Cellulose microfibrillated suspension of carrots obtained by mechanical defibrillation and their application in edible starch films

Industrial Crops and Products

Volumn 89, Issue , 2016, Pages 285-294

  Guimarães, Isabela Costa ^a,b   dos Reis, Kelen Cristina ^a   Menezes, Evandro Galvão Tavares ^a,b   Rodrigues, Ariel Costa ^a   da Silva, Thaís Ferreira ^a   de Oliveira, Isadora Rebouças Nolasco ^b   Vilas Boas, Eduardo Valério de Barros ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF LAVRAS   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF VIÇOSA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Cellulose; Corn starch; Daucus carota; Edible coating; Microfibrillated cellulose

Indexed keywords

CELLULOSE; CELLULOSE FILMS; DEFIBRILLATORS; NANOCELLULOSE; PARTICLE SIZE; REINFORCEMENT; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STARCH; SUSPENSIONS (FLUIDS); TENSILE STRENGTH;

CORN STARCH; DAUCUS CAROTA; EDIBLE COATING; EDIBLE FILMS; MECHANICAL DEFIBRILLATION; MICROFIBRILLATED CELLULOSE (MFC); STARCH FILMS; WATER VAPOR PERMEABILITY;

MECHANICAL PERMEABILITY;

AGGREGATION; CELLULOSE; PARTICLE SIZE; ROOT VEGETABLE; STARCH; TENSILE STRENGTH; WATER VAPOR;

CELLULOSE DERIVATIVES; DISPERSIONS; FIBRILS; PLANT FIBERS; VEGETABLES;

DAUCUS CAROTA; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84970021091     PISSN: 09266690     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.05.024     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. ASTM, 2000. Designition E96-00: Standard test method for water vapor transmission of materials.
2. ASTM, 2008. Designition D398-08 Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics.
3. Alves J.S. Elaboração e caracterização de filmes finos de amido de milho e parafina 2009, Universidade Federal de Lavras.
4. Abe K., Yano H. Comparison of the characteristics of cellulose microfibril aggregates of wood, rice straw and potato tuber. Cellulose 2009, 1017-1023. 10.1007/s10570-009-9334-9.
5. Alemdar A., Sain M. Isolation and characterization of nanofibers from agricultural residues - wheat straw and soy hulls. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99:1664-1671. 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.04.029.
6. Alain Dufresne, Cavaille J., Vignon M.R. Mechanical behavior of sheets prepared from sugar beet cellulose microfibrils. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1996, 1185-1194. 10.1002/(sici)1097-4628(19970509)64:6<1185:aid-app19>3.0.co;2-v.
7. Alves J.S., Reis K.C., Menezes E.G.T., Pereira F.V., Pereira J. Effect of cellulose nanocrystals and gelatin in corn starch plasticized films. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 115:215-222.
8. Avérous L., Fringant C., Moro L. Plasticized starch-cellulose interactions in polysaccharide composites. Polymer (Guildf). 2001, 42:6565-6572. 10.1016/S0032-3861(01)00125-2.
9. Azeredo H.M.C., Mattoso L.H.C., Wood D., Williams T.G., Avena-Bustillos R.J., McHugh T.H. Nanocomposite edible films from mango puree reinforced with cellulose nanofibers. J. Food Sci. 2009, 74:31-35. 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01186.x.
10. Azeredo H.M.C., Miranda K.W.E., Ribeiro H.L., Rosa M.F., Nascimento D.M. Nanoreinforced alginate-acerola puree coatings on acerola fruits. J. Food Eng. 2012, 113:505-510. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2012.08.006.
11. Bufalino L. Filmes de nanocelulose a partir de resíduos madeireiros da Amazônia 2014, Universidade Federal de Lavras.
12. Bourtoon T., Chinnan M.S. Preparation and properties of rice starch/chitosan blend biodegradable film. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2008, l41:1633-1664.
13. Bilbao-Sainz C., Bras J., Williams T., Sénechal T., Orts W. HPMC reinforced with different cellulose nano-particles. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 86:1549-1557. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.06.060.
14. Bufalino L., Neto A.R.D., Tonoli G.H.D., Fonseca A., de S., Costa T.G., Marconcini J.M., Colodette J.L., Labory C.R.G., Mendes L.M. How the chemical nature of Brazilian hardwoods affects nanofibrillation of cellulose fibers and film optical quality. Cellulose 2015, 22:3657-3672. 10.1007/s10570-015-0771-3.
15. Chen Y., Liu C., Chang P.R., Cao X., Anderson D.P. Bionanocomposites based on pea starch and cellulose nanowhiskers hydrolyzed from pea hull fibre: effect of hydrolysis time. Carbohydr. Polym. 2009, 76:607-615. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.11.030.
16. Cristina K., Helena H., Elias D.S., Carlos L., Lima D.O. Cucumis sativus L. SUBMETIDO 2006, 487-493.
17. De Azeredo H.M.C. Nanocomposites for food packaging applications. Food Res. Int. 2009, 42:1240-1253. 10.1016/j.foodres.2009.03.019.
18. Dias M.V. Filmes a base de quitosana incorporados com α-tocoferol e montmorilonita para a aplicação em embalagens funcional e antioxidante 2013, Universidade Federal de Lavras.
19. Do Amaral Sobral P.J. Inflûencia da espessura de biofilmes feitos à base de proteínas miofibrilares sobre suas propriedades funcionais. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 2000, 35:1251-1259. 10.1590/S0100-204X2000000600022.
20. Dinand E., Chanzy H., Vignon M.R. Parenchymal cell cellulose from sugar beet pulp: preparation and properties. Cellulose 1996, 3:183-188. 10.1007/BF02228800.
21. Elanthikkal S., Gopalakrishnapanicker U., Varghese S., Guthrie J.T. Cellulose microfibres produced from banana plant wastes: isolation and characterization. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 80:852-859. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.12.043.
22. Ferreira, D.F., 1999. Sistemas para Análise de Variância para Dados (SISVAR).
23. Garcia N.L., Ribba L., Dufresne A., Aranguren M.I., Goyanes S. Physico-mechanical properties of biodegradable starch nanocomposites. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2009, 294:169-177. 10.1002/mame.200800271.
24. Garcia L.C., Pereira L.M., de Luca Sarantópoulos C.I.G., Hubinger M.D. Selection of an edible starch coating for minimally processed strawberry. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2010, 3:834-842. 10.1007/s11947-009-0313-9.
25. Guimarães M., Botaro V.R., Novack K.M., Teixeira F.G., Tonoli G.H.D. Starch/PVA-based nanocomposites reinforced with bamboo nanofibrils. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 70:72-83. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.03.014.
26. Guimarães M., Botaro V.R., Novack K.M., Teixeira F.G., Tonoli G.H.D. High moisture strength of cassava starch/polyvinyl alcohol-compatible blends for the packaging and agricultural sectors. J. Polym. Res. 2015, 22:1-18.
27. Hebeish A., Guthrie J.T. The Chemistry and Technology of Cellulosic Copolymers 1981, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg. 10.1007/978-3-642-67707-6.
28. Henrique Celina M., Cereda Marney P., Dupuy N. Análise de cor, transparência e infravermelho dos filmes de fécula modificada de mandioca. Agron.Trop. 2007, 57:25-30.
29. Henrique C.M., Cereda M.P., Sarmento S.B.S. Características físicas de filmes biodegradáveis produzidos a partir de amidos modificados de mandioca. Ciência. Tecnol. Aliment. 2008, 28:231-240. 10.1590/S0101-20612008000100033.
30. Iwamoto S., Isogai A., Iwata T. Structure and mechanical properties of wet-spun fibers made from natural cellulose nanofibers. Biomacromolecules 2011, 831-836.
31. Kaushik A., Singh M., Verma G. Green nanocomposites based on thermoplastic starch and steam exploded cellulose nanofibrils from wheat straw. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 82:337-345. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.04.063.
32. Lagaron J.M., Catalá R., Gavara R. Structural characteristics defining high-barrier polymericmaterials. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2004, 20:1-7.
33. Li M., Wang L., Li D., Cheng Y., Adhikari B. Preparation and characterization of cellulose nanofibers from de-pectinated sugar beet pulp. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 102:136-143. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.11.021.
34. Ludueña L.N., Alvarez V.a., Vazquez A. Processing and microstructure of PCL/clay nanocomposites. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2007, 460-461:121-129. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.01.104.
35. McGuire R.G. Reporting of objective color measurements. Feature 1992, 27:1254-1255.
36. Ma X., Jian R., Chang P.R., Yu J. Fabrication and characterization of citric acid-Modified starch nanoparticles/Plasticized-Starch composites. Biomacromolecules 2008, 3314-3320. 10.1021/bm800987c.
37. Mali S., Grossamann M.V.E., Yamashita F. Filmes de amido: produção, propriedades e petencial de utilização. Semina: Ciências Agrárias 2010, 31:137-156.
38. Mellinas C., Valdes A., Ramos M., Burgos N., Garrigos M.C., Jimenez A. Active edible films: current statea and future trands. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015, 10.1002/app.42631.
39. Mirhosseini H., Ping C., Hamid N.S.A., Yusof S. Effect of Arabic gum, xanthan gum and orange oil contents on ζ-potential, conductivity, stability, size index and pH of orange beverage emulsion. Colloids. Surf. A 2008, 315:47-56. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2007.07.007.
40. Rani B., Kawatra A. Fiber constituents of some foods. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 1994, 45:343-347.
41. Reddy N., Yang Y. Biofibres from agricultural by products for industrial applications. Trends Biotechnol. 2005, 23:22-27.
42. Reddy K.O., Zhang J., Zhang J., Rajulu A.V. Preparation and properties of self-reinforced cellulose composite films from Agave microfibrils using an ionic liquid. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 114:537-545. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.08.054.
43. Rezende S., Stanisçuaski S., Lucca L., De Raffin A. Revisão 2003, 26:726-737.
44. Syverud K., Stenius P. Strength and barrier properties of MFC films. Cellulose 2009, 16:75-85. 10.1007/s10570-008-9244-2.
45. Saito T., Hirota M., Tamura N., Kimura S., Fukuzumi H., Heux L., Isogai A. Individualization of nano-sized plant cellulose fibrils by direct surface carboxylation using TEMPO catalyst under neutral conditions. Biomacromolecules 2009, 10:1992-1996. 10.1021/bm900414t.
46. Sharma K.D., Karki S., Thakur N.S., Attri S. Chemical composition, functional properties and processing of carrot-a review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 49:22-32.
47. Siqueira G., Bras J., Dufresne A. Cellulose whiskers versus microfibrils: influence of the nature of the nanoparticle and its surface functionalization on the thermal and mechanical properties of nanocomposites. Biomacromolecules 2009, 10:425-432. 10.1021/bm801193d.
48. Siqueira G., Oksman K., Tadokoro S.K., Mathew A.P. Re-dispersible carrot nano fi bers with high mechanical properties and reinforcing capacity for use in composite materials. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2016, 123:49-56. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.12.001.
49. Spence K.L., Venditti R.a., Rojas O.J., Habibi Y., Pawlak J.J. A comparative study of energy consumption and physical properties of microfibrillated cellulose produced by different processing methods. Cellulose 2011, 18:1097-1111. 10.1007/s10570-011-9533-z.
50. Syverud K., Chinga-Carrasco G., Toledo J., Toledo P.G. A comparative study of Eucalyptus and Pinus radiata pulp fibres as raw materials for production of cellulose nanofibrils. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 84:1033-1038. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.12.066.
51. Tetens, V.O., 1930. Ubereinigemeteorologische. Begriffe Zgeophys 6, 297-309.
52. Tarrés Q., Saguer E., Pèlach M.A., Alcalà M., Delgado-Aguilar M., Mutjé P. The feasibility of incorporating cellulose micro/nanofibers in papermaking processes: the relevance of enzymatic hydrolysis. Cellulose 2016, 23:1433-1445. 10.1007/s10570-016-0889-y.
53. Tibolla H., Maria F., Cecilia F. Cellulose nano fibers produced from banana peel by chemical and enzymatic treatment. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 59:1311-1318. 10.1016/j.lwt.2014.04.011.
54. Tonoli G.H.D., Teixeira E.M., Corrêa A.C., Marconcini J.M., Caixeta L.A., Pereira-da-silva M.A., Mattoso L.H.C. Cellulose micro/nanofibres from Eucalyptus kraft pulp: preparation and properties. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 89:80-88. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.02.052.
55. Viana L.C. Desenvolvimento de filmes celulósicos nanoestruturados a partir de fibras de Pinus sp 2013, Universidade Federal do Paraná.
56. Victória M., Grossmann E., Yamashita F. Filmes de amido: produção, propriedades e potencial de utilização Starch films: production, properties and potential of utilization. Semina: Ciências Agrárias 2010, 31(1):137-156.
57. Wurzburg O.B. Cross -linking starches. Modified Starches: Properties and Uses 1986, 41-53. CRC Press, Boca Raton. O.B. WURZBURG (Ed.).
58. Wu R.L., Wang X.L., Li F., Li H.Z., Wang Y.Z. Green composite films prepared from cellulose, starch and lignin in room-temperature ionic liquid. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:2569-2574. 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.11.044.
59. Xie F., Pollet E., Halley P.J., Averous L. Review: starch-based nanobiocomposites. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2013, 38:1590-1628.
60. Zhao Y., Xu C., Xing C., Shi X., Matuana L.M., Zhou H., Ma X. Fabrication and characteristics of cellulose nanofibril films from coconut palm petiole prepared by different mechanical processing. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 65:96-101. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.11.057.
61. Zhong Y., Song X., Li Y. Antimicrobial, physical and mechanical properties of kudzu starch-chitosan composite films as a function of acid solvent types. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 84:335-342. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.11.041.
62. Zuluaga R., Putaux J.L., Cruz J., Vélez J., Mondragon I., Gañán P. Cellulose microfibrils from banana rachis: effect of alkaline treatments on structural and morphological features. Carbohydr. Polym. 2009, 76:51-59. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.09.024.