The ability of a new continuous cardiac output monitor to measure trends in cardiac output following implementation of a patient information calibration and an automated exclusion algorithm

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 465-471

  Ishihara, Hironori ^a   Sugo, Yoshihiro ^b   Tsutsui, Masato ^c   Yamada, Takashige ^d   Sato, Tetsufumi ^e   Akazawa, Toshimasa ^f   Sato, Nobukazu ^g   Yamashita, Koichi ^h   Takeda, Junzo ^d  

^a HIROSAKI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NIHON KOHDEN CORPORATION   (Japan)

^c NATIONAL DEFENSE MEDICAL COLLEGE   (Japan)

^d KEIO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^e OKAYAMA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Japan)

^f JUNTENDO UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^g TOHO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^h KOCHI MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cardiac output; Measurement technique; Non invasive calibration; Pulse contour analysis; Pulse wave transit time

Indexed keywords

CARDIAC OUTPUT; CONTINUOUS CARDIAC OUTPUT; EXCLUSION ALGORITHMS; MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES; PATIENT INFORMATION; PULSE WAVE TRANSIT TIME; PULSE-CONTOUR ANALYSIS; WAVEFORM ANALYSIS METHODS;

ALGORITHMS; AUTOMATION; CALIBRATION;

HEMODYNAMICS;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; AUTOMATED EXCLUSION ALGORITHM; AUTOMATION; CALIBRATION; CARDIOVASCULAR MONITORING DEVICE; CONTINUOUS CARDIAC OUTPUT MONITORING SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HEART OUTPUT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; PATIENT INFORMATION; PATIENT INFORMATION CARDIAC OUTPUT CALIBRATION; PATIENT MONITORING; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULMONARY ARTERY CATHETER; THERMODILUTION; TREND STUDY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; HEART SURGERY; INSTRUMENTATION; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PHYSIOLOGIC MONITORING; SWAN GANZ CATHETER;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; CALIBRATION; CARDIAC OUTPUT; CARDIAC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; CATHETERIZATION, SWAN-GANZ; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; THERMODILUTION;

EID: 84877106251     PISSN: 13871307     EISSN: 15732614     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10877-012-9384-7     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. 2 pulse wave. Jpn Med Instrum. 2005;75:63-9.
2. Ishihara H, Okawa H, Tanabe K, Tsubo T, Sugo Y, Akiyama T, Takeda S. A new non-invasive continuous cardiac output trend solely utilizing routine cardiovascular monitors. J Clin Monit Comput. 2004;18:313-20.
3. Ochiai R, Takeda J, Hosaka H, Sugo Y, Tanaka R, Soma T. The relationship between modified pulse wave transit time and cardiovascular changes in isoflurane anesthetized dogs. J Clin Monit Comput. 1999;15:493-501.
4. Yamada T, Tsutsui M, Sugo Y, Sato T, Akazawa T, Sato N, Yamashita K, Ishihara H, Takeda J. Multicenter study verifying a method of noninvasive continuous cardiac output measurement using pulse wave transit time: a comparison with intermittent bolus thermodilution cardiac output. Anesth Analg. 2012;115:82-86.
5. Balik M, Pachl J, Hendl J. Effect of the degree of tricuspid regurgitation on cardiac output measurements by thermodilution. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28:1117-21.
6. Bland JM, Altman DG. Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual. J Biopharm Stat. 2007;17:571-82.
7. Critchley LA, Critchley JA. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput. 1999;15:85-91.
8. Critchley LA, Lee A, Ho AMH. A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output. Anesth Analg. 2010;111:1180-92.
9. Critchley LA, Yang XX, Lee A. Assessment of trending ability of cardiac output monitors by polar plot methodology. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011;25:536-46.
10. Compton FD, Zukunft B, Hoffmann C, Zidek W, Schaefer JH. Performance of a minimally invasive uncalibrated cardiac output monitoring system (Flotrac™/Vigileo™) in haemodynamically unstable patients. Br J Anaesth. 2008;100:451-6.
11. Jeong YB, Kim TH, Roh YJ, Choi IC, Suh JH. Comparison of uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis with continuous thermodilution cardiac output measurements in patients undergoing elective off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010;24:767-71.
12. Vetrugno L, Costa MG, Spagnesi L, Pompei L, Chiarandini P, Gimigliano G, Rocca GD. Uncalibrated arterial pulse cardiac output measurements in patients with moderately abnormal left ventricular function. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011;25:53-8.
13. Sugo Y, Ukawa T, Takeda S, Ishihara H. A novel continuous cardiac output monitor based on pulse wave transit time. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010;2853-2856:2010.
14. Lorsomradee S, Lorsomradee S, Cromheecke S, De Hert SG. Uncalibrated arterial pulse contour analysis versus continuous thermodilution technique: effects of alterations in arterial waveform. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007;21:636-43.
15. Kanazawa M, Fukuyama H, Kinefuchi Y, Takiguchi M, Suzuki T. Relationship between aortic-to-radial arterial pressure gradient after cardiopulmonary bypass and changes in arterial elasticity. Anesthesiology. 2003;99:48-53.
16. Breukers RM, Sepehrkhouv S, Spiegelenberg SR, Groeneveld AB. Cardiac output measured by a new arterial pressure waveform analysis method without calibration compared with thermodilution after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anes. 2007;21:632-5.
17. Olafiranye O, Qureshi G, Salciccioli L, Vemon-Jones K, Phillip C, Kassotis J, Lazar JM. The relationship between effective arterial capacitance and pulse wave velocity is dependent on left ventricular stroke volume. Angiology. 2009;60:82-6.