Using metabarcoding to reveal and quantify plant-pollinator interactions

Scientific Reports

Volumn 6, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Pornon, André ^a,b   Escaravage, Nathalie ^a,b   Burrus, Monique ^a,b   Holota, Hélène ^a,b   Khimoun, Aurélie ^c   Mariette, Jérome ^d   Pellizzari, Charlène ^a,b   Iribar, Amaia ^a,b   Etienne, Roselyne ^a,b   Taberlet, Pierre ^e   Vidal, Marie ^d   Winterton, Peter ^a   Zinger, Lucie ^a,b   Andalo, Christophe ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PAUL SABATIER   (France)

^b Laboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

^d CEMAGREF   (France)

^e UNIVERSITÉ JOSEPH FOURIER   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INSECT; PERCEPTION; PLANT COMMUNITY; POLLINATION; POLLINATOR; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; SPECIES; ANIMAL; DNA BARCODING; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT; PLANT PHYSIOLOGY; POLLEN; PROCEDURES; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

PLANT DNA;

ANIMALS; DNA BARCODING, TAXONOMIC; DNA, PLANT; INSECTA; PLANT PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; PLANTS; POLLEN; POLLINATION; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84973358462     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep27282     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Biesmeijer, J. C. et al. Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science 313, 351-354 (2006).
2. Goulson, D. Effects of introduced bees on native ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34, 1-26 (2003).
3. Scheper, J. et al. Museum specimens reveal loss of pollen host plants as key factor driving wild bee decline in The Netherlands. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 49, 17552-17557 (2014).
4. Clare, E. L., Schiestl, F. T., Leitch, A. R. & Chittka, L. The promise of genomics in the study of plant-pollinator interactions. Genome Biol 14, 1-11 (2013).
5. Bascompte, J. & Jordano, P. Plant-animal mutualistic networks: the architecture of biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 38, 567-593 (2007).
6. Vázquez, D. P., Chacoff, N. P. & Cagnolo, L. Evaluating multiple determinants of the structure of plant-animal mutualistic networks. Ecology 90, 2039-2046 (2009).
7. Genini, J., Patricia, L., Morellato, C., Guimaraes, Jr. P. R. & Olesen, J. M. Cheaters in mutualism networks. Biol Lett 6, 494-497 (2010).
8. Morales, C. L. & Traveset, A. Interspecific pollen transfer: Magnitude, prevalence and consequences for plant fitness. Crit Rev Pl Sci 27, 221-238 (2008).
9. Moeller, D. A. & Geber, M. A. Ecological context of the evolution of self-pollination in Clarkia xantiana: Population size, plant communities, and reproductive assurance. Evolution 59, 786-799 (2005).
10. Carvell, C., Westrich, P., Meek, W. R., Pywell, R. F. & Nowakowski, M. Assessing the value of annual and perennial forage mixtures for bumblebees by direct observation and pollen analysis. Apidologie 37, 326-340 (2005).
11. Lopezaraiza-Mikel, M. E., Hayes, R. B., Whalley, M. R. & Memmott, J. The impact of an alien plant on A native plant-pollinator network: an experimental approach. Ecol Lett 10, 539-550 (2009).
12. King, C., Ballantyne, G. & Willmer, P. G. Why flower visitation is A poor proxy for pollination: measuring single-visit pollen deposition, with implications for pollination networks and conservation. Meth Ecol Evol 4, 811-818 (2013).
13. Popic, T. J., Wardle, G. M. & Davila, Y. C. Flower-visitor networks only partially predict the function of pollen transport by bees. Aust Ecol, doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2012.02377.x (2012).
14. Galimberti, A. et al. A DNA barcoding approach to characterize pollen collected by honeybees. Plos One 9(10), e109363 (2014).
15. Potts, S. G. et al. Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers. Trends Ecol Evol 25(6), 345-353 (2010).
16. Schweiger, O. et al. Multiple stressors on biotic interactions: how climate change and alien species interact to affect pollination. Biol Rev 85, 777-795 (2010).
17. Taberlet, P., Coissac, E., Hajibabaei, M. & Rieseberg, L. H. Environmental DNA. Mol Ecol 21, 1789-1793 (2012).
18. Epp, L. S. et al. New environmental metabarcodes for analysing soil DNA: potential for studying past and present ecosystems. Mol Ecol 21, 1821-1833 (2012).
19. Fonseca, V. G. et al. Second-generation environmental sequencing unmasks marine metazoan biodiversity. Nature Com 1, 98, doi: 10.1038/ncomms1095 (2010).
20. Ficetola, G. F., Miaud, C., Pompanon, F. & Taberlet, P. Species detection using environmental DNA from water samples. Biol Lett, doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0118 (2008).
21. Peterson, G., Johansen, B. & Seberg, O. PCR and sequencing form A sing pollen grain. Plant Mol Biol 31, 189-191 (1996).
22. Wilson, E. E., Sidhu, C. S., Levan, K. E. & Holway, D. A. Pollen foraging behaviour of solitary Hawaiian bees revealed through molecular pollen analysis. Mol Ecol 19, 4823-4829 (2010).
23. Sickel, W. et al. Increased efficiency in identifying mixed pollen samples by meta-barcoding with A dual-indexing approach. BMC Ecol, doi: 10.1186/s12898-015-0051-y (2015).
24. Richardson, R. T. et al. Application of ITS2 metabarcoding to determine the provenance of pollen collected by honey bees in an agroecosystem. Appl Plant Sci 3(1), 1400066 (2015).
25. Amend, A. S., Seifert, K. A. & Bruns, T. D. Quantifying microbial communities with 454 pyrosequencing: does read abundance count? Mol Ecol 19(24), 5555-65 (2010).
26. Hollingsworth, P. M., Graham, S. W. & Little, D. P. Choosing and using A plant DNA barcode. Plos One 6, e19254 (2011).
27. Thomsen, P. F. & Willerslev, E. Environmental DNA-an emerging tool in conservation for monitoring past and present biodiversity. Biol Conserv 183, 4-18 (2015).
28. Miya, M. et al. MiFish, A set of universal PCR primers for metabarcoding environmental DNA from fishes: detection of more than 230 subtropical marine species. R Soc Open Sci 2(7), 150088 (2015).
29. Delmas, C. E. L. Interactions plantes-pollinisateurs et reproduction sexuée en habitat fragmenté. PhD thesis, Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse 3 (2012).
30. Kunin, W. E. Sex and the single mustard: population density and pollinator behavior effects on seed-set. Ecology 74, 2145-2160 (1993).
31. Lundgren, R., Lázaro, A. & Totland, Ø. Experimental pollinator decline affects plant reproduction and is mediated by plant mating system. J Poll Ecol 11(7), 46-56 (2013).
32. Giovanetti, M. & Aronne, G. Honey bee interest in flowers with anemophilous characteristics: first notes on handling time and routine on Fraxinus ornus and Castanea sativa. Bull Insect 64(1), 77-82 (2011).
33. Kraaijeveld, K. et al. Efficient and sensitive identification and quantification of airborne pollen using next-generation DNA sequencing. Mol Ecol Resour 15, 8-16 (2015).
34. Keller, A. et al. Evaluating multiplexed next-generation sequencing as A method in palynology for mixed pollen samples. Plant Biol 17, 558-566 (2015).
35. Charrier, O. Histoire biogéographique et système de reproduction de Rhododendron ferrugineum dans les Pyrénées. PhD thesis, Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse 3 (2014).
36. Escaravage, N. & Wagner, J. Pollination effectiveness and pollen dispersal in A Rhododendron ferrugineum (Ericaceae) population. Plant Biol 6, 606-615 (2004).
37. Harder, L. D. Behavioral responses by bumble bees to variation in pollen availability Oecologia 85(1), 41-47 (1990).
38. Pacini, E. & Hesse, M. Pollenkitt-its composition, forms and functions. Flora 200, 399-415 (2005).
39. Meo, A. A. & Khan, M. A. Pollen morphology as an aid to the identification of Chrysanthemum species (compositae-anthemideae) from Pakistan. Pakistan J Bot 38(1), 29-41 (2006).
40. Candido, R. S., da Silva Fourny, A. C., Gonçalves-Esteves, V. & Lopes, R. C. Hippeastrum species in areas of Restinga in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: pollen characters. Acta Bot. Brasilica 27(4), 661-668 (2013).
41. Kosenko, V. N. Contributions to the pollen morphology and taxonomy of the Liliaceae. Grana 38, 20-30 (1999).
42. Bennett, M. D. & Leitch, I. J. Plant DNA C-values Database (2012). Available at: http://data.kew.org/cvalues/(Accessed: 13 December 2015).
43. Declèves, S. Qualité diététique du pollen: le paradoxe des Asteraceae. Mémoire fin d'études, Master 2, Université de Mons (2014).
44. Matsuki, Y., Tateno, R., Shibata, M. & Isagi, Y. Pollination efficiencies of flower-visiting insects as determined by direct genetic analysis of pollen origin. Am J Bot 95(8), 925-930 (2008).
45. Gibson, R. H., Nelson, I. L., Hopkins, G. W., Hamlett, B. J. & Memmott, J. Pollinator webs, plant communities and the conservation of rare plants: Arable weeds as A case study. J Appl Ecol 43, 246-257 (2006).
46. Taberlet, P., Gielly, L., Pautou, G. & Bouvet, J. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Mol Biol 17, 1105-1109 (1991).
47. Alvarez, I. & Wendel, J. F. Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference. Mol Phyl Evol 29, 417-434 (2003).
48. Taberlet, P. et al. Power and limitations of the chloroplast trnL (UAA) intron for plant DNA barcoding. Nucleic Acids Res 35, e14 (2007).
49. Jurado-Rivera, J. A., Vogler, A. P., Reid, A. P. V., Petitpierre, E. & Gómez-Zurita, J. DNA barcoding insect-host plant associations. Proc R Soc B 276, 639-648 (2009).
50. Baamrane, M. A. A. et al. Assessment of the food habits of the Moroccan Dorcas gazelle in M'Sabih Talaa, West Central Morocco, using the trnL approach. Plos One 7(4), e35643 (2012).
51. White, T. J., Bruns, T., Lee, S. & Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR protocols, A guide to methods and applications (eds Innis, M. A. et al.) 315-322. (Academic Press, 1990).
52. Rousset, F. & Ferdy, J.-B. Testing environmental and genetic effects in the presence of spatial autocorrelation. Ecography 37(8), 781-790 (2014).
53. Delmas, C. E. L. et al. Relative impact of mate versus pollinator availability on pollen limitation and outcrossing rates in A massflowering species. Plant Biol 17(1), 209-218 (2014).
54. Delmas, C. E. L., Escaravage, N. & Pornon, A. Massive floral display affects insect visits but not pollinator-mediated pollen transfer in Rhododendron ferrugineum. Plant Biol 16, 234-243 (2014).
55. Horskins, K. & Turner, V. B. Resource use and foraging patterns of honeybees, Apis mellifera, and native insects on flowers of Eucalyptus costata. Aust. J. Ecol. 24, 221-227 (1999).
56. Esling, P., Lejzerowicz, F. & Pawlowski, J. Accurate multiplexing and filtering for high-throughput amplicon-sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res 43(5), 2513-2524 (2015).
57. Ficetola, G. F. et al. An in silico approach for the evaluation of DNA barcodes. BMC Genomics 11, 434 (2010).
58. Boyer, F. et al. Obitools: A unix-inspired software package for DNA metabarcoding. Mol Ecol Resour, doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12428 (2016).
59. Magoc, T. & Salsberg, S. L. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 27(21), 2957-2963 (2011).
60. Needleman, S. B. & Wunsch, C. D. A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J Mol Biol 48(3), 443-53 (1970).