Modeling the process, not the product, of learning

Computers As Cognitive Tools: Volume II, No More Walls

Volumn , Issue , 2020, Pages 3-28

  Akhras, Fabio N ^a   Self, John A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85118326473     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (35)

1. Agre, P. E. (1995). Computational research on interaction and agency. Artificial Intelligence, 72, 1-52.
2. Akhras, F. N. (1997). Reasoning about process in intelligent learning environments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Leeds.
3. Akman, V., & Surav, M. (1996, Fall). Steps toward formalizing context. Artificial Intelligence Magazine, 55-72.
4. Barwise, J., & Perry, J. (1983). Situations and attitudes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Bednar, A. K., Cunningham, D., Duffy, T. M., & Perry, J. D. (1992). Theory into practice: How do we link? In T. M. Duffy & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation (pp. 17-34). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 7, 161-186.
7. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
8. Clancey, W. J. (1993). Guidon-Manage revisited: A socio-technical systems approach. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 4, 5-34.
9. Detterman, D. K., & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.). (1993). Transfer on trial: Intelligence, cognition, and instruction. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
10. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: Heath.
11. Dillenbourg, P., & Self, J. A. (1992). A framework for learning modeling, Interactive Learning Environments, 2, 111-137.
12. Duffy, T. M., & Jonassen, D. H. (1992). Constructivism: New implications for instructional technology. In T. M. Duffy & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction (pp. 1-16). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (1996). The expert learner: Strategic, self-regulated, and reflective. Instructional Science, 24, 1-24.
14. Fosnot, C. T. (1996). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. In C. T. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (pp. 8-33). New York: Teachers College Press.
15. Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing (pp. 67-82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Glynn, S. M., & Duit, R. (1995). Learning science meaningfully: Constructing conceptual models. In S. M. Glynn & R. Duit (Eds.), Learning science in the schools (pp. 3-33). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Greeno, J. G. (1997). On claims that answer the wrong questions. Educational Researcher, 26(1), 5-17.
18. Greeno, J. G., Moore, J. L., & Smith, D. R. (1993). Transfer of situated learning. In D. K. Detterman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Transfer on trial: Intelligence, cognition, and instruction (pp. 99-167). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
19. Greer, J. E., & McCalla, G. I. (Eds.). (1994). Student modeling: The key to individualised knowledge-based instruction. Berlin: Springer.
20. Jonassen, D. H. (1992). Evaluating constructivistic learning. In T. M. Duffy & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation (pp. 137-148). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Lajoie, S. R, & Derry, S. J. (Eds.). (1993). Computers as cognitive tools. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. Piaget, J., & Garcia, R. (1991). Toward a logic of meanings. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Resnick, L. B. (1987). Learning in school and out. Educational Researcher, 16(9), 13-20.
25. Resnick, L. B. (1996). Situated rationalism: The biological and cultural foundations for learning. Prospects, 26(1), 37-53.
26. Sack, W., Soloway, E., & Weingrad, P. (1992). Re: Writing Cartesian student models. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 3, 381-399.
27. Self, J. A. (1996). Computational mathetics: Towards a science of learning systems design (CBLU Tech. Rep. No. 96/23). Leeds: University of Leeds.
28. Shuell, T. J. (1992). Designing instructional computing systems for meaningful learning. In M. Jones & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Adaptive learning environments (pp. 19-54). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
29. VanLehn, K. (1988). Student modeling. In M. Poison & J. Richardson (Eds.), Foundations of intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 55-78). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. von Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching. Synthese, 80, 121-140.
31. von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. London: Falmer Press.
32. Vosniadou, S. (1996). Towards a revised cognitive psychology for new advances in learning and instruction. Learning and Instruction, 6(2), 95-109.
33. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. Wenger, E. (1987). Artificial intelligence and tutoring systems. Los Altos: Morgan Kaufmann.
35. Winn, W. (1993). A constructivist critique of the assumptions of instructional design. In T. M. Duffy, J. Lowyck, & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Designing environments for constructive learning (pp. 189-212). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.