Comparison of a continuous noninvasive arterial pressure device with invasive measurements in cardiovascular postsurgical intensive care patients: A prospective observational study

European Journal of Anaesthesiology

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 20-28

  Ilies, Christoph ^a,b   Grudev, Genadi ^a   Hedderich, Jürgen ^a   Renner, Jochen ^a   Steinfath, Markus ^a   Bein, Berthold ^a   Haake, Nils ^c   Hanss, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

^b Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine Herz und Gefä ßklinik ^*  (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADRENALIN; NORADRENALIN;

AGED; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; ASCENDING AORTA SURGERY; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; CALIBRATION; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; COMPLETE HEART BLOCK; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; EMERGENCY CARE; EXTRACORPOREAL OXYGENATION; FEMALE; GRAFT REJECTION; HEART ARRHYTHMIA; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MEASUREMENT ERROR; NON INVASIVE BLOOD PRESSURE MONITOR; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; ADVERSE EFFECTS; CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HEMODYNAMICS; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS;

AGED; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE DETERMINATION; CARDIOVASCULAR SURGICAL PROCEDURES; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84927744364     PISSN: 02650215     EISSN: 13652346     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000136     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Dueck R, Jameson L. Reliability of hypotension detection with noninvasive radial artery beat-to-beat versus upper arm cuff BP monitoring. Anesth Analg 2006; 102 (Suppl): S10.
2. Hirschl MM, Binder M, Herkner H, et al. Accuracy and reliability of noninvasive continuous finger blood pressure measurement in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 1996; 24: 1684-1689.
3. Monk TG, Saini V, Weldon BC, Sigl JC. Anesthetic management and one-year mortality after noncardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 4-10.
4. Avanzini F, Alli C, Boccanelli A, et al. High pulse pressure and low mean arterial pressure: Two predictors of death after a myocardial infarction. J Hypertens 2006; 24: 2377-2385.
5. Sprung J, Warner ME, Contreras MG, et al. Predictors of survival following cardiac arrest in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: A study of 518 294 patients at a tertiary referral center. Anesthesiology 2003; 99: 259-269.
6. Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, et al. 2007 guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens 2007; 25: 1105-1187.
7. Slogoff S, Keats AS, Arlund C. On the safety of radial artery cannulation. Anesthesiology 1983; 59: 42-47.
8. El-Hamamsy I, Durrleman N, Stevens LM, et al. Incidence and outcome of radial artery infections following cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 76: 801-804.
9. Furfaro S, Gauthier M, Lacroix J, et al. Arterial catheter-related infections in children. A 1-year cohort analysis. Am J Dis Child 1991; 145: 1037-1043.
10. Shinozaki T, Deane RS, Mazuzan JE Jr, et al. Bacterial contamination of arterial lines. A prospective study. JAMA 1983; 249: 223-225.
11. Thomas F, Burke JP, Parker J, et al. The risk of infection related to radial vs femoral sites for arterial catheterization. Crit Care Med 1983; 11: 807-812.
12. Traore O, Liotier J, Souweine B. Prospective study of arterial and central venous catheter colonization and of arterial-and central venous catheterrelated bacteremia in intensive care units. Crit Care Med 2005; 33: 1276-1280.
13. Wallach SG. Cannulation injury of the radial artery: Diagnosis and treatment algorithm. Am J Crit Care 2004; 13: 315-319.
14. Bause GS, Weintraub AC, Tanner GE. Skin avulsion during oscillometry. J Clin Monit 1986; 2: 262-263.
15. Pedley CF, Bloomfield RL, Colflesh MJ, et al. Blood pressure monitorinduced petechiae and ecchymoses. Am J Hypertens 1994; 7: 1031-1032.
16. Lin CC, Jawan B, de Villa MV, et al. Blood pressure cuff compression injury of the radial nerve. J Clin Anesth 2001; 13: 306-308.
17. Ilies C, Bauer M, Berg P, et al. Investigation of the agreement of a continuous noninvasive arterial pressure device in comparison with invasive radial artery measurement. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108: 202-210.
18. Gardner RM. Direct blood pressure measurement -dynamic response requirements. Anesthesiology 1981; 54: 227-236.
19. Kleinman B, Powell S, Kumar P, Gardner RM. The fast flush test measures the dynamic response of the entire blood pressure monitoring system. Anesthesiology 1992; 77: 1215-1220.
20. Pen? á z J, Voigt A, Teichmann W. Contribution to the continuous indirect blood pressure measurement. Z Gesamte Inn Med 1976; 31: 1030-1033.
21. Peres Bota D, Melot C, Lopes Ferreira F, et al. The Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score (MODS) versus the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in outcome prediction. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28: 1619-1624.
22. Vincent JL, de Mendonca A, Cantraine F, et al. Use of the SOFA score to assess the incidence of organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care units: Results of a multicenter, prospective study. Working group on 'sepsisrelated problems' of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Crit Care Med 1998; 26: 1793-1800.
23. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 1996; 22: 707-710.
24. Ramsay MA, Savege TM, Simpson BR, Goodwin R. Controlled sedation with alphaxalone-alphadolone. Br Med J 1974; 2: 656-659.
25. R-Development-Core-Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2010.
26. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-310.
27. Myles PS, Cui J. Using the Bland-Altman method to measure agreement with repeated measures. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99: 309-311.
28. Bland JM, Altman DG. Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual. J Biopharm Stat 2007; 17: 571-582.
29. Ludbrook J. Statistical techniques for comparing measurers and methods of measurement: A critical review. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2002; 29: 527-536.
30. Mantha S, Roizen MF, Fleisher LA, et al. Comparing methods of clinical measurement: Reporting standards for Bland and Altman analysis. Anesth Analg 2000; 90: 593-602.
31. Critchley LA, Critchley JA. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput 1999; 15: 85-91.
32. Cecconi M, Rhodes A, Poloniecki J, et al. Bench-to-bedside review: The importance of the precision of the reference technique in method comparison studies -with specific reference to the measurement of cardiac output. Crit Care 2009; 13: 201.
33. Columb MO. Clinical measurement and assessing agreement. Curr Anaesth Crit Care 2008; 19: 328-329.
34. AAMI. American national standard: Manual, electronic, or automated sphygmomanometers. ANSI/AAMI SP10: 2002. Arlington, VA: American National Standards Institute; 2002.
35. Hahn R, Rinosl H, Neuner M, Kettner SC. Clinical validation of a continuous noninvasive haemodynamic monitor (CNAP 500) during general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108: 581-585.
36. Jeleazcov C, Krajinovic L, Munster T, et al. Precision and accuracy of a new device (CNAPTM) for continuous noninvasive arterial pressure monitoring: Assessment during general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2010; 105: 264-272.
37. Manios E, Vemmos K, Tsivgoulis G, et al. Comparison of noninvasive oscillometric and intra-arterial blood pressure measurements in hyperacute stroke. Blood Press Monit 2007; 12: 149-156.
38. Lehman LW, Saeed M, Talmor D, et al. Methods of blood pressure measurement in the ICU. Crit Care Med 2013; 41: 34-40.
39. Wax DB, Lin HM, Leibowitz AB. Invasive and concomitant noninvasive intraoperative blood pressure monitoring: Observed differences in measurements and associated therapeutic interventions. Anesthesiology 2011; 115: 973-978.
40. Anastas ZM, Jimerson E, Garolis S. Comparison of noninvasive blood pressure measurements in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Nurs 2008; 23: 519-524.
41. Stewart MJ, Gough K, Padfield PL. The accuracy of automated blood pressure measuring devices in patients with controlled atrial fibrillation. J Hypertens 1995; 13: 297-300.
42. Lamb TS, Thakrar A, Ghosh M, et al. Comparison of two oscillometric blood pressure monitors in subjects with atrial fibrillation. Clin Invest Med 2010; 33: E54-E62.
43. Jani B, Bulpitt CJ, Rajkumar C. Blood pressure measurement in patients with rate controlled atrial fibrillation using mercury sphygmomanometer and Omron HEM-750CP device in the clinic setting. J Hum Hypertens 2006; 20: 543-545.