Using contrails and animated sequences to visualize uncertainty in dynamic sensory profiles obtained from temporal check-all-that-apply (TCATA) data

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 54, Issue , 2016, Pages 90-100

  Castura, John C ^a   Baker, Allison K ^b   Ross, Carolyn F ^b  

^a Compusense Inc ^*  (Canada)

^b WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Animated sequences; Bootstrap scores; Contrails; Data concentration ellipses; TCATA; Temporal check all that apply; Virtual panels

Indexed keywords

EID: 84978732070     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.06.011     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ares, G., Jaeger, S.R., Antúnez, L., Vidal, L., Giménez, A., Coste, B., et al. Comparison of TCATA and TDS for dynamic sensory characterization of food products. Food Research International 78 (2015), 148–158.
2. Baker, A.K., Castura, J.C., Ross, C.F., Temporal check-all-that-apply characterization of Syrah wine finish. Journal of Food Science 81 (2016), S1521–S1529.
3. Boinbaser, L., Parente, M.E., Castura, J.C., Ares, G., Dynamic sensory characterization of cosmetic creams during application using temporal check-all-that-apply (TCATA) questions. Food Quality and Preference 45 (2015), 33–40.
4. Cadoret, M., Husson, F., Construction and evaluation of confidence ellipses applied at sensory data. Food Quality and Preference 28 (2013), 106–115.
5. Castura, J.C., Antúnez, L., Giménez, A., Ares, G., Temporal check-all-that-apply (TCATA): A novel temporal sensory method for characterizing products. Food Quality and Preference 47A (2016), 79–90.
6. Cochran, W.G., The comparison of percentages in matched samples. Biometrika 37 (1950), 256–266.
7. Dahl, T., Næs, T., Identifying outlying assessors in sensory profiling using fuzzy clustering and multi-block methodology. Food Quality and Preference 20 (2009), 287–294.
8. De Berg, M., van Kreveld, M., Overmars, M., Cheong, O., Computational geometry: Algorithms and applications. 3rd ed., 2008, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2–8.
9. Efron, B., Boostrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. Annals of Statistics 7 (1979), 1–26.
10. Fischer, U., Noble, A.C., The effect of ethanol, catechin concentration, and pH on sourness and bitterness of wine. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 45 (1994), 6–10.
11. Fontoin, H., Saucier, C., Teissedre, P.-L., Glories, Y., Effect of pH, ethanol and acidity on astringency and bitterness of grape seed tannin oligomers in model wine solution. Food Quality and Preference 19 (2008), 286–291.
12. Fox, J., Weisberg, S., An R Companion to Applied Regression. 2nd ed., 2011, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA Sage. URL: http://socserv.socsci.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Companion.
13. Friendly, M., Monette, G., Fox, J., Elliptical insights: Understanding statistical methods through elliptical geometry. Statistical Science 28 (2013), 1–39.
14. Greenacre, M., Tying up the loose ends in simple correspondence analysis. Economics Working Papers 940. 2006, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
15. Husson, F., Lê, S., Pagès, J., Confidence ellipse for the sensory profiles obtained by principal component analysis. Food Quality and Preference 16 (2005), 245–250.
16. Johnson, R.A., Wichern, D.W., Principal component analysis. Applied multivariate statistical analysis, 6th ed., 2007, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 430–480.
17. Legendre, P., Legendre, L., Ordination in reduced space. Numerical Ecology, 3rd ed. (English), 2012, Elsevier Science BV, Amsterdam, 425–521.
18. Lenfant, F., Loret, C., Pineau, N., Hartmann, C., Martin, N., Perception of oral food breakdown. The concept of sensory trajectory. Appetite 52 (2009), 659–667.
19. Martin, S., Pangborn, R.M., Taste interaction of ethyl alcohol with sweet, salty, sour, and bitter compounds. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 21 (1970), 653–655.
20. Meyners, M., Castura, J.C., Best practice recommendations for attribute order in CATA and related methodologies. Food Quality and Preference 48 (2015), 210–215.
21. Meyners, M., Castura, J.C., Carr, B.T., Existing and new approaches for the analysis of CATA data. Food Quality and Preference 30 (2013), 309–319.
22. Oliveira, D., Antúnez, L., Giménez, A., Castura, J.C., Deliza, R., Ares, G., Sugar reduction in probiotic chocolate-flavored milk: Impact on dynamic sensory profile and liking. Food Research International 75 (2015), 148–156.
23. Pineau, N., Schlich, P., Cordelle, S., Mathonnière, C., Issanchou, S., Imbert, A., et al. Temporal dominance of sensations: Construction of the TDS curves and comparison with time–intensity. Food Quality and Preference 20 (2009), 450–455.
24. R Core Team (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL: https://www.R-project.org/.
25. Rousseeuw, P.J., Ruts, I., Tukey, J.W., The bagplot: A bivariate boxplot. The American Statistician 53 (1999), 382–387.
26. Tucker, L.R., Some mathematical notes on three-mode factor analysis. Psychometrika 31 (1966), 279–311.