endogamy among Tibetan exiles in South Asia. Visual Anthropology Review 22(2), 34-52.
95. Chimni,B.S. (2003). Status of refugees in India: strategic ambiguity. In R. Samaddar (ed.), Refugees and the State: Practices of Asylum and Care in India. New Delhi: Sage, pp. 443- 470.
96. Clapham, C. (1998). Degrees of statehood. Review of International Studies 24(2), 143-157.
97. Clayton, D. (2000). Governmentality. In R.J. Johnston, D. Gregory, G. Pratt, & M.Watts (eds), The Dictionary of Human Geography, 4th edn. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 318-319.
98. Collier, S. (2008). Enacting catastrophe: preparedness, insurance, budgetary rationalisation. Economy and Society 37, 224-250.
99. Colson, E. (2003). Forced migration and the anthropological response. Journal of Refugee Studies 16(1), 1-18.
100. Constantinou, C.M. (1996). On the Way to Diplomacy. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
101. Constantinou, C.M. (1998). Before the Summit: representations of sovereignty on the Himalayas. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 27(1), 23-53.
102. Cook, I.& Crang,P. (1995). Doing Ethnographies:Concepts and Techniques in Modern Geography (CATMOG) 58. Norwich: Institute of British Geographers' Quantitative Geography Study Group.
103. Conway, M. & Gotovitch, J. (2001). Europe in Exile: European Exile Communities in Britain 1940-1945. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
104. Corbridge, S., Williams, G., Srivistava,N. & Veron, R. (2005). Seeing the State:Governance and Governmentality in India. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
105. Cornell, A. (2011). Oppose and Propose: Lessons from Movement for a New Society Oakland, CA: AK Press.
106. Corrigan, P. & Sayer, S. (1985). The Great Arch: English State Formation as Cultural Revolution. Oxford: Blackwell.
107. Cox, K.R. (1998). Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale, or: looking for local politics. Political Geography 17(1), 1-23.
108. Craggs, R. (2014). Hospitality in geopolitics and the making of Commonwealth international relations. Geoforum 52, 90-100.
109. Crang, P. (1994). "It's showtime": on the workplace geographies of display in a restaurant in Southeast England. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 12(6), 675-704.
110. Crawford, J. (2006). The Creation of States in International Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
111. Cresswell,T. (1996). In Place/Out of Place:Geography, Ideology and Transgression. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
112. CTRC (2003). His Holiness the Dalai Lama's Central Tibetan Relief Committee: Building Sustainable Communities in Exile. Dharamsala: Central Tibetan Relief Committee.
113. Dahl, R.A. (2000). On Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
114. Dalai Lama (1963). Constitution of Tibet. New Delhi: Bureau of His Holiness The Dalai Lama.
115. Dalai Lama (1988). Strasbourg Proposal 1988: Address to Members of the European Parliament, 15 June. Available from http://www.dalailama.com/messages/tibet/strasbourgproposal- 1988 (accessed 14 September 2015).
116. Dalai Lama (1990). Freedom in Exile:The Autobiography of the Dalai Lama.London: Harper Collins.
117. Dalai Lama (1997). My Land and My People: The Autobiography of His Holiness the Dalai Lama. New York:Warner Books.
118. Darling, J. (2010). A city of sanctuary: the relational re-imagining of Sheffield's asylum politics. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 35(1), 125-140.
119. Das, V. & Poole, D. (eds) (2004). Anthropology in the Margins of the State. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
120. Davidson, J. (2003). "Putting on a face": Sartre, Goffman and agoraphobic anxiety in social space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 21, 107-122.
121. Davies, A. (2012). Assemblage and social movements: Tibet Support Groups and the spatialities of political organisation. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 37(2), 273-286.
122. Davis,T.C. (2007). Stages of Emergency:ColdWar Nuclear Civil Defense. Durham,NC:Duke University Press.
123. Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: Sage.
124. Dean, M. & Henman, P. (2004). Governing society today: editor's introduction. Alternatives 29, 483-494.
125. Department of EducationCTA (2005). Basic Education Policy for Tibetans in Exile.Dharamsala: Department of Education, CTA.
126. Department of Finance (2005) Paljor Bulletin June. Dharamsala: Department of Finance, CTA.
127. Derrida, J. (1997) Politics and friendship: A discussion with Jacques Derrida. Interview at the Centre for Modern French Thought, University of Sussex, 1 December 1997. Available from http://www.livingphilosophy.org/Derrida-politics-friendship.htm (accessed 15 September 2015).
128. Derrida, J. (1999). Adieu to Emmanuel Levinas. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
129. Desbiens, C., Mountz, A. & Walton-Roberts, M. (2004). Guest editorial. Introduction: reconceptualising the state from the margins of political geography. Political Geography 23(3), 241-243.
130. de Voe, D.M. (1987). Keeping refugee status: a Tibetan perspective. In S.M. Morgan & E. Colson (eds), People in Upheaval. New York: Centre for Migration Studies, pp. 54-65.
131. Dhondup, K. (1994). Dharamsala: Shangrila or Sarajevo? Tibetan Review 29(7), 14-20.
132. DIIR (1996). Tibet: Proving Truth from Facts. Dharamsala: DIIR, CTA.
133. DIIR (2005). The Middle-Way Approach: A Framework for Resolving the Issue of Tibet. Dharamsala: DIIR, CTA.
134. DIIR (2010). Middle Way Policy and All Recent Related Documents. Dharamsala: CTA.
135. Dodds, K., Kuus, M. & Sharp, J. (2013). Introduction: geopolitics and its critics. In K. Dodds, M.Kuus & J. Sharp (eds), The Ashgate Research Companion to Critical Geopolitics. Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 1-14.
136. Doty, R.L. (1996). Sovereignty and the nation: constructing the boundaries of national identity. In T.J. Biersteker & C.Weber (eds), State Sovereignty as Social Construct. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 121-147.
137. Dreyfus, G. (1995). Law, state and political ideology in Tibet. Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 18(1), 117-138.
138. Dresser, N. (1997). On Sticking Out Your Tongue. Los Angeles Times, 8 November. Available from http://articles.latimes.com/1997/nov/08/local/me-51420 (accessed 15 September 2015).
139. Duara, P. (2003). Sovereignty and Authenticity:Manchukuo and the East Asian Modern. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
140. Duffield, M. (2010). Risk management and the fortified aid compound: every-day life in post-interventionary society. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 4, 453-474.
141. Dufoix, S. (2002). Politiques d'exil.Hongrois,Polonais et Tchécoslovaques en France apr`es 1945. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
142. du Gay, P. (2000). In Praise of Bureaucracy. London: Sage. Dulaney, A.G., Cusack,D.M. & vanWalt van Praag, M. (1998). The Case Concerning Tibet: Tibet's Sovereignty and the Tibetan People's Right to Self-determination.New Delhi:TPPRC.
143. Dulaney, A.G., Cusack,D.M. & vanWalt van Praag, M. (1998). The Case Concerning Tibet: Tibet's Sovereignty and the Tibetan People's Right to Self-determination.New Delhi:TPPRC.
144. Duska, S.A. (2008). Harmony, ideology and dispute resolution: a legal ethnography of the Tibetan diaspora in India. PhD thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
145. Easton, D. (1975). A re-assessment of the concept of political support. British Journal of Political Science 5(4), 435-457.
146. Edensor, T. (ed.) (2010). Geographies of Rhythm:Nature, Place, Mobilities and Bodies. Aldershot: Ashgate.
147. Edin, M. (1992). Transition to democracy in exile: A study of the Tibetan Government's strategy for self-determination. MPhil thesis, University of Uppsala, Sutteanum.
148. Edkins, J., Persram, N. & Pin-Fat, V. (eds) (1999). Sovereignty and Subjectivity. Boulder, CO: Lynne Riener.
149. Elden, S. (2005). Missing the point: globalization, deterritorialization and the space of the world. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 30(1), 8-19.
150. Elden, S. (2006). Contingent sovereignty, territorial integrity and the sanctity of borders. The SAIS Review of International Affairs 26(1), 11-24.
151. Elden, S. (2007).Governmentality, calculation, territory.Environment and Planning D:Society and Space 25(3), 562-580.
152. Elverskog, J. (2006). Our Great Qing: The Mongols, Buddhism, And the State in Late Imperial China. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
153. Erman, E. & Uhlin, A. (2010). Legitimacy Beyond the State?: Re-examining the Democratic Credentials of Transnational Actors. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
154. Farah, R. (2009). Refugee camps in the Palestinian and Sahrawi National LiberationMovements. Journal of Palestine Studies 38(2), 76-93.
155. Feldman, I. (2008). Governing Gaza:Bureaucracy,Authority and theWork of Rule (1917-67). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
156. Ferguson, J. (1990). The Anti-Politics Machine: "Development," Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
157. Ferguson, J. & Gupta, A. (2002). Spatializing states: Toward an ethnography of neoliberal governmentality. American Ethnologist 29(4), 981-1002.
158. Ferguson, Y.H., & Mansbach, R.W. (1996). Polities: Authority, Identities, and Change. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
159. Flint, C. (2009). State. In D. Gregory, R. Johnston, G. Pratt & S. Whatmore (eds), The Dictionary of Human Geography, 5th edn. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 722-724.
160. Foley, G., Schaap, A. & Howell, E. (eds) (2013). The Aboriginal Tent Embassy: Sovereignty, Black Power, Land Rights and the State. London: Routledge.
161. Forsberg, T. (1996). Beyond sovereignty, within territoriality: mapping the space of latemodern (geo)politics. Cooperation and Conflict 31(4), 355-386.
162. Fortier, A.-M. (1999). Re-membering places and the performance of belonging(s). Theory, Culture and Society 16(2), 41-64.
163. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (A. Sheridan, trans.). London: Penguin Books.
164. Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon & P. Miller (eds), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 87- 104.
165. Foucault, M. (2004). Naissance de la biopolitique. Cours au Coll`ege de France, 1978-1979. Paris: Seuil/Gallimard.
166. Foucault, M. (2007). Security,Territory,Population: Lectures at the Collége de France 1977-78. New York: Picador.
167. Frechette, A. (1997). Statelessness and power: transformational entitlements among Tibetan exiles in Kathmandu, Nepal. PhD thesis, Harvard University.
168. Frechette, A. (2006). Constructing the state in the Tibetan diaspora. In K. Boyd & T.-W. Ngo (eds), State Making in Asia. London: Routledge, pp. 127-149.
169. French, R.R. (1991). The new Snow Lion: The Tibetan Government-in-exile in India. In Y. Shain (ed.), Governments-in-exile in Contemporary World Politics. London: Routledge, pp. 188-201.
170. French, R.R. (1995). The Golden Yoke: The Legal Cosmology of Buddhist Tibet. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
171. Fuchs, A. & Klann, N.-H. (2010). Paying a Visit: The Dalai Lama Effect on International Trade. Center for European Governance and Economic Development, Research Paper No. 113.
172. Fürer-Haimendorf, C. (1990). The Renaissance of the Tibetan Civilization. London: Synergetic Press.
173. Garfield, J.L. (2002). Empty Words: Buddhist Philosophy and Cross-cultural Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
174. Garratt, K. (1997). Tibetan refugees, asylum seekers, returnees and the Refugees' Convention - predicaments, problems and prospects. Tibet Journal 22(3), 18-56.
175. Geertz, C. (1980). Negara: The Theatre State in Nineteenth-Century Bali. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
176. George, J. (1994). Discourses of Global Politics: A Critical (Re)Introduction to International Relations. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
177. Gibson-Graham, J.K. (1996). The End of Capitalism (As We Knew It): A Feminist Critique of Political Economy. Oxford: Blackwell.
178. Giddens, A. (1985). The Nation-State and Violence. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
179. Gill, N. (2010). New state-theoretic approaches to asylum and refugee geographies. Progress in Human Geography 34(5), 626-645.
180. Goddeeris, I. (2007). The temptation of legitimacy: exile politics from a comparative perspective. Contemporary European History 16(3), 395-405.
181. Goffman,E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life.New York: Doubleday Anchor.
182. Goldman, M. (2006). Imperial Nature: The World Bank and Struggle for Social Justice in the Age of Globalization. New Haven: Yale University Press.
183. Goldstein, M.C. (1971). The balance between centralization and decentralization in the traditional Tibetan political system: an essay on the nature of Tibetan political macrostructure. Central Asiatic Journal 15, 170-182.
184. Goldstein, M.C. (1971). Serfdom and mobility: an examination of the institution of "human lease" in traditional Tibetan society. The Journal of Asian Studies 30(3), 521- 534.
185. Goldstein, M.C. (1975). Tibetan refugees in South India: A new face to the Indo-Tibetan interface. The Tibet Society Bulletin 9, 12-29.
186. Goldstein, M.C. (1978). Ethnogenesis and resource competition among Tibetan refugees in South India: A new face to the Indo-Tibetan interface. In J.F. Fisher (ed.), Himalayan Anthropology: The Indo-Tibetan Interface. The Hague: Mouton Publishers, pp. 395-420.
187. Goldstein, M.C. (1989). A History of Modern Tibet, 1913-1951, Volume 1 the Demise of the Lamaist state. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
188. Gordillo, G. (2006). The crucible of citizenship: ID-paper fetishism in the Argentinian Chaco. American Ethnologist 33(2), 162-176.
189. Gottlieb,G. (1993). Nation Against State:A New Approach to Ethnic Conflicts and the Decline of Sovereignty. New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press.
190. Gould, A. (1993). Capitalist Welfare Systems. New York: Longman.
191. Gregson, N. & Rose, G. (2000). Taking Butler elsewhere: performativities, spatialities and subjectivities. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 18(4), 433-452.
192. Grimmelmann, J. (2012). Sealand, HavenCo, and the rule of law. University of Illinois Law Review (2), 405-484.
193. Grunfeld, A.T. (1987). The Making of Modern Tibet. London: Zed Books. Gupta, A. (1995). Blurred boundaries: the discourse of corruption, the culture of politics, and the imagined state. American Ethnologist 22(2), 375-402.
194. Gupta, A. (1995). Blurred boundaries: the discourse of corruption, the culture of politics, and the imagined state. American Ethnologist 22(2), 375-402.
195. Gupta, A. (2007). Imagining nations. In D. Nugent & J. Vincent (eds), A Companion to the Anthropology of Politics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 267-281.
196. Gupta, A. (2012). Red Tape: Bureaucracy, Structural Violence and Poverty in India. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
197. Gupta, A. & Ferguson, J. (1992). Beyond "culture": space, identity, and the politics of difference. Cultural Anthropology 7(1), 6-23.
198. Gyalpo, D. (2004). 44 years of democracy in exile. Tibetan Bulletin 8(5), 24-26.
199. Gyalpo, D. (2004). Exile Tibetans in Statistics: Book Review of 'Tibetan Community in Exile: Demographic and Socio-Economic Issues 1998-2001, Planning Commission, CTA. Phayul.com, 13 October. Available at www.phayul.com/news/article.aspx? id=7948<=4&c=1 (accessed 14 September 2015).
200. Hampton, T. (2009). Fictions of Embassy: Literature and Diplomacy in Early Modern Europe. New York: Cornell University Press.
201. Hanafi, S. (2008). Palestinian refugee camps in Lebanon: Laboratories of state-in-themaking, discipline and Islamist radicalism. In R. Lentin (ed.), Thinking Palestine. London: Zed Books, pp. 82-100.
202. Hannah, M. (2000). Governmentality and the Mastery of Territory in Nineteenth-Century America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
203. Hannah, M. (2009). Calculable territory and theWest German census boycott movements of the 1980s. Political Geography 28, 66-75.
204. Hansen,P. (2003).Why is there no subaltern studies in Tibet? The Tibet Journal 28(4), 7-22.
205. Hansen, T.B. (2001). Governance and state mythologies in Mumbai. In T.B. Hansen & F. Stepputat (eds), States of Imagination: Ethnographic Explorations of the Postcolonial State. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 221-256.
206. Hansen,T.B. (2005). Sovereigns beyond the state: on legality and authority in urban India. In T.B. Hansen & F. Stepputat (eds), Sovereign Bodies: Citizens,Migrants and States in the Postcolonial World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 169-191.
207. Hansen, T.B. & Stepputat, F. (2001). Introduction: states of imagination. In T.B. Hansen & F. Stepputat (eds), States of Imagination: Ethnographic Explorations of the Postcolonial State. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 1-40.
208. Hansen, T.B. & Stepputat, F. (eds) (2005). Sovereign Bodies: Citizens, Migrants and States in the Postcolonial World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
209. Harris, C. (1997). Struggling with Shangri-la: A Tibetan artist in exile. In F. Korom (ed.), Constructing Tibetan Culture: Contemporary Perspectives. Quebec: World Heritage Press, pp. 160-177.
210. Held, D. (2006). Models of Democracy, 3rd edn. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
211. Herbert, S. (2000). For ethnography. Progress in Human Geography 24(4), 550-568.
212. Hertzfeld, M. (2012). Afterword: reciprocating the hospitality of these pages. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 18(S1), S210-S217.
213. Herzfeld, M. (1992). The Social Production of Indifference: Exploring the Symbolic Roots of Western Bureaucracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
214. Hess, J.M. (2006). Statelessness and the state: Tibetans, citizenship, and nationalist activism in a transnational world. International Migration 44(1), 79-101.
215. Hess, J.M. (2009). Immigrant Ambassadors:Citizenship and Belonging in the Tibetan Diaspora. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
216. Hewitt, K. (1983). Place annihilation: Area bombing and the fate of urban places. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 73(2), 257-284.
217. Heyman, J. (1995). Putting power in the anthropology of bureaucracy: the Immigration and Naturalization Service at the Mexico-United States border. Current Anthropology 36(2), 261-287.
218. Higate, P.& Henry, M. (2009). Insecure Spaces:Peacekeeping,Power and Performance in Haiti, Kosovo and Liberia. London: Zed Books.
219. Hoag, C. (2011). Assembling partial perspectives: thoughts on the anthropology of bureaucracy. Political and Legal Anthropology Review 34(1), 81-94.
220. Hobsbawm,E.&Ranger,T. (1983). The Invention of Tradition.Cambridge,UK:Cambridge University Press.
221. Hocking, B. (1999). Patrolling the 'frontier': globalization, localization and the 'actorness' of non-central governments. In F. Aldecoa & M. Keating (eds), Paradiplomacy in Action: The Foreign Relations of Subnational Governments. Portland, OR: Frank Cass, pp. 17-39.
222. Hodges, S. (2004). Governmentality, population and reproductive family in modern India. Economic and Political Weekly, 13 March, 1157-1163.
223. Home Office (2003). China Country Report, October 2003. London: Immigration and Nationality Directorate, Home Office UK.
224. hooks, b. (1990). Marginality as a site of resistance. In R. Ferguson (ed.), Out There: Marginalization and Contemporary Cultures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 341-343.
225. Horowitz, D.L. (1998). Self-determination: politics, philosophy and law. In M. Moore (ed.), National Self-Determination and Secession. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 181-214.
226. Horowitz, L.S. (2009). Environmental violence and crises of legitimacy in New Caledonia. Political Geography 28, 248-258.
227. Houston, S.& Wright, R. (2003). Making and remaking Tibetan diasporic identities. Social and Cultural Geography 4(2), 217-231.
228. Howitt, R. (1998). Scale as relation: musical metaphors of geographical scale. Area 30(1), 49-58.
229. Howitt, R. (2003). Scale. In J. Agnew, K. Mitchell & G.Toal (eds),A Companion to Political Geography. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 138-157.
230. Huber,T. (2001). Shangri-la in exile: representations of Tibetan identity and transnational culture. In T. Dodin & H. Räther (eds), Imagining Tibet:Perceptions, Projections, and Fantasies. Somerville, MA: Wisdom, pp. 357-371.
231. Human Rights Watch (2010). "I saw it with my own eyes": Abuses by Chinese security forces in Tibet, 2008-2010. New York: Human Rights Watch Human RightsWatch (2013). "They say we should be grateful":Mass rehousing and relocation programs in Tibetan areas of China. New York: Human Rights Watch.
232. Human RightsWatch (2013). "They say we should be grateful":Mass rehousing and relocation programs in Tibetan areas of China. New York: Human Rights Watch.
233. Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada (1998). CHN30410.E:The requirements a Tibetan-in-exile must meet to obtain a Green Book. Available from UNHCR refworld: http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6ac8d64.html (accessed 14 September 2015).
234. International Campaign for Tibet (2012). Refugee Report: Dangerous Crossing - 2011 Update.Washington DC: International Campaign for Tibet.
235. Isin, E.F. (2008). Theorizing acts of citizenship. In E.F. Isin & G.M. Nielsen (eds), Acts of Citizenship. London: Zed Books, pp. 15-43.
236. Isin,E.F.& Turner,B.S. (2007). Investigating citizenship: an agenda for citizenship studies. Citizenship Studies 11(1), 5-17.
237. Jackson, R. (1990). Quasi-states: Sovereignty, International Relations and the Third World. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
238. Jeffrey, A. (2006). Building state capacity in post-conflict Bosnia and Herzegovina: The case of Brcko District. Political Geography 25(2), 203-227.
239. Jeffrey, A. (2013). The Improvised State: Sovereignty, Performance and Agency in Dayton Bosnia. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
240. Jeffrey, C. (2008). Guest editorial: waiting. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 26(6), 954-958.
241. Jeffrey, C. (2010). Timepass: Youth, Class and the Politics of Waiting in India. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
242. Jeffrey, C., Jeffrey, P.& Jeffrey, R. (2008). Degrees Without Freedom? Education, Masculinities and Unemployment in North India. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
243. Jessop, B. (1990). State Theory: Putting Capitalist States in Their Place. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
244. Jessop, B. (1997). A neo-Gramscian approach to the regulation of urban regimes: accumulation strategies, hegemonic projects, and governance. In M. Lauria (ed.), Reconstructing Urban Regime Theory:Regulating Urban Politics in a Global Economy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 51-73.
245. Jessop, B. (2007). From micro-powers to governmentality: Foucault's work on statehood, state formation, statecraft and state power. Political Geography 26(1), 34-40.
246. Jessop, B., Brenner, N. & Jones, M. (2008). Theorizing sociospatial relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 26(3), 389-401.
247. Jerryson, M. & Juergensmeyer, M. (eds) (2010). BuddhistWarfare. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
248. Jones, R. (2009). Categories, borders and boundaries. Progress in Human Geography 33(2), 174-189.
249. Jones, R. (2007). People/States/Territories. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
250. Jones, R. (2012). State encounters. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 30(5), 805-821.
251. Kantorowicz, E. (1957/1981). The King's Two Bodies, a Study in Medieval Political Theology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
252. Kashag (2012). Kalon Tripa accepts resignations of special envoy Lodi G. Gyari and envoy Kelsang Gyaltsen. Central Tibetan Administration press release, 3 June. Available from http://tibet.net/2012/06/03/kalon-tripa-accepts-resignations-of-specialenvoy- lodi-g-gyari-and-envoy-kelsang-gyaltsen/ (accessed 14 September 2015).
253. Kearns, G. (2008). Progressive geopolitics. Geography Compass 2(5): 1599-1620.
254. Keating, M. (2001). Plurinational Democracy: Stateless Nations in a Post-Sovereignty Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
255. Kharat, R. (2003). Tibetan Refugees in India. New Delhi: Kaveri Books.
256. Kingston, P. (2004). Introduction. States-within-states: historical and theoretical perspectives. In P. Kingston & I.S. Spears (eds), States-Within-States: Incipient Political Entities in the Post Cold War Era. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1-13.
257. Klieger, P.C. (1992). Tibetan Nationalism: The Role of Patronage in the Accomplishment of a National Identity. Berkeley, CA: Folklore Institute.
258. Klieger, P.C. (2002). Introduction: The quest for understanding the modern Tibetan self. In P.C. Klieger (ed.), Tibet, Self, and the Tibetan Diaspora: Voices of Difference. Leiden: Brill, pp. 1-9.
259. Knaus, J.K. (2000). Orphans of the Cold War: America and the Tibetan Struggle for Survival. New York: PublicAffairs.
260. Kolas, A. (1996). Tibetan nationalism: the politics of religion. Journal of Peace Research 33(1), 51-66.
261. Kolossov, V.A. & O'Loughlin, J. (1998). Pseudo-states as harbingers of a new geopolitics: the example of the Trans-Dniester Moldovan Republic (TMR). Geopolitics 3(1), 151- 176.
262. Kondapalli, S. & Mifune, E. (eds) (2010). China and its Neighbours. New Delhi: Pentagon Press.
263. Korom, F. (ed.) (1997). Constructing Tibetan Culture: Contemporary Perspectives. Quebec: World Heritage Press.
264. Krader, L. (1963). Social organisation of the Mongol-Turkic pastoral nomads. The Hague: Mouton.
265. Krasner, S.D. (1999). Sovereignty:Organised Hypocrisy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
266. Krishna, S. (1992). Oppressive pasts and desired futures: re-imagining India. Futures 24(9), 858-866.
267. Kuleshov, N.S. (1996). Russia's Tibet File. Dharamsala: Library of Tibetan Works and Archives (LTWA).
268. Kuus, M. (2008). Professionals of geopolitics: agency in international politics. Geography Compass 2(6), 2062-2079.
269. Kuus, M. (2011). Bureaucracy and place: expertise in the European Quarter. Global Networks 11(4), 421-439.
270. Kuus, M. (2013). Foreign policy and ethnography: a sceptical intervention. Geopolitics 18(1), 115-131.
271. Kuus, M. (2014). Geopolitics and Expertise:Knowledge and Authority in European Diplomacy. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
272. Kuzmin, S.L. (2011). Hidden Tibet: History of Independence and Occupation. Dharamsala: Library of Tibetan Works and Archives (LTWA).
273. Lafitte,G. (1999). Tibetan futures: imagining collective destinies. Futures 31(2), 155-169.
274. Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
275. Lattimore,O. (1940/1949). Inner Asian Frontiers of China. New York: American Geographical Society, Research Series No. 21, 2nd edn.
276. Lau, T. (2009). Tibetan fears and Indian foes: fears of cultural extinction and antagonism as discursive strategy. Explorations in Anthropology 9(1), 81-90.
277. Lecours, A. (2002). Paradiplomacy: Reflections on the foreign policy and international relations of regions. International Negotiation 7(1), 91-114.
278. Lefebvre, H. (2004). Rhythmanalysis: Space,Time and Everyday Life (S. Elden & G. Moore, trans.). London: Continuum.
279. Legg, S. (2005). Foucault's population geographies: classifications, biopolitics and governmental spaces. Population, Space and Place 11(3), 137-156.
280. Lei, H. (2011). Foreign Ministry spokesperson Hong Lei's regular press conference on September 26, 2011.Available from http://uy.china-embassy.org/eng/fyrth/t863132.htm (accessed 16 September 2015).
281. Lemay-Hébert,N. (2009). Statebuilding without nation-building? Legitimacy, state failure and the limits of the institutionalist approach. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 3(1), 21-45.
282. Ley,D. (2000). Geography of spectacle. In R.J. Johnston,D. Gregory,G. Pratt & M.Watts (eds), The Dictionary of Human Geography, 4th edn. Oxford: Blackwell, p. 872.
283. Lipset, S.M. (1984). Social conflict, legitimacy, and democracy. In W. Connolly (ed.), Legitimacy and the State. New York, New York University Press, pp. 88-103.
284. Lopez, D.S. (1998). Prisoners of Shangri-la: Tibetan Buddhism and the West. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
285. Luke, T.W. (1996). Governmentality and contragovernmentality: rethinking sovereignty and territoriality after the Cold War. Political Geography 15(6/7), 491-507.
286. Lynch, M. (2012). The Arab Uprising: The Unfinished Revolutions of the New Middle East. New York, PublicAffairs.
287. MacLeod, R. (1988). Introduction. In R. MacLeod (ed.), Government and Expertise: Specialists, Administrators and Professionals,1860-1919. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-24.
288. Mains, D. (2007). Neoliberal times: progress, boredom and shame among young men in urban Ethiopia. American Ethnologist 34(4), 659-673.
289. Malkki, L. (1992). National Geographic: the rooting of peoples and the territorialization of national identity among scholars and refugees. Cultural Anthropology 7(1), 24-44.
290. Malkki, L. (1995). Purity and Exile: Violence, Memory, and National Cosmology among Hutu Refugees in Tanzania. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
291. Mandaville, P.G. (1999).Territory and translocality: discrepant idioms of political identity. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 28(3), 653-673.
292. Mann, M. (1984). The autonomous power of the state: its origins, mechanisms and results. Archives Européennes de Sociologie 25, 185-213.
293. Marcus, G.E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: the emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology 24, 95-117.
294. Marston, S.A. (2004). Space, culture, state: uneven developments in political geography. Political Geography 23(1), 1-16.
295. Massey, D. (2005). For Space. London: Sage.
296. Mayall, J. & de Oliveira, R.S. (eds) (2011). The New Protectorates: International Tutelage and the Making of Liberal States. London: C. Hurst & Co.
297. McAdam,J. (2010). 'Disappearing states', statelessness and the boundaries of international law. UNSW Law Research Paper No. 2010-2.
298. McConnell,F. (2009).De facto, displaced, tacit: the sovereign articulations of the Tibetan government-in-exile. Political Geography 28(6), 343-352.
299. McConnell, F. (2009). Governments-in-exile: statehood, statelessness and the reconfiguration of territory and sovereignty. Geography Compass 3(5), 1912-1919.
300. McConnell, F. (2011). A state within a state? Exploring relations between the Indian state and the Tibetan community and government-in-exile. Contemporary South Asia 18(3), 297-313.
301. McConnell, F. (2012). Governmentality to practise the state? Constructing a Tibetan population in exile. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 30(1), 78-95.
302. McConnell, F. (2013). Citizens and refugees: constructing and negotiating Tibetan identities in exile. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103(4), 967- 983.
303. McConnell, F. (2013). The geopolitics of Buddhist reincarnation: contested futures of Tibetan leadership. Area 45(2), 162-169.
304. McConnell, F. (2013). Tibetan democracy in exile: the 'uniqueness' and limitations of democratic procedures in a territory-less polity. In V. Arora & N. Jayaram (eds), Routeing Democracy in the Himalayas: Experiments and Experiences. New Delhi: Routledge, pp. 204-231.
305. McConnell, F. (2014). Contextualising and contesting peace: geographies of Tibetan satyagraha. In N. Megoran, F. McConnell & P. Williams (eds), Geographies of Peace. London: I B Tauris, pp. 131-150.
306. McConnell, F. (2015). Reconfiguring diaspora identities and homeland connections: the Tibetan 'Lhakar' movement. In M.E. Christou & A. Christou (eds), Dismantling Diasporas: Rethinking the Geographies of Diasporic Identity,Connection and Development.Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 99-111.
307. McConnell, F., Moreau, T. & Dittmer, J. (2012). Mimicking state diplomacy: The legitimizing strategies of unofficial diplomacies. Geoforum 43(4), 804-814.
308. McCorquodale, R.& Orosz,N. (eds) (1994). Tibet:The Position in International Law, Report of the Conference of International Lawyers on Issues Relating to Self-Determination and Independence for Tibet, London 6-10 January 1993. Stuttgart: Hansjörg Mayer.
309. McDowell, L. & Court, G. (1994). Performing work: bodily representations in merchant banks. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 12, 727-750.
310. McGranahan, C. (2007). Empire out of bounds: Tibet in the era of decolonization. In A. Stoler, C. McGranahan & P. Perdue (eds), Imperial Formations. Santa Fe, NM: SAR Press, pp. 187-227.
311. McGranahan, C. (2010). Arrested Histories:Tibet, the CIA and Memories of a Forgotten War. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
312. McGukin, E.A. (1997). Postcards from Shangri-la: tourism, Tibetan refugees and the politics of cultural production. PhD thesis, City University New York, New York.
313. McKay, A. (1997). Tibet and the British Raj: The Frontier Cadre, 1904-1947. Richmond, UK: Curzon Press.
314. McLagan, M. (1996). Mobilising for Tibet: transnational politics and diaspora culture in the post Cold War era. PhD thesis, New York University, New York.
315. Megoran, N. (2006). For ethnography in political geography: experiencing and reimagining Ferghana Valley boundary closures. Political Geography 25(6), 622-640.
316. Mehrotra, L.L. (2000). India's Tibet Policy: An Appraisal and Options, 3rd edn. New Delhi: TPPRC.
317. Migdal, J. (1988). Strong States and Weak Societies: State-Society Relations and State Capabilities in the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
318. Miller, P. & Rose, M. (1990). Governing economic life. Economy and Society 19(1), 1-31.
319. Mills, M. (2003). Identity, Ritual and State in Tibetan Buddhism:The Foundations of Authority in Gelukpa Monasticism. London: Routledge.
320. Mills, M. (2003). This turbulent priest: contesting religious rights and the state in the Tibetan Shugden controversy. In R. Wilson & J.P. Mitchell (eds),Human Rights in Global Perspective: Anthropological Studies of Rights,Claims and Entitlements. London: Routledge, pp. 54-70.
321. Mills, M. (2014). Who belongs to Tibet? Governmental narratives of state in the Ganden Podrang. In G. Toffin & J. Pfaff-Czarnecka (eds), Facing Globalization in the Himalayas: Belonging and the Politics of the Self. New Delhi: SAGE, pp. 397-418.
322. Minca, C. (2005). The return of the camp. Progress in Human Geography 29, 405-412.
323. Ministry of Foreign Affairs (1959). Notes, Memoranda and Letters Exchanged and Agreements Signed by the Government of India and China, Vol. 2. Delhi: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
324. Mitchell, T. (1991). The limits of the state: beyond statist approaches and their critics. American Political Science Review 85(1), 77-96.
325. Mitchell, T. (2002). Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-politics, Modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
326. Miyazaki, H. (2004). The Method of Hope: Anthropology, Philosophy, and Fijian Knowledge. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
327. Moncrieffe, J. & Eyben, R. (2007). The Power of Labelling: How People are Categorized and Why it Matters. London: Earthscan.
328. Montevideo Convention on Rights and Duties of States (1933). 165 L.N.T.S. 19. 26 December 1933.
329. Moshe, S. (1996). The Palestinian Entity, 1959-1974: Arab Politics and the PLO. London: Cass.
330. Mountz, A. (2010). Seeking Asylum:Human Smuggling and Bureaucracy at the Border. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
331. Mountz, A. (2011). Where asylum-seekers wait: feminist counter-topographies of sites between states. Gender, Place and Culture 18, 381-399.
332. Moynihan, M. (1997). Tibetan refugees in India and Nepal, testimony by Maura Moynihan, consultant to Refugees International, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee Hearing on Tibet. Available from http://www.radioradicale.it/exagora/tibetanrefugees- in-india-and-nepal-testimony-by-maura-moynihan-ict (accessed 16 September 2015).
333. Mundy, J.A. (2007). Performing the nation, prefiguring the state: the Western Saharan refugees, thirty years later. Journal of Modern African Studies 45(2), 275-297.
334. Murdoch, J. & Ward, N. (1997). Governmentality and territoriality: the statistical manufacture of Britain's 'National Farm'. Political Geography 16(4), 307-324.
335. Murphy, A.B. (1996). The sovereign state system as political-territorial ideal: Historical and contemporary considerations. In T.J. Biersteker & C.Weber (eds), State Sovereignty as Social Construct. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 81-120.
336. Murphy, S. (1999). Democratic legitimacy and the recognition of states and governments. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 48(3), 545-581.
337. Navaro-Yashin, Y. (2002). Faces of the State: Secularism and Public Life in Turkey. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
338. Navaro-Yashin, Y. (2003). 'Life is dead here': Sensing the political in 'no man's land'. Anthropological Theory 3(1), 107-125.
339. Navaro-Yashin, Y. (2005). Confinement and imagination: sovereignty and subjectivity in a quasi-state. In T.B. Hansen & F. Stepputat (eds), Sovereign Bodies: Citizens, Migrants and States in the Postcolonial World Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 103-119.
340. Navaro-Yashin, Y. (2006). Affect in the civil service: a study of a modern state-system. Postcolonial Studies 9(3), 281-294.
341. Navaro-Yashin, Y. (2012). The Make-Believe Space: Affective Geography in a Postwar Polity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
342. Neumann, I.B. (2012). At Home with the Diplomats: Inside a European Foreign Ministry. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
343. Nevins, J. (2002). Operation Gatekeeper: The Rise of the "Illegal Alien" and the Making of the U.S.-Mexico Boundary. London: Routledge.
344. Nielsen, M. (2007). Filling in the blanks: the potency of fragmented imageries of the state. Review of African Political Economy 34(114), 695-708.
345. Norbu,D. (1976). Editorial: towards sectarian harmony and national unity. Tibetan Review 11(9), 3-4.
346. Norbu, D. (1992). 'Otherness' and the modern Tibetan ientity. Himal May/June, 10-11.
347. Norbu, D. (2001). Refugees from Tibet: structural causes of successful settlements. The Tibet Journal 26(2), 3-25.
348. Norbu, D. (2004). The settlements: participation and integration. In D. Bernstorff & H. Von Welck (eds), Exile as Challenge: The Tibetan Diaspora. New Delhi: Orient Longman, pp. 186-212.
349. Norbu, J. (2004). Opening of the political eye: Tibet's long search for democracy. In J. Norbu (ed.), Shadow Tibet. New Delhi: Bluejay Books, pp. 11-25.
350. Norbu, J. (2007). Rangzen! Combat Law: The Human Rights and Law Bimonthly 6 (September-October), 28-35.
351. Nordholt, H. (1996). The Spell of Power: A History of Balinese Politics, 1650-1940. Leiden: KITLV Press.
352. Nowak, M. (1978). Liminal 'self ', ambiguous 'power': the genesis of the 'Rangzen' metaphor among Tibetan youth in India. PhD thesis, University of Washington.
353. Nugent, D. (2007). Governing states. In D. Nugent & J. Vincent (eds), A Companion to the Anthropology of Politics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 198-215.
354. Nuijten, M. (2003). Power, Community and the State: The Political Anthropology of Organisation in Mexico. Sterling, VA: Pluto Press.
355. Nye, J.S. (2004). Soft Power:The Means to Success inWorld Politics. New York: PublicAffairs.
356. O'Brien, R. (1992). Global Financial Integration: The End of Geography. London: Chatham House Papers. OTuathail, G. & Luke, T. (1994). Present at the (dis)integration: deterritorialisation and reterritorialisation in the new wor(l)d order. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 84(3), 381-398.
357. OTuathail, G. & Luke, T. (1994). Present at the (dis)integration: deterritorialisation and reterritorialisation in the new wor(l)d order. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 84(3), 381-398.
358. Oberoi, P. (2006). Exile and Belonging: Refugees and State policy in South Asia. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
359. Office of The Dalai Lama. (1969). Tibetans in Exile 1959-1969: A Report on Ten Years of Rehabilitation in India. New Delhi: Bureau of The Dalai Lama.
360. Ohmae, K. (1996). End of the Nation State: The Rise of Regional Economies. London: Harper Collins.
361. Ong, A. (1999). Flexible Citizenship: The Cultural Logic of Transnationality. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
362. Pack, J. (2013). The 2011 Libyan Uprisings and the Struggle for the Post-Qadhafi Future. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
363. Paljor Bulletin (2005). Dharamsala: Department of Finance, CTA, June 2005.
364. Painter, J. (2006). Prosaic geographies of stateness. Political Geography 25(7), 752-774.
365. Painter, J. (2007). Stateness in action. Geoforum 38(4), 605-607.
366. Painter, J. (2010). Rethinking territory. Antipode 42(5), 1090-1118. Painter, J. & Jeffrey, A. (2009). Political Geography, 2nd edn. London: Sage.
367. Painter, J. & Jeffrey, A. (2009). Political Geography, 2nd edn. London: Sage.
368. Palakshappa, T.C. (1978). Tibetans in India:A Case Study of Mundgod Tibetans. New Delhi: Sterling Publishers.
369. Pegg, S.M. (1998). International Society and the De Facto State. Aldershot: Ashgate.
370. People's Republic of China (1992). Tibet - its ownership and human rights situation. PRC Government White Paper, September 1992. Available from www.china.org.cn/ewhite/ tibet/9-1.htm (accessed 14 September 2015).
371. Petech, L. (1973). Aristocracy and Government in Tibet, 1728-1959. Rome: Istituto Italiano per il medio ed Estremo Oriente.
372. Philo, C. & Parr, H. (2000). Editorial: Institutional geographies: introductory remarks. Geoforum 31(4), 513-521.
373. Phuntsog, J. (2005). 6.4b yuan worth of projects approved in Tibet. South China Morning Post, 31May.
374. Pickerill, J. & Chatterton, P. (2006). Notes towards autonomous geographies. Creation, resistance and self-management as survival tactics. Progress in Human Geography 30(6), 1-17.
375. Pierson, C. (1996). The Modern State. London: Routledge.
376. Pile, S. (1997). Introduction: opposition, political identities and spaces of resistance. In S. Pile & M. Keith (eds), Geographies of Resistance. London: Routledge. Pile, S. & Thrift, N. (1995). Introduction. In S. Pile and N. Thrift (eds), Mapping the Subject: Geographies of Cultural Transformation. London: Routledge, pp. 1-12.
377. Pile, S. & Thrift, N. (1995). Introduction. In S. Pile and N. Thrift (eds), Mapping the Subject: Geographies of Cultural Transformation. London: Routledge, pp. 1-12.
378. Pirie, F. (2005). Segmentation within the state: the reconfiguration of Tibetan tribes in China's reform period. Nomadic Peoples 9(1-2), 83-102.
379. Pitt-Rivers, J.A. (1968). The stranger, the guest and the hostile host: introduction to the study of the laws of hospitality. In J.-G. Peristiany (ed.), Contributions to Mediterranean Sociology: Mediterranean Rural Communities and Social Change. Paris: Mouton, pp. 13- 30.
380. Planning Council (1994). Integrated Development Plan II: 1995-2000. Dharamsala: Planning Council, CTA.
381. Planning Council (2000). Tibetan Demographic Survey. Dharamsala: Planning Council, Central Tibetan Administration.
382. Planning Commission (2004).Tibetan Community in Exile:Demographic and Socio-Economic Issues, 1998-2001. Dharamsala: Central Tibetan Administration.
383. Planning Commission (2010). Demographic Survey of Tibetans in Exile - 2009. Dharamsala: Central Tibetan Administration.
384. Pollard, J., McEwan, C. & Hughes, A. (2012). Postcolonial Economies. London: Zed.
385. Poulantzas, N. (1978). State, Power, Socialism. London: New Left Books.
386. Powers, J. (2004). History as Propaganda:Tibetan Exiles versus the People's Republic of China. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
387. Pratt, G. (2009). Performance. In D. Gregory, R.J. Johnston, G. Pratt & S. Whatmore (eds), The Dictionary of Human Geography, 5th edn. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 525- 526.
388. Prost, A. (2006). The problem with 'rich refugees' sponsorship, capital, and the informal economy of Tibetan refugees. Modern Asian Studies 40(1), 233-253.
389. Rabgey, T. & Wangchuk, T. (2004). Sino-Tibetan dialogue in the post-Mao era: lessons and prospects. Policy Studies 12.Washington, DC: East-West Center Washington.
390. Rajaram, P.K. & Soguk, N. (2006). Introduction: geography and the reconceptualisation of politics. Alternatives 31(4), 367-376.
391. Ramadan, A. (2008). The guests' guests: Palestinian refugees, Lebanese civilians, and the war of 2006. Antipode 40(4), 658-677.
392. Ramadan, A. (2009). A refugee landscape: writing Palestinian nationalisms in Lebanon. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 8(1): 69-99.
393. Ramadan, A. (2012). Spatialising the refugee camp. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 38(1), 65-77.
394. Regalsky, P. & Laurie,N. (2007). 'The school, whose place is this'? The deep structures of the hidden curriculum in indigenous education in Bolivia. Comparative Education 43(2), 231-351.
395. Reid-Henry, S. (2007). Exceptional sovereignty? Guantanamo Bay and the recolonial present. Antipode 39(4), 627-648.
396. Reisman,M.(1991).Governments-in-exile: Notes towards a theory of formation and operation. In Y. Shain (ed.), Governments-in-exile in Contemporary World Politics. London: Routledge, pp. 238-248.
397. Relyea, S. (1998). Trans-state entities: postmodern cracks in the great Westphalian dam. Geopolitics 3(2), 30-61.
398. Riles, A. (ed.) (2006). Documents: Artifacts of Modern Knowledge. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
399. Robinson,E.H. (2013). The distinction between state and government. Geography Compass (7/8), 556-566.
400. Robinson, J. (2003). Postcolonialising geography: tactics and pitfalls. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 24(3), 273-289.
401. Roemer, S. (2008). The Tibetan Government-in-Exile: Politics at Large. Oxford: Routledge.
402. Rose,N.& Miller, P. (1992). Political power beyond the state: problematics of government. The British Journal of Sociology 43(2), 173-205.
403. Rose, P.I. (ed.) (2005). The Dispossessed: An Anatomy of Exile. Amherst, MA:University of Massachusetts Press.
404. Rosello, M. (2001). Postcolonial Hospitality. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
405. Rose-Redwood, R.S. (2006). Governmentality, geography and the geo-coded world. Progress in Human Geography 30(4), 469-486.
406. Roslington, J. (2013). Unrecognised states in the interwar world. Paper presented at the Producing Legitimacy: Governance against the Odds, University of Cambridge, 22-23 April 2013.
407. Rougier, B. (2007). Everyday Jihad:The Rise of Militant Islam among Palestinians in Lebanon (P. Ghazaleh, trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
408. Routledge, P. (1996). Third space as critical engagement. Antipode 28(4), 399-419.
409. Routledge, P. (2003). Voices of the dammed: discursive resistance amidst erasure in the Narmada Valley. Political Geography 22(3), 243-270.
410. Rubin, B.R. (2007). Saving Afghanistan. Foreign Affairs 86(1), 57-74, 76-78.
411. Ruddick, S. (2004). Activist geographies: building possible worlds. In P. Cloke, P. Crang & M. Goodwin (eds), Envisioning Human Geographies. London: Arnold, pp. 229- 241.
412. Ruggie, J. (1993). Territoriality and beyond: problematising modernity in international relations. International Organisation 47(1), 139-174.
413. Sack, R.D. (1986). Human Territoriality: Its Theory and History. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
414. Said, E. (1984). The mind of winter: reflections on life in exile. Harper's 269(1612), 49-55.
415. Said, E. (2001). Reflections on Exile and Other Literary and Cultural Essays. London: Granta Books.
416. Samaddar, R. (2003). Power and care: building the new Indian state. In R. Samaddar (ed.), Refugees and the State: Practices of Asylum and Care in India. New Delhi: Sage, pp. 21-68.
417. Samuel, G. (1982). Tibet as a stateless society and some Islamic parallels. The Journal of Asian Studies 41(2), 215-229.
418. Samuel, G. (1993). Civilized Shamans: Buddhism in Tibetan Societies. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institute Press.
419. San Martin, P. (2010).Western Sahara:The Refugee Nation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
420. Sangay, L. (2003). Tibet: exiles' journey. Journal of Democracy 14(3), 119-130.
421. Schechner, R. (1987). Preface: Victor Turner's last adventure. In V. Turner (ed.), The Anthropology of Performance. New York: PAJ Publications, pp. 7-20.
422. Schechner, R. (2002). Performance Studies: An Introduction. London: Routledge.
423. Schwartz, R. (1999). Renewal and resistance: Tibetan Buddhism in the modern era. In I. Harris (ed.), Buddhism and Politics in Twentieth-Century Asia. London: Pinter, pp. 229- 253).
424. Scott, J.C. (1998). Seeing Like a State:How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
425. Scott, J.C. (2009). The Art of Not Being Governed:An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
426. Secor, A.J. (2001). Ideologies in crisis: political cleavages and electoral politics in Turkey in the 1990s. Political Geography 20(5), 539-560.
427. Sennett, R. (1980). Authority. New York: W.W. Norton.
428. Shain, Y. (1989). The Frontier of Loyalty: Political Exiles in the Age of the Nation-State. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
429. Shain, Y. (ed.) (1991). Governments-in-exile in Contemporary World Politics. London: Routledge.
430. Shakabpa, T.W.D. (1984). Tibet:A Political History. New York: Potala Publications.
431. Shakabpa, T.W.D. (2010). One Hundred Thousand Moons: An Advanced Political History of Tibet,Volume 1 (D.F. Maher, trans.). Leiden: Brill.
432. Shakya, T. (1999). The Dragon in the Land of Snows: A History of Modern Tibet Since 1947. New York: Columbia University Press.
433. Shapiro, M.J. (1996). Introduction. In M.J. Shapiro & H.R. Alker (eds), Challenging Boundaries: Global Flows,Territorial Identities. Minneapolis,MN:University of Minnesota Press, pp. i-xxii.
434. Sharp, J. (2013). Geopolitics at the margins? Reconsidering genealogies of critical geopolitics. Political Geography 37, 20-29.
435. Shelley, T. (2004). Endgame in the Western Sahara: What Future for Africa's Last Colony? London: Zed Books.
436. Shils, E. (1965). Charisma, order, and status. American Sociological Review 30(2), 199-213.
437. Shimazu,N. (2014). Diplomacy as theatre: staging the Bandung Conference of 1955. Modern Asian Studies 48(1), 225-252.
438. Shiromany, A.A. (ed.) (1998). The Political Philosophy of HH the XIV Dalai Lama: Selected Speeches and Writings. New Delhi: TPPRC.
439. Shneiderman, S. (2006). Barbarians at the border and civilizing projects: analyzing ethnic and national identities in the Tibetan context. In P.C. Klieger (ed.), Tibetan Borderlands. Leiden: Brill, pp. 9-34.
440. Shneiderman, S. (2010). Are the Central Himalayas in Zomia? Some scholarly and political considerations across time and space. Journal of Global History 5, 289-312.
441. Shore, C. & Wright, S. (eds) (1997). Anthropology of Policy: Critical Perspectives on Governance and Power. London: Routledge.
442. Shryock, A. (2012). Breaking hospitality apart: bad hosts, bad guests, and the problem of sovereignty. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 18(S1), S20-S33.
443. Sidaway, J.D. (2002). Imagined Regional Communities: Integration and Sovereignty in the Global South. London: Routledge.
444. Sidaway, J.D. (2003). Sovereign excesses? Portraying postcolonial sovereigntyscapes. Political Geography 22(2), 157-178.
445. Siddiqui, A. (1991). Muslims of Tibet. Tibet Journal 16(4), 71-85.
446. Sidhu, R. & Christie, P. (2007). Spatialising the scholarly imagination: globalisation, refugees and education. Transnational Curriculum Inquiry 4(1), 7-17.
447. Sloane, R.D. (2014). Tibetan Diaspora in the shadow of the self-immolation crisis: consequences of colonialism. In S. Akram & T. Syring (eds), Still Waiting for Tomorrow: the Law and Politics of Unresolved Refugee Crises. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 55-74.
448. Smith, A.D. (1981). States and homelands: the social and geopolitical implications of national territory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 10(3), 187-201.
449. Smith, W.W. (2008). China's Tibet? Autonomy or Assimilation. Plymouth, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.
450. Sneath, D. (2007). The Headless State: Aristocratic Orders, Kinship Society and Misrepresentations of Nomadic Inner Asia. New York: Columbia University Press.
451. Soguk,N. (1996). Transnational/transborder bodies: resistance, accommodation and exile in refugee and migration movements on the US-Mexico Border. In M.J. Shapiro & H.R. Alker (eds), Challenging Boundaries: Global Flows,Territorial Identities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 285-326.
452. Soguk,N.& Whitehall,G. (1999). Wandering grounds: transversality, identity, territoriality and movement. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 28(3), 675-698.
453. Sonam, B.D. (ed.) (2004). Muses in Exile:An Anthology of Tibetan Poetry. New Delhi: Paljor Publications.
454. Southall, A. (1956). Alur Society:A Study in Processes and Types of Domination. Cambridge: W. Heffer & Sons.
455. Sparke, M. (2013). From global dispossession to local repossession: towards a worldly cultural geography of Occupy activism. In N.C. Johnson, R.H. Schein & J. Winders (eds), The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Cultural Geography. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 387-408.
456. Spears, I.S. (2004). States-within-states: an introduction to their empirical attributes. In P. Kingston & I.S. Spears (eds), States-Within-States: Incipient Political Entities in the Post Cold War Era. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 15-34.
457. Sperling, E. (2001). "Orientalism" and aspects of violence in the Tibetan tradition. In T. Dodin & H. Räther (eds), Imagining Tibet: Perceptions, Projections, and Fantasies. Somerville, MA: Wisdom, pp. 315-329.
458. Sperling, E. (2004). The Tibet-China conflict: history and polemics. Policy Studies 7.Washington DC: East-West Center Washington.
459. Starkweather, S. (2009). Governmentality, territory and the U.S. census: The 2004 Overseas Enumeration Test. Political Geography 28, 239-247.
460. Steinberg, P.E.& Chapman,T.E. (2009). KeyWest's Conch Republic: Building sovereignties of connection. Political Geography 28(5), 283-295.
461. Stepputat, F. (1992). Beyond relief? Life in a Guatemalan refugee settlement in Mexico. PhD dissertation. University of Copenhagen.
462. Sternberger, D. (1968). Legitimacy. In D.L. Sills (ed.), International Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 9. New York: Macmillan, pp. 244-248. Stoddard, H. (1994). Tibetan publications and national identity. In R. Barnett (ed.), Resistance and Reform in Tibet. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 121- 156.
463. Stoddard, H. (1994). Tibetan publications and national identity. In R. Barnett (ed.), Resistance and Reform in Tibet. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 121- 156.
464. Stoler, L.A. (2007). Affective states. In D. Nugent & J. Vincent (eds), A Companion to the Anthropology of Politics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 4-20.
465. Strang, D. (1996). Contested sovereignty: the social construction of colonial imperialism. In T.J. Biersteker & C. Weber (eds), State Sovereignty as Social Construct. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 22-49.
466. Strathern, M. (ed.) (2000). Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics, and the Academy. New York: Routledge.
467. Strauss, M.J. (2007). Guantanamo Bay and the evolution of international leases and servitudes. The New York City Law Review 10(2), 479-510.
468. Ström, A.K. (1995). The quest for grace: identification and cultural continuity in the Tibetan Diaspora. Oslo Occasional Papers in Social Anthropology 24.
469. Strong, A. (1912). Some aspects of the Tibetan problem. Contemporary Review 102, 527- 533.
470. Subba, T.B. (1990). Flight and Adaptation: Tibetan Refugees in the Darjeeling-Sikkim Himalaya. Dharamsala: Library of Tibetan Works and Archives.
471. Subramanya, N. (2004). Human Rights and Refugees. New Delhi: A P H Publishing Corporation.
472. Talmon, S. (1998). Recognition of Governments in International Law: With particular reference to governments-in-exile. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
473. Tambiah, S.J. (1977). The Galactic Polity: The structure of traditional kingdoms in Southeast Asia. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 293, 69-97.
474. Taussig, M. (1992). The Nervous System. London: Routledge.
475. Taussig, M. (1997). The Magic of the State. London: Routledge.
476. Taylor, D. (1995). Performing gender: Las Madres de la Plaza de Mayo. In D. Taylor & J. Villegas (eds), Negotiating Performance: Gender, Sexuality, and Theatricality in Latin/o America. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 275-305.
477. Taylor, P.J. (1994). The state as container: territoriality in the modern world-system. Progress in Human Geography 18(2), 151-162.
478. TCC (2006). Tibetan Chamber of Commerce: Report of Proceedings of The First Annual General Meeting November 23-24, 2006, Dharamsala. New Delhi: Tibetan Chamber of Commerce.
479. TechnoServe (2010). The economic development program of Tibetan refugees in India: Improving the quality of life through the creation and enhancement of livelihood opportunities. Mumbai: TechnoServe.
480. Tenzin Dorjee (2013). Diplomacy or mobilization? The Tibetan dilemma in the struggle with China. In J.-H. Bae & J.H. Ku (eds), China's Internal and External Relations and Lessons for Korea and Asia. Seoul: Korea Institute for National Unification, pp. 63-112.
481. Tenzin Sherab. (2012). A review of the Central Tibetan Administration's poverty programme. Tibetan Review 47(7-9), 22.
482. TGiE (1992). Guidelines for Future Tibet's Polity and basic features of its Constitution (draft translation). Dharamsala, Central Tibetan Administration.
483. The Economist (2001). Home thoughts from abroad. The Economist 22 December, pp. 45-46.
484. The Economist (2008). Tibet: Britain's suzerain remedy. The Economist 6 November, p. 64.
485. The Tibet Post (2010). Tibetans Urged to Participate in 2011 Indian National Census. The Tibet Post International, 13 May. Available from www.thetibetpost.com/ en/outlook/interviews-and-recap/866-tibetans-urged-to-participate-in-2011-indiannational- census (accessed 15 September 2015).
486. Thomassen, B. (2012). Notes towards an anthropology of political revolutions. Comparative Studies in Society and History 54(3), 679-706.
487. Thrift,N. (2000). It's the little things. In K. Dodds &D.Atkins (eds), Geopolitical Traditions: A Century of Geopolitical Thought. London: Routledge, pp. 380-387.
488. Thupten Samphel (2006). Majnuka Tilla re-visited. Tibetan Bulletin 10(5), 27-28.
489. Tibet Justice Center (2011). Legal issues implicated by the Dalai Lama's devolution of power. Republished by Tibetan Political Review. Available from https://sites.google.com/ site/tibetanpoliticalreview/articles/tibetjusticecenterreleaseslegalmemorandumondalaila mashistoricdevolutionofpower (accessed 16 September 2015).
490. Tibet Justice Center (2012). Tibet's Stateless Nationals II:Tibetan Refugees in India. Oakland: TJC.
491. Tibet.net (2012) 8th Annual Conference of Tibetan Settlement Officers begins. Central Tibetan Administration, June 14. Available from http://tibet.net/2012/06/8th-annualconference- of-tibetan-settlement-officers-begins/ (accessed 15 September 2015).
492. Tibetan Bulletin (2001). Prof. Samdhong Rinpoche speaking to the press after taking his oath of office. Lhakpa Tsering Hall, Dharamsala. 5 September 2001. Tibetan Bulletin 5(4), 25.
493. Tibetan Bulletin (2003). Exile economics. Tibetan Bulletin 7(3), 16.
494. Tibetan Political Review (2011). Sangay's new Cabinet: strengths and weaknesses. Tibetan Political Review 26 September. Available from https://sites.google.com/site/ tibetanpoliticalreview/articles/sangay%E2%80%99snewcabinetstrengthsandweaknesses (accessed 15 September 2015).
495. Tibetan Political Review (2013). To be or not be: should Tibetans in India assert Indian citizenship? Tibetan Political Reivew 26 April. Available from https://sites. google.com/site/tibetanpoliticalreview/editorials/tobeornotbe (accessed 15 September 2015).
496. Tibetan Political Review (2013). Tibetan democracy takes a step backwards. Tibetan Political Review 24 October. Available from http://www.tibetanpoliticalreview. org/editorials/tibetandemocracytakesastepbackwards (accessed 15 September 2015).
497. Tibetan Review (2008). Exile government outlines position vis-`a-vis NGOs.Tibetan Review 43(3), 26-27.
498. TibetanWomen's Association (2005). The Status of Exiled TibetanWomen in India.Dharamsala: Tibetan Women's Association.
499. Till, K. (2003). Places of memory. In J. Agnew, K. Mitchell & G. Toal (eds), A Companion to Political Geography. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 289-301.
500. TPPRC (2003). Tibet's Parliament in Exile. New Delhi: Tibetan Parliamentary and Policy Research Centre.
501. TPPRC (2006). Indian Parliament on the Issue of Tibet: Lok Sabha Debates 1952-2005. New Delhi: Tibetan Parliamentary and Policy Research Centre.
502. Travers, A. (2011). The careers of the noble officials of the Ganden Phodrang (1895- 1959): organisation and hereditary divisions within the service of state. In K.N. Gurung, T. Myatt, N. Schneider & A. Travers (eds), Revisiting Tibetan Culture and History, Proceedings of the Second International Seminar of Young Tibetologists, Paris, 2009, Volume 1, Revue d'Études Tibétaines n°21. Paris: CNRS, pp. 155-174.
503. Travers, A. (2012). Patrimonial aspects of public service: the careers of the Ganden Phodrang officials (1895-1959). In R. Vitali (ed.), Studies on the History and Literature of Tibet and the Himalaya. Kathmandu: Vajra Publications, pp. 157-181.
504. Trouillot, M.-R. (2001). The anthropology of the state in the age of globalization: close encounters of the deceptive kind. Current Anthropology 42(1), 125-138.
505. Trouillot, M.-R. (2003). Global Transformations: Anthropology and the Modern World. New York: Palgrave.
506. Tsundue, T. (2003). Kora: Stories and Poems. Dharamsala: TibetWrites.
507. Tsundue, T. (2004). Sontsa: Tibetan youth power. Tibetan Review 39(8), 19.
508. Turner, S. (2005). Suspended spaces - contesting sovereignties in a refugee camp. In T.B. Hansen & F. Stepputat (eds), Sovereign Bodies: Citizens, Migrants, and States in the Postcolonial World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 312-332.
509. Turner, V. (1974). Dramas, Fields, and Metaphors: Symbolic Action in Human Society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
510. Turner, V. (1982). From Ritual to Theatre: The Human Seriousness of Play. Baltimore: PAJ Press.
511. Turner, V. (1987). The Anthropology of Performance. New York: PAJ Publications.
512. Turner, V. (1987). Betwixt and between: the liminal period in rites of passage. In L.C. Mahdi, S. Foster & M. Little (eds), Betwixt&Between:Patterns of Masculine and Feminine Initiation. Peru, IL: Open Court Publishing, pp. 2-19.
513. Tuttle, G. (2005). Tibetan Buddhists in the Making of Modern China. New York: Columbia University Press.
514. Van Hear,N. (2003). From Durable Solutions to Transnational Relations:Home and Exile among Refugee Diasporas. New Issues in Refugee Research.Working Paper No. 83, March 2003. Geneva: UNHCR Evaluation and Policy Analysis Unit.
515. van Schendel, W. (2002). Stateless in South Asia: The making of the India-Bangladesh enclaves. Journal of Asian Studies 61(1), 115-147.
516. van Walt van Praag, M. (1987). Status of Tibet: History, Rights and Prospects in International Law. Boston: Wisdom Publications.
517. van Walt van Praag, M. (2013). A legal examination of the 1913 Mongolia-Tibet Treaty of Friendship and Alliance. Lungta, Spring 2013: Special edition: The Centennial of the Tibeto-Mongol Treaty 1913-2013.
518. Vasudevan, A. (2015). The autonomous city: Towards a critical geography of occupation. Progress in Human Geography 39(3), 316-337.
519. Vigne, R. (1987). SWAPO of Namibia: a movement in exile. Third World Quarterly 9(1), 85-107.
520. Vinokurov, E. (2007). A Theory of Enclaves. Lantham, MD: Lexington Books.
521. Vrasti,W. (2008). The strange case of ethnography and international relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 37(2), 279-301.
522. Wahlbeck, O. (1998). Transnationalism and diasporas: the Kurdish example. Paper presented at the International Sociological Association XIV World Congress of Sociology, Montreal, Canada.
523. Wakefield, S.E.L. (2007). Reflective action in the academy: exploring praxis in critical geography using a 'food movement' case study. Antipode 39(2), 331-354.
524. Walker, R.J.B. (1993). Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
525. Wangdu, K. (2013). Special Frontier Force: A clandestine Tibetan guerrilla unit in the Indian military. Merabsarpa 6 January. Available from http://www.merabsarpa. com/politics/special-frontier-force (accessed 15 September 2015).
526. Watts, M. (2003). Development and governmentality. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 24(1), 6-34.
527. Watts, N.F. (2004). Institutionalizing Virtual Kurdistan West. In J.S. Migdal (ed.), Boundaries and Belonging:States and Societies in the Struggle to Shape Identities and Local Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 121-147.
528. Weber, C. (1995). Simulating Sovereignty: Intervention, the State and Symbolic Exchange. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
529. Weber, C. (1998). Performative states. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 27(1), 78-95. Weber, M. (1919/2009). Politics as a vocation. In H.H. Gerth & C. Wright Mills (eds), Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 77-128.
530. Weber, M. (1919/2009). Politics as a vocation. In H.H. Gerth & C. Wright Mills (eds), Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 77-128.
531. Weber, M. (1922/2009). Bureaucracy. In H.H. Gerth & C. Wright Mills (eds), Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 196-232.
532. Weber, M. (1947). The Theory of Social and Economic Organisation. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
533. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society:Volume I. New York: Bedminster.
534. Wei, J. (ed.) (1989). 100 Questions about Tibet. Beijing: Beijing Review Publications.
535. Weizman, E. (2011). The Least of All Possible Evils: Humanitarian Violence from Arendt to Gaza. London: Verso.
536. Wilson, A. (forthcoming). Remaking Sovereignty:State Power,Revolution and Exile in a Saharan Liberation Movement. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
537. Wilson, A. & McConnell, F. (forthcoming). Constructing legitimacy without legality in long term exile: Comparing Western Sahara and Tibet. Geoforum.
538. White, G.W. (2004). Nation, State, and Territory. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
539. Wunderlich, F.M. (2010). The aesthetics of place-temporality in everyday urban space: the case of Fitzroy Square. In T. Edensor (ed.), Geographies of Rhythm: Nature, Place, Mobilities and Bodies. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 45-56.
540. Yamamoto, L. & Esteban, M. (2010). Vanishing island states and sovereignty. Ocean and Coastal Management 53, 1-9.
541. Yeh, E. (2002). Will the real Tibetan please stand up! Identity politics in the Tibetan diaspora. In P.C. Klieger (ed.), Tibet, Self, and the Tibetan Diaspora: Voices of Difference. Leiden: Brill, pp. 229-254.
542. Yeh, E.T. (2007). Exile meets homeland: politics, performance and authenticity in the Tibetan diaspora. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 25(4), 648-667.
543. Yeh, E.T. (2013). Taming Tibet: Landscape Transformation and the Gift of Chinese Development. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
544. Yeh, E.T.& Lama, K.T. (2006). Hip-hop gangsta or most deserving victims? Transnational migrant identities and the paradox of Tibetan racialization in the USA. Environment and Planning A 38(5), 809-829.
545. Zizek, S. (1995). The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso.