Monitoring high-risk patients: minimally invasive and non-invasive possibilities

Best Practice and Research: Clinical Anaesthesiology

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 201-216

  Renner, Jochen ^a   Grünewald, Matthias ^a   Bein, Berthold ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

^b DEPARTMENT OF CARDIOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

cardiac output; echocardiography; haemodynamic monitoring; minimally invasive; non invasive; pulse contour analysis; stroke volume

Indexed keywords

DEVICES; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PHYSIOLOGIC MONITORING; RISK; TRENDS;

HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; PERIOPERATIVE CARE; RISK;

EID: 84969931596     PISSN: 15216896     EISSN: 1532169X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpa.2016.04.006     Document Type: Review

References (89)

1. [1] Pearse, R.M., Moreno, R.P., Bauer, P., et al. Mortality after surgery in Europe: a 7 day cohort study. Lancet 380 (2012), 1059–1065.
2. [2] Rose, J., Weiser, T.G., Hider, P., et al. Estimated need for surgery worldwide based on prevalence of diseases: a modelling strategy for the WHO Global Health Estimate. Lancet Glob Health 3:Suppl. 2 (2015), S13–S20.
3. [3] Weiser, T.G., Haynes, A.B., Molina, G., et al. Estimate of the global volume of surgery in 2012: an assessment supporting improved health outcomes. Lancet, 385(Suppl. 2), 2015, S11.
4. [4] Ghaferi, A.A., Birkmeyer, J.D., Dimick, J.B., Variation in hospital mortality associated with inpatient surgery. N Engl J Med 361 (2009), 1368–1375.
5. [5] Khuri, S.F., Henderson, W.G., DePalma, R.G., et al. Determinants of long-term survival after major surgery and the adverse effect of postoperative complications. Ann Surg 242 (2005), 326–341.
6. [6] Pearse, R.M., Rhodes, A., Moreno, R., et al. EuSOS: European surgical outcomes study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 28 (2011), 454–456.
7. [7] Pearse, R.M., Harrison, D.A., James, P., et al. Identification and characterisation of the high-risk surgical population in the United Kingdom. Crit Care, 10, 2006, R81.
8. [8] Jhanji, S., Thomas, B., Ely, A., et al. Mortality and utilisation of critical care resources amongst high-risk surgical patients in a large NHS trust. Anaesthesia 63 (2008), 695–700.
9. [9] Story, D.A., Shelton, A.C., Poustie, S.J., et al. The effect of critical care outreach on postoperative serious adverse events. Anaesthesia 59 (2004), 762–766.
10. [10] Findlay GA, Protopapa K, Smith N, et al. Knowing the risk. A review of the peri-operative care of surgical patients. London: National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death. http://www/.ncepod.or g.uk/2011report2/do wnloads/POC _fullreport.pdf date last accessed.
11. [11] Pinsky, M.R., Payen, D., Functional hemodynamic monitoring. Crit Care 9 (2005), 566–572.
12. [12] Benes, J., Giglio, M., Brienza, N., et al. The effects of goal-directed fluid therapy based on dynamic parameters on post-surgical outcome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care, 18, 2014, 584.
13. [13] Benes, J., Haidingerova, L., Pouska, J., et al. Fluid management guided by a continuous non-invasive arterial pressure device is associated with decreased postoperative morbidity after total knee and hip replacement. BMC Anesthesiol, 15, 2015, 148.
14. [14] Joosten, A., Huynh, T., Suehiro, K., et al. Goal-directed fluid therapy with closed-loop assistance during moderate risk surgery using noninvasive cardiac output monitoring: a pilot study. Br J Anaesth 114 (2015), 886–892.
15. [15] Erlanger, J., Hooker, D.R., An experimental study of blood pressure and of pulse pressure in man. Johns Hopkins Hosp Rep 12 (1904), 145–378.
16. [16] Wesseling, K.H., Jansen, J.R., Settels, J.J., et al. Computation of aortic flow from pressure in humans using a nonlinear, three-element model. J Appl Physiol (1985) 74 (1993), 2566–2573.
17. [17] Alhashemi, J.A., Cecconi, M., Hofer, C.K., Cardiac output monitoring: an integrative perspective. Crit Care, 15, 2011, 214.
18. [18] Hofkens, P.J., Verrijcken, A., Merveille, K., et al. Common pitfalls and tips and tricks to get the most out of your transpulmonary thermodilution device: results of a survey and state-of-the-art review. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 47 (2015), 89–116.
19. [19] Laight, N.S., Levin, A.I., Transcardiopulmonary thermodilution-calibrated arterial waveform analysis: a primer for anesthesiologists and intensivists. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 29 (2015), 1051–1064.
20. [20] Broch, O., Renner, J., Gruenewald, M., et al. A comparison of third-generation semi-invasive arterial waveform analysis with thermodilution in patients undergoing coronary surgery. Sci World J, 2012, 2012, 451081.
21. [21] De Backer, D., Marx, G., Tan, A., et al. Arterial pressure-based cardiac output monitoring: a multicenter validation of the third-generation software in septic patients. Intensive Care Med 37 (2011), 233–240.
22. [22] Marque, S., Gros, A., Chimot, L., et al. Cardiac output monitoring in septic shock: evaluation of the third-generation Flotrac-Vigileo. J Clin Monit Comput 27 (2013), 273–279.
23. [23] Monnet, X., Anguel, N., Jozwiak, M., et al. Third-generation FloTrac/Vigileo does not reliably track changes in cardiac output induced by norepinephrine in critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth 108 (2012), 615–622.
24. [24] Suehiro, K., Tanaka, K., Funao, T., et al. Systemic vascular resistance has an impact on the reliability of the Vigileo-FloTrac system in measuring cardiac output and tracking cardiac output changes. Br J Anaesth 111 (2013), 170–177.
25. [25] Ji, F., Li, J., Fleming, N., et al. Reliability of a new 4th generation FloTrac algorithm to track cardiac output changes in patients receiving phenylephrine. J Clin Monit Comput 29 (2015), 467–473.
26. [26] Benes, J., Chytra, I., Altmann, P., et al. Intraoperative fluid optimization using stroke volume variation in high risk surgical patients: results of prospective randomized study. Crit Care, 14, 2010, R118.
27. [27] Mayer, J., Boldt, J., Mengistu, A.M., et al. Goal-directed intraoperative therapy based on autocalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis reduces hospital stay in high-risk surgical patients: a randomized, controlled trial. Crit Care, 14, 2010, R18.
28. [28] Scheeren, T.W., Wiesenack, C., Gerlach, H., et al. Goal-directed intraoperative fluid therapy guided by stroke volume and its variation in high-risk surgical patients: a prospective randomized multicentre study. J Clin Monit Comput 27 (2013), 225–233.
29. [29] Gruenewald, M., Renner, J., Meybohm, P., et al. Reliability of continuous cardiac output measurement during intra-abdominal hypertension relies on repeated calibrations: an experimental animal study. Crit Care, 12, 2008, R132.
30. [30] Mowat, I., Todman, E., Jaggar, S., Validation of the LiDCO pulse contour system in patients with impaired left ventricular function. Anaesthesia, 67, 2012, 188 author reply 88–9.
31. [31] O'Loughlin, E., Ward, M., Crossley, A., et al. Evaluation of the utility of the Vigileo FloTrac(), LiDCO(), USCOM and CardioQ() to detect hypovolaemia in conscious volunteers: a proof of concept study. Anaesthesia 70 (2015), 142–149.
32. [32] Bein, B., Meybohm, P., Cavus, E., et al. The reliability of pulse contour-derived cardiac output during hemorrhage and after vasopressor administration. Anesth Analg 105 (2007), 107–113.
33. [33] Broch, O., Renner, J., Hocker, J., et al. Uncalibrated pulse power analysis fails to reliably measure cardiac output in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Crit Care, 15, 2011, R76.
34. [34] Nordstrom, J., Hallsjo-Sander, C., Shore, R., et al. Stroke volume optimization in elective bowel surgery: a comparison between pulse power wave analysis (LiDCOrapid) and oesophageal Doppler (CardioQ). Br J Anaesth 110 (2013), 374–380.
35. [35] Monnet, X., Vaquer, S., Anguel, N., et al. Comparison of pulse contour analysis by Pulsioflex and Vigileo to measure and track changes of cardiac output in critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth 114 (2015), 235–243.
36. [36] Broch, O., Carbonell, J., Ferrando, C., et al. Accuracy of an autocalibrated pulse contour analysis in cardiac surgery patients: a bi-center clinical trial. BMC Anesthesiol, 15, 2015, 171.
37. [37] Salzwedel, C., Puig, J., Carstens, A., et al. Perioperative goal-directed hemodynamic therapy based on radial arterial pulse pressure variation and continuous cardiac index trending reduces postoperative complications after major abdominal surgery: a multi-center, prospective, randomized study. Crit Care, 17, 2013, R191.
38. [38] Schober, P., Loer, S.A., Schwarte, L.A., Perioperative hemodynamic monitoring with transesophageal Doppler technology. Anesth Analg 109 (2009), 340–353.
39. [39] Singer, M., Oesophageal Doppler. Curr Opin Crit Care 15 (2009), 244–248.
40. [40] Colquhoun, D.A., Roche, A.M., Oesophageal Doppler cardiac output monitoring: a longstanding tool with evolving indications and applications. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 28 (2014), 353–362.
41. [41] Lefrant, J.Y., Bruelle, P., Aya, A.G., et al. Training is required to improve the reliability of esophageal Doppler to measure cardiac output in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 24 (1998), 347–352.
42. [42] Abbas, S.M., Hill, A.G., Systematic review of the literature for the use of oesophageal Doppler monitor for fluid replacement in major abdominal surgery. Anaesthesia 63 (2008), 44–51.
43. [43] Mowatt, G., Houston, G., Hernandez, R., et al. Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of oesophageal Doppler monitoring in critically ill and high-risk surgical patients. Health Technol Assess, 13, 2009 iii–iv, ix–xii, 1–95.
44. [44] Noblett, S.E., Snowden, C.P., Shenton, B.K., et al. Randomized clinical trial assessing the effect of Doppler-optimized fluid management on outcome after elective colorectal resection. Br J Surg 93 (2006), 1069–1076.
45. [45] Singer, M., Oesophageal Doppler monitoring: should it be routine for high-risk surgical patients?. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 24 (2011), 171–176.
46. [46] Ghosh, S., Arthur, B., Klein, A.A., NICE guidance on CardioQ(TM) oesophageal Doppler monitoring. Anaesthesia 66 (2011), 1081–1083.
47. [47] Srinivasa, S., Lemanu, D.P., Singh, P.P., et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of oesophageal Doppler-guided fluid management in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 100 (2013), 1701–1708.
48. [48] Penaz, J., Voigt, A., Teichmann, W., Contribution to the continuous indirect blood pressure measurement. Z Gesamte Inn Med 31 (1976), 1030–1033.
49. [49] Bogert, L.W., van Lieshout, J.J., Non-invasive pulsatile arterial pressure and stroke volume changes from the human finger. Exp Physiol 90 (2005), 437–446.
50. [50] Fortin, J., Marte, W., Grullenberger, R., et al. Continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring using concentrically interlocking control loops. Comput Biol Med 36 (2006), 941–957.
51. [51] Wagner, J.Y., Grond, J., Fortin, J., et al. Continuous noninvasive cardiac output determination using the CNAP system: evaluation of a cardiac output algorithm for the analysis of volume clamp method-derived pulse contour. J Clin Monit Comput, 2015, 10.1007/s10877-015-9744-1.
52. [52] Broch, O., Bein, B., Gruenewald, M., et al. A comparison of continuous non-invasive arterial pressure with invasive radial and femoral pressure in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Minerva Anestesiol 79 (2013), 248–256.
53. [53] Fischer, M.O., Avram, R., Carjaliu, I., et al. Non-invasive continuous arterial pressure and cardiac index monitoring with Nexfin after cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 109 (2012), 514–521.
54. [54] Hohn, A., Defosse, J.M., Becker, S., et al. Non-invasive continuous arterial pressure monitoring with Nexfin does not sufficiently replace invasive measurements in critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth 111 (2013), 178–184.
55. [55] Martina, J.R., Westerhof, B.E., van Goudoever, J., et al. Noninvasive continuous arterial blood pressure monitoring with Nexfin(R). Anesthesiology 116 (2012), 1092–1103.
56. [56] Sphygmomanometers ANSfEoA, American National Standard for Electronic or Automated Sphygmomanometers. 2002, AAMI, Arlington.
57. [57] Jansen, J.R., Schreuder, J.J., Mulier, J.P., et al. A comparison of cardiac output derived from the arterial pressure wave against thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients. Br J Anaesth 87 (2001), 212–222.
58. [58] Harms, M.P., Wesseling, K.H., Pott, F., et al. Continuous stroke volume monitoring by modelling flow from non-invasive measurement of arterial pressure in humans under orthostatic stress. Clin Sci (Lond) 97 (1999), 291–301.
59. [59] Jellema, W.T., Wesseling, K.H., Groeneveld, A.B., et al. Continuous cardiac output in septic shock by simulating a model of the aortic input impedance: a comparison with bolus injection thermodilution. Anesthesiology 90 (1999), 1317–1328.
60. [60] Broch, O., Renner, J., Gruenewald, M., et al. A comparison of the Nexfin(R) and transcardiopulmonary thermodilution to estimate cardiac output during coronary artery surgery. Anaesthesia 67 (2012), 377–383.
61. [61] Chen, G., Meng, L., Alexander, B., et al. Comparison of noninvasive cardiac output measurements using the Nexfin monitoring device and the esophageal Doppler. J Clin Anesth 24 (2012), 275–283.
62. [62] Monnet, X., Picard, F., Lidzborski, E., et al. The estimation of cardiac output by the Nexfin device is of poor reliability for tracking the effects of a fluid challenge. Crit Care, 16, 2012, R212.
63. [63] Bubenek-Turconi, S.I., Craciun, M., Miclea, I., et al. Noninvasive continuous cardiac output by the Nexfin before and after preload-modifying maneuvers: a comparison with intermittent thermodilution cardiac output. Anesth Analg 117 (2013), 366–372.
64. [64] Ilies, C., Bauer, M., Berg, P., et al. Investigation of the agreement of a continuous non-invasive arterial pressure device in comparison with invasive radial artery measurement. Br J Anaesth 108 (2012), 202–210.
65. [65] Ilies, C., Grudev, G., Hedderich, J., et al. Comparison of a continuous noninvasive arterial pressure device with invasive measurements in cardiovascular postsurgical intensive care patients: a prospective observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 32 (2015), 20–28.
66. [66] Ilies, C., Kiskalt, H., Siedenhans, D., et al. Detection of hypotension during Caesarean section with continuous non-invasive arterial pressure device or intermittent oscillometric arterial pressure measurement. Br J Anaesth 109 (2012), 413–419.
67. [67] Jeleazcov, C., Krajinovic, L., Munster, T., et al. Precision and accuracy of a new device (CNAPTM) for continuous non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring: assessment during general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 105 (2010), 264–272.
68. [68] Critchley, L.A., Yang, X.X., Lee, A., Assessment of trending ability of cardiac output monitors by polar plot methodology. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 25 (2011), 536–546.
69. [69] Smolle, K.H., Schmid, M., Prettenthaler, H., et al. The accuracy of the CNAP(R) device compared with invasive radial artery measurements for providing continuous noninvasive arterial blood pressure readings at a medical intensive care unit: a method-comparison study. Anesth Analg 121 (2015), 1508–1516.
70. [70] Benes, J., Simanova, A., Tovarnicka, T., et al. Continuous non-invasive monitoring improves blood pressure stability in upright position: randomized controlled trial. J Clin Monit Comput 29 (2015), 11–17.
71. [71] Keren, H., Burkhoff, D., Squara, P., Evaluation of a noninvasive continuous cardiac output monitoring system based on thoracic bioreactance. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 293 (2007), H583–H589.
72. [72] Raval, N.Y., Squara, P., Cleman, M., et al. Multicenter evaluation of noninvasive cardiac output measurement by bioreactance technique. J Clin Monit Comput 22 (2008), 113–119.
73. [73] Rich, J.D., Archer, S.L., Rich, S., Noninvasive cardiac output measurements in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J 42 (2013), 125–133.
74. [74] Squara, P., Denjean, D., Estagnasie, P., et al. Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring (NICOM): a clinical validation. Intensive Care Med 33 (2007), 1191–1194.
75. [75] Ballestero, Y., Lopez-Herce, J., Urbano, J., et al. Measurement of cardiac output in children by bioreactance. Pediatr Cardiol 32 (2011), 469–472.
76. [76] Fagnoul, D., Vincent, J.L., Backer de, D., Cardiac output measurements using the bioreactance technique in critically ill patients. Crit Care, 16, 2012, 460.
77. [77] Ishihara, H., Okawa, H., Tanabe, K., et al. A new non-invasive continuous cardiac output trend solely utilizing routine cardiovascular monitors. J Clin Monit Comput 18 (2004), 313–320.
78. [78] Sugo, Y., Ukawa, T., Takeda, S., et al. A novel continuous cardiac output monitor based on pulse wave transit time. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2010 (2010), 2853–2856.
79. [79] Ishihara, H., Sugo, Y., Tsutsui, M., et al. The ability of a new continuous cardiac output monitor to measure trends in cardiac output following implementation of a patient information calibration and an automated exclusion algorithm. J Clin Monit Comput 26 (2012), 465–471.
80. [80] Bataille, B., Bertuit, M., Mora, M., et al. Comparison of esCCO and transthoracic echocardiography for non-invasive measurement of cardiac output intensive care. Br J Anaesth 109 (2012), 879–886.
81. [81] Kneeshaw, J.D., Transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) in the operating room. Br J Anaesth 97 (2006), 77–84.
82. [82] Cheitlin, M.D., Armstrong, W.F., Aurigemma, G.P., et al. ACC/AHA/ASE 2003 guideline update for the clinical application of echocardiography–summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASE Committee to Update the 1997 Guidelines for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography). J Am Coll Cardiol 42 (2003), 954–970.
83. [83] Descorps-Declere, A., Smail, N., Vigue, B., et al. Transgastric, pulsed Doppler echocardiographic determination of cardiac output. Intensive Care Med 22 (1996), 34–38.
84. [84] Perrino, A.C. Jr., Harris, S.N., Luther, M.A., Intraoperative determination of cardiac output using multiplane transesophageal echocardiography: a comparison to thermodilution. Anesthesiology 89 (1998), 350–357.
85. [85] Kratz, T., Campo Dell'Orto, M., Exner, M., et al. Focused intraoperative transthoracic echocardiography by anesthesiologists: a feasibility study. Minerva Anestesiol 81 (2015), 490–496.
86. [86] Ospina-Tascon, G.A., Cordioli, R.L., Vincent, J.L., What type of monitoring has been shown to improve outcomes in acutely ill patients?. Intensive Care Med 34 (2008), 800–820.
87. [87] Pearse, R.M., Harrison, D.A., MacDonald, N., et al. Effect of a perioperative, cardiac output-guided hemodynamic therapy algorithm on outcomes following major gastrointestinal surgery: a randomized clinical trial and systematic review. JAMA 311 (2014), 2181–2190.
88. [88] Mehta, N., Fernandez-Bustamante, A., Seres, T., A review of intraoperative goal-directed therapy using arterial waveform analysis for assessment of cardiac output. Sci World J, 2014, 2014, 702964.
89. [89] Johansson, T., Fritsch, G., Flamm, M., et al. Effectiveness of non-cardiac preoperative testing in non-cardiac elective surgery: a systematic review. Br J Anaesth 110 (2013), 926–939.