Network-structured discussions for collaborative concept mapping and peer learning

IBM Journal of Research and Development

Volumn 59, Issue 6, 2015, Pages

  Rafaeli, S ^a   Kent, C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TEACHING; TOPOLOGY;

COLLABORATIVE CONSTRUCTION; COLLABORATIVE TOOLS; CONSTRUCTIVIST LEARNING; LEARNING COMMUNITY; LEARNING EXPERIENCES; LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM; ON-LINE COLLABORATIONS; ONLINE DISCUSSIONS;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 84975523383     PISSN: 00188646     EISSN: 21518556     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1147/JRD.2015.2461091     Document Type: Review

References (63)

1. M. Prince, "Does active learning work? A review of the research," J. Eng. Educ., vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 223-231, Jul. 2004.
2. H. Foot and C. Howe, "The psychoeducational basis of peer-assisted learning," in Peer-Assisted Learning, K. J. Topping and S. W. Ehly, Eds. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1998, pp. 27-43.
3. J. Bishop and M. A. Verleger, "The flipped classroom: A survey of the research," in Proc. ASEE Nat. Conf., Atlanta, GA, USA, 2013, pp. 1-18.
4. R. Kop, H. Fournier, and J. S. F. Mak, "A pedagogy of abundance or a pedagogy to support human beings? Participant support on massive open online courses," Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn., vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 74-93, 2011.
5. I. Allen, J. Seaman, and R. Garrett, "Blending in: The extent and promise of blended education in the United States," Sloan Consortium, Newburyport, MA, USA, 2007.
6. R. H. Neira and É. V. Iturbide, "Improving the analysis of students participation & collaboration in moodle forums," in Advanced Learning, R. Hijn-Neira Ed. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech, 2009. [Online]. Available: http://www.intechopen.com/books/advanced-learning/improving-the-analysis-of-studentsparticipation-amp-collaboration-in-moodle-forums
7. J. Hewitt, "Beyond threaded discourse," Int. J. Educ. Telecommun., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 207-221, 2001.
8. D. M. Poole, "Student participation in a discussion-oriented online course: A case study," J. Res. Comput. Educ., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 162-177, 2000.
9. S. M. Alessi and S. R. Trollip, Multimedia for Learning: Methods and Development. Boston, MA, USA: Allyn & Bacon, 2001.
10. V. P. Dennen, "Pedagogical lurking: Student engagement in non-posting discussion behavior," Comput. Human Behavior, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 1624-1633, Jul. 2008.
11. S. Palmer, D. Holt, and S. Bray, "Does the discussion help the impact of a formally assessed online discussion on final student results," British J. Educ. Technol., vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 847-858, Sep. 2008.
12. K. F. Hew, W. S. Cheung, and C. S. L. Ng, "Student contribution in asynchronous online discussion: A review of the research and empirical exploration," Instructional Sci., vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 571-606, Nov. 2010.
13. M. J. W. Thomas, "Learning within incoherent structures: The space of online discussion forums," J. Comput. Assist. Learn., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 351-366, Sep. 2002.
14. E. Webb, A. Jones, P. Barker, and P. van Schaik, "Using e-learning dialogues in higher education," Innovations Educ. Teaching Int., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 93-103, 2004.
15. S. Herring, "Interactional coherence in CMC," J. Comput.-Mediated Commun., vol. 4, no. 4, p. 2022, Jun. 1999.
16. S. Rafaeli, "The electronic bulletin board: A computer-driven mass medium," Social Sci. Comput. Rev., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 123-136, Jul. 1984.
17. Semantic Web. [Online]. Available: http://www.w3.org/standards/semanticweb
18. J. Novak, Learning, Creating, and Using Knowledge. Concept Maps as Facilitative Tools in Schools and Corporations, 2nd Ed. New York, NY, USA: Taylor & Francis, 2010.
19. J. Novak, "Concept maps and vee diagrams: Two metacognitive tools to facilitate meaningful learning," Instructional Sci., vol. 52, pp. 29-52, 1990.
20. J. E. Newhagen and S. Rafaeli, "Why communication researchers should study the internet: A dialogue," J. Comput.-Mediated Commun., vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 4-13, Mar. 1996.
21. M. S. Gazzaniga, Human: The Science Behind What Makes Us Unique. New York, NY, USA: Harper Collins, 2008.
22. J. Novak and B. Gowin, Learning How to Learn. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1984.
23. J. D. Novak and A. J. Cañas, "The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them," Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition (IHMC) CmapTools, Ocala, FL, USA, Tech. Rep., 2008.
24. A. J. Cañas, R. Carff, G. Hill, M. Carvalho, M. Arguedas, T. C. Eskridge, and R. Carvajal, "Concept maps: Integrating knowledge and information visualization," in Knowledge and Information Visualization. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2005, pp. 205-219.
25. T. Tomoto, T. Akakura, and Y. Nishihori, "Collaborative knowledge construction using concept maps for cross-cultural communication," in Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Mobile UBICOMM, Syst., Services Technol., Lisbon, Portugal, 2011, pp. 180-186.
26. H. Lin and H. Faste, "Digital mind mapping: Innovations for real-time collaborative thinking," in Proc. CHI Extended Abstracts Human Factors Comput. Syst., 2011, pp. 2137-2142.
27. C. Chiu, C. Huang, and W. Chang, "The evaluation and influence of interaction in network supported collaborative concept mapping," Comput. Educ., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 17-25, Jan. 2000.
28. D. P. Ausubel, Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. New York, NY, USA: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968.
29. L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in Society: the Development of Higher Psychological Process. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard Univ. Press, 1978.
30. R. Fountain, "Conceptual enhancement via textual plurality? A pedagogical wiki bow towards collaborative structuration," in Proc. Int. Symp. Wikis, 2007, pp. 43-46.
31. B. Holmes, B. Tangney, A. Fitzgibbon, T. Savage, and S. Mehan, "Communal constructivism: Students constructing learning for as well as with others," in Proc. Soc. Inf. Technol. Teacher Educ. Int. Conf., 2001, pp. 3114-3119.
32. P. Johnson-Laird, Mental Models. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard Univ. Press, 1983.
33. W. B. Rouse and N. M. Morris, "On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search for mental models," Psychol. Bull., vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 359-363, Nov. 1986.
34. R. Klimoski and S. Mohammed, "Team mental model: Construct or metaphor?" J. Manage., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 403-437, 1994.
35. P. Bossche, W. Gijselaers, M. Segers, G. Woltjer, and P. Kirschner, "Team learning: Building shared mental models," Instructional Sci., vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 283-301, 2010.
36. A. Pena, "Collaborative student modeling by cognitive maps," in Proc. IEEE 1st. Int. Conf. DFMA, 2005, pp. 160-167.
37. M. Cole and Y. Engeström, "A cultural historic approach to distributed cognition," in Distributed cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations, G. Salomon, Ed. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1993, pp. 1-46.
38. C. Van Boxtel, J. van der Linden, and G. Kanselaar, "Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge," Learn. Instruction, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 311-330, Aug. 2000.
39. J. W. Coffey, R. R. Hoffman, and J. Novak, "A summary of literature pertaining to the use of concept mapping techniques and technologies for education and performance support," Inst. Human Mach. Cognition, Pensacola, FL, USA, Tech. Rep. Submitted Chief Naval Educ. Train., 2003.
40. N. Stoyanova and P. Kommers, "Learning effectiveness of concept mapping in a computer supported collaborative problem solving design," in Proc. 1st Eur. Int. Conf. Comput.-Supported Collab. Learn., Maastricht, Netherlands, 2001, vol. 13, pp. 1-8.
41. G. Salomon, "It's not just the tool, but the educational rationale that counts," presented at the World Conf. Educational Media, Hypermedia, Telecommun., Montreal, QC, Canada, 2000.
42. S. Papert, "Introduction by Seymour Papert," in Constructionist Learning, I. Harel, Ed. Boston, MA, USA: MIT Press, 1990.
43. I. A. Sánchez and A. Fitzgibbon, "Mapping distributed cognition: A collaborative constructionist approach," in Proc. Soc. Inf. Technol. Teacher Educ. Int. Conf., Phoenix, AZ, USA, 2005, pp. 1100-1107.
44. D. DeStefano and J.-A. LeFevre, "Cognitive load in hypertext reading: A review," Comput. Human Behavior, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1616-1641, May 2007.
45. F. Amadieu, A. Tricot, and C. Mariné, "Prior knowledge in learning from a non-linear electronic document: Disorientation and coherence of the reading sequences," Comput. Human Behavior, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 381-388, Mar. 2009.
46. Y.-M. Huang, Y.-M. Huang, C.-H. Liu, and C.-C. Tsai, "Applying social tagging to manage cognitive load in a Web 2.0 self-learning environment," Interactive Learn. Environ., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 273-289, 2013.
47. L. Salmerón, T. Baccino, J. J. Cañas, R. I. Madrid, and I. Fajardo, "Do graphical overviews facilitate or hinder comprehension in hypertext," Comput. Educ., vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 1308-1319, Dec. 2009.
48. L. Salmerón, Ladislao, and V. García, "Reading skills and children's navigation strategies in hypertext," Comput. Human Behavior, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 1143-1151, May 2011.
49. J. Nielsen, Multimedia and Hypertext: The Internet and Beyond (Interactive Technologies). San Mateo, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann, 1995.
50. T. Gruber, "Collective knowledge systems: Where the social web meets the semantic web," Web Semantics: Sci., Services Agents World Wide Web, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 4-13, 2008.
51. G. Siemens, D. Gaševic, C. Haythornthwaite, S. Dawson, S. B. Shum, R. Ferguson, E. Duval, K. Verbert, and R. S. Baker, "Open learning analytics: An integrated and modularized platform," Soc. Learn. Anal. Res. (Solar), 2011.
52. R. Mazza, M. Bettoni, M. Faré, and L. Mazzola, "MOCLog-monitoring online courses with log data," in Proc. 1st Moodle Res. Conf., 2012, pp. 14-15.
53. A. Wise, Y. Zhao, and S. Hausknecht, "Learning analytics for online discussions: embedded and extracted approaches," J. Learn. Anal., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 48-71, 2014.
54. N. Sclater, Engagement Reporting Tools for Blackboard and Moodle. [Online]. Available: http://sclater.com/blog/engagement-reporting-tools-for-blackboard-and-moodle
55. N. Sclater, Effective Learning Analytics. [Online]. Available: http://analytics.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2014/10/02/learning-analytics-what-types-of-product-are-available/
56. S. Rafaeli and F. Sudweeks, "Networked interactivity," J. Comput.-Mediated Commun., vol. 2, no. 4, p. 1, 1997.
57. L. Vygotsky, Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 1986.
58. S. Rafaeli, "Interactivity: From new media to communication," in Advancing Communication Science: Merging Mass and Interpersonal Processes, R. P. Hawkins, J. M. Wieman, and S. Pingree, Eds. Newbury Park, CA, USA: Sage, 1988, pp. 110-134.
59. A. Jeong, "A guide to analyzing message-response sequences and group interaction patterns in computer mediated communication," Distance Educ., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 367-383, 2005.
60. A. F. Wise, J. Speer, F. Marbouti, and Y. T. Hsiao, "Broadening the notion of participation in online discussions: Examining patterns in learners' online listening behaviors," Instruct. Sci., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 323-343, Mar. 2013.
61. M. Muller, N. S. Shami, D. R. Millen, and J. Feinberg, "We are all lurkers: Consuming behaviors among authors and readers in an enterprise file-sharing service," in Proc. GROUP, New York, NY, USA, 2010, pp. 201-210.
62. B. Nonnecke, J. Preece, D. Andrews, and R. Voutour, "Online lurkers tell why," in Proc. 10th Amer. Conf. Inf. Syst., New York, NY, USA, 2004, pp. 1-7.
63. S. Rafaeli, G. Ravid, and V. Soroka, "De-lurking in virtual communities: A social communication network approach to measuring the effects of social and cultural capital," in Proc. HICSS, Big Island, HI, USA, 2004, pp. 70-203.