Digital Equity and Students’ Home Computing: A Hong Kong Study

Asia-Pacific Education Researcher

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 509-518

  Yuen, Allan H K ^a   Lau, Wilfred W F ^b   Park, Jae Hyung ^c   Lau, Gervas K K ^a   Chan, Albert K M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^c THE EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Digital equity; Gender difference; Home computing; ICT in education; Parental mediation; Socioeconomic difference

Indexed keywords

EID: 84978148535     PISSN: 01195646     EISSN: 22437908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s40299-016-0276-3     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Anderson, R. E., & Plomp, T. (2008). National Contexts. In N. Law, W. Pelgrum, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Pedagogy and ICT Use in schools around the world: Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 Study (pp. 37–66). Hong Kong SAR: Springer.
2. Angus, L., Snyder, I., & Sutherland-Smith, W. (2004). ICT and educational (dis)advantage: Families, computers and contemporary social and educational inequalities. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(1), 3–18.
3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.
4. BECTA. (2003). ImpaCT2: The impact of information and communication technologies on pupil learning and attainment. Coventry: Becta Report.
5. BECTA. (2008). Meeting their potential: the role of education and technology in overcoming disadvantage and disaffection in young people. Coventry: Becta Research Report.
6. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.
7. Bourdieu, P. (1996) [1989]. The state nobility: Elite schools in the field of power. Stanford University Press, Stanford.
8. Bucy, E. P., & Newhagen, J. E. (2004). Media access: Social and psychological dimensions of new technology use. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum.
9. Carveth, R., & Kretchmer, S. B. (2002). Policy options to combat the digital divide in Western Europe. Informing Science, 5(3), 115–123.
10. Chan, Y. M. (2000). Self-esteem: A cross-cultural comparison of British-Chinese white-British and Hong Kong Chinese children. Educational Psychology, 20(1), 59–74.
11. Chan, K., & Ng, Y. L. (2012). Segmentation of Chinese adolescent girls using gender roles and ideal female images. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29(7), 521–531.
12. Clark, L. S. (2011). Parental mediation theory for the digital age. Communication Theory, 21, 323–343.
13. Compaine, B. M. (2001). The digital divide: Facing a crisis or creating a myth?. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Davis, C., & Jewitt, C. (2011). Introduction to the special issue on parental engagement in children’s uses of technologies for learning: Putting policy into practice in the home. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 27, 289–291.
15. DeCoster, J. (2004). Data analysis in SPSS. Retrieved October 2, 2015 from http://www.stat-help.com/notes.html.
16. Drotner, K. (2008). Leisure is hard work: Digital practices and future competencies. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media (John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning) (p. 167). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
17. Durndell, A., Glissov, P., & Siann, G. (1995). Gender and computing: Persisting differences. Educational Research, 37(3), 219–227.
18. EMB. (2004). Empowering learning and teaching with information technology, July 2004. Hong Kong: Education and Manpower Bureau, Hong Kong SAR Government.
19. Facer, K., Furlong, J., Furlong, R., & Sutherland, R. (2001). Constructing the child computer user: From public policy to private practices. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 22(1), 91–108.
20. Gamoran, A. (2001). American schooling and educational inequality: A forecast for the 21st century. Sociology of Education, 2001, 135–153.
21. Gannon, S. (2008). ‘Twenty-four seven on the computers’: Girls ICTs and risk. Gender & Education, 20(4), 361–373.
22. Gil-Aluja, J. (2004). Fuzzy sets in the management of uncertainty. Berlin, New York: Springer.
23. Gunkel, D. J. (2003). Second thoughts: Toward a critique of the digital divide. New Media & Society, 5(4), 499–522.
24. Harris, S. (1999). Secondary school students’ use of computers at home. British Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4), 331–339.
25. Hollingworth, S., Mansaray, A., Allen, K., & Rose, A. (2011). Parents’ perspectives on technology and children’s learning in the home: Social class and the role of the habitus. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(4), 347–360.
26. Jenkins, H. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
27. Jewitt, C., & Parashar, U. (2011). Technology and learning at home: Findings from the evaluation of the home access programme pilot. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 27, 303–313.
28. Johnson, N. (2009). Teenage technological experts’ views of schooling. Australian Educational Researcher, 36, 59–72.
29. Kalmus, V., Realo, A., & Siibak, A. (2011). Motives for Internet use and their relationships with personality traits and socio-demographic factors. Trames, 15(65/60), 385–403.
30. Kapitzke, C. (2000). Information technology as cultural capital: Shifting the boundaries of power. Education and Information Technologies, 5(1), 49–62.
31. Kerawalla, L., & Crook, C. (2002). Children’s computer use at home and at school: Context and continuity. British Educational Research Journal, 28(6), 751–771.
32. Lareau, A. (2000). Home advantage: Social class and parental intervention in elementary education (2nd ed.). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
33. Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhoods class, race, and family life. Berkeley and Los Angeles, California: University of California Press.
34. Lau, W.F. & Yuen, A.H.K. (2014). Internet ethics of adolescents: Understanding demographic differences, Computers & Education, 72, 378–385.
35. Li, L. H. (2011). Impact of housing design factors on children’s conduct at school: An empirical study of Hong Kong. Journal of Housing and Building Environment, 26, 427–439.
36. Light, J. S. (2001). Rethinking the digital divide. Harvard Educational Review, 71(4), 709–774.
37. Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A., & Ólafsson, K. (2011). EU kids online final report. London: The London School of Economics and Political Science.
38. Loader, B. (1998). Cyberspace divide: Equality, agency and policy in the information society. London; New York: Routledge.
39. Moghaddam, G. G. (2010). Information technology and gender gap: Toward a global view. The Electronic Library, 28(5), 722–733.
40. Sáinz, M., & López-Sáez, M. (2010). Gender differences in computer attitudes and the choice of technology-related occupations in a sample of secondary students in Spain. Computers & Education, 54(2), 578–587.
41. Sefton-Green, J. (2004). Literature review in informal learning with technology outside school. Bristol: Futurelab.
42. Selwyn, N. (1998). The effect of using a home computer on students’ educational use of IT. Computers & Education, 31, 211–227.
43. Selwyn, N. (2011). Schools and schooling in the digital age. London: Routledge.
44. Shek, D. T. L. (1999). Assessment of global parenting style and specific parenting behavior in a Chinese context. Psychologia, 42, 69–79.
45. Shek, Daniel T. L., & Lee, T. Y. (2007). Family life quality and emotional quality of life in Chinese adolescents with and without economic disadvantage. Social Indicator Research, 80, 393–410.
46. Sølvberg, A. (2002). Gender differences in computer-related control beliefs and home computer use. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 46(4), 409–426.
47. Spera, C. (2005). A review of the relationship among parenting practices parenting styles, and adolescent school achievement. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 125–146.
48. Sutherland, R., Facer, K., Furlong, R., & Furlong, J. (2000). A new environment for education? The computer in the Home. Computers & Education, 34, 195–212.
49. Sutton, R. E. (1991). Equity and computers in the schools: A decade of research. Review of Educational Research, 61(4), 475–503.
50. Tacq, J. (1997). Multivariate analysis techniques in social science research. London: Sage Publications.
51. Tondeur, J., Sinnaeve, I., van Houtte, M., & van Braak, J. (2010). ICT as cultural capital: The relationship between socioeconomic status and the computer-use profile of young people. New Media Society, 13(1), 151–168.
52. Turkle, S. (2005). The second self: Computers and the human spirit, twentieth anniversary edition. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
53. Valcke, M., Bonte, S., De Wever, B., & Rots, I. (2010). Internet parenting styles and the impact on Internet use of primary school children. Computers & Education, 55(2), 454–464.
54. van Braak, J., & Kavadias, D. (2005). The influence of social-demographic determinants on secondary school children’s computer use. Experience, Beliefs and Competence, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 14(1), 43–59.
55. van Dijk, J. (2012). The network society (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
56. Vekiri, I. (2010). Socioeconomic differences in elementary students’ ICT beliefs and out-of-school experience. Computers & Education, 54, 941–950.
57. Volman, M., & van Eck, E. (2001). Gender equity and information technology in education: The second decade. Review of Educational Research, 71(4), 613–634.
58. Vryonides, M. (2009). Applying Bourdieu’s concepts of social and cultural capital in educational research in Greece and Cyprus. In K. Robson & C. Sanders (Eds.), Quantifying theory: Pierre Bourdieu. Berlin: Springer.
59. Wan, C., Tam, K., Lau, I. Y., Chiu, C., Lee, S., & Peng, S. (2007). Perceived cultural importance and actual self-importance of values in cultural identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(2), 337–354.
60. Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
61. Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access. Use, and Outcomes, Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 179–225.
62. Wellington, Jerry. (2001). Exploring the secret garden: The growing importance of ICT in the home. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(2), 233–244.
63. Winner, L. (1986). The whale and the reactor: A search for limits in an age of high technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
64. Yu, M., Yuen, A.H.K., & Park, J., (2012). Students' computer use at home: A study on family environment and parental influence. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 7(1), 3–23.
65. st century. Hong Kong: Centre for Information Technology in Education, The University of Hong Kong.