Advances in temporal analysis in learning and instruction

Frontline Learning Research

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 15-24

  Molenaar, Inge ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Learning and Instruction; Methodologies; Temporal Analysis; Time

Indexed keywords

EID: 84979014033     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22953159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14786/flr.v2i4.118     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Akhras, F. N., & Self, J. A. (2000). Modeling the process, not the product, of learning. In S. P. Lajoie, Computers as cognitive tools, volume two: No more walls (pp. 3-28). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Azevedo, R. (2014). Issues in dealing with sequential and temporal characteristics of self-and socially-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 9(2), 217-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11409-014-9123-1
3. Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527685
4. Bannert, M. (2006). Effects of reflection prompts when learning with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4, 359-375. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/94V6-R58H-3367-G388
5. Bannert, M., Reimann, P. & Sonnenberg, C. (2014). Process Mining Techniques for Analysing Patterns and Strategies in Students' Self-Regulated Learning. Metacognition and learning, Vol 9, 161-185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11409-013-9107-6
6. Segedy, J. R., Kinnebrew, J. S., & Biswas, G. (2012). Supporting student learning using conversational agents in a teachable agent environment. In The future of learning: Proceedings of the 10th international conference of the learning sciences (ICLS 2012) (Vol. 2, pp. 251-255).
7. Bloome, D., Beierle, M. Grigorenko, M. & Goldman, S. (2009). Learning over time: uses of intercontextuality, collective memories, and classroom chronotopes in the construction of learning opportunities in a ninth-grade language arts classroom. Language and Education, 23(4), pp. 313-334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500780902954257
8. Chiu, M. M., & Khoo, L. (2005). A new method for analyzing sequential processes: Dynamic multi-level analysis. Small Group Research, 36, 600-631. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1046496405279309
9. Chiu, M. M. (2008). Flowing toward correct contributions during groups' mathematics problem solving: A statistical discourse analysis. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17 (3), 415-463. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10508400802224830
10. Goldstein, H. (1995). Multilevel statistical models. Sydney: Edward Arnold.
11. Günther, C., & Van der Aalst, W. (2007). Fuzzy Mining: Adaptive process simplification based on multi-perspective metrics. In G. Alonso, P. Dadam & M. Rosemann (Eds.), International Conference on Business Process Management (BPM 2007) (pp. 328-343). Berlin: Springer.
12. Greene, J. A. & Azevedo, R. (2010). The Measurement of Learners’ Self-Regulated Cognitive and Metacognitive Processes while Using Computer-based Learning Environments. Educational psychologist, 45, 203 – 209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2010.515935
13. Hadwin, A.F., & Järvelä, S. (2011). Introduction to a special issue on social aspects of self-regulated learning: Where social and self meet in the strategic regulation of learning. Teachers College Record, 113(2), 235-239
14. Hollenstein, T. (2013).State Space Grids: Depicting Dynamics Across Development.New York: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5007-8
15. Iiskala. T., Vauras, M., Lehtinen, E., & Salonen, P. (2011). Socially Shared Metacognition within Primary School Pupil Dyads’ Collaborative Processes. Learning and Instruction, 21, 379-393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.05.002
16. Järvelä, S. & Hadwin, A. (2013). New Frontiers: Regulating learning in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 25-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.748006
17. Lemke, J.L. (2000). Across the Scales of Time: Artifacts, Activities, and Meanings in Ecosocial Systems. Mind, Culture and activity, 7(4), 273–290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327884MCA0704_03
18. Kapur, M., Voiklis, J., & Kinzer, C. (2008). Sensitivities to early exchange in synchronous computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) groups. Computers and Education, 51, 54-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.04.007
19. Kapur, M. (2011). Temporality matters: Advancing a method for analyzing problem-solving processes in a computer-supported collaborative environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (ijCSCL), 6,(1), 39-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9109-9
20. Kennedy, P. (2008). A guide to econometrics. Cambridge: Blackwell.
21. Kinnebrew, J. S., Segedy J.R. & Biswas, G. (2014). Analyzing the Temporal Evolution of Students' Behaviors in Open-Ended Learning Environments. Metacognition and learning, Vol 9, 217-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11409-014-9112-4
22. Kuvalja, M., Verma, M. & Whitebread, D. (2014). Patterns of co-occurring non-verbal behavior and self-directed speech; a comparison of three methodological approaches. Metacognition and learning, Vol 9, 87-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11409-013-9106-7
23. Magnusson, M. S. (2000). Discovering hidden time patterns in behavior: T-patterns and their detection Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers: A Journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc, 32(1), 93–110.
24. Malmberg, J., Järvelä, S. & Kirchner, P. (2014). Elementary school students’ strategic learning: does task-type matter? Metacognition and learning, Vol 9, p. 113-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11409-013-9108-5
25. Mayer, R.E. (2008). Learning and Instruction. Pearson; New Jersey.
26. Mercer, N. (2008) The seeds of time: why classroom dialogue needs a temporal analysis. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17, 1, 33-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10508400701793182
27. Molenaar, I., van Boxtel, C.A.M. & Sleegers, P.J.C. & Roda, C. (2011). Attention Management for Self-Regulated Learning: AtgentSchool. In C. Roda (Ed), Human Attention in Digital Environments, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 259-280.ttp://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511974519.011
28. Molenaar, I., Chiu, M. M., van Boxtel, C. & Sleegers, P. J.C. (2011). Scaffolding of small groups’ metacognitive activities with an avatar. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6, 601-624. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9130-z
29. Molenaar, I., van Boxtel, C.A.M & Sleegers, P.J.C. (2011). Metacognitive Scaffolding in an Innovative Learning Arrangement. Instructional Science, vol 39(6), 785-803. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9154-1
30. Molenaar, I & Chiu M.M. (2014). Dissecting sequences of regulation and cognition: statistical discourse analysis of primary school children’s collaborative learning. Metacognition and learning, Vol 9, 137-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11409-013-9105-8
31. Molenaar, I. & Järvelä, S. (2014). Sequential and Temporal Characteristics of Self and Social regulated Learning. Metacognition and Learning, Vol 9, p. 75-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11409-014-9114-2
32. Molenaar, I & Wise, A.F. (in prep). Concepts of Time: A Framework for Thinking about Temporal Aspects of Learning.
33. Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2008). Self-regulated learning with hypermedia: The role of prior domain knowledge. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(2), 270-298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.03.001
34. Reimann, P. (2009). Time is precious: Variable-and event-centred approaches to process analysis in CSCL research, International Journal of Computer-supported Collaborative Learning, 3, 239-257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11412-009-9070-z
35. Schegloff, E. A., 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208
36. Schmitz, B. (2006). Advantages of studying processes in educational research. Learning and Instruction. 16, 433-449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.09.004
37. Schoor, C. & Bannert, M. (2012). Exploring Regulatory Processes during a Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Task Using Process Mining. Computers in Human Behavior. 28(4), 1321-1331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.02.016
38. Suthers. D., Teplovs, C., de Laat, M., Oshima, J., & Zeini, S. (2011). Connecting levels of learning in networked communities. Workshop conducted at the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, July 9, 2011, Hong Kong.
39. Robero, C., Ventura, S., Pechenizkiy, M., & Baker, R. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of educational data mining. Boca Raton: Chapman&Hall/CRC.
40. Veenman, M.V.J. (2011). Learning to Self-Monitor and Self-Regulate. In R. Mayer,& P. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction. New York: Routledge.
41. Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2006). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 46, 71-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.003
42. Winne, P. H. (2014). Issues in researching self-regulated learning as patterns of events. Metacognition and Learning, 229-237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11409-014-9113-3
43. Wise, A. F., & Chiu, M. M. (2011). Analyzing temporal patterns of knowledge construction in a role-based online discussion. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(3), 445-470. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9120-1
44. Wise, A. F., Perera, N., Hsiao, Y., Speer, J., & Marbouti, F. (2012). Microanalytic case studies of individual participation patterns in an asynchronous online discussion in an undergraduate blended course. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(2), 108-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.11.007
45. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: an Overview. Theory into Practice, 42(2), 64-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2