DrugE-Rank: Improving drug-target interaction prediction of new candidate drugs or targets by ensemble learning to rank

Bioinformatics

Volumn 32, Issue 12, 2016, Pages i18-i27

  Yuan, Qingjun ^a   Gao, Junning ^a   Wu, Dongliang ^a   Zhang, Shihua ^b   Mamitsuka, Hiroshi ^c,d   Zhu, Shanfeng ^a  

^a FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^c KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DRUG;

BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; DRUG DATABASE; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; DRUG DEVELOPMENT; DRUG INTERACTION; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; GENOMICS; PROCEDURES; SOFTWARE; UNITED STATES;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PHARMACEUTICAL; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; DRUG DISCOVERY; DRUG INTERACTIONS; GENOMICS; PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS; SOFTWARE; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION;

EID: 84976517528     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw244     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Acharya,C. et al. (2011) Recent advances in ligand-based drug design: relevance and utility of the conformationally sampled pharmacophore approach. Curr. Comput.-Aided Drug Des., 7, 10.
2. Agarwal,S. et al. (2010) Ranking chemical structures for drug discovery: a new machine learning approach. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 50, 716-731.
3. Bleakley,K. and Yamanishi,Y. (2009) Supervised prediction of drug-target interactions using bipartite local models. Bioinformatics, 25, 2397-2403.
4. Bolton,E.E. et al. (2008) Pubchem: integrated platform of small molecules and biological activities. Ann. Rep. Comput. Chem., 4, 217-241.
5. Boutet,E. et al. (2007) Uniprotkb/swiss-prot. Methods Mol. Biol., 406, 89-112.
6. Burges,C.J. (2010) From ranknet to lambdarank to lambdamart: an overview. Technical report MSR-TR-2010-82, Microsoft Research.
7. Davis,J. and Goadrich,M. (2006) The relationship between precision-recall and roc curves. Machine Learning, Proceedings of the Twenty-Third International Conference ICML 2006, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, 233-240.
8. Ding,H. et al. (2014) Similarity-based machine learning methods for predicting drug-target interactions: a brief review. Brief. Bioinfo., 15, 734-747.
9. Gö nen,M. (2012) Predicting drug-target interactions from chemical and genomic kernels using bayesian matrix factorization. Bioinformatics, 28, 2304-2310.
10. Jacob,L. and Vert,J.P. (2008) Protein-ligand interaction prediction: an improved chemogenomics approach. Bioinformatics, 24, 2149-2156.
11. Keiser,M. et al. (2009) Predicting new molecular targets for known drugs. Nature, 462, 175-181.
12. Law,V. et al. (2014) Drugbank 4.0: shedding new light on drug metabolism. Nucleic Acids Res., 42,-D1, D1091-D1097.
13. Li,H. (2011) A short introduction to learning to rank. IEICE Trans., 94-D, 1854-1862.
14. Liu,B. et al. (2015a) Application of learning to rank to protein remote homology detection. Bioinformatics, 31, 3492-3498.
15. Liu,K. et al. (2015b) Meshlabeler: improving the accuracy of large-scale mesh indexing by integrating diverse evidence. Bioinformatics, 31, 339-347.
16. Liu,T.Y. (2009) Learning to rank for information retrieval. Found. Trends Inf. Retriev., 3, 225-331.
17. Lounkine,E. et al. (2012) Large-scale prediction and testing of drug activity on side-effect targets. Nature, 486, 361-367.
18. Lyne,P.D. (2002) Structure-based virtual screening: an overview. Drug Discov. Today, 7, 1047-1055.
19. Mei,J.P. et al. (2013) Drug-target interaction prediction by learning from local information and neighbors. Bioinformatics, 29, 238-245.
20. Mousavian,Z. and Masoudi-Nejad,A. (2014) Drug-target interaction prediction via chemogenomic space: learning based methods. Expert Opin. Drug Metabol. Toxicol., 10, 1273-1287.
21. Nagamine,N. and Sakakibara,Y. (2007) Statistical prediction of protein-chemical interactions based on chemical structure and mass spectrometry data. Bioinformatics, 23, 2004-2012.
22. Nunez,S. et al. (2012) Target-drug interations: first principles and their application to drug discovery. Drug Discov. Today, 17, 10-22.
23. Overington,J. et al. (2006) How many drug targets are there. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov., 5, 993-996.
24. Qeli,E. et al. (2014) Improved prediction of peptide detectability for targeted proteomics using a rank-based algorithm and organism-specific data. J. Proteomics., 108, 269-283.
25. Rao,H. et al. (2011) Update of profeat: a web server for computing structural and physicochemical features of proteins and peptides from amino acid sequence. Nucleic Acids Res., 39(suppl 2), W385-W390.
26. Rathke,F. et al. (2010) Structrank: a new approach for ligand-based virtual screening. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 51, 83-92.
27. Scannell,J. et al. (2012) Diagnosing the decline in pharmaceutical r&d efficiency. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov., 11, 191-200.
28. Shi,J. et al. (2015) Predicting drug-target interaction for new drugs using enhanced similarity measures and super-target clustering. Methods, 83, 98-104.
29. Tabei,Y. et al. (2012) Identification of chemogenomic features from drug-target interaction networks using interpretable classifiers. Bioinformatics, 28, i487-i494.
30. van Laarhoven,T. et al. (2011) Gaussian interaction profile kernels for predicting drug-target interaction. Bioinformatics, 27, 3036-3043.
31. van Laarhoven,T. and Marchiori,E. (2013) Predicting drug-target interactions for new drug compounds using a weighted nearest neighbor profile. PloS One, 8, e66952.
32. Xia,Z. et al. (2010) Semi-supervised drug-protein interaction prediction from heterogeneous biological spaces. BMC Syst. Biol., 4, S6.
33. Yabuuchi,H. et al. (2011) Analysis of multiple compound-protein interactions reveals novel bioactive molecules. Mol. Syst. Biol., 7, 472.
34. Yamanishi,Y. (2013) Chemogenomic approaches to infer drug-target interaction networks. Methods Mol. Biol., 939, 97-113.
35. Yamanishi,Y. et al. (2008) Prediction of drug-target interaction networks from the integration of chemical and genomic spaces. Bioinformatics, 24, i232-i240.
36. Zhang,W. et al. (2015) When drug discovery meets web search: learning to rank for ligand-based virtual screening. J. Cheminf., 7, 5.
37. Zheng,X. et al. (2013) Collaborative matrix factorization with multiple similarities for predicting drug-target interactions. In ACM KDD, 1025-1033.