Flowing toward correct contributions during group problem solving: A statistical discourse analysis

Journal of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 415-463

  Chiu, Ming Ming ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 48049108247     PISSN: 10508406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10508400802224830     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Amason, A. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 123-148.
2. Balacheff, N. (1988). Aspects of proof in pupils' practice of school mathematics. In D. Pimm. (Ed.), Mathematics, teachers and children (pp. 316-230). London: Hodder & Stoughton.
3. Bales, R. F. (2001). Social interaction systems. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
4. Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 307-359.
5. Benjamini, Y., Krieger, A. M., & Yekutieli, D. (2006). Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate. Biometrika, 93, 491-507.
6. Blanton, M., & Kaput, J. (2003). Developing elementary teachers' "algebra eyes and ears." Teaching Children Mathematics, 10, 70-77.
7. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9. Burgoon, J. K., Dillman, L., & Stern, L. (1993). Adaptation in dyadic interaction. Communication Theory, 3, 295-316.
10. California Department of Education. (2005). Academic performance index._ Retrieved May 8, 2007, from www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ar/index.asp
11. Chiu, M. M. (1997). Building on diversity. Los Angeles: University of California at Los Angeles. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 410 325)
12. Chiu, M. M. (2000a). Group problem solving processes: Social interactions and individual turns. Journal for the. Theory of Social Behavior, 30(1), 27-50.
13. Chiu, M. M. (2000b). Status effects on solutions, leadership, and evaluations during group problem, solving. Sociology of Education, 73(3), 175-195.
14. Chiu, M. M. (2001). Analyzing group work processes: Towards a conceptual framework and systematic statistical analyses. In F. Columbus (Ed.), Advances in psychology research (Vol. 4, pp. 193-222). Huntington, NY: Nova Science.
15. Chiu, M. M., & Khoo, L. (in press). Conflict between cooperative and competitive goals during group problem solving: Impolite disagreements and perceived leadership. Human Communication Research.
16. Chiu, M. M., & Khoo, L. (2003). Rudeness and status effects during group problem solving Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 506-523.
17. Chiu, M. M., & Khoo, L. (2005). A new method for analyzing sequential processes: Dynamic multi-level analysis. Small Group Research, 36, 600-631.
18. Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127-149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
19. Cobb, P. (1995). Mathematical learning and small-group interaction: Four case studies. In P. Cobb & H. Bauersfeld (Eds.), The emergence of mathematical meaning (pp. 25-130). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Cohen, E. G. (1982). Expectation states and interracial interaction in school settings. Annual Review of Sociology, 8, 109-235.
21. Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom.: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1-35.
22. Coleman, E. (1998). Using explanatory knowledge during collaborative problem solving in science. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 387-427.
23. De Lisi, R., & Goldbeck, S. L. (1999). Implications of Piagetian theory for peer learning. In A. M. O'Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives onpeer learning (pp. 3-37). Mahwali, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Dembo, M. H., & McAuliffe, T. J. (1987). Effects of perceived achievement and grade status on social interaction and influence in cooperative groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 415-423.
25. Doise, W., Mugny, G., & Perret-Clermont, A. N. (1975). Social interaction and the development of cognitive operations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 367-383.
26. Ellis, D. G., & Fisher, A. B. (1994). Small group decision making (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
27. Ericsson, K. A. (2001). Protocol analysis in psychology. In N. Smelser & P. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 12256-12262). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
28. Franke, M., Carpenter, T., & Battey, D. (2007). Content matters. In J. Kaput & M. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 333-359). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Gersick, C. J. G. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9-41.
30. Goldbeck, S. (1998). Peer collaboration and children's representation of the horizontal surface of liquid. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 19, 571-592.
31. Goldstein, H. (1995). Multilevel statistical models. Sydney, Australia: Edward Arnold.
32. Grasa, A. A. (1989). Econometric, model selection. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
33. Green, S. B. (1991). How many subjects does it take to do a regression analysis? Multivariate. Behavioral Research, 26, 499-510.
34. Hackman, M. Z., & Johnson, C. E. (2000). Leadership. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
35. Hinsz, V. B. (1990). Cognitive and consensus processes in group recognition memory performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 705-718.
36. Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S., & Vollrath, D. A. (1997). The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 43-64.
37. Hirokawa, R. Y. (1983). Group communication and problem-solving effectiveness: An investigation of group phases. Human Communication Research, 9, 291-305.
38. Holtgraves, T. (1997). YES, BUT ... Positive politeness in conversation arguments. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16, 222-239.
39. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
40. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2002). Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Education, 12(1), 5-14.
41. Kennedy (2004). Guide to econometrics. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
42. Kieran, C. (1992). The learning and teaching of school algebra. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 390-419). New York: Macmillan.
43. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44. Kuhn, D., Shaw, V., & Felton, M. (1997). Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentative reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 287-315.
45. Labov, W. (2001). The social stratification of English in New York City. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
46. Lilien, D. M., Startz, R., Ellsworth, S., Noh, J., & Engle, R. (1995). EViews. Irvine, CA: Quantitative Micro Software.
47. Ljung, G., & Box, G. (1979). On a measure of lack of fit in time series models. Biometrika, 66, 265-270.
48. Maddala, G. S., & Kim, I. M. (1998). Unit roots, cointegration and structural change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
49. McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in economics (pp. 105-142). New York: Academic.
50. Mercer, N. (2008). The seeds of time. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17, 33-59.
51. Michaels, S., O'Connor, C., & Resnick, L. B. (in press). Deliberative discourse idealized and realized. Studies in Philosophy and Education.
52. Nijstad, B. A., Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (2003). Cognitive stimulation and interference in idea generating groups. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 137-159). New York: Oxford University Press.
53. Orlitzky, M., & Hirokawa, R. Y. (2001). To err is human, to correct for it divine. Small Group Research, 32, 313-341.
54. Paulus, P. B., &Brown, V. (2003). Ideational creativity in groups. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity (pp. 110-136). New York: Oxford University Press.
55. Pavitt, C. (1993). What (little) we know about formal group discussion procedures: A review of relevant research. Small Group Research, 24, 217-235.
56. Pavitt, C., & Johnson, K. K. (2001). The association between group procedural MOPs and group discussion procedure. Small Group Research, 32, 595-624.
57. Person, N. K., Kreuz, R. J., Zwaan, R., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). Pragmatics and pedagogy Cognition and Instruction, 13, 161-188.
58. Piaget, J. (1985). The equilibrium of cognitive structures (T. Brown & K. L. Thampy, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
59. Poole, M. S. ( 1981). Decision development in small groups: A comparison of two models. Communication Monographs, 48, 1-24
60. Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 235-276.
61. Sfard, A. (2007). When the rules of discourse change, but nobody tells you. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16, 567-615.
62. Sharan, S., & Shachar, H. (1988). Language and learning in the cooperative classroom. New York: Springer.
63. Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, M. (1992). Towards an analysis of discourse. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in spoken discourse analysis (pp. 1-34). London: Routledge.
64. Slavin, R. E. (1990). Cooperative learning. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
65. Sowder, L., & Harel, G. (1998). Types of students' justifications. Mathematics Teacher, 91, 670-674.
66. Stasser, G. (1992). Pooling of unshared information during group discussion. In S. Worchel, W. Wood, & J. Simpson (Eds.), Groups process and productivity (pp. 48-57). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
67. Stasser, G., & Taylor, L. (1991). Speaking turns in face-to-face discussions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 675-684.
68. Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 81-93.
69. Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
70. Tracy, K., & Tracy, S. J. (1998). Rudeness at 911: Reconceptualizing face and face attack. Human Communication Research, 25, 225-251.
71. Tsui, A. (1992). A functional description of questions. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in spoken discourse analysis (pp. 89-110). London: Routledge.
72. Tudge, J. R. H. (1989). When collaboration leads to regression: Some negative consequences of socio-cognitive conflict. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 123-138.
73. Webb, N. M. (1984). Sex differences in interaction and achievement in cooperative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 33-44.
74. Webb, N. M. (1991). Task-related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small groups. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 366-389.
75. Webb, N. M., & Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841-873). New York: Macmillan.