A review on nanocellulosic fibres as new material for sustainable packaging: Process and applications

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Volumn 64, Issue , 2016, Pages 823-836

  Abdul Khalil, H P S ^a,b   Davoudpour, Y ^a   Saurabh, Chaturbhuj K ^a   Hossain, Md S ^a   Adnan, A S ^c   Dungani, R ^d   Paridah, M T ^b   Mohamed, Zaidul Islam Sarker ^e   Fazita, M R Nurul ^a   Syakir, M I ^a   Haafiz, M K M ^a  

^a Universiti Sains Malaysia   (Malaysia)

^b UNIVERSITY PUTRA MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

^c SCHOOL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Malaysia)

^d BANDUNG INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Indonesia)

^e INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Cellulose nanofiber; Design process; Eco friendly packaging; Natural fiber; Sustainable material

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; NANOCELLULOSE; NANOFIBERS; PACKAGING; PRODUCT DESIGN; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

BIO-BASED MATERIALS; CELLULOSE NANOFIBERS; DESIGN-PROCESS; ECO-FRIENDLY; ECO-FRIENDLY PACKAGING; PACKAGING APPLICATIONS; PACKAGING PROCESS; PRODUCT PACKAGING; SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS; SUSTAINABLE PACKAGING;

PACKAGING MATERIALS;

CELLULOSE; NATURAL FIBERS; PACKAGING;

EID: 84978374837     PISSN: 13640321     EISSN: 18790690     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.072     Document Type: Review

References (176)

1. [1] Scott, G., ‘Green’ polymers. Polym Degrad Stab 68:1 (2000), 1–7.
2. [2] Davis, G., Song, J., Biodegradable packaging based on raw materials from crops and their impact on waste management. Ind crops and Prod 23:2 (2006), 147–161.
3. [3] Rhim, J.-W., Ng, P.K., Natural biopolymer-based nanocomposite films for packaging applications. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 47:4 (2007), 411–433.
4. [4] Petersen, K., et al. Potential of biobased materials for food packaging. Trends Food Sci Technol 10:2 (1999), 52–68.
5. [5] Khalil, H.P.S.A., et al. Production and modification of nanofibrillated cellulose using various mechanical processes: a review. Carbohydr Polym 99 (2014), 649–665.
6. [6] Khalil, H.P.S.A., et al. High-pressure enzymatic hydrolysis to reveal physicochemical and thermal properties of bamboo fiber using a supercritical water fermenter. BioResources 9:4 (2014), 7710–7720.
7. [7] Khalil, H.P.S.A., et al. The role of soil properties and it's interaction towards quality plant fiber: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 43 (2015), 1006–1015.
8. [8] Zhao, R., Torley, P., Halley, P.J., Emerging biodegradable materials: starch-and protein-based bio-nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 43:9 (2008), 3058–3071.
9. [9] Kalia, S., et al. Cellulose-based bio-and nanocomposites: a review. Int J Polym Sci, 2011, 2011.
10. [10] Lee, S., Xu, X., Design for the environment: life cycle assessment and sustainable packaging issues. Int J Environ Technol Manag 5:1 (2005), 14–41.
11. [11] Ludueña, L., Vázquez, A., Alvarez, V., Effect of lignocellulosic filler type and content on the behavior of polycaprolactone based eco-composites for packaging applications. Carbohydr Polym 87:1 (2012), 411–421.
12. [12] Kamel, S., Nanotechnology and its applications in lignocellulosic composites, a mini review. Express Polym Lett 1:9 (2007), 546–575.
13. [13] Chauhan, V.S., Chakrabarti, S.K., Use of nanotechnology for high performance cellulosic and papermaking products. Cellulose Chem Technol, 46(5), 2012, 389.
14. [14] Thielemans, W., Warbey, C.R., Walsh, D.A., Permselective nanostructured membranes based on cellulose nanowhiskers. Green Chem 11:4 (2009), 531–537.
15. [15] Ashori, A., et al. Solvent-free acetylation of cellulose nanofibers for improving compatibility and dispersion. Carbohydr Polym 102 (2014), 369–375.
16. [16] Fatah, I.Y.A., et al. Exploration of a chemo-mechanical technique for the isolation of nanofibrillated cellulosic fiber from oil palm empty fruit bunch as a reinforcing agent in composites materials. Polymers 6:10 (2014), 2611–2624.
17. [17] Zhang, X., Tu, M., Paice, M.G., Routes to potential bioproducts from lignocellulosic biomass lignin and hemicelluloses. BioEnergy Res 4:4 (2011), 246–257.
18. [18] Jonoobi, M., et al. Chemical composition, crystallinity, and thermal degradation of bleached and unbleached kenaf bast (Hibiscus cannabinus) pulp and nanofibers. BioResources 4:2 (2009), 626–639.
19. [19] Siro, I., et al. Highly transparent films from carboxymethylated microfibrillated cellulose: the effect of multiple homogenization steps on key properties. J Appl Polym Sci 119:5 (2011), 2652–2660.
20. [20] Su, Y., et al. Characterization of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers in aqueous suspension by small-angle X-ray scattering. J Appl Crystallogr 47:2 (2014), 788–798.
21. [21] Davoudpour, Y., et al. Optimization of high pressure homogenization parameters for the isolation of cellulosic nanofibers using response surface methodology. Ind Crops Prod 74 (2015), 381–387.
22. [22] Khalil, H.P.S.A., et al. Bamboo fibre reinforced biocomposites: a review. Mater Des 42 (2012), 353–368.
23. [23] Gustafsson, J., et al. Surface characteristics of thermomechanical pulps; the influence of defibration temperature and refining. Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng Asp 225:1 (2003), 95–104.
24. [24] Alwani, M.S., et al. Microstructural study, tensile properties, and scanning electron microscopy fractography failure analysis of various agricultural residue fibers. J Nat Fibers 12:2 (2015), 154–168.
25. [25] Iwamoto, S., et al. Comparison study of TEMPO-analogous compounds on oxidation efficiency of wood cellulose for preparation of cellulose nanofibrils. Polym Degrad Stab 95:8 (2010), 1394–1398.
26. [26] Lee, K.Y., et al. Electrospinning of polysaccharides for regenerative medicine. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 61:12 (2009), 1020–1032.
27. [27] Fernando, D., et al. Micromorphology and topochemistry of extractives in Scots pine and Norway spruce thermomechanical pulps: a cytochemical approach. J Wood Sci 54:2 (2008), 134–142.
28. [28] Ghosh, S., Nag, D., Mechanical pulping for manufacture of hand made paper from Date-Palm leaves (Phoenix dactylifera-L). J Indian Chem Soc 87:6 (2010), 761–763.
29. [29] Benhamou, K., et al. Control of size and viscoelastic properties of nanofibrillated cellulose from palm tree by varying the TEMPO-mediated oxidation time. Carbohydr Polym 99 (2014), 74–83.
30. [30] Gonzalez, R.W., et al. Thermo-mechanical pulping as a pretreatment for agricultural biomass for biochemical conversion. BioResources 6:2 (2011), 1599–1614.
31. [31] Gon, D., et al. Jute composites as wood substitute. Int J Text Sci 1:6 (2012), 84–93.
32. [32] Mezencevova, A., et al. Influence of thermomechanical pulp fiber compositions on internal curing of cementitious materials. J Mater Civil Eng 24:8 (2011), 970–975.
33. [33] Shinoda, R., et al. Relationship between length and degree of polymerization of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibrils. Biomacromolecules 13:3 (2012), 842–849.
34. [34] Vanhatalo, K.M., Dahl, O.P., Effect of mild acid hydrolysis parameters on properties of microcrystalline cellulose. BioResources 9:3 (2014), 4729–4740.
35. [35] dos Santos Muguet, M.C., et al. Thermomechanical pulping of novel Brazilian Eucalyptus hybrids. Holzforschung 67:5 (2013), 489–495.
36. [36] Nayeri, M.D., et al. Medium density fibreboard made from kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) stem: effect of thermo-mechanical refining and resin content. BioResources 9:2 (2014), 2372–2381.
37. [37] Abou-Yousef, H., El-Sakhawy, M., Kamel, S., Multi-stage bagasse pulping by using alkali/Caro's acid treatment. Ind Crops Prod 21:3 (2005), 337–341.
38. [38] El-Sakhawy, M., Hassan, M.L., Physical and mechanical properties of microcrystalline cellulose prepared from agricultural residues. Carbohydr Polym 67:1 (2007), 1–10.
39. [39] El-Sakhawy, M., Effect of bleaching sequence on paper ageing. Polym Degrad Stab 87:3 (2005), 419–423.
40. [40] Ioelovich, M., Morag, E., Effect of cellulose structure on enzymatic hydrolysis. BioResources 6:3 (2011), 2818–2835.
41. [41] Adsul, M., et al. Enzymatic hydrolysis of delignified bagasse polysaccharides. Carbohydr Polym 62:1 (2005), 6–10.
42. [42] Rodríguez, A., et al. Rice straw pulp obtained by using various methods. Bioresour Technol 99:8 (2008), 2881–2886.
43. [43] Rahmati, H., Ebrahimi, P., Sedghi, M., Effect of Cooking condition and oxygen-deslignification on Bambusa tulda kraft pulping. Indian J Chem Technol 17:1 (2010), 74–77.
44. [44] Vu, T.H.M., Pakkanen, H., Alen, R., Delignification of bamboo (Bambusa procera acher): Part 1. Kraft pulping and the subsequent oxygen delignification to pulp with a low kappa number. Ind Crops Prod 19:1 (2004), 49–57.
45. [45] Jahan, M.S., Rahman, M.M., Effect of pre-hydrolysis on the soda-anthraquinone pulping of corn stalks and Saccharum spontaneum (kash). Carbohydr Polym 88:2 (2012), 583–588.
46. [46] Ho, C.-L., et al. Kinetic study of carbohydrate dissolution during tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol/HCL pulping of rice straw. BioResources 7:4 (2012), 5719–5736.
47. [47] Pönni, R., Galvis, L., Vuorinen, T., Changes in accessibility of cellulose during kraft pulping of wood in deuterium oxide. Carbohydr Polym 101 (2014), 792–797.
48. [48] Navarro, F., et al. Sisal chemo-thermomechanical pulp paper with a strongly hydrophobic surface coating produced by a pentafluorophenyldimethylsilane cold plasma. J Appl Polym Sci 112:1 (2009), 479–488.
49. [49] Peterlin, S., et al. Surface characterization of stepwise oxidized spruce thermomechanical pulp samples by different analytical methods. Cellulose 16:5 (2009), 833–839.
50. [50] Stupińska, H., et al. An environment-friendly method to prepare microcrystalline cellulose. Fibres Text Eastern Eur 5–6:64 (2007), 167–172.
51. [51] Saito, T., et al. TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose: Microscopic analysis of fibrous fractions in the oxidized products. Carbohydr Polym 65:4 (2006), 435–440.
52. [52] Pouyet, F., et al. Formation of carbonyl groups on cellulose during ozone treatment of pulp: Consequences for pulp bleaching. Carbohydr Polym 109 (2014), 85–91.
53. [53] Håkansson, H., Ahlgren, P., Acid hydrolysis of some industrial pulps: effect of hydrolysis conditions and raw material. Cellulose 12:2 (2005), 177–183.
54. [54] Pouyet, F., et al. Minimizing viscosity loss during totally chlorine-free bleaching of hardwood kraft pulp. BioResources 8:1 (2012), 238–249.
55. [55] Ko, J.K., et al. Effect of liquid hot water pretreatment severity on properties of hardwood lignin and enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 112:2 (2015), 252–262.
56. [56] Peresin, M.S., et al. Effect of moisture on electrospun nanofiber composites of poly (vinyl alcohol) and cellulose nanocrystals. Biomacromolecules 11:9 (2010), 2471–2477.
57. [57] Nada, A.-A.M., et al. Preparation and characterization of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC). BioResources 4:4 (2009), 1359–1371.
58. [58] Jahan, M.S., et al. Jute as raw material for the preparation of microcrystalline cellulose. Cellulose 18:2 (2011), 451–459.
59. [59] Adel, A.M., et al. Characterization of microcrystalline cellulose prepared from lignocellulosic materials. Part I. Acid catalyzed hydrolysis. Bioresour Technol 101:12 (2010), 4446–4455.
60. [60] Aracri, E., Vidal, T., Ragauskas, A.J., Wet strength development in sisal cellulose fibers by effect of a laccase–TEMPO treatment. Carbohydr Polym 84:4 (2011), 1384–1390.
61. [61] Puangsin, B., et al. TEMPO-mediated oxidation of hemp bast holocellulose to prepare cellulose nanofibrils dispersed in water. J Polym Environ 21:2 (2013), 555–563.
62. [62] Lee, J.-A., et al. Preparation and characterization of cellulose nanofibers (CNFs) from microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) and CNF/polyamide 6 composites. Macromol Res 22:7 (2014), 738–745.
63. [63] Lavoine, N., et al. Elaboration of a new antibacterial bio-nano-material for food-packaging by synergistic action of cyclodextrin and microfibrillated cellulose. Innov Food Sci Emerging Technol 26 (2014), 330–340.
64. [64] Kalia, S., et al. Nanofibrillated cellulose: surface modification and potential applications. Colloid Polym Sci 292:1 (2014), 5–31.
65. [65] Khalil, H.P.S.A., et al. Production and modification of nanofibrillated cellulose using various mechanical processes: a review. Carbohydr Polym 99 (2014), 649–665.
66. [66] Spence, K.L., et al. A comparative study of energy consumption and physical properties of microfibrillated cellulose produced by different processing methods. Cellulose 18:4 (2011), 1097–1111.
67. [67] Lavoine, N., et al. Microfibrillated cellulose–Its barrier properties and applications in cellulosic materials: a review. Carbohydr Polym 90:2 (2012), 735–764.
68. [68] Isik, M., Sardon, H., Mecerreyes, D., Ionic liquids and cellulose: dissolution, chemical modification and preparation of new cellulosic materials. Int J Mol Sci 15:7 (2014), 11922–11940.
69. [69] Ma, Z., Kotaki, M., Ramakrishna, S., Electrospun cellulose nanofiber as affinity membrane. J Membr Sci 265:1 (2005), 115–123.
70. [70] Deepa, B., et al. Structure, morphology and thermal characteristics of banana nano fibers obtained by steam explosion. Bioresour Technol 102:2 (2011), 1988–1997.
71. [71] Cherian, B.M., et al. Isolation of nanocellulose from pineapple leaf fibres by steam explosion. Carbohydr Polym 81:3 (2010), 720–725.
72. [72] Heitz, M., et al. Fractionation of Populus tremuloides at the pilot plant scale: Optimization of steam pretreatment conditions using the STAKE II technology. Bioresour Technol 35:1 (1991), 23–32.
73. [73] Anton, F., Method and Apparatus for Spinning, Google Patents; 1944.
74. [74] Marsh, K., Bugusu, B., Food packaging—roles, materials, and environmental issues. J Food Sci 72:3 (2007), R39–R55.
75. [75] Herrick, FW, et al. Microfibrillated cellulose: morphology and accessibility. In: ITT Rayonier Inc., Shelton, WA, J. Appl. Polym. Sci.: Appl. Polym. Symp. (United States); 1983.
76. [76] Dufresne, A., Vignon, M.R., Improvement of starch film performances using cellulose microfibrils. Macromolecules 31:8 (1998), 2693–2696.
77. [77] Goussé, C., et al. Surface silylation of cellulose microfibrils: preparation and rheological properties. Polymer 45:5 (2004), 1569–1575.
78. [78] Iwamoto, S., et al. Optically transparent composites reinforced with plant fiber-based nanofibers. Appl Phys A 81:6 (2005), 1109–1112.
79. [79] Kim, C.-W., et al. Structural studies of electrospun cellulose nanofibers. Polymer 47:14 (2006), 5097–5107.
80. [80] Pääkkö, M., et al. Enzymatic hydrolysis combined with mechanical shearing and high-pressure homogenization for nanoscale cellulose fibrils and strong gels. Biomacromolecules 8:6 (2007), 1934–1941.
81. [81] Abe, K., Iwamoto, S., Yano, H., Obtaining cellulose nanofibers with a uniform width of 15 nm from wood. Biomacromolecules 8:10 (2007), 3276–3278.
82. [82] Seydibeyoğlu, M.Ö., Oksman, K., Novel nanocomposites based on polyurethane and micro fibrillated cellulose. Compos Sci Technol 68:3 (2008), 908–914.
83. [83] Henriksson, M., et al. Cellulose nanopaper structures of high toughness. Biomacromolecules 9:6 (2008), 1579–1585.
84. [84] Yun, G.Y., et al. Effect of aligned cellulose film to the performance of electro-active paper actuator. Sens Actuators A: Phys 141:2 (2008), 530–535.
85. [85] Johnson, R.K., et al. A new bio-based nanocomposite: fibrillated TEMPO-oxidized celluloses in hydroxypropylcellulose matrix. Cellulose 16:2 (2009), 227–238.
86. [86] Ohkawa, K., et al. Preparation of pure cellulose nanofiber via electrospinning. Text Res J 79:15 (2009), 1396–1401.
87. [87] Quiévy, N., et al. Influence of homogenization and drying on the thermal stability of microfibrillated cellulose. Polym Degrad Stab 95:3 (2010), 306–314.
88. [88] Vartiainen, J., et al. Health and environmental safety aspects of friction grinding and spray drying of microfibrillated cellulose. Cellulose 18:3 (2011), 775–786.
89. [89] Jin, H., et al. Superhydrophobic and superoleophobic nanocellulose aerogel membranes as bioinspired cargo carriers on water and oil. Langmuir 27:5 (2011), 1930–1934.
90. [90] Chen, H., Yada, R., Nanotechnologies in agriculture: New tools for sustainable development. Trends Food Sci Technol 22:11 (2011), 585–594.
91. [91] Tischer, P.C.F., et al. Nanostructural reorganization of bacterial cellulose by ultrasonic treatment. Biomacromolecules 11:5 (2010), 1217–1224.
92. [92] Rattaz, A., et al. Cellulose nanofibres by sonocatalysed-TEMPO-oxidation. Cellulose 18:3 (2011), 585–593.
93. [93] Freire, M.G., et al. Electrospun nanosized cellulose fibers using ionic liquids at room temperature. Green Chem 13:11 (2011), 3173–3180.
94. [94] Kaushik, A., Singh, M., Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibrils from wheat straw using steam explosion coupled with high shear homogenization. Carbohydr Res 346:1 (2011), 76–85.
95. [95] Li, J., et al. Homogeneous isolation of nanocellulose from sugarcane bagasse by high pressure homogenization. Carbohydr Polym 90:4 (2012), 1609–1613.
96. [96] Ferrer, A., et al. Valorization of residual Empty Palm Fruit Bunch Fibers (EPFBF) by microfluidization: production of nanofibrillated cellulose and EPFBF nanopaper. Bioresour Technol 125 (2012), 249–255.
97. [97] Hassan, M.L., et al. Nanofibers from bagasse and rice straw: process optimization and properties. Wood Sci Technol 46:1-3 (2012), 193–205.
98. [98] Tanpichai, S., et al. Effective Young's modulus of bacterial and microfibrillated cellulose fibrils in fibrous networks. Biomacromolecules 13:5 (2012), 1340–1349.
99. [99] Jonoobi, M., Mathew, A.P., Oksman, K., Producing low-cost cellulose nanofiber from sludge as new source of raw materials. Ind Crops Prod 40 (2012), 232–238.
100. [100] Martínez-Sanz, M., Lopez-Rubio, A., Lagaron, J.M., Nanocomposites of ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer with thermally resistant cellulose nanowhiskers by melt compounding (I): morphology and thermal properties. J Appl Polym Sci 128:5 (2013), 2666–2678.
101. [101] Abraham, E., et al. X-ray diffraction and biodegradation analysis of green composites of natural rubber/nanocellulose. Polym Degrad Stab 97:11 (2012), 2378–2387.
102. [102] Uetani, K., Yano, H., Zeta potential time dependence reveals the swelling dynamics of wood cellulose nanofibrils. Langmuir 28:1 (2011), 818–827.
103. [103] Charani, P.R., et al. Production of microfibrillated cellulose from unbleached kraft pulp of Kenaf and Scotch Pine and its effect on the properties of hardwood kraft: microfibrillated cellulose paper. Cellulose 20:5 (2013), 2559–2567.
104. [104] Cao, X., et al. Novel spider-web-like nanoporous networks based on jute cellulose nanowhiskers. Carbohydr Polym 92:2 (2013), 2041–2047.
105. [105] Šutka, A, et al. Characterization of cellulose microfibrils obtained from Hemp. in conference papers in science. Hindawi Publishing Corporation; 2013.
106. [106] Li, J., et al. Homogeneous isolation of nanocelluloses by controlling the shearing force and pressure in microenvironment. Carbohydr Polym 113 (2014), 388–393.
107. [107] Karimi, S., et al. Kenaf bast cellulosic fibers hierarchy: a comprehensive approach from micro to nano. Carbohydr Polym 101 (2014), 878–885.
108. [108] Nair, S.S., et al. Characterization of cellulose nanofibrillation by micro grinding. J Nanopart Res 16:4 (2014), 1–10.
109. [109] Li, Y., et al. High Yield Preparation Method of Thermally Stable Cellulose Nanofibers. BioResources 9:2 (2014), 1986–1997.
110. [110] He, X., et al. Uniaxially aligned electrospun all-cellulose nanocomposite nanofibers reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals: scaffold for tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules 15:2 (2014), 618–627.
111. [111] Wang, W., et al. Production of cellulose nanofibrils from bleached eucalyptus fibers by hyperthermostable endoglucanase treatment and subsequent microfluidization. Cellulose 22:1 (2015), 351–361.
112. [112] Savadekar, N., et al. Preparation of cotton linter nanowhiskers by high-pressure homogenization process and its application in thermoplastic starch. Appl Nanosci 5:3 (2014), 281–290.
113. [113] Chen, H., Chemical composition and structure of natural lignocellulose. Hongzhang, Chen, (eds.) Biotechnology of lignocellulose, 2014, Springer, 25–71.
114. [114] Siqueira, G., Bras, J., Dufresne, A., Cellulosic bionanocomposites: a review of preparation, properties and applications. Polymers 2:4 (2010), 728–765.
115. [115] Moon, R.J., et al. Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 40:7 (2011), 3941–3994.
116. [116] Dorrestijn, E., et al. The occurrence and reactivity of phenoxyl linkages in lignin and low rank coal. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 54:1 (2000), 153–192.
117. [117] Heredia, A., Jiménez, A., Guillén, R., Composition of plant cell walls. Z Lebensm-Unters Forsch 200:1 (1995), 24–31.
118. [118] McKendry, P., Energy production from biomass (Part 1): overview of biomass. Bioresour Technol 83:1 (2002), 37–46.
119. [119] Célino, A., et al. The hygroscopic behavior of plant fibers: a review. Front Chem, 2013, 1.
120. [120] Madsen, B., Gamstedt, E.K., Wood versus plant fibers: similarities and differences in composite applications. Adv Mater Sci Eng, 2013, 2013.
121. [121] Nogi, M., Yano, H., Transparent nanocomposites based on cellulose produced by bacteria offer potential innovation in the electronics device industry. Adv Mater 20:10 (2008), 1849–1852.
122. [122] Singh, A., Sharma, P.K., Malviya, R., Eco friendly pharmaceutical packaging material. World Appl Sci J 14:11 (2011), 1703–1716.
123. [123] De Moura, M.R., Mattoso, L.H., Zucolotto, V., Development of cellulose-based bactericidal nanocomposites containing silver nanoparticles and their use as active food packaging. J Food Eng 109:3 (2012), 520–524.
124. [124] Nafchi, A.M., et al. Antimicrobial, rheological, and physicochemical properties of sago starch films filled with nanorod-rich zinc oxide. J Food Eng 113:4 (2012), 511–519.
125. [125] Jayaramudu, J., et al. Structure and properties of poly (lactic acid)/Sterculia urens uniaxial fabric biocomposites. Carbohydr Polym 94:2 (2013), 822–828.
126. [126] Aluigi, A., et al. Composite biomaterials from fibre wastes: characterization of wool–cellulose acetate blends. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf 39:1 (2008), 126–132.
127. [127] Ghaderi, M., et al. All-cellulose nanocomposite film made from bagasse cellulose nanofibers for food packaging application. Carbohydr Polym 104 (2014), 59–65.
128. [128] Müller, C.M., Laurindo, J.B., Yamashita, F., Effect of cellulose fibers on the crystallinity and mechanical properties of starch-based films at different relative humidity values. Carbohydr Polym 77:2 (2009), 293–299.
129. [129] Neo, Y.P., et al. Evaluation of gallic acid loaded zein sub-micron electrospun fibre mats as novel active packaging materials. Food Chem 141:3 (2013), 3192–3200.
130. [130] Youssef, A.M., El-Samahy, M.A., Rehim, M.H.A., Preparation of conductive paper composites based on natural cellulosic fibers for packaging applications. Carbohydr Polym 89:4 (2012), 1027–1032.
131. [131] Khatri, V., et al. ZnO-modified cellulose fiber sheets for antibody immobilization. Carbohydr Polym 109 (2014), 139–147.
132. [132] Sanchez-Garcia, M., Gimenez, E., Lagaron, J., Morphology and barrier properties of solvent cast composites of thermoplastic biopolymers and purified cellulose fibers. Carbohydr Polym 71:2 (2008), 235–244.
133. [133] Small, A.C., Johnston, J.H., Novel hybrid materials of magnetic nanoparticles and cellulose fibers. J Colloid Interface Sci 331:1 (2009), 122–126.
134. [134] Fortunati, E., et al. Investigation of thermo-mechanical, chemical and degradative properties of PLA-limonene films reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals extracted from Phormium tenax leaves. Eur Polym J 56 (2014), 77–91.
135. [135] Gutiérrez, M.C., De Paoli, M.-A., Felisberti, M.I., Cellulose acetate and short curauá fibers biocomposites prepared by large scale processing: reinforcing and thermal insulating properties. Ind Crops Prod 52 (2014), 363–372.
136. [136] Yang, Q., Lue, A., Zhang, L., Reinforcement of ramie fibers on regenerated cellulose films. Compos Sci Technol 70:16 (2010), 2319–2324.
137. [137] Reddy, J.P., Rhim, J.-W., Characterization of bionanocomposite films prepared with agar and paper-mulberry pulp nanocellulose. Carbohydr Polym 110 (2014), 480–488.
138. [138] Yousefi, H., et al. Comparative study of paper and nanopaper properties prepared from bacterial cellulose nanofibers and fibers/ground cellulose nanofibers of canola straw. Ind Crops Prod 43 (2013), 732–737.
139. [139] Moroa, L., Starch-based biodegradable materials suitable for thermoforming packaging. Starch/Stärke 53 (2001), 368–371.
140. [140] Bradley, E.L., Castle, L., Chaudhry, Q., Applications of nanomaterials in food packaging with a consideration of opportunities for developing countries. Trends Food Sci Technol 22:11 (2011), 604–610.
141. [141] Paunonen, S., Strength and barrier enhancements of cellophane and cellulose derivative films: a review. BioResources 8:2 (2013), 3098–3121.
142. [142] Flisberg, P., Rönnqvist, M., Nilsson, S., Billerud optimizes its bleaching process using online optimization. Interfaces 39:2 (2009), 119–132.
143. [143] Harms, R.W., Freamon, B.K., Blight, D.W., Indian ocean slavery in the age of abolition. 2013, Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, United States.
144. [144] Zadbuke, N., et al. Recent trends and future of pharmaceutical packaging technology. J Pharm Bioallied Sci, 5(2), 2013, 98.
145. [145] Reddy, N., Yang, Y., Biofibers from agricultural byproducts for industrial applications. Trends Biotechnol 23:1 (2005), 22–27.
146. [146] Kamel, S., et al. Pharmaceutical significance of cellulose: a review. Express Polym Lett 2:11 (2008), 758–778.
147. [147] Kosior, E., Braganca, R.M., Fowler, P., Lightweight compostable packaging: literature review. 2006, The Waste & Resources Action Programme, Oxon.
148. [148] Mülhaupt, R., Green polymer chemistry and bio-based plastics: dreams and reality. Macromol Chem Phys 214:2 (2013), 159–174.
149. [149] Nomikos, S, et al. Exploring cross-media concepts for future packaging – challenges for the printing industry. In: Proceedings of the 32nd IARIGAI international conference, Citeseer; 2005.
150. [150] Arora, A., Padua, G., Review: nanocomposites in food packaging. J Food Sci 75:1 (2010), R43–R49.
151. [151] Venkateshwarlu, G., Nagalakshmi, K., Developments in bionanocomposite films: prospects for eco-friendly and smart food packaging. Biotechnol Dev, 2013, 51.
152. [152] Liu, H., Yang, S., Ni, Y., Effect of pulp fines on the dye−fiber interactions during the color-shading process. Ind Eng Chem Res 49:18 (2010), 8544–8549.
153. [153] Siqueira, G., Bras, J., Dufresne, A., Cellulosic bionanocomposites: a review of preparation, properties and applications. Ploymers, 2010, 728–765.
154. [154] Restuccia, D., et al. New EU regulation aspects and global market of active and intelligent packaging for food industry applications. Food Control 21:11 (2010), 1425–1435.
155. [155] Rezaei, A., Nasirpour, A., Fathi, M., Application of cellulosic nanofibers in food science using electrospinning and its potential risk. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Safety 14:3 (2015), 269–284.
156. [156] Vargas, F., et al. Cellulosic pulps of cereal straws as raw material for the manufacture of ecological packaging. BioResources 7:3 (2012), 4161–4170.
157. [157] Yan, Q., et al. Effects of extrusion and glycerol content on properties of oxidized and acetylated corn starch-based films. Carbohydr Polym 87:1 (2012), 707–712.
158. [158] Bilck, A.P., et al. Efficacy of some biodegradable films as pre-harvest covering material for guava. Sci Hortic 130:1 (2011), 341–343.
159. [159] Salmieri, S., et al. Antimicrobial nanocomposite films made of poly (lactic acid)-cellulose nanocrystals (PLA-CNC) in food applications: Part A—effect of nisin release on the inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes in ham. Cellulose 21:3 (2014), 1837–1850.
160. [160] López, O.V., et al. Food packaging bags based on thermoplastic corn starch reinforced with talc nanoparticles. Food Hydrocoll 43 (2015), 18–24.
161. [161] Valdés, A., et al. Natural additives and agricultural wastes in biopolymer formulations for food packaging. Front Chem, 2, 2014.
162. [162] Guzman, A., Gnutek, N., Janik, H., Biodegradable polymers for food packing-factors influencing their degradation and certification types-a comprehensive review. Chem Chem Technol 5:1 (2011), 115–123.
163. [163] Yam, K.L., Lee, D.S., Emerging food packaging technologies: principles and practice, 2012, Elsevier, 80 High Street, Sawston, Cambridge CB22 3HJ, UK.
164. [164] Zhang, H.C., et al. Environmentally conscious design and manufacturing: a state-of-the-art survey. J Manuf Syst 16:5 (1997), 352–371.
165. [165] Lewis, H., Verghese, K., Fitzpatrick, L., Evaluating the sustainability impacts of packaging: the plastic carry bag dilemma. Packaging Technol Sci 23:3 (2010), 145–160.
166. [166] Ljungberg, L.Y., Materials selection and design for development of sustainable products. Mater Des 28:2 (2007), 466–479.
167. [167] McDonough, W., Braungart, M., Cradle to cradle: remaking the way we make things, 2010, MacMillan, 19 Union Square West, New York 1003, United States.
168. [168] Fricke, G., Successful individual approaches in engineering design. Res Eng Des 8:3 (1996), 151–165.
169. [169] Bieniawski, ZT. Principles of engineering design for rock mechanics, Rock Mechanics, In: Proceedings of the 33rd US Symposium on Rock Mechanics. Tillerson and Wawersik US; 1992. p. 1031–1040.
170. [170] Chikofsky, E.J., Cross, J.H., Reverse engineering and design recovery: A taxonomy. IEEE Softw 7:1 (1990), 13–17.
171. [171] Benavides, E.M., Advanced engineering design: an integrated approach, 2011, Elsevier, 80 High Street, Sawston, Cambridge CB22 3HJ, UK.
172. [172] Nemoto, J., et al. Simple freeze-drying procedure for producing nanocellulose aerogel-containing, high-performance air filters. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:35 (2015), 19809–19815.
173. [173] Hossain, M.S., et al. Selective extraction, separation and recovery of Cu(II) in presence of Zn(II) and Ni(II) from leach liquor of waste printed circuit board using microcapsules coated with Cyanex 272. Korean J Chem Eng 29:5 (2012), 668–675.
174. [174] Mishra, S.P., et al. Production of nanocellulose from native cellulose–various options utilizing ultrasound. BioResources 7:1 (2011), 0422–0436.
175. [175] Suhaily, S., et al. A review of oil palm biocomposites for furniture design and applications: potential and challenges. BioResources 7:3 (2012), 4400–4423.
176. [176] Poole, S., Simon, M., Technological trends, product design and the environment. Des Stud 18:3 (1997), 237–248.