Exploring the biophysical option space for feeding the world without deforestation

Nature Communications

Volumn 7, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Erb, Karl Heinz ^a   Lauk, Christian ^a   Kastner, Thomas ^a   Mayer, Andreas ^a   Theurl, Michaela C ^a,b   Haberl, Helmut ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KLAGENFURT   (Austria)

^b Research Institute of Organic Agriculture   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL TRADE; BIOMASS; BIOPHYSICS; CROP YIELD; DEFORESTATION; DEVELOPING WORLD; EXPLORATION; FEEDING; FOOD SUPPLY; FUTURE PROSPECT; GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE; LIVESTOCK;

BIOMASS; CATERING SERVICE; CROPLAND; DEFORESTATION; DIET; FEEDING; GRAZING; HARVEST; HUMAN; LIVESTOCK; RURAL AREA; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; CROP PRODUCTION; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FORECASTING; FOREST; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROCEDURES; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TRENDS;

ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; BIOMASS; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; CROP PRODUCTION; FOOD SUPPLY; FORECASTING; FORESTS; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL;

EID: 84973334738     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11382     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Current State and Trends Vol. 1 (Island Press, 2005).
2. Erb, K.-H. et al. A comprehensive global 5 min resolution land-use data set for the year 2000 consistent with national census data. J. Land Use Sci. 2, 191-224 (2007).
3. Lambin, E. F. & Meyfroidt, P. Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 3465-3472 (2011).
4. Haberl, H. et al. Quantifying and mapping the human appropriation of net primary production in earth's terrestrial ecosystems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 12942-12947 (2007).
5. Krausmann, F. et al. Global human appropriation of net primary production doubled in the 20th century. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 10324-10329 (2013).
6. Ericksen, P. J., Ingram, J. S. I. & Liverman, D. M. Food security and global environmental change: emerging challenges. Environ. Sci. Policy 12, 373-377 (2009).
7. IAASTD. Agriculture at a crossroad. International assessment of agricultural knowledge, science and technology for development. Global Report (Island Press, 2009).
8. Foley, J. A. et al. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478, 337-342 (2011).
9. Saugier, B., Roy, J. & Mooney, H. A. in Terrestrial Global Productivity (eds Roy, J., Saugier, B. & Mooney, H. A.) 543-557 (Academic Press, 2001).
10. Sloan, S., Jenkins, C. N., Joppa, L. N., Gaveau, D. L. A. & Laurance, W. F. Remaining natural vegetation in the global biodiversity hotspots. Biol. Conserv. 177, 12-24 (2014).
11. Gibbs, H. K. et al. Tropical forests were the primary sources of new agricultural land in the 1980s and 1990s. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 16732-16737 (2010).
12. Meyfroidt, P. & Lambin, E. F. Global forest transition: prospects for an end to deforestation. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 36, 343-371 (2011).
13. Steffen, W. et al. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347, 1259855 (2015).
14. Alexandratos, N. & Bruinsma, J. World Agriculture: Towards 2030/2050. the 2012 Revision (FAO, 2012).
15. 2 emissions from land use change - forest conservation as a precondition for sustainable production of second generation bioenergy. Ecol. Econ. 74, 64-70 (2012).
16. Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J. & Befort, B. L. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 20260-20264 (2011).
17. Mauser, W. et al. Global biomass production potentials exceed expected future demand without the need for cropland expansion. Nat. Commun. 6, 8946 (2015).
18. Ray, D. K., Ramankutty, N., Mueller, N. D., West, P. C. & Foley, J. A. Recent patterns of crop yield growth and stagnation. Nat. Commun. 3, 1293 (2012).
19. Billen, G., Lassaletta, L. & Garnier, J. A vast range of opportunities for feeding the world in 2050: trade-off between diet, N contamination and international trade. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 025001 (2015).
20. Pimentel, D., Hepperly, P., Hanson, J., Douds, D. & Seidel, R. Environmental, energetic, and economic comparisons of organic and conventional farming systems. BioScience 55, 573-582 (2005).
21. Bengtsson, J., Ahnström, J. & Weibull, A. C. The effects of organic agriculture on biodiversity and abundance: a meta-analysis. Ecology 42, 261-269 (2005).
22. Gattinger, A. et al. Enhanced top soil carbon stocks under organic farming. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 18226-18231 (2012).
23. Badgley, C. & Perfecto, I. Can organic agriculture feed the world? Renew. Agr. Food Syst. 22, 80-86 (2007).
24. Connor, D. J. Organic agriculture cannot feed the world. Field Crops Res. 106, 187-190 (2008).
25. dePonti, T., Rijk, B. & van Ittersum, M. K. The crop yield gap between organic and conventional agriculture. Agr. Syst 108, 1-9 (2012).
26. Stehfest, E. et al. Climate benefits of changing diet. Clim. Change 95, 83-102 (2009).
27. Bajželj, B. et al. Importance of food-demand management for climate mitigation. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 924-929 (2014).
28. Smith, P. et al. How much land-based greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved without compromising food security and environmental goals? Glob. Change Biol. 19, 2285-2302 (2013).
29. Havlik, P. et al. Climate change mitigation through livestock system transitions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3709-3714 (2014).
30. Weindl, I. et al. Livestock in a changing climate: production system transitions as an adaptation strategy for agriculture. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 094021 (2015).
31. Popp, A. et al. Land-use protection for climate change mitigation. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 1095-1098 (2014).
32. Haberl, H. Competition for land: a sociometabolic perspective. Ecol. Econ. 119, 424-431 (2015).
33. Schader, C. et al. Impacts of feeding less food-competing feedstuffs to livestock on global food system sustainability. J. R. Soc. Interface 12, 20150891 (2015).
34. Eisler, M. C. et al. Agriculture: steps to sustainable livestock. Nature 507, 32-34 (2014).
35. Ripple, W. J. et al. Ruminants, climate change and climate policy. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 2-5 (2014).
36. Lambin, E. F. et al. Estimating the world's potentially available cropland using a bottom-up approach.. Glob. Environ. Change 23, 892-901 (2013).
37. Herrero, M. et al. Biomass use, production, feed efficiencies, and greenhouse gas emissions from global livestock systems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 20888-20893 (2013).
38. Erb, K.-H., Haberl, H. & Plutzar, C. Dependency of global primary bioenergy crop potentials in 2050 on food systems, yields, biodiversity conservation and political stability. Energy Policy 47, 260-269 (2012).
39. Haberl, H. et al. Global bioenergy potentials from agricultural land in 2050: sensitivity to climate change, diets and yields. Biomass Bioenergy 35, 4753-4769 (2011).
40. Tilman, D. & Clark, M. Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health. Nature 515, 518-522 (2014).
41. Smith, P. Delivering food security without increasing pressure on land. Glob. Food Sec. 2, 18-23 (2013).
42. Scarborough, P., Allender, S., Clarke, D., Wickramasinghe, K. & Rayner, M. Modelling the health impact of environmentally sustainable dietary scenarios in the UK. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 66, 710-715 (2012).
43. FAO. World Livestock 2011. Livestock in food security. (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2011).
44. Parfitt, J., Barthel, M. & Macnaughton, S. Food waste within food supply chains: quantification and potential for change to 2050. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 365, 3065-3081 (2010).
45. Rosenzweig, C. et al. Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3268-3273 (2014).
46. Godfray, H. C. J. et al. Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327, 812-818 (2010).
47. Mueller, N. D. et al. Closing yield gaps through nutrient and water management. Nature 490, 254-257 (2012).
48. Searchinger, T. D. et al. High carbon and biodiversity costs from converting Africa's wet savannahs to cropland. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 481-486 (2015).
49. Kastner, T., Erb, K.-H. & Haberl, H. Rapid growth in agricultural trade: effects on global area efficiency and the role of management. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 034015 (2014).
50. Müller, C. & Lotze-Campen, H. Integrating the complexity of global change pressures on land and water. Glob. Food Sec. 1, 88-93 (2012).
51. Overmars, K. P. et al. Estimating the opportunity costs of reducing carbon dioxide emissions via avoided deforestation, using integrated assessment modelling. Land Use Policy 41, 45-60 (2014).
52. Carter, S. et al. Mitigation of agricultural emissions in the tropics: comparing forest land-sparing options at the national level. Biogeosciences 12, 4809-4825 (2015).
53. Kindermann, G. et al. Global cost estimates of reducing carbon emissions through avoided deforestation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 10302-10307 (2008).
54. Leifeld, J. et al. Organic farming gives no climate change benefit through soil carbon sequestration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, E984-E984 (2013).
55. Popp, A. et al. Land-use transition for bioenergy and climate stabilization: model comparison of drivers, impacts and interactions with other land use based mitigation options. Clim. Change 123, 495-509 (2013).
56. Rosen, R. A. IAMs and peer review. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 390-390 (2015).
57. Krausmann, F., Erb, K.-H., Gingrich, S., Lauk, C. & Haberl, H. Global patterns of socioeconomic biomass flows in the year 2000: a comprehensive assessment of supply, consumption and constraints. Ecol. Econ. 65, 471-487 (2008).
58. Erb, K. H., Krausmann, F., Lucht, W. & Haberl, H. Embodied HANPP: Mapping the spatial disconnect between global biomass production and consumption. Ecol. Econ. 69, 328-334 (2009).
59. Petz, K. et al. Mapping and modelling trade-offs and synergies between grazing intensity and ecosystem services in rangelands using global-scale datasets and models.. Glob. Environ. Change 29, 223-234 (2014).
60. United Nations. World Population Prospects: the 2010 revision (United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, 2011).
61. Gustavsson, J., Cederberg, C., Sonesson, U., van Otterdijk, R. & Meybeck, A. Global food losses and food waste: extent, causes and prevention (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2011).
62. FAOSTAT. Statistical Databases. Available at: http://faostat.fao.org. Accessed on 15 April 2015.
63. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Scenarios Volume 2Island Press, 2005).
64. Seufert, V., Ramankutty, N. & Foley, J. A. Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture. Nature 485, 229-232 (2012).
65. von Fragstein und Niemsdorff, P. & Kristiansen, P. in Organic Agriculture. A Global Perspective (eds Kristiansen, P., Taji, A. & Reganold, J.) 53-82 (CABI, 2006).
66. Bouwman, A. F., Van der Hoek, K. W., Eickhout, B. & Soenario, I. Exploring changes in world ruminant production systems. Agr. Syst. 84, 121-153 (2005).
67. USDA & HHS. Dietary Guidelines for Americans (United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and US Health and Human Services (HHS), 2010).