Studying movement, hybridity, and change: Toward a multi-sited sensibility for research on learning across contexts and borders

Teachers College Record

Volumn 116, Issue 14, 2014, Pages 603-632

  Vossoughi, Shirin ^a   Gutiérrez, Kris D ^b  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84977474601     PISSN: 01614681     EISSN: 14679620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (107)

1. Asad, T. (1993). Genealogies of religion: Discipline and reasons of power in Islam and Christianity. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
2. Asad, T., Fernandez, J. W., Herzfeld, M., Lass, A., Rogers, S. C., Schneider, J., & Verdery, K. (1997). Provocations of European ethnology. American Anthropologist, 99(4), 713-730.
3. Barron, B. (2006). Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development: A learning ecology perspective. Human Development, 49(4), 193-224.
4. Barton, D. (1994). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
5. Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (2000). Literacy practices. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton, & R. Ivanic (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp. 7-16). New York, NY: Routledge.
6. Bevan, B., & Michalchik, V. (2013). Where it gets interesting: Competing models of STEM learning after school. Afterschool Matters, 17, 1-8.
7. Burawoy, M. (2003). Revisits: An outline of a theory of reflexive ethnography. American Sociological Review, 68(5), 645-679.
8. Candea, M. (2007). Arbitrary locations: In defense of the bounded field site. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 13(1), 167-184.
9. Candea, M. (2009). Arbitrary locations: In defense of the bounded field-site. In M-A. Falzon (Ed.), Multi-sited ethnography: Theory, praxis and locality in contemporary research (pp. 25-46). Surrey, England: Ashgate Publishing.
10. Cazden, C. B. (1986). Classroom discourse. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 432-463). New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.
11. Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
12. Clifford, J. (1983). On ethnographic authority. Representations, 2, 118-146.
13. Clifford, J. (1988). The predicament of culture: Twentieth-century ethnography, literature, and art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (Eds.). (1993). Inside/outside: Teacher research and knowledge. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
15. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. Cole, M., & Griffin, P. (1983). A socio-historical approach to re-mediation. The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 5(4), 69-74.
17. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster Inc.
18. Diaz, E., & Flores, B. (2001). Teacher as sociocultural sociohistorical mediator. In M. de la Luz Reyes & J. Halcon (Eds.), The best for our children: Critical perspectives on literacy for Latino students (pp. 29-47). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
19. Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
20. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.
21. Engeström, Y. (1991). Toward overcoming the encapsulation of school learning. Learning and Instruction, 1, 243-259.
22. Engeström, Y. (1996). Developmental work research as educational research. Nordisk Pedagogik: Journal of Nordic Educational Research, 16(5), 131-143.
23. Engeström, Y. (2005). Developmental work research: Expanding activity theory in practice (Vol. 12). Berlin, Germany: Lehmanns Media.
24. Engeström, Y. (2008). Putting Vygotsky to work: The change laboratory as an application of double stimulation. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. Wertsch (Eds.), Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 363-382). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
25. Engeström, Y. (2009). The future of activity theory: A rough draft. In A. Sannino, H. Daniels, & K. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory (pp. 303-328). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
26. Erickson, F. (1984). Literacy, reason and civility: An anthropologist's perspective. Review of Educational Research, 54(4), 525-546.
27. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 119-161). New York, NY: Macmillan.
28. Erickson, F. (1996). On the evolution of qualitative approaches in educational research: From Adam's task to Eve's. The Australian Educational Researcher, 23(2), 1-15.
29. Erickson, F. (1998). Qualitative research methods for science education. In B. J. Fraser & K G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook on science education (pp. 1155-1173). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
30. Erickson, F. (2001). Co-membership and wiggle room: Some implications of the study of talk for the development of social theory. In N. Coupland, S. Sarangi, & C. Candlin (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and social theory (pp. 152-181). London, England: Longman.
31. Erickson, F. (2004). Talk and social theory: Ecologies of speaking and listening in everyday life. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
32. Erickson, F. (2006). Studying side by side: Collaborative action ethnography in educational research. In G. Spindler & L. Hammond (Eds.), Innovations in educational ethnography: Theory, methods and results (pp. 235-257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. Erickson, F. (2010). Classroom ethnography. International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 320-325). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
34. Erickson, F., Bagrodia, R., Cook-Sather, A., Espinoza, M., Jurow, S., Shultz, J. J., & Spencer, J. (2008). Students' experience of school curriculum: The everyday circumstances of granting and withholding assent to learn. In F. M. Connelly, M. F. He, & J. Phillion (Eds.), The Sage handbook of curriculum and instruction (pp. 198-218). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. Erickson, F., & Gutiérrez, K. (2002). Comment: Culture, rigor, and science in educational research. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 21-24.
36. Erickson, F., & Schultz, J. J. (1982). The counselor as gatekeeper: Social and cultural organization of communication in counseling interviews. New York, NY: Academic.
37. Erickson, F., & Schultz, J. (1997). When is a context? Some issues and methods in the analysis of social competence. In M. Cole, Y. Engeström, & O. Vasquez (Eds.), Mind, culture, and activity: Seminal papers from the laboratory of comparative human cognition (pp. 22-31). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
38. Espinoza, M. (2009). A case study of the production of educational sanctuary in one migrant classroom. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4(1), 44-62.
39. Espinoza, M. (2011). Making and unmaking: The organizational come-and-go of creativity. Unpublished research report. San Francisco Exploratorium.
40. Falzon, M. (2009). Multi-sited ethnography: Theory, praxis and locality in contemporary research. Surrey, England: Ashgate Publishing.
41. Fitzgerald, D. (2006). Towards a theoretical ethnography of migration. Qualitative Sociology, 29(1), 1-24.
42. Fortun, K. (2009). Scaling and visualizing multi-sited ethnography. In M. Falzon (Ed.), Multi-sited ethnography: Theory, praxis and locality in contemporary research (pp. 73-86). Surrey, England: Ashgate Publishing.
43. Gille, Z., & Riain, S. Ó. (2002). Global ethnography. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 271-295.
44. Gonzalez, N., Moll, L. C., & Amanti, C. (Eds.). (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities and classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. Gustavson, L. C., & Cytrynbaum, J. D. (2003). Illuminating spaces: Relational spaces, complicity, and multisited ethnography. Field Methods, 15(3), 252-270.
46. Gutiérrez, K. (2006). White innocence: A framework and methodology for rethinking educational discourse and inquiry. International Journal of Learning, 12(10), 223-230.
47. Gutiérrez, K. D. (2007). Commentary. In C. Lewis, P. Enciso, & E. B. Moje (Eds.), Reframing sociocultural research on literacy (pp. 115-120). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. Gutiérrez, K. D. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(2), 148-164.
49. Gutiérrez, K. D. (2012a). When scientific and everyday concepts grow into one another: A syncretic approach for new literacies. Paper presented at the annual Literacy Research Association conference. San Diego, CA.
50. Gutiérrez, K. D. (2012b). Re-mediating current activity for the future. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19(1), 17-21.
51. Gutiérrez, K. (2013). Foreword. In K. Hall, T. Cremin, B. Comber, & L. Moll (Eds.), International handbook of research on children 's literacy, learning, and culture (pp. xxix-xxxvi). New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.
52. Gutiérrez, K., Ali, A., & Henriquez, C. (2010). Syncretism and hybridity: Schooling, language, and race and students from non-dominant communities. In M. W. Apple, S. J. Ball, & L. A. Gandin (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of the sociology of education (pp. 358-369). London, England: Routledge.
53. Gutiérrez, K. D., & Arzubiaga, A. E. (2012). An ecological and activity theoretic approach to studying diasporic and non-dominant communities. Research on schools, neighborhoods, and communities: Toward civic responsibility (pp. 203-216). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
54. Gutiérrez, K., Baquedano-Lopez, P., & Tejeda, C. (1999). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6(4), 286-303.
55. Gutiérrez, K. D., Bien, A. C., Selland, M. K., & Pierce, D. M. (2011). Polylingual and polycultural learning ecologies: Mediating emergent academic literacies for dual language learners. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 11(2), 232-261.
56. Gutiérrez, K. D., & Larson, J. (2007). Discussing expanded spaces for learning. Language Arts, 85(1), 69.
57. Gutiérrez, K., & Orellana, M. (2006). The "problem" of English learners: Constructing genres of difference. Research in the Teaching of English, 40(4), 505-510.
58. Gutiérrez, K., Paguyo, C., & Mendoza, L. (2012). Essentializing racial and ethnic identity. In J. Banks (Ed.), Encyclopedia of diversity in education (pp. 816-822). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
59. Gutiérrez, K. D., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19-25.
60. Gutiérrez, K., Rymes, B., & Larson, J. (1995). Script, counterscript, and underlife in the classroom: James Brown versus Brown v. Board of Education. Harvard Educational Review, 65(3), 445-472.
61. Gutiérrez, K., & Vossoughi, S. (2010). Lifting off the ground to return anew: Mediated praxis, transformative learning and social design experiments. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 100-117.
62. Hage, G. (2005). A not so multi-sited ethnography of a not so imagined community. Anthropological Theory, 5(4), 463-475.
63. Hall, K. D. (2004). The ethnography of imagined communities: The cultural production of Sikh ethnicity in Britain. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 595(1), 108-121.
64. Hand, V., Penuel, W. R., & Gutiérrez, K. D. (2012). (Re)Framing educational possibility: Attending to power and equity in shaping access to and within learning opportunities. Human Development, 55(5-6), 250-268.
65. Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
66. Heller, M. (2008). Language and the nation state: Challenges to sociolinguistic theory and practice. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12(4), 504-524.
67. Holy, L. (1984). Theory, methodology and the research process. In R. Ellen (Ed.), Ethnographic research: A guide to general conduct (pp. 13-24). London, England: Academic Press.
68. Hull, G., & Schultz, K. (2001). Literacy and learning out of school: A review of theory and research. Review of Educational Research, 71, 575-611.
69. Hymes, D. (1972) Reinventing anthropology. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
70. Ingold, T. (1994). Introduction to culture. In T. Ingold (Ed.), Companion encyclopedia of anthropology: Humanity, culture and social life (pp. 329-349). London, England: Routledge.
71. Ito, M., Gutiérrez, K., Livingstone, S., Penuel, B., Rhodes, J., Salen, K., Schor, J., Sefton-Green, J., & Watkins, S. C. (2013). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Irvine, CA: Digital Learning and Media Research Hub.
72. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
73. Lave, J. (2011). Apprenticeship in critical ethnographic practice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
74. Leacock, E. (1977). Race and the "we-they dichotomy" in culture and classroom. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 8(2), 152-159.
75. Lee, C. (2001). Is October Brown Chinese?: A cultural modeling activity system for underachieving students. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 97-141.
76. Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 296-316.
77. Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95-117.
78. Marcus, G. E. (1998). Ethnography through thick and thin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
79. Marcus, G. E. (1999). What is at stake-and is not-in the idea and practice of multi-sited ethnography. Canberra Anthropology, 22(2), 6-14.
80. Marcus, G. E. (2009). Multi-sited ethnography: Notes and queries. In M. Falzon (Ed.), Multi-sited ethnography: Theory, praxis, and locality in contemporary research (pp. 181-196). Surrey, England: Ashgate Publishing.
81. Martínez, R. A. (2010). Spanglish as literacy tool: Toward an understanding of the potential role of Spanish-English code-switching in the development of academic literacy. Research in the Teaching of English, 45(2), 124-149.
82. Massey, D. (2005). For space. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
83. Matusov, E. (1998). When solo activity is not privileged: Participation and internalization models of development. Human Development, 41, 326-349.
84. McDermott, R. P. (1977). Social relations as contexts for learning in school. Harvard Educational Review, 47(2), 198-213.
85. McDermott, R., & Raley, J. (2011). Looking closely: Toward a natural history of human ingenuity. In E. Margolis & L. Pauwels (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of visual research methods (pp. 372-391). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
86. Moll, L. C. (1997). The creation of mediating settings. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 4(3), 191-199.
87. Nasir, N. I. S. (2000). "Points ain't everything": Emergent goals and average and percent understandings in the play of basketball among African American students. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 31(3), 283-305.
88. Nasir, N. S., Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Lee, C. D. (2006). Learning as a cultural process: Achieving equity through diversity. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 489-504). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
89. Nespor, J. (1997). Tangled up in school: Politics, space, bodies, and signs in the educational process. New York, NY: Routledge.
90. O'Connor, K., & Allen, A. (2010). Learning as the organizing of social futures. In W. R. Penuel & K. O'Connor (Eds.), Learning research as a human science. National Society for Studies in Education, 109(1), 160-175.
91. O'Connor, M. C. (1996). Managing the intermental: Classroom group discussion and the social context of learning. In D. Slobin, J. Gerhardt, A. Kyratzis, & J. Guo (Eds.), Social interaction, social context, and language (pp. 495-509) . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
92. Pacheco, M. (2012). Learning in/through everyday resistance: A cultural-historical perspective on community resources and curriculum. Educational Researcher, 41(4), 121-132.
93. Pierides, D. (2010). Multi-sited ethnography and the field of educational research. Critical Studies in Education, 51(2), 179-195.
94. Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
95. Rosaldo, R. (1993). Culture and truth: The remaking of social analysis. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
96. Rose, M. (2005). The mind at work: Valuing the intelligence of the American worker. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
97. Rose, M. (2012). Rethinking remedial education and the academic-vocational divide. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19(1), 1-16.
98. Said, E. (1979). Orientalism. New York, NY: Vintage.
99. Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
100. Scribner, S., & Stevens, J. (1989). Experimental studies on the relationship of school math and work math (Technical Paper No. 4). New York, NY: National Center on Education and Employment.
101. Street, B. V. (2005). Introduction: New literacy studies and literacies across educational contexts. In B. V. Street (Ed.), Literacies across educational contexts: Mediating learning and teaching (pp. 1-21). Philadelphia, PA: Caslon.
102. Valencia, R. (1997). The evolution of deficit thinking. London, England: The Falmer Press.
103. Valencia, R. (2002). The plight of Chicano students: An overview of schooling conditions. In R. Valencia (Ed.), Chicano school failure and success (pp. 3-51). New York, NY: Routledge.
104. Vossoughi, S. (2011a). On the formation of intellectual kinship: A qualitative case study of literacy, learning, and social analysis in a summer migrant education program. (University of California, Los Angeles). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 299.
105. Vossoughi, S. (2011b). Inhabiting the possible: Pedagogy and solidarity at Camp Ayandeh. Jadaliyya. Retrieved from http://www.jadaliyya.com/pages/index/2449/inhabiting-the-possible_pedagogy-and-solidarity-at
106. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
107. Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.