The promise of genomics in the study of plant-pollinator interactions

Genome Biology

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2013, Pages

  Clare, Elizabeth L ^a   Schiestl, Florian P ^b   Leitch, Andrew R ^a   Chittka, Lars ^a  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Adaptation; coevolution; ecological genomics; hybridization; polyploidy; sensory systems; standing genetic variation; transcriptome

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; APIS MELLIFERA; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA; ARTICLE; BIRD; DROSOPHILA; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE LOCATION; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME ANALYSIS; GENOME SIZE; HUMMING BIRD; INTERSPECIFIC HYBRIDIZATION; NONHUMAN; ORGANISMAL INTERACTION; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; PLANT GENE; PLANT GENOME; PLANT POLLINATOR INTERACTION; POLLINATION; POLLINATOR; POLYPLOIDY; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; ADAPTATION; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; ANIMAL; BAT; BOVIDS; EVOLUTION; FLOWER; GENETICS; GENOMICS; HERBIVORY; INSECT; PHYSIOLOGY; PLOIDY;

TRANSCRIPTOME;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; BIRDS; CHIROPTERA; FLOWERS; GENES, PLANT; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOMICS; HERBIVORY; INSECTS; PLOIDIES; POLLINATION; RUMINANTS; TRANSCRIPTOME;

EID: 84883795637     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1474760X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-6-207     Document Type: Article

References (114)

1. Rosenstiel TN, Shortlidge EE, Melnychenko AN, Pankow JF, Eppley SM. Sex-specific volatile compounds influence microarthropod-mediated fertilization of moss. Nature 2012, 489:431-433. 10.1038/nature11330, 22810584.
2. Wetschnig W, Depisch B. Pollination biology of Welwitschia mirabilis Hook.f. (Welwitschiaceae, Gnetopsida). Phyton 1999, 39:167-183.
3. Norstog KJ, Stevenson DW, Niklas KJ. The role of beetles in the pollination of Zamia furfuracea L. fil. (Zamiaceae). Biotropica 1986, 18:300-306.
4. Kato M, Inoue T, Nagamitsu T. Pollination biology of Gnetum (Gnetaceae) in a lowland mixed dipterocarp forest in Sarawak. Am J Bot 1995, 82:862-868.
5. Chittka L, Raine NE. Recognition of flowers by pollinators. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2006, 9:428-435. 10.1016/j.pbi.2006.05.002, 16713328.
6. Schiestl FP, Johnson SD. Pollinator-mediated evolution of floral signals. Trends Ecol Evolution 2013, 28:307-315.
7. Hermann K, Kuhlemeier C. The genetic architecture of natural variation in flower morphology. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2011, 14:60-65. 10.1016/j.pbi.2010.09.012, 20934369.
8. Schiestl FP, Schlüter PM. Floral isolation, specialized pollination, and pollinator behavior in orchids. Annu Rev Entomol 2009, 54:425-446. 10.1146/annurev.ento.54.110807.090603, 19067636.
9. Waser NM, Chittka L, Price MV, Williams NM, Ollerton J. Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters. Ecology 1996, 77:1043-1060.
10. Dyer AG, Whitney HM, Arnold SEJ, Glover BJ, Chittka L. Mutations perturbing petal cell shape and anthocyanin synthesis influence bumblebee perception of Antirrhinum majus flower colour. Arthropod Plant Interact 2007, 1:45-55.
11. Muchhala N. Adaptive trade-off in floral morphology mediates specialization for flowers pollinated by bats and hummingbirds. Am Nat 2007, 169:494-504. 10.1086/512047, 17427121.
12. Leonard AS, Papaj DR. "X" marks the spot: The possible benefits of nectar guides to bees and plants. Funct Ecol 2011, 25:1293-1301.
13. Lunau K, Papiorek S, Eltz T, Sazima M. Avoidance of achromatic colours by bees provides a private niche for hummingbirds. J Exp Biol 2011, 214:1607-1612. 10.1242/jeb.052688, 21490268.
14. Gegear RJ. Multicomponent floral signals elicit selective foraging in bumblebees. Naturwissenschaften 2005, 92:269-271. 10.1007/s00114-005-0621-5, 15883831.
15. Whitney HM, Kolle M, Andrew P, Chittka L, Steiner U, Glover BJ. Floral iridescence, produced by diffractive optics, acts as a cue for animal pollinators. Science 2009, 323:130-133. 10.1126/science.1166256, 19119235.
16. Simon R, Holderied MW, Koch CU, Von Helversen O. Floral acoustics: conspicuous echoes of a dish-shaped leaf attract bat pollinators. Science 2011, 333:631-633. 10.1126/science.1204210, 21798950.
17. Clark D, Whitney H, Sutton G, Robert D. Detection and learning of floral electric fields by bumblebees. Science 2013, 340:66-69. 10.1126/science.1230883, 23429701.
18. Xu S, Schlüter PM, Grossniklaus U, Schiestl FP. The genetic basis of pollinator adaptation in a sexually deceptive orchid. PLoS Genet 2012, 8:e1002889. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002889, 3420943, 22916031.
19. The Honeybee Genome Sequencing Consortium Insights into social insects from the genome of the honeybee Apis mellifera. Nature 2006, 443:931-949. 10.1038/nature05260, 2048586, 17073008, The Honeybee Genome Sequencing Consortium.
20. Kessler D, Baldwin IT. Making sense of nectar scents: the effects of nectar secondary metabolites on floral visitors of Nicotiana attenuata. Plant J 2006, 49:840-854.
21. Kessler D, Diezel C, Baldwin IT. Changing pollinators as a means of escaping herbivores. Curr Biol 2010, 20:237-242. 10.1016/j.cub.2009.11.071, 20096581.
22. Chittka L, Döring TF. Are autumn foliage colors red signals to aphids?. PLoS Biol 2007, 5:1640-1644.
23. Wessinger C, Rausher MD. Lessons from flower colour evolution on targets of selection. J Exp Bot 2012, 63:5741-5749. 10.1093/jxb/ers267, 23048126.
24. Rieseberg LH, Willis JH. Plant speciation. Science 2007, 317:910-914. 10.1126/science.1137729, 2442920, 17702935.
25. Pauw A, Stofberg J, Waterman R. Flies and flowers in Darwins's race. Evolution 2009, 63:268-279. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00547.x, 19146595.
26. Strasburg JL, Sherman NA, Wright KM, Moyle LC, Willis JH, Rieseberg LH. What can patterns of differentiation across plant genomes tell us about adaptation and speciation?. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2012, 367:364-373. 10.1098/rstb.2011.0199, 3233712, 22201166.
27. Elmer KR, Meyer A. Adaptation in the age of ecological genomics: insights from parallelism and convergence. Trends Ecol Evol 2011, 26:298-306. 10.1016/j.tree.2011.02.008, 21459472.
28. Wallace JG, Larsson SJ, Buckler ES. Entering the second century of maize quantitative genetics. Heredity 2013, doi: 10.1038/hdy.2013.6.
29. Weber A, Briggs W, Rucker J, Baltazar M, Sanchez-Gonzales J, Feng P, Buckler ES, Doebley J. The genetic architecture of complex traits in teosinte (Zea mays ssp. parviglumis): new evidence from association mapping. Genetics 2008, 180:1221-1232. 10.1534/genetics.108.090134, 2567369, 18791250.
30. Bancroft I. Association genetics and more from crop transcriptome sequences. Information Systems for Biotechnology News 2013,, http://www.isb.vt.edu/news/2013/Jan/bancroft.pdf
31. Hayes B, Lewin H, Goddard M. The future of livestock breeding: genomic selection for efficiency, reduced emissions intensity and adaptation. Trends Genet 2013, 29:206-214. 10.1016/j.tig.2012.11.009, 23261029.
32. Atwell S, Huang YS, Vilhjálmsson BJ, Willems G, Horton M, Li Y, Meng D, Platt A, Tarone AM, Hu TT, Jiang R, Muliyati NW, Zhang X, Amer MA, Baxter I, Brachi B, Chory J, Dean C, Debieu M, De Meaux J, Ecker JR, Faure N, Kniskern JM, Jones JDG, Michael T, Nemri A, Roux F, Salt DE, Tang C, Todesco M, et al. Genome-wide association study of 107 phenotypes in Arabidopsis thaliana inbred lines. Nature 2010, 465:627-631. 10.1038/nature08800, 3023908, 20336072.
33. Ekblom R, Galindo J. Applications of next generation sequencing in molecular ecology of non-model organisms. Heredity 2011, 107:1-15. 10.1038/hdy.2010.152, 3186121, 21139633.
34. Baird NA, Etter PD, Atwood TS, Currey MC, Shiver AL, Lewis ZA, Selker EU, Cresko WA, Johnson EA. Rapid SNP discovery and genetic mapping using sequenced RAD markers. PLoS ONE 2008, 3:e3376. 10.1371/journal.pone.0003376, 2557064, 18852878.
35. The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 2000, 408:796-815. 10.1038/35048692, 11130711, The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative.
36. Feuillet C, Leach JE, Rogers J, Schnable PS, Eversole K. Crop genome sequencing: lessons and rationales. Trends Plant Sci 2010, 16:77-88.
37. Edwards D, Batley J. Plant genome sequencing: applications for crop improvement. Plant Biotechnol J 2010, 8:2-9. 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2009.00459.x, 19906089.
38. Moyle LC. Ecological and evolutionary genomics in the wild tomatoes (Solanum sect. Lycopersicon). Evolution 2008, 62:2995-3013. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00487.x, 18752600.
39. Consortium TTG. The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature 2012, 485:635-641. 10.1038/nature11119, 3378239, 22660326.
40. Baucom RS, Chang S-M, Kniskern JM, Rausher MD, Stinchcombe JR. Morning glory as a powerful model in ecological genomics: tracing adaptation through both natural and artificial selection. Heredity 2011, 107:377-385. 10.1038/hdy.2011.25, 3199921, 21448228.
41. Bossolini E, Klahre U, Brandenburg A, Reinhardt D, Kuhlemeier C. High resolution linkage maps of the model organism Petunia reveal substantial synteny decay with the related genome of tomato. Genome 2011, 54:327-340. 10.1139/g10-116, 21491975.
42. Phytozone: Mimulus guttatus v1.1 (Monkey flower), http://www.phytozome.net/mimulus
43. Cronk Q, Ojeda I. Bird-pollinated flowers in an evolutionary and molecular context. J Exp Bot 2008, 59:715-727. 10.1093/jxb/ern009, 18326865.
44. Robinson GE, Hackett KJ, Purcell-Miramontes M, Brown SJ, Evans JD, Goldsmith MR, Lawson D, Okamuro J, Robertson HM, Schneider DJ. Creating a buzz about insect genomes. Science 2011, 331:1386. 10.1126/science.331.6023.1386, 21415334.
45. The 1KP Project, http://www.onekp.com
46. Yuan Y-W, Sagawa JM, Young RC, Christensen BJ, Bradshaw HD. Genetic dissection of a major anthocyanin QTL contributing to pollinator-mediated reproductive isolation between sister species of Mimulus. Genetics 2013, 194:255-263. 10.1534/genetics.112.146852, 23335333.
47. Cardinal S, Danforth BN. Bees diversified in the age of eudicots. Proc Biol Sci 2013, 280:1471-2954.
48. Wheat CW, Vogel H, Wittstock U, Braby MF, Underwood D, Mitchell-Olds T. The genetic basis of a plant-insect coevolutionary key innovation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007, 104:20427-20431. 10.1073/pnas.0706229104, 2154447, 18077380.
49. Whittall JB, Hodges SA. Pollinator shifts drive increasingly long nectar spurs in columbine flowers. Nature 2007, 447:706-709. 10.1038/nature05857, 17554306.
50. Yashina S, Gubin S, Maksimovich S, Yashina A, Gakhova E, Gilichinsky D. Regeneration of whole fertile plants from 30,000-y-old fruit tissue buried in Siberian permafrost. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012, 109:4008-4013. 10.1073/pnas.1118386109, 3309767, 22355102.
51. Kessler D, Gase K, Baldwin IT. Field experiments with transformed plants reveal the sense of floral scents. Science 2008, 321:1200-1202. 10.1126/science.1160072, 18755975.
52. Sapir Y. Pollination genetics: using molecular genetic underlying floral traits to study pollination ecology in an evolutionary context. Israel J Plant Sci 2009, 57:141-149.
53. Darwin C. The Effects of Cross and Self-Fertilization in the Vegetable Kingdom 1877, London: John Murray.
54. Bradshaw HD, Wilbert SM, Otto KG, Schemske DW. Genetic mapping of floral traits associated with reproductive isolation in monkeyflowers (Mimulus). Nature 1995, 376:762-765.
55. Clegg MT, Durbin ML. Flower color variation: a model for the experimental study of evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000, 97:7016-7023. 10.1073/pnas.97.13.7016, 34378, 10860965.
56. Schoen DJ, Giannasi DE, Ennos RA, Clegg MT. Stem color and pleiotropy of genes determining flower color in the common morning glory. J Hered 1984, 75:113-116.
57. Epperson BK, Clegg MT. Instability at a flower color locus in the morning glory. J Hered 1987, 78:346-352.
58. Epperson BK, Clegg MT. Unstable white flower colour genes and their derivatives in morning glory. J Hered 1992, 83:405-409.
59. Schemske DW, Bradshaw HD. Pollinator preference and the evolution of floral traits in monkeyflowers (Mimulus). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999, 96:11910-11915. 10.1073/pnas.96.21.11910, 18386, 10518550.
60. Dudash MR, Hassler C, Stevens PM, Fenster CB. Experimental floral and inflorescence trait manipulations affect pollinator preference and function in a hummingbird-pollinated plant. Am J Bot 2011, 98:275-282. 10.3732/ajb.1000350, 21613116.
61. Chittka L, Waser NM. Why red flowers are not invisible to bees. Israel J Plant Sci 1997, 45:169-183.
62. Bradshaw HD, Schemske DW. Allele substitution at a flower colour locus produces a pollinator shift in monkeyflowers. Nature 2003, 426:176-178. 10.1038/nature02106, 14614505.
63. Raine N, Ings T, Dornhaus A, Saleh N, Chittka L. Adaptation, genetic drift, pleiotropy, and history in the evolution of bee foraging behaviour. Adv Study Behav 2006, 36:305-354.
64. Whitney HM, Chittka L, Bruce TJA, Glover BJ. Conical epidermal cells allow bees to grip flowers and increase foraging efficiency. Curr Biol 2009, 19:948-953. 10.1016/j.cub.2009.04.051, 19446458.
65. Klahre U, Gurba A, Hermann K, Saxenhofer M, Bossolini E, Guerin PM, Kuhlemeier C. Pollinator choice in Petunia depends on two major genetic loci for floral scent production. Curr Biol 2011, 21:730-739. 10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.059, 21497087.
66. Stuurman J, Hoballah ME, Broger L, Moore J, Basten C, Kuhlemeier C. Dissection of floral pollination syndromes in Petunia. Genetics 2004, 168:1585-1599. 10.1534/genetics.104.031138, 1448759, 15579709.
67. Conner JK. Ecological genetics of floral evolution. The Ecology and Evolution of Flowers 2006, 260-277. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Harder LD, Barrett SCH.
68. Singaravelan N, Ne'eman G, Inbar M, Izhaki I. Feeding responses of free-flying honeybees to secondary compounds mimicking floral nectars. J Chem Ecol 2005, 31:2791-2804. 10.1007/s10886-005-8394-z, 16365705.
69. Wright GA, Baker DD, Palmer MJ, Stabler D, Mustard JA, Power EF, Borland AM, Stevenson PC. Caffeine in floral nectar enhances a pollinator's memory of reward. Science 2013, 339:1202-1204. 10.1126/science.1228806, 23471406.
70. Smith DR, Brown WM. Polymorphisms in mitochondrial DNA of European and Africanized honeybees (Apis mellifera). Experientia 1988, 44:257-260. 10.1007/BF01941730, 2895016.
71. Savard J, Tautz D, Richards S, Weinstock GM, Gibbs RA, Werren JH, Tettelin H, Lercher MJ. Phylogenomic analysis reveals bees and wasps (Hymenoptera) at the base of the radiation of Holometabolous insects. Genome Res 2006, 16:1334-1338. 10.1101/gr.5204306, 1626634, 17065606.
72. Mallet J. Hybridization as an invasion of the genome. Trends Ecol Evol 2005, 20:229-237. 10.1016/j.tree.2005.02.010, 16701374.
73. Jiao Y, Wickett NJ, Ayyampalayam S, Chanderbali AS, Landherr L, Ralph PE, Tomsho LP, Hu Y, Liang H, Soltis PS, Soltis DE, Clifton SW, Schlarbaum SE, Schuster SC, Ma H, Leebens-Mack J, dePamphilis CW. Ancestral polyploidy in seed plants and angiosperms. Nature 2011, 473:97-100. 10.1038/nature09916, 21478875.
74. Leitch AR, Leitch IJ. Genomic plasticity and the diversity of polyploid plants. Science 2008, 320:481-483. 10.1126/science.1153585, 18436776.
75. Soltis DE, Albert VA, Leebens-Mack J, Bell CD, Paterson AH, Zheng C, Sankoff D, Depamphilis CW, Wall PK, Soltis PS. Polyploidy and angiosperm diversification. Am J Bot 2009, 96:336-348. 10.3732/ajb.0800079, 21628192.
76. Wood TE, Takebayashi N, Barker MS, Mayrose I, Greenspoon PB, Rieseberg LH. The frequency of polyploid speciation in vascular plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009, 106:13875-13879. 10.1073/pnas.0811575106, 2728988, 19667210.
77. Buggs RJA, Soltis PS, Mavrodiev E V, Symonds VV, Soltis DE. Does phylogenetic distance between parental genomes govern the success of polyploids?. Castanea 2008, 73:74-93.
78. Paun O, Forest F, Fay MF, Chase MW. Hybrid speciation in angiosperms: parental divergence drives ploidy. New Phytol 2009, 182:507-518. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02767.x, 2988484, 19220761.
79. Grover CE, Gallagher JP, Szadkowski EP, Yoo MJ, Flagel LE, Wendel JF. Homoeolog expression bias and expression level dominance in allopolyploids. New Phytol 2012, 196:966-971. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04365.x, 23033870.
80. Leitch AR, Leitch IJ. Ecological and genetic factors linked to contrasting genome dynamics in seed plants. New Phytol 2012, 194:629-646. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04105.x, 22432525.
81. Cooley AM, Modliszewski JL, Rommel ML, Willis JH. Gene duplication in Mimulus underlies parallel floral evolution via independent trans-regulatory changes. Curr Biol 2011, 21:700-704. 10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.028, 21474312.
82. Karrenberg S, Lexer C, Rieseberg LH. Reconstructing the history of selection during homoploid hybrid speciation. Am Nat 2007, 169:725-737. 10.1086/516758, 2442913, 17479459.
83. Chen ZJ. Genetic and epigenetic mechanisms for gene expression and phenotypic variation in plant polyploids. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2007, 58:377-406. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.58.032806.103835, 1949485, 17280525.
84. Aubourg S, Lecharny A, Bohlmann J. Genomic analysis of the terpenoid synthase (AtTPS) gene family of Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Genet Genom 2002, 267:730-745.
85. Dudareva N, Klempien A, Muhlemann JK, Kaplan I. Biosynthesis, function and metabolic engineering of plant volatile organic compounds. New Phytol 2013, 198:16-32. 10.1111/nph.12145, 23383981.
86. Schlüter PM, Xu S, Gagliardini V, Whittle E, Shanklin J, Grossniklaus U, Schiestl FP. Stearoyl-acyl carrier protein desaturases are associated with floral isolation in sexually deceptive orchids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011, 108:5696-5701. 10.1073/pnas.1013313108, 3078338, 21436056.
87. Gupta AK, Akhtar TA, Widmer A, Pichersky E, Schiestl FP. Identification of white campion (Silene latifolia) guaiacol O-methyltransferase involved in the biosynthesis of veratrole, a key volatile for pollinator attraction. BMC Plant Biol 2012, 12:158. 10.1186/1471-2229-12-158, 3492160, 22937972.
88. Symondson WOC. Molecular identification of prey in predator diets. Mol Ecol 2002, 11:627-641. 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01471.x, 11972753.
89. Pompanon F, Deagle BE, Symondson WOC, Brown DS, Jarman SN, Taberlet P. Who is eating what: diet assessment using next generation sequencing. Mol Ecol 2012, 21:1931-1950. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05403.x, 22171763.
90. Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc Biol Sci 2003, 270:313-321. 10.1098/rspb.2002.2218, 1691236, 12614582.
91. Ratnasingham S, Hebert PDN. BOLD The barcode of life data systems http://www.barcodinglife.org. Mol Ecol Notes 2007, 7:355-364. 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01678.x, 1890991, 18784790.
92. Floyd RM, Clare EL. Food forensics: New technology uses DNA to reveal what's on the menu for bats. BATS 2009, 27:6-8.
93. McCann K. Protecting biostructure. Nature 2007, 446:29. 10.1038/446029a, 17330028.
94. CBOL plant working group A DNA barcode for land plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009, 106:12794-12797. 2722355, 19666622, CBOL plant working group.
95. Wilson EE, Sidhu CS, LeVan KE, Holway DA. Pollen foraging behaviour of solitary Hawaiian bees revealed through molecular pollen analysis. Mol Ecol 2010, 19:4823-4829. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04849.x, 20958818.
96. Valentini A, Miquel C, Nawaz MA, Bellemain E, Coissac E, Pompanon F, Gielly L, Cruaud C, Nascetti G, Wincker P, Swenson JE, Taberlet P. New perspectives in diet analysis based on DNA barcoding and parallel pyrosequencing: the trnL approach. Mol Ecol Resour 2009, 9:51-60.
97. Soininen EM, Valentini A, Coissac E, Miquel C, Gielly L, Brochmann C, Brysting AK, Sønstebø JH, Ims RA, Yoccoz NG, Taberlet P. Analysing diet of small herbivores: the efficiency of DNA barcoding coupled with high-throughput pyrosequencing for deciphering the composition of complex plant mixtures. Front Zool 2009, 6:16. 10.1186/1742-9994-6-16, 2736939, 19695081.
98. Von Helversen O, Winkler L, Bestmann HJ. Sulphur-containing "perfumes'' attract flower-visiting bats. J Comp Physiol A 2000, 186:143-153. 10.1007/s003590050014, 10707312.
99. Hayden S, Bekaert M, Crider TA, Mariani S, Murphy WJ, Teeling EC. Ecological adaptation determines functional mammalian olfactory subgenomes. Genome Res 2010, 20:1-9. 10.1101/gr.099416.109, 2798820, 19952139.
100. Stapley J, Reger J, Feulner PGD, Smadja C, Galindo J, Ekblom R, Bennison C, Ball AD, Beckerman AP, Slate J. Adaptation genomics: the next generation. Trends Ecol Evol 2010, 25:705-712. 10.1016/j.tree.2010.09.002, 20952088.
101. Hodges SA, Derieg NJ. Adaptive radiations: From field to genomic studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009, 106:9947-9954. 10.1073/pnas.0901594106, 2702792, 19528644.
102. Hsu C-C, Chung Y-L, Chen T-C, Lee Y-L, Kuo Y-T, Tsai W-C, Hsiao Y-Y, Chen Y-W, Wu W-L, Chen H-H. An overview of the Phalaenopsis orchid genome through BAC end sequence analysis. BMC Plant Biol 2011, 11:1-11. 10.1186/1471-2229-11-1, 3025944, 21205309.
103. Bombarely A, Rosli HG, Vrebalov J, Moffett P, Mueller LA, Martin GB. A draft genome sequence of Nicotiana benthamiana to enhance molecular plant-microbe biology research. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2012, 25:1523-1530. 10.1094/MPMI-06-12-0148-TA, 22876960.
104. Plant DNA C-values database, http://data.kew.org/cvalues/
105. mimulusevolution.org, http://www.mimulusevolution.org
106. Wu CA, Lowry DB, Cooley AM, Wright KM, Lee YW, Willis JH. Mimulus is an emerging model system for the integration of ecological and genomic studies. Heredity 2008, 100:220-230. 10.1038/sj.hdy.6801018, 17551519.
107. Ollerton J, Cranmer L, Stelzer RJ, Sullivan S, Chittka L. Bird pollination of Canary Island endemic plants. Naturwissenschaften 2009, 96:221-232. 10.1007/s00114-008-0467-8, 18931830.
108. Des Marais DL, Rausher MD. Parallel evolution at multiple levels in the origin of hummingbird pollinated flowers in Ipomoea. Evolution 2010, 64:2044-2054.
109. Caruso CM. The ecological genetics of floral traits. Heredity 2006, 97:86-87. 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800853, 16736061.
110. Anssour S, Krugel T, Sharbel T, Saluz H, Bonaventure G, Baldwin I. Phenotypic, genetic and genomic consequences of natural and synthetic polyploidization of Nicotiana attenuata and Nicotiana obtusifolia. Ann Bot 2009, 103:1207-1217. 10.1093/aob/mcp058, 2685307, 19307190.
111. BOLDSYSTEMS, http://boldsystems.org/
112. NCBI Taxonomy, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
113. Arnot DE, Roper C, Bayoumi RAL. Digital codes from hypervariable tandemly repeated DNA sequences in the Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite gene can genetically barcode isolates. Mol Biochem Parasitol 1993, 61:15-24. 10.1016/0166-6851(93)90154-P, 8259128.
114. Floyd R, Abebe E, Papert A, Blaxter M. Molecular barcodes for soil nematode identification. Mol Ecol 2002, 11:839-850. 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01485.x, 11972769.