(Re)Framing educational possibility: Attending to power and equity in shaping access to and within learning opportunities

Human Development

Volumn 55, Issue 5-6, 2012, Pages 250-268

  Hand, Victoria ^a   Penuel, William R ^a   Gutiérrez, Kris D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Equity; Framing; Opportunity to learn; Power; Race; Social practice

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL MODEL; ETHNIC GROUP; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HUMAN RELATION; IDENTITY; LEARNING ENVIRONMENT; LEARNING STYLE; POWER ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SOCIOLOGY; STUDENT; TEACHER;

EID: 84872290588     PISSN: 0018716X     EISSN: 14230054     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000345313     Document Type: Article

References (96)

1. Artiles, A. (2011). Toward an interdisciplinary understanding of educational equity and difference: The case of the racialization of ability. Educational Researcher, 40, 431-445.
2. Bartlett, F. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
3. Bateson, G. (1972). A theory of play and fantasy. In G. Bateson (Ed.), Steps to an ecology of mind: A revolutionary approach to man's understanding of himself (pp. 177-193). New York: Ballantine
4. Benford, R., & Snow, D. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611-639.
5. Bloome, D., Puro, P., & Theodorou, E. (1989). Procedural display and classroom lessons. Curriculum Inquiry, 19, 265-291.
6. Boaler, J. (2008). Promoting 'relational equity' and high mathematics achievement through an innovative mixed-Ability approach. British Educational Research Journal, 34, 167-194.
7. Boaler, J., & Greeno, J.G. (2000). Identity, agency, and knowing in mathematics worlds. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning . Westport: Ablex Publishers
8. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiment by nature and design . Cambridge: Harvard University Press
9. Brown, A.L., & Campione, J.C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice . Cambridge: MIT Press
10. Burke, K. (1941). The philosophy of literary form: Studies in symbolic action . Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press
11. Coburn, C. (2004). Beyond decoupling: Rethinking the relationship between the institutional environment and the classroom. Sociology of Education, 77, 211-244.
12. Coburn, C.E. (2006). Framing the problem of reading instruction: Using frame analysis to uncover the microprocesses of policy implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 43, 343-379.
13. Coburn, C.E., Bae, S., & Turner, E.O. (2008). Authority, status, and the dynamics of insider-outsider partnerships at the district level. Peabody Journal of Education, 83, 364-399.
14. Coburn, C.E., & Woulfin, S.L. (2012). Reading coaches and the relationship between policy and practice. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 5-30.
15. Darder, A. (1991). Culture and power in the classroom: A critical foundation for bicultural education . New York: Bergin & Garvey
16. Davies, B., & Harré, R. (2008). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 20, 43-63.
17. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-Theoretical approach to developmental research . Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit
18. Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14, 133-156.
19. Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamaki, R.L. (1999). Perspectives on activity theory . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
20. Engle, R.A. (2006). Framing interactions to foster generative learning: A situative explanation of transfer in a community of learners classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 451-498.
21. Engle, R.A., & Conant, F.R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 399-483.
22. Entman, R.M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 50-58.
23. Erickson, F. (1987). Transformation and school success: The politics and culture of educational achievement. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 18, 335-356.
24. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977 . New York: The Harvester Press
25. Gee, J.P. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourse (1st ed.). New York: The Falmer Press
26. Giroux, H.A., & McLaren, P.L. (Eds.) (1989). Critical pedagogy, the state, and cultural struggle . Albany: State University of New York Press
27. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis . Cambridge: Harvard University Press
28. Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk . Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press
29. González, N., Moll, L., & Amanti, C. (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households and classrooms . Mahwah: Erlbaum
30. Goodwin, C., & Duranti, A. (1992). Rethinking context: An introduction. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as interactive phenomenon . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
31. Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M.H. (1996). Seeing as situated activity: Formulating planes. In Y. Engeström & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 61-95). New York: Cambridge University Press
32. Greeno, J.G. (2009). A theory bite on contextualizing, framing, and positioning: A companion to Son and Goldstone. Cognition and Instruction, 27, 269-275.
33. Greeno, J.G., & Berger, D. (1991). Number sense as situated knowing in a conceptual domain functional knowledge in problem solving. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 170-218.
34. Gresalfi, M., Martin, T., Hand, V., & Greeno, J.G. (2008). Constructing competence: An analysis of student participation in the activity systems of mathematics classrooms. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70, 49-70.
35. Grossman, F.D. (2009). Dissent from within: How educational insiders use protest to create policy change. Educational Policy, 24, 655-686.
36. Gutiérrez, K. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the Third Space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43, 148-164.
37. Gutiérrez, K., Baquedano-López, P., Alvarez, H.H., & Chiu, M.M. (1999). Building a culture of collaboration through hybrid language practices. Theory into Practice, 38, 87-93.
38. Gutiérrez, K., Baquedano-López, P., & Tejada, C. (2000). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6, 286-303.
39. Gutiérrez, K., Rymes, B., & Larson, J. (1995). Script, counterscript, and underlife in the classroom: James Brown versus 'Brown v. Board of Education'. Harvard Educational Review, 65, 445-471.
40. Gutiérrez, K., & Vossoughi, S. (2010). Lifting off the ground to return anew: Mediated praxis, transformative learning, and social design experiments. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 100-117.
41. Hall, E.T. (1976). Beyond culture . Garden City: Anchor Press/Doubleday
42. Hammer, D. (1994). Epistemological beliefs in introductory physics. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 151-183.
43. Hammer, D., Elby, A., Scherr, R.E., & Redish, E.F. (2005). Resources, framing and transfer. In J.P. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing
44. Hand, V. (2003). Reframing participation: Meaningful mathematical activity in diverse classrooms (doctoral dissertation). Stanford University, Stanford
45. Hand, V. (2010). The co-construction of opposition within a low-Track mathematics classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 97-132.
46. Hand, V. (2012). Seeing power and culture in mathematics learning: Teacher noticing for equitable mathematics instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80, 233-247.
47. Horn, I.S. (2007). Fast kids, slow kids, lazy kids: Modeling the mismatch problem in math teachers' conversations. Journal of Learning Sciences, 16, 37-79.
48. Hoyle, S. (1993). Participation frameworks in sportscasting play: Imaginary and literal footings. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Framing in discourse (pp. 114-144). New York: Oxford University Press
49. Jiménez-Aleixandre, M., Rodríquez, A., & Duschl, R. (2000). 'Doing the lesson' or 'doing science': Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84, 757-792.
50. Jurow, S. (2005). Shifting engagements in figured worlds: Middle school mathematics students' participation in an architectural design project. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 35-67.
51. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choice, values and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 314-350.
52. Keren, G. (2011). Perspectives on framing . New York: Psychology Press
53. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind . Chicago: University of Chicago Press
54. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by . Chicago: University of Chicago Press
55. Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 29-63.
56. Leander, K.M. (2001). 'This is our freedom bus going home right now': Producing and hybridizing space-Time contexts in pedagogical discourse. Journal of Literacy Research, 33, 637-679.
57. Lee, C.D. (2001). Is October Brown Chinese? A cultural modeling activity system for underachieving students. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 97-141.
58. Lee, C.D. (2002). Interrogating race and ethnicity as constructs in the examination of cultural processes in developmental research. Human Development, 45, 282-290.
59. MacLeod, J. (1987). Ain't no makin' it: Leveled aspirations in a low-income neighborhood. Boulder: Westview
60. McDermott, R. (1993). The acquisition of a child by a learning disability. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity (pp. 269-305). New York: Cambridge University Press
61. McDermott, R., Raley, J., & Seyer-Ochi, I. (2009). Race and class in a culture of risk. Review of Research in Education, 33, 101-116.
62. Mills, C. (2011). Framing literacy policy: Power and policy drivers in primary schools. Literacy, 45, 103-110.
63. Nasir, N.S. (2008). Everyday pedagogy: Lessons from basketball, track, and dominoes. Phi Delta Kappan, 89, 529-532.
64. Nasir, N.S. (2011). Racialized identities: Race and achievement among African American youth . Stanford: Stanford University Press
65. Nasir, N.S., & Hand, V. (2006). Exploring sociocultural perspectives on race, culture, and learning. Review of Research in Education, 76, 449-475.
66. Nasir, N.S., & Hand, V. (2008). From the court to the classroom: Opportunities for engagement, learning and identity in basketball and classroom mathematics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17, 143-180.
67. Nespor, J. (2002). Networks and contexts of reform. Journal of Educational Change, 3, 365-382.
68. Noguera, P. (2001). Racial politics and the elusive quest for excellence and equity in education. Education and Urban Society, 34, 18-41.
69. O'Connor, K., & Allen, A. (2010). Learning as the organizing of social futures. In W. Penuel & K. O'Connor (Eds.), Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 108, 160-175.
70. Oakes, J., & Rogers, J. (2006). Learning power: Organizing for education and justice . New York: Teachers College Press
71. Oakes, J., Rogers, J., Blasi, G., & Lipton, M. (2006, April). Grassroots organizing, social movements, and the right to high-quality education. Paper presented at the Rethinking Rodriguez Symposium, Warren Institute, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley
72. Pollock, M. (2004). Colormute: Race talk dilemmas in American schools . Princeton: Princeton University Press
73. Polman, J.L., & Miller, D. (2010). Changing stories: Trajectories of identification among African American youth in a science outreach apprenticeship. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 879-918.
74. Pope, D. (2001). 'Doing school': How we are creating a generation of stressed out, materialistic, and miseducated students. New Haven: Yale University Press
75. Redish, E.F. (2004). A theoretical framework for physics education research: Modeling student thinking. In E.F. Redish & M. Vicentini (Eds.), Proceedings of the Enrico Fermi Summer School, Course CLVI (pp. 1-63). Bologna: Italian Physical Society
76. Redish, E.F., & Hammer, D. (2009). Reinventing college physics for biologists: Explicating an epistemological curriculum. American Journal of Physics, 77, 629.
77. Renée, M., Welner, K., & Oakes, J. (2009). Social movement organizing and equity-focused educational change: Shifting the zone of mediation. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational change (pp. 158-163). London: Kluwer
78. Rumelhart, D. (1975). Notes on a schema for stories. In D. Bobrow & A. Collins (Eds.), Representation and understanding (pp. 211-236). New York: Academic Press
79. Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (1993). Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy. American Political Science Review, 87, 334-347.
80. Schön, D., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies . New York: Basic Books
81. Schwab, J.J. (1982). Science, curriculum, and liberal education: Selected essays . Chicago: University of Chicago Press
82. Snow, D.A., & Benford, R.D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1, 197-217.
83. Snow, D.A., Rochford, E.B., Jr., Worden, S.K., & Benford, R.D. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51, 464-481.
84. Tannen, D. (1993). Framing in discourse . New York: Oxford University Press
85. Taylor, C. (2004). Modern social imaginaries . Durham: Duke University Press
86. Taylor, E. (2006). A critical race analysis of the achievement gap in the United States: Politics, reality, and hope. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 5, 71-87.
87. Thompson J.B. (1995). Studies in the theory of ideology . Berkeley: University of California Press
88. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
89. Valero, P., & Zevenbergen, R. (Eds.). (2004). Researching the sociopolitical dimensions of mathematics education: Issues of power in theory and methodology . Norwell: Kluwer Academic
90. Varenne, H., & McDermott, R.P. (1998). Successful failure: The school America builds . New York: Westview Press
91. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
92. Welner, K. (2001). Legal rights, local wrongs: When community control collides with educational equity . New York: Suny Press
93. Williams, R.H., & Kubal, T.J. (1999). Movement frames and the cultural environment: Resonance, failure, and the boundaries of the legitimate. Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, 21, 225-248.
94. Wortham, S. (2003). Curriculum as a resource for the development of social identity. Sociology of Education, 76, 228-246.
95. Wortham, S. (2004). The interdependence of social identification and learning. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 715-750.
96. Wortham, S. (2006). Learning identity: The joint emergence of social identification and academic learning . New York: Cambridge University Press