Strategies for development and implementation of bio-based materials as effective renewable resources of energy: A comprehensive review on adsorbent technology

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Volumn 62, Issue , 2016, Pages 654-664

  Ummartyotin, S ^a   Pechyen, C ^a  

^a THAMMASAT UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Adsorption; Bioconversion; Biosorption; Energy policy; Waste treatment

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATED CARBON; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; CHITIN; ENERGY POLICY; SORBENTS; SORPTION; TOXIC MATERIALS;

BIO-BASED; BIO-BASED MATERIALS; BIO-BASED POLYMERS; CHITIN-CHITOSAN; ENERGY; LOW-COSTS; NON-TOXIC MATERIALS; POLYMER BASED; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; SORBENT MATERIALS;

WASTE TREATMENT;

EID: 84979769247     PISSN: 13640321     EISSN: 18790690     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.066     Document Type: Review

References (86)

1. [1] Faruk, O., et al. Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibers: 2000–2010. Prog Polym Sci 37 (2012), 1552–1596.
2. [2] Eichhorn, S.J., et al. Review: current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposite. J Mater Sci 45 (2010), 1–33.
3. [3] Dittenber, D.B., GangaRao, H.V.S., Critical review of recent publications on use of natural composites in infrastructure. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 43 (2012), 1419–1429.
4. [4] Mouritz, A.P., et al. Review of advanced composite structures for naval ships and submarines. Compos Struct 53 (2001), 21–42.
5. [5] Koronis, G., Silva, A., Fontul, M., Green composites: a review of adequate materials for automotive applications. Compos Part B Eng 44 (2013), 120–127.
6. [6] Okahisa, Y., et al. Optically transparent wood-cellulose nanocomposite as a base substrate for flexible organic light-emitting diode displays. Compos Sci Technol 69 (2009), 1958–1961.
7. [7] Legnani, C., et al. Bacterial cellulose membrane as flexible substrate for organic light emitting devices. Thin Solid Films 517 (2008), 1016–1020.
8. [8] Ummartyotin, S., et al. Development of transparent bacterial cellulose nanocomposite film as substrate for flexible organic light emitting diode (OLED) display. Ind Crops Prod 35 (2012), 92–97.
9. [9] Mun, C., Chen, Y., Kim, J., Cellulose-titanium dioxide-multiwalled carbon nanotube hybrid nanocomposite and its ammonia gas sensing properties at room temperature. Sens Actuators B Chem 171–172 (2012), 1186–1191.
10. [10] Kim, J., Yun, S., Ounaies, Z., Discovery of cellulose as a smart material. Macromolecules 39 (2006), 4202–4206.
11. [11] Grande, C.J., et al. Nanocomposites of bacterial cellulose/hydroxyapatite for biomedical applications. Acta Biomater 5 (2009), 1605–1615.
12. [12] Realini, C.E., Marcos, B., Active and intelligent packaging systems for a modern society. Meat Sci 98 (2014), 404–419.
13. [13] Rhim, J.W., Park, H.M., Ha, C.S., Bio-nanocomposites for food packaging applications. Prog Polym Sci 38 (2013), 1629–1652.
14. [14] Lee, K.T., Quality and safety aspects of meat products as affected by various physical manipulations of packaging materials. Meat Sci 86 (2010), 138–150.
15. [15] Yam, K.L., Intelligent packaging to enhance food safety and quality. Emerg Food Packag Technol, 2012, 137–152.
16. [16] Ummartyotin, S., Sain, M., Preparation of a cellulose and water-based resin composite. Mater Lett 123 (2014), 70–74.
17. [17] Othman, S.H., Bio-nanocomposite materials for food packaging applications: types of biopolymer and nano-sized filler. Agric Agric Sci Proc 2 (2014), 296–303.
18. [18] Mihindukulasuriya, S.D.F., Lim, L.T., Nanotechnology development in food packaging: a review. Trends Food Sci Technol 40 (2014), 149–167.
19. [19] Kango, S., et al. Surface modification of inorganic nanoparticles for development of organic–inorganic nanocomposites a review. Prog Polym Sci 38 (2013), 1232–1261.
20. [20] Cisternas, L.A., On the synthesis of inorganic chemical and metallurgical processes, review and extension. Miner Eng 12 (1999), 15–41.
21. [21] Soroudi, A., Jakubowicz, I., Recycling of bioplastics, their blends and biocomposites: a review. Eur Polym J 49 (2013), 2839–2858.
22. [22] Imre, B., Pukanszky, B., Compatibilization in bio-based and biodegradable polymer blends. Eur Polym J 49 (2013), 1215–1233.
23. [23] Juntaro, J., Environmentally friendly hierarchical composites. Department of Chemical Engineering and Chemical Technology, 2009, University of London, London.
24. [24] Wu, C., Production and characterization of optically transparent nanocomposite film. Faculty of Forestry, 2010, University of Toronto, Toronto.
25. [25] van den Broek, L.A.M., et al. Chitosan films and blends for packaging material. Carbohydr Polym 116 (2015), 237–242.
26. [26] Erdohan, Z.O., Cam, B., Turhan, K.N., Characterization of antimicrobial polylactic acid based films. J Food Eng 119 (2013), 308–315.
27. [27] Han, J.H., A review of food packaging technologies and innovations. Innov Food Packag, 2014, 3–12.
28. [28] Abdul Khalil, H.P.S.B.A.H., Ireana Yusra, A.F., Green composites from sustainable cellulose nanofibrils: a review. Carbohydr Polym 87 (2012), 963–979.
29. [29] Abdul Khalil, H.P.S., et al. Production and modification of nanofibrillated cellulose using various mechanical processes: a review. Carbohydr Polym 99 (2014), 649–665.
30. [30] Collard, F.X., Blin, J., A review on pyrolysis of biomass constituents: mechanisms and composition of the products obtained from the conversion of cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 38 (2014), 594–608.
31. [31] Lede, J., Cellulose pyrolysis kinetics: an historical review on the existence and role of intermediate active cellulose. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 94 (2012), 17–32.
32. [32] Thoorens, G., et al. Microcrystalline cellulose, a direct compression binder in a quality by design environment – a review. Int J Pharm 473 (2014), 64–72.
33. [33] S., Ummartyotin, C., Pechyen, Microcrystalline-cellulose and polypropylene based composite: a simple, selective and effective material for microwavable packaging. Carbohydr Polym 142 (2016), 133–140.
34. [34] Ummartyotin, S., Manuspiya, H., A critical review on cellulose: from fundamental to an approach on sensor technology. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 41 (2015), 402–412.
35. [35] Sain MM, Bhatnagar A. Manufacturing process of cellulose nanofibers from renewable feed stocks, US; 2008.
36. [36] Ross, P., Mayer, R., Benziman, M., Cellulose biosynthesis and function in bacteria. Microbiol Rev 55 (1991), 35–58.
37. [37] Ravi Kumar, M.N.J., A review of chitin and chitosan applications. React Funct Polym 46 (2000), 1–27.
38. [38] Rinaudo, M., Chitin and chitosan: properties and applications. Prog Polym Sci 31 (2006), 603–632.
39. [39] Pillai, C.K.S., Paul, W., Sharma, C.P., Chitin and chitosan polymers: chemistry, solubility and fiber formation. Prog Polym Sci 34 (2009), 641–678.
40. [40] Rasal, R.M., Janorkar, A.V., Hirt, D.E., Poly (lactic acid) modifications. Prog Polym Sci 35 (2010), 338–356.
41. [41] JM., Raquez, Polylactide (PLA)-based nanocomposites. Prog Ploym Sci 38:10–11 (2016), 1504–1542.
42. [42] Guru, P.S., Dash, S., Sorption on eggshell waste – a review on ultrastructure biomineralization and other applications. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 209 (2014), 49–67.
43. [43] Balaz, M., Eggshell membrane biomedical as a platform for applications in materials science. Acta Biomater 10 (2014), 3827–3843.
44. [44] Boronat, T., et al. Development of a biocomposite based on green polyethylene biopolymer and eggshell. Mater Des 68 (2015), 177–185.
45. [45] Chen, G., et al. Ultrasonic-assisted production of biodiesel from transesterification of palm oil over ostrich eggshell-derived CaO catalysts. Bioresour Technol 171 (2014), 428–432.
46. 2 capture: experimental and kinetic studies. Chem Eng J 243 (2014), 455–464.
47. [47] Gil, A., et al. A review on characterization of pillared clays be specific techniques. Appl Clay Sci 53 (2011), 97–105.
48. [48] Choudalakis, G., Gotsis, A.D., Permeability of polymer/clay nanocomposites: a review. Eur Polym J 45 (2009), 967–984.
49. [49] Rittirong, K., et al. CTAB as a soft template for modified clay as filler in active packaging. Data Brief 3 (2015), 47–50.
50. [50] Bunnak, N., et al. Dielectric properties improvement of polymer composite prepared from poly(vinylidene difluoride) and barium-modified porous clay heterostructure. Electron Mater Lett 9 (2013), 315–323.
51. [51] Bunnak, N., et al. Increment of dielectric constant in binary composite based on PVDF/clay system. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 26 (2015), 7270–7276.
52. [52] Bunnak, N., et al. Synthesis and characterization of magnetic porous clay heterostructure. J Porous Mater 21 (2014), 1–8.
53. [53] Abioye, A.M., Ani, F.N., Recent development in the production of activated carbon electrodes from agricultural waste biomass for supercapacitors: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 52 (2015), 1282–1293.
54. [54] Jain, A., Balasubramanian, R., Srinivasan, M.P., Hydrothermal conversion of biomass waste to activated carbon with high porosity: a review. Chem Eng J 283 (2016), 789–805.
55. [55] Acevedo, B., Barriocanal, C., Texture and surface chemistry of activated carbons obtained from tyre wastes. Fuel Process Technol 134 (2015), 275–283.
56. [56] Acosta, R., et al. Tetracycline adsorption onto activated carbons produced by KOH activation of tyre pyrolysis char. Chemosphere 149 (2016), 168–176.
57. [57] Angin, D., Production and characterization of activated carbon from sour cherry stones by zinc chloride. Fuel 115 (2014), 804–811.
58. [58] Sathishkumar, P., Arulkumar, M., Palvannan, T., Utilization of agro-industrial waste Jatropha curcas pods as an activated carbon for the adsorption of reactive dye Remazol Brilliant Blue R (RBBR). J Clean Prod 2012 (2012), 67–75.
59. 2. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 95 (2012), 21–24.
60. [60] Karacetin, G., Sivrikaya, S., Imamoglu, M., Adsorption of methylene blue from aqueous solutions by activated carbon prepared from hazelnut husk using zinc chloride. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 110 (2014), 270–276.
61. [61] Maattanen, A., et al. Enhanced surface wetting of pigment coated paper by UVC irradiation. Ind Eng Chem Res 49 (2010), 11351–11356.
62. [62] Ummartyotin, S., Manuspiya, H., An overview of feasibilities and challenge of conductive cellulose for rechargeable lithium based battery. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 50 (2015), 204–213.
63. [63] Largitte, L., et al. Comparison of the adsorption of lead by activated carbons from three lignocellulosic precursors. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 219 (2016), 265–275.
64. 2 capturing capacity. Chem Eng J 281 (2015), 606–612.
65. [65] Hsu, S.H., et al. Adsorption of chlorinated volatile organic compounds using activated carbon made from Jatropha curcas seeds. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 45 (2014), 2526–2530.
66. [66] Ion, V.A., Parvulescu, O.C., Dobre, T., Volatile organic compounds adsorption onto neat and hybrid bacterial cellulose. Appl Surf Sci 335 (2015), 137–146.
67. [67] Goncalves, V.C., Balogh, D.T., Optical chemical sensors using polythiophene derivatives as active layer for detection of volatile organic compounds. Sens Actuators B Chem 162 (2012), 307–312.
68. [68] Xu, S., et al. Electrospinning of native non-volatile solvent system. Polymer 49 (2008), 2911–2917.
69. [69] Avila-Nino, J.A., et al. Nonvolatile write-once-read-many-times memory device with functionalized-nanoshells/PEDOT:PSS nanocomposites. Mater Sci Eng B 176 (2011), 462–466.
70. [70] Cuq, B., et al. Relative humidity and temperature effects on mechanical and water vapor barrier proeprties of myofibrillar protein-based films. Polym Gels Netw 5 (1997), 1–15.
71. [71] Ducere, V., Bernes, A., Lacabanne, C., A capacitive humidity sensor using cross-linked cellulose acetate butyrate. Sens Actuators B Chem 106 (2005), 331–334.
72. [72] Sun, A., et al. Highly sensitive humidity sensor at low humidity based on the quaternized polypyrrole composite film. Sens Actuators B Chem 142 (2009), 197–203.
73. [73] Li, Y., et al. Poly(4-vinylpyridine)/carbon black composite as a humidity sensor. Sens Actuators B Chem 123 (2007), 554–559.
74. 4 composites. Sens Actuators B Chem 124 (2007), 542–548.
75. [75] Ahmed, S.A., Soliman, E.M., Silica coated magnetic particles using microwave synthesis for removal of dyes from natural water samples: synthesis, characterization, equilibrium, isotherm and kinetic studies. Appl Surf Sci 284 (2013), 23–32.
76. [76] Chung, J., et al. Synthesis of a ZnS shell on the ZnO nanowire and its effect on the nanowire-based dye-sensitized solar cells. J Phys Chem 114 (2010), 21360–21365.
77. [77] Clifford, J.N., et al. Sensitizer molecular structure-device efficiency relationship in dye sensitized solar cell. Chem Soc Rev 40 (2011), 1635–1646.
78. [78] Costenaro, D., et al. Size effect of synthetic saponite-clay in quasi-solid electrolyte for dye-sensitized solar cells. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 117 (2013), 9–14.
79. [79] Hashmi, G., et al. Review of materials and manufacturing options for large area flexible dye solar cells. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15 (2011), 3717–3732.
80. [80] Panthi, G., et al. Electrospun ZnO hybrid nanofibers for photodegradation of wastewater containing organic dyes: a review. J Ind Eng Chem 21 (2015), 26–35.
81. [81] Rita Narayan, M., Review: dye sensitized solar cells based on natural photosensitizers. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16 (2012), 208–215.
82. [82] Thuy, U.T.D., et al. Synthesis of CuS and CuS/ZnS core/shell nanocrystals for photocatalytic degradation of dyes under visible light. Catal Commun 44 (2014), 62–67.
83. [83] S., Ummartyotin, Y., Infahsaeng, A comprehensive review on ZnS: from synthesis to an approach on solar cell. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 55 (2016), 17–24.
84. [84] Pandey, V.C., et al. Jatropha curcas: a potential biofuel plant for sustainable environmental development. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16 (2012), 2870–2883.
85. [85] Tongpoothorn, W., et al. Preparation of activated carbon derived from Jatropha curcas fruit shell by simple thermo-chemical activation and characterization of their physico-chemical properties. Chem Eng Res Des 89 (2011), 335–340.
86. [86] Hesas, R.H., et al. Comparison of oil palm shell-based activated carbons produced by microwave and conventional heating methods using zinc chloride activation. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 104 (2013), 176–184.