Identification of chemogenomic features from drug-target interaction networks using interpretable classifiers

Bioinformatics

Volumn 28, Issue 18, 2012, Pages

  Tabei, Yasuo ^a   Pauwels, Edouard ^b,c,d   Stoven, Véronique ^b,c,d   Takemoto, Kazuhiro ^a,e   Yamanishi, Yoshihiro ^f  

^a JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

^b PSL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY   (France)

^c INSTITUT CURIE   (France)

^d INSERM U900   (France)

^e KYUSHU INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^f KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DRUG; LIGAND; PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; DRUG DESIGN; HUMAN; METABOLISM; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; DRUG DESIGN; HUMANS; LIGANDS; LINEAR MODELS; PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS;

EID: 84866467225     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts412     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Blagg,J. (2006) Structure-activity relationships for in vitro and in vivo toxicity. Annu. Rep. Med. Chem., 41, 353-368.
2. Chen,B. et al. (2009) PubChem as a source of polypharmacology. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 49, 2044-2055.
3. Consortium,T.U. (2010) The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) in 2010. Nucleic Acids Res., 38, D142-D148.
4. Dobson,C. (2004) Chemical space and biology. Nature, 432, 824-828.
5. Faulon,J. et al. (2008) Genome scale enzyme-metabolite and drug-target interaction predictions using the signature molecular descriptor. Bioinformatics, 24, 225-233.
6. Finn,R. et al. (2008) The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res., 36, D281-D288.
7. Han,L. et al. (2008) Developing and validating predictive decision tree models from mining chemical structural fingerprints and high-throughput screening data in PubChem. BMC Bioinformatics, 9, 401.
8. Hoffmann,B. et al. (2010) A new protein binding pocket similarity measure based on comparison of clouds of atoms in 3D: application to ligand prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 22, 99.
9. Hsieh,C.J. et al. (2008)Adual coordinate descentmethod for large-scale linear SVM. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Maching Learning, pp. 408-415.
10. Jacob,L. and Vert,J. (2008) Protein-ligand interaction prediction: an improved chemogenomics approach. Bioinformatics, 24, 2149-2156.
11. Kanehisa,M. et al. (2006) From genomics to chemical genomics: new developments in KEGG. Nucleic Acids Res., 34, D354-D357.
12. Keiser,M. et al. (2009) Predicting new molecular targets for known drugs. Nature, 462, 175-181.
13. Klekota,J. and Roth,F. (2008) Chemical substructures that enrich for biological activity. Bioinformatics, 24, 2518-2525.
14. Kolb,P. et al. (2009) Docking and chemoinformatic screens for new ligands and targets. Curr. Opin. Biotech., 20, 429-436.
15. Li,Y. et al. (2011) A computational approach to finding novel targets for existing drugs. PLoS Comput. Biol., 7, e1002139.
16. Morris,R. et al. (2005) Real spherical harmonic expansion coefficients as 3D shape descriptors for protein binding pocket and ligand comparisons. Bioinformatics, 21, 2347-2355.
17. Najmanovich,R. et al. (2008) Detection of 3D atomic similarities and their use in the discrimination of small molecule protein-binding sites. Bioinformatics, 24, i105-i111.
18. Pauwels,E. et al. (2011) Predicting drug side-effect profiles: a chemical fragment-based approach. BMC Bioinformatics, 12, 169.
19. Shen,J. et al. (2007) Predicting protein-protein interactions based only on sequences information. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci., 104, 4337.
20. Shigemizu,D. et al. (2009) Extraction and analysis of chemical modification patterns in drug development. J. Chem. Inform. Model., 49, 1122-1129.
21. Stockwell,B. (2000) Chemical genetics: ligand-based discovery of gene function. Nat. Rev. Genet., 1, 116-125.
22. Takigawa,I. et al. (2011) Mining significant substructure pairs for interpreting polypharmacology in drug-target network. PloS One, 6, e16999.
23. Whitebread,S. et al. (2005) Keynote review: in vitro safety pharmacology profiling: an essential tool for successful drug development. Drug Disco. Today, 10, 1421-1433.
24. Wishart,D. et al. (2006) DrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration. Nucleic Acids Res., 34 (Suppl 1), D668-D672.
25. Yabuuchi,H. et al. (2011) Analysis of multiple compound-protein interactions reveals novel bioactive molecules. Mol. Syst. Biol., 7, 472.
26. Yamanishi,Y. et al. (2008) Prediction of drug-target interaction networks from the integration of chemical and genomic spaces. Bioinformatics, 24, i232-i240.
27. Yamanishi,Y. et al. (2011) Extracting sets of chemical substructures and protein domains governing drug-target interactions. J. Chem. Inform. Model., 51, 1183-1194.
28. Yang,L. et al. (2009) Harvesting candidate genes responsible for serious adverse drug reactions from a chemical-protein interactome. PLoS Comput. Biol., 5, e1000441.