Identifying outlying assessors in sensory profiling using fuzzy clustering and multi-block methodology

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 287-294

  Dahl, Tobias ^a   Næs, Tormod ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^b NOFIMA   (Norway)

Author keywords

Fuzzy clustering; Multi block methods; Noise cluster; Outliers; Principal components

Indexed keywords

EID: 63249111733     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2008.12.001     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Berget I., Mevik B.-H., and Næs T. New modifications and applications of fuzzy C- means methodology. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 52 (2008) 2403-2418
2. Berget I., Mevik B.-H., Vebø H., and Næs T. A strategy for finding biological relevant clusters in microarray data. Journal of Chemometrics 19 (2005) 482-491
3. Bezdek J.C. Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithms (1981), Plenum Press
4. Brockhoff P.B., and Skovgaard I. Modelling individual differences between assessors in sensory evaluation. Food Quality and Preference 5 (1994) 215-224
5. Brockoff P., Hirst D., and Næs T. In: Næs T., and Risvik E. (Eds). Multivariate analysis of data in sensory science (1996), Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
6. Carroll, J. D. (1968). Generalisation of canonical analysis to three or more sets of variables. In Proceedings of the 76'th convention of the American Psychological Association. vol. 3, pp. 227-228.
7. Dahl T., and Næs T. Outlier and groups detection in sensory panels using hierarchical cluster analysis with the Procrustes distance. Food Quality and Preference 15 (2004) 195-208
8. Dahl T., and Næs T. A bridge between Tucker-1 and Carroll's generalised canonical analysis. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 50 11 (2006) 3086-3098
9. Dahl T., Tomic O., and Næs T. Some new tools for visualising multi-way sensory data. Food Quality and Preference 19 (2008) 103-113
10. Dave R.N. Characterization and detection of noise in clustering. Pattern Recognition Letters 12 (1991) 657-664
11. Gower J.C. Generalized Procrustes analysis. Psychometrica 45 1 (1975) 3-24
12. Hanafi M., and Kiers H. Analysis of K sets of data, with differential emphasis on agreement between and within sets. Computational statistics and data analysis 51 (2006) 1491-1508
13. Hanafi M., Mazerolles G., Dufour E., and Qannari E.M. Common components and specific weight analysis and multiple Co-inertia analysis applied to the coupling of several measurements techniques. Journal of Chemometrics 20 (2006) 1-12
14. Kohler A., Hanafi M., Bertrand D., Oust Janbu A., Møretrø T., Naderstad K., et al. Interpreting several types of measurements in bioscience. In: Lasch P., and Kneipp J. (Eds). Modern concepts in biomedical vibrational spectroscopy (2008), John Wiley & Sons, USA
15. Kroonenberg P., and DeLeeuw J. Principal components analysis of three-mode data by means of alternating least squares algorithms. Psychometrika 45 (1980) 69-97
16. Næs T. Handling individual differences between assessors in sensory profiling. Food Quality and Preference 2 (1990) 187-199
17. Næs T., and Kowalski B. Predicting sensory profiles from external instrumental measurements. Food Quality and Preference 4 5 (1989) 135-147
18. Pages J., and Husson F. Multiple factors analysis with confidence ellipses: a methodology to study the relationships between sensory and instr8umental data. Journal of Chemometrics 19 (2005) 138-144
19. Qannari E.M., Courcoux P., and Vigneau E. Common components and specific weights analysis performed on preference data. Food Quality and Preference 12 (2001) 365-368
20. Smilde A., Bro R., and Geladi P. Multi-way analysis (2004), Wiley, Chichester, UK
21. Schlich P. Defining and validating assessor compromises about product distances and attribute correlations. In: Næs T., and Risvik E. (Eds). Multivariate analysis of data in sensory science (1996), Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
22. Ten Berge J.M.F. Orthogonal Procrustes rotation for two or more matrices. Psychometrica 42 (1977) 267-276
23. Tucker L.R. The extension of factor analysis to three-dimensional matrices. In: Frederiksen N., and Gulliksen H. (Eds). Contributions to Mathematical Psychology (1964), Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York 110-182
24. Tucker L.R. Some mathematical notes on three-mode factor analysis. Psychometrika 31 (1966) 279-311
25. Van der Burg E., and Dijksterhuis G. Generalised canonical analysis of individual sensory profiles and instrumental data. In: Naes T., and Risvik E. (Eds). Multivariate analysis of data in sensory science (1996), Elsevier
26. Wakeling I.N., Raats M.N., and MacFie H.J.H. A new significance test for consensus in generalised procrustes analysis. Journal of Sensory Studies 7 (1992) 91-96
27. Wold J.P., Veberg A., Nilsen A., Iani V., Petras J., and Moan J. The role of naturally occuring chlorophyll and porphyrins in light-induced oxidation of dairy products. A study based on fluorescence spectroscopy and sensory analysis. International Dairy Journal 15 (2005) 343-353
28. Westerhuis J.H., Kourti T., and MacGregor J.F. Analysis of multiblock and hierarchical PCA and PLS models. Journal of Chemometrics 12 (1998) 301-321