Phylogenomics for systematic biology

Systematic Biology

Volumn 65, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 353-356

  Posada, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIGO   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; DATA MINING; DNA BARCODING; GENETIC DATABASE; GENOME; GENOMICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PROCEDURES; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; DATA MINING; DATABASES, GENETIC; DATASETS AS TOPIC; DNA BARCODING, TAXONOMIC; GENOME; GENOMICS; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; HUMANS; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

EID: 84978923837     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syw027     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (53)

1. Bayzid M.S., Mirarab S., Boussau B., Warnow T. 2015. Weighted statistical binning: enabling statistically consistent genome-scale phylogenetic analyses. PloS One 10:e0129183.
2. Berv J.S., Prum R.O. 2014. A comprehensive multilocus phylogeny of the Neotropical cotingas (Cotingidae, Aves) with a comparative evolutionary analysis of breeding systemand plumage dimorphism and a revised phylogenetic classification. Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 81:120-136.
3. Bi K., Vanderpool D., Singhal S., Linderoth T., Moritz C., Good J.M. 2012. Transcriptome-based exon capture enables highly cost-effective comparative genomic data collection at moderate evolutionary scales. BMC Genom. 13:403.
4. Bouckaert R., Heled J., Kuhnert D., Vaughan T., Wu C.H., Xie D., Suchard M.A., Rambaut A., Drummond A.J. 2014. BEAST 2: A software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS Comp. Biol. 10:e1003537.
5. Bragg J.G., Potter S., Bi K., Moritz C. 2015. Exon capture phylogenomics: efficacy across scales of divergence. Mol. Ecol. Resour.
6. Chaudhary R., Boussau B., Burleigh J.G., Fernandez-Baca D. 2015. Assessing approaches for inferring species trees from multi-copy genes. Syst. Biol. 64:325-339.
7. De OliveiraMartins L., Mallo D., Posada D. 2016. A Bayesian supertree model for genome-wide species tree reconstruction. Syst. Biol. 65:397-416.
8. Degnan J.H., Rosenberg N.A. 2009. Gene tree discordance, phylogenetic inference and the multispecies coalescent. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24:332-340.
9. Delsuc F., Brinkmann H., Philippe H. 2005. Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6:361-375.
10. Edwards S.V. 2009. Is a new and general theory of molecular systematics emerging? Evolution 63:1-19.
11. Edwards S.V., Xi Z., Janke A., Faircloth B.C., McCormack J.E., Glenn T.C., Zhong B., Wu S., Lemmon E.M., Lemmon A.R., et al. 2016. Implementing and testing the multispecies coalescent model: A valuable paradigm for phylogenomics. Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 94: 447-462.
12. Elshire R.J., Glaubitz J.C., Sun Q., Poland J.A., Kawamoto K., Buckler E.S., Mitchell S.E. 2011. A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. Plos One 6.
13. Faircloth B.C., McCormack J.E., Crawford N.G., Harvey M.G., Brumfield R.T., Glenn T.C. 2012. Ultraconserved elements anchor thousands of genetic markers spanning multiple evolutionary timescales. Syst. Biol. 61:717-726.
14. Galtier N., Daubin V. 2008. Dealing with incongruence in phylogenomic analyses. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B 363:4023-4029.
15. Gilbert P.S., Chang J., Pan C., Sobel E.M., Sinsheimer J.S., Faircloth B.C., Alfaro M.E. 2015. Genome-wide ultraconserved elements exhibit higher phylogenetic informativeness than traditional gene markers in percomorph fishes. Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 92:140-146.
16. Goodman M., Czelusniak J., Moore G., Romero-Herrera A., Matsuda G. 1979. Fitting the gene lineage into its species lineage, a parsimony strategy illustrated by cladograms constructed from globin sequences. Syst. Zool. 28:132-163.
17. Heled J., DrummondA.J. 2010. Bayesian inference of species trees from multilocus data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27:570-580.
18. Hovmoller R., Lacey Knowles L., Kubatko L.S. 2013. Effects of missing data on species tree estimation under the coalescent. Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 69:1057-1062.
19. Huang H., Knowles L.L. 2016. Unforeseen consequences of excluding missing data from next-generation sequences: simulation study of RAD sequences. Syst. Biol. 65:357-365.
20. Jeffroy O., Brinkmann H., Delsuc F., Philippe H. 2006. Phylogenomics: The beginning of incongruence? Trends Genet. 22:225-231.
21. Knowles L.L. 2009. Estimating species trees: methods of phylogenetic analysis when there is incongruence across genes. Syst. Biol. 58: 463-467.
22. Kumar S., Filipski A.J., Battistuzzi F.U., Kosakovsky Pond S.L., Tamura K. 2012. Statistics and truth in phylogenomics. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29:457-472.
23. Lanier H.C., Huang H., Knowles L.L. 2014. How low can you go? The effects of mutation rate on the accuracy of species-Tree estimation. Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 70:112-119.
24. Leache A.D., Harris R.B., Rannala B., Yang Z.H. 2014. The influence of gene flow on species tree estimation: A simulation study. Syst. Biol. 63:17-30.
25. Liu L., Wu S.Y., Yu L.L. 2015. Coalescent methods for estimating species trees from phylogenomic data. J. Syst. Evol. 53:380-390.
26. Liu L., Yu L., Edwards S.V. 2010. A maximum pseudo-likelihood approach for estimating species trees under the coalescent model. BMC Evol. Biol. 10:302.
27. Maddison W. 1997. Gene trees in species trees. Syst. Biol. 46:523-536.
28. Manthey J.D., Campillo L.C., Burns K.J., Moyle R.G. 2016. Comparison of target-capture and restriction-site associatedDNAsequencing for phylogenomics: A test in cardinalid tanagers (Aves, Genus: Piranga). Syst. Biol.
29. Mirarab S., Bayzid M.S., Boussau B., WarnowT. 2014. Statistical binning enables an accurate coalescent-based estimation of the avian tree. Science 346:1250463.
30. Mirarab S., Bayzid M.S., Warnow T. 2016. Evaluating summary methods for multilocus species tree estimation in the presence of incomplete lineage sorting. Syst. Biol. 65:366-380.
31. Nguyen N., Mirarab S., Warnow T. 2012. MRL and SuperFine+MRL: new supertree methods. Algorithms Mol. Biol. 7:3.
32. Nishihara H., Okada N., HasegawaM. 2007. Rooting the eutherian tree: The power and pitfalls of phylogenomics. Genome Biol. 8:R199.
33. Ogilvie H.A., Heled J., Xie D., Drummond A.J. 2016. Computational performance and statistical accuracy of BEAST and comparisons with other methods. Syst. Biol. 65:381-396.
34. Page R.D., Charleston M.A. 1997. From gene to organismal phylogeny: reconciled trees and the gene tree/species tree problem. Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 7:231-240.
35. Phillips M.J., Delsuc F., Penny D. 2004. Genome-scale phylogeny and the detection of systematic biases. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:1455-1458.
36. Ragan M.A. 1992. Phylogenetic inference based on matrix representation of trees. Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 1:53-58.
37. Rasmussen M.D., Kellis M. 2012.Unified modeling of gene duplication, loss, and coalescence using a locus tree. Genome Res. 22: 755-765.
38. Rodriguez-Ezpeleta N., Brinkmann H., Roure B., Lartillot N., Lang B.F., Philippe H. 2007. Detecting and overcoming systematic errors in genome-scale phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 56:389-399.
39. RogerA.J., Hug L.A. 2006. The origin and diversification of eukaryotes: problems with molecular phylogenetics and molecular clock estimation. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B 361:1039-1054.
40. Rubin B.E., Ree R.H., Moreau C.S. 2012. Inferring phylogenies from RAD sequence data. PloS One 7:e33394.
41. Salichos L., Rokas A. 2013. Inferring ancient divergences requires genes with strong phylogenetic signals. Nature 497: 327-331.
42. Simmons M.P. 2014. A confounding effect of missing data on character conflict in maximum likelihood and Bayesian MCMC phylogenetic analyses. Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 80:267-280.
43. Slowinski J.B., Page R.D. 1999. How should species phylogenies be inferred from sequence data? Syst. Biol. 48:814-825.
44. Springer M.S., Gatesy J. 2016. The gene tree delusion. Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 94:1-33.
45. Steel M., Rodrigo A. 2008. Maximum likelihood supertrees. Syst. Biol. 57:243-250.
46. Streicher J.W., Schulte J.A., 2nd, Wiens J.J. 2016. How should genes and taxa be sampled for phylogenomic analyses with missing data? An empirical study in Iguanian lizards. Syst. Biol. 65: 128-145.
47. Szollosi G.J., Boussau B., Abby S.S., Tannier E., Daubin V. 2012. Phylogenetic modeling of lateral gene transfer reconstructs the pattern and relative timing of speciations. Proc.NatlAcad. Sci. USA 109:17513-17518.
48. Szollosi G.J., Tannier E., Daubin V., Boussau B. 2015. The inference of gene trees with species trees. Syst. Biol. 64:E42-E62.
49. Tonini J., Moore A., Stern D., Shcheglovitova M., Orti G. 2015. Concatenation and species tree methods exhibit statistically indistinguishable accuracy under a range of simulated conditions. PLoS Curr. 7.
50. Wagner C.E., Keller I., Wittwer S., Selz O.M., Mwaiko S., Greuter L., Sivasundar A., Seehausen O. 2013. Genome-wide RAD sequence data provide unprecedented resolution of species boundaries and relationships in the Lake Victoria cichlid adaptive radiation. Mol. Ecol. 22:787-798.
51. Wiens J.J., Morrill M.C. 2011. Missing data in phylogenetic analysis: reconciling results from simulations and empirical data. Syst. Biol. 60:719-731.
52. Xi Z., Liu L., Davis C.C. 2016. The impact of missing data on species tree estimation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33:838-860.
53. Yu Y., Ristic N., Nakhleh L. 2013. Fast algorithms and heuristics for phylogenomics under ILS and hybridization. BMC Bioinform. 14.