Comparative study of paper and nanopaper properties prepared from bacterial cellulose nanofibers and fibers/ground cellulose nanofibers of canola straw

Industrial Crops and Products

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 732-737

  Yousefi, Hossein ^a,b   Faezipour, Mehdi ^a   Hedjazi, Sahab ^a   Mousavi, Mohammad Mazhari ^c   Azusa, Yoshio ^b   Heidari, Amir Hossein ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN   (Iran)

^b KOBE UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c GORGAN UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND NATURAL RESOURCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Canola straw; Ground and bacterial cellulose nanofibers; Nanopaper; Paper

Indexed keywords

AVERAGE DIAMETER; BACTERIAL CELLULOSE; BARRIER PROPERTIES; CELLULOSE NANOFIBERS; COMPARATIVE STUDIES; CONTROL SAMPLES; CRYSTALLINITIES; MICRO-FIBER; MICROFIBERS; NANOPAPER; ONSET TEMPERATURE; YOUNG'S MODULUS;

CELLULOSE; ELASTIC MODULI; GRINDING (MACHINING); PAPER; TENSILE STRENGTH;

NANOFIBERS;

BACTERIUM; BIODEGRADATION; CANOLA; CELLULOSE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CRYSTALLINITY; PERMEABILITY; STRAW; TENSILE STRENGTH; YOUNG MODULUS;

BACTERIA; CELLULOSE; GRINDING; PAPER; TENSILE STRENGTH;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); BRASSICA NAPUS; BRASSICA NAPUS VAR. NAPUS;

EID: 84866290819     PISSN: 09266690     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.08.030     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Abe K., Iwamoto S., Yano H. Obtaining cellulose nano fibers with a uniform width of 15nm from wood. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8:8276-8287.
2. Abe K., Yano H. Comparison of the characteristics of cellulose microfibril aggregates of wood, rice straw and potato tuber. Cellulose 2009, 16:1017-1023.
3. Alexander L.E. X-ray Diffraction Methods in Polymer Science 1969, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
4. Barud M., Dexpert-Ghys J., Messaddeq Y., Ribeiro S.J.L. Self supported silver nanoparticles containing bacterial cellulose membrane. Mater. Sci. Eng. C-Biomim Supramol. Syst. 2008, 20:515-518.
5. Berglund L., Peijs T. Cellulose biocomposites-from bulk moldings to nanostructured systems. MRS Bull. 2010, 35:201-207.
6. Bras J., Hassan M.L., Bruzesse C., Hassan E.A., El-Wakil N.A., Dufresne A. Mechanical, barrier, and biodegradability properties of bagasse cellulose whiskers reinforced natural rubber nanocomposites. Indus. Crop. Prod. 2010, 32:627-633.
7. Brown A.J. An acetic ferment which forms cellulose. J. Chem. Soc. 1886, 49:432-439.
8. Eichhorn S.J., Dufresne A., Aranguren M., Marcovich N.E., Capadona J.R., Rowan S.J., Weder C., Thielemans W., Roman M., Renneckar S., Gindl W., Veigel, Yano H., Abe K., Nogi M., Nakagaito A.N., Mangalam A., Simonsen J., Benight A.S., Bismarck A., Berglund L.A., Peijs T. Current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposites. J. Mater. Sci. 2010, 45:1-13.
9. Fendler A., Villanueva M.P., Giminez E., Lagarón J.M. Characterization of the barrier properties of composites of HDPE and purified cellulose fibers. Cellulose 2007, 14:427-438.
10. Frey M., Joo Y., Kim C.W. Waste fiber can be recycled into valuable products using new technique of electrospinning. Polym. Prepr. 2003, 44:168-169.
11. Gao W.H., Chen K.F., Yang R.D., Yang F., Han W.J. Properties of bacterial cellulose and its influence on the physical properties of paper. Bioresources 2010, 6:144-153.
12. Garvey C.J., Parker I.H., Simon G.P. On the interpretation of X-ray diffraction powder patterns in terms of the nanostructure of cellulose I fibres. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2005, 206:1568-1575.
13. Gatenholm P., Klemm D. Bacterial nanocellulose as a renewable material for biomedical applications. MRS Bull. 2010, 35:208-213.
14. Gea S., Torres F.G., Troncoso O.P., Reynolds C.T., Vilaseca F., Iguchi M., Peijs T. Biocomposites based on bacterial cellulose and apple and radish pulp. J. Biobased Mater. Bioenerg. 2007, 22:497-501.
15. Hedjazi S., Kordsachia O., Patt R., Jahan Latibari A., Tschirner U. Alkaline sulfite-anthraquinone (AS/AQ) pulping of wheat straw and totally chlorine free (TCF) bleaching of pulps. Indus. Crop. Prod. 2009, 29:27-36.
16. Henriksson M., Henriksson G., Berglundm L.A., Lindstrom T. An environmentally friendly method for enzyme assisted preparation of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) nanofibers. Eur Polym. J. 2007, 43:3434-3441.
17. Henriksson M., Berglund L., Isaksson P., Lindström T., Nishino T. Cellulose nanopaper structures of high toughness. Biomacromolecules 2008, 9:1579-1585.
18. Isogai A., Saito T., Fukuzumi H. TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers. Nanoscale 2011, 3:71-85.
19. Iwamoto S., Nakagaito A.N., Yano H. Nano-fibrillation of pulp fibers for the processing of transparent nanocomposites. Appl. Phys. A 2007, 89:461-466.
20. Janardhnan S., Sain M. Isolation of cellulose microfibrils: an enzymatic approach. Bioresources 2006, 1:176-188.
21. Klemm D., Kramer F., Moritz S., Lindström T., Ankerfors M., Gray D., Dorris A. Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2011, 50:5438-5466.
22. Lavoine N., Desloges I., Dufresne A., Bras J. Microfibrillated cellulose-its barrier properties and applications in cellulosic materials: a review. Carbohyd. Polym. 2012, 90:735-764.
23. Nakagaito N., Iwamoto S., Yano H. Bacterial cellulose: the ultimate nano-scalar cellulose morphology for the production of high-strength composites. Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. 2005, 80:93-97.
24. Nishino T., Arimoto N. All-cellulose composite by selective dissolving of fiber surface. Biomacromolecules 2006, 8:2712-2716.
25. Poland C.A., Duffin R., Kinloch I. Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestoslike pathogenicity in a pilot study. Nature Nanotech. 2008, 3:423-428.
26. Ranby B.G. Aqueous colloidal solutions of cellulose micelles. Acta Chem. Scand. 1949, 3:649-650.
27. Saito T., Kimura S., Nishiyama Y., Isogai A. Cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8:2485.
28. Sehaqui H., Zhou Q., Ikkala O., Berglund L.A. Strong and tough cellulose nanopaper with high specific surface area and porosity. Biomacromolecules 2011, 12:3638-3644.
29. Siro I., Plackett D. Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: as review. Cellulose 2010, 17:459-494.
30. Soykeabkaew N., Chandeep S., Nishino T., Peijs T. All-cellulose nanocomposites by surface selective dissolution of bacterial cellulose. Cellulose 2009, 16:435-444.
31. Swatloski R.P., Spear S.K., Holbrey J.D., Rogers R.D. Dissolution of cellulose with ionic liquids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124:4974-4975.
32. Syverud K., Stenius P. Strength and barrier properties of MFC films. Cellulose 2009, 16:75-85.
33. Taniguchi T., Okamura K. New films produced from microfibrillated natural fibres. Polym. Int. 1998, 47:291-294.
34. Turbak A.F., Snyder F.W., Sandberg K.R. Microfibrillated cellulose, a new cellulose product: properties, uses, and commercial potential. Appl. Polym. Sci. Appl. Polym. Symp. 1983, 37:815-827.
35. Ummartyotin S., Juntaro J., Sain M., Manuspiya H. Development of transparent bacterial cellulose nanocomposite film as substrate for flexible organic light emitting diode (OLED) display. Indus. Crop. Prod. 2012, 35:92-97.
36. Yamanaka S., Watanabe K., Kitamura N., Iguchi M., Mitsuhashi S., Nishi Y., Uryu M. Structure and mechanical properties of sheets prepared from bacterial cellulose. J. Mater. Sci. 1989, 24:3141-3145.
37. Yousefi H. Canola straw as a bio-waste resource for medium density fiberboard (MDF) manufacture. Waste Manage. 2009, 29:2644-2648.
38. Yousefi H., Faezipour M., Nishino T., Shakeri A., Ebrahimi G. All-cellulose composite and nanocomposite made from partially dissolved micro and nano fibers of canola straw. Polym. J. 2011, 43:559-564.
39. Yousefi H., Nishino T., Faezipour M., Ebrahimi G., Shakeri A. Direct fabrication of nanocomposite from cellulose microfibers using ionic liquid-based nanowelding. Biomacromolecules 2011, 12:4080-4085.