Noninvasive continuous cardiac output by the nexfin before and after preload-modifying maneuvers: A comparison with intermittent thermodilution cardiac output

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 117, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 366-372

  Bubenek Turconi, Serban Ion ^a,b   Craciun, Mihaela ^b   Miclea, Ion ^b   Perel, Azriel ^c  

^a CAROL DAVILA UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND PHARMACY   (Romania)

^b Prof Dr C C Iliescu Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases   (Romania)

^c TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYPERTENSIVE AGENT; INOTROPIC AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR EQUIPMENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEART FUNCTION TEST; HEART OUTPUT MEASUREMENT; HEART PRELOAD; HUMAN; INTERMITTENT THERMODILUTION CARDIAC OUTPUT; LEG MOVEMENT; MALE; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; NONINVASIVE CONTINUOUS CARDIAC OUTPUT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULMONARY ARTERY CATHETER; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC;

AGED; AREA UNDER CURVE; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORS; CARDIAC OUTPUT; CARDIAC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CARDIOTONIC AGENTS; CATHETERIZATION, SWAN-GANZ; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FINGERS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; PATIENT POSITIONING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SUPINE POSITION; THERMODILUTION; TIME FACTORS; VASOCONSTRICTOR AGENTS; WATER-ELECTROLYTE BALANCE;

EID: 84881370424     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: 15267598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31829562c3     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Funk DJ, Moretti EW, Gan TJ. Minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring in the perioperative setting. Anesth Analg 2009;108:887-97
2. Vincent JL, Rhodes A, Perel A, Martin GS, Della Rocca G, Vallet B, Pinsky MR, Hofer CK, Teboul JL, de Boode WP, Scolletta S, Vieillard-Baron A, De Backer D, Walley KR, Maggiorini M, Singer M. Clinical review: Update on hemodynamic monitor-ing-a consensus of 16. Crit Care 2011;15:229
3. Hamilton MA, Cecconi M, Rhodes A. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of preemptive hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and high-risk surgical patients. Anesth Analg 2011;112:1392-402
4. Gurgel ST, do Nascimento P Jr. Maintaining tissue perfusion in high-risk surgical patients: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Anesth Analg 2011;112:1384-91
5. Alhashemi JA, Cecconi M, Hofer CK. Cardiac output monitoring: an integrative perspective. Crit Care 2011;15:214
6. Squara P, Cecconi M, Rhodes A, Singer M, Chiche JD. Tracking changes in cardiac output: methodological considerations for the validation of monitoring devices. Intensive Care Med 2009;35:1801-8
7. Critchley LA. Pulse contour analysis: is it able to reliably detect changes in cardiac output in the haemodynamically unstable patient? Crit Care 2011;15:106
8. Critchley LA, Lee A, Ho AM. A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output. Anesth Analg 2010;111:1180-92
9. Feldman JM. Is it a bird? Is it a plane? The role of patient monitors in medical decision making. Anesth Analg 2009;108: 707-10
10. Michard F. Thinking outside the (cardiac output) box. Crit Care Med 2012;40:1361-2
11. Bogert LW, Wesseling KH, Schraa O, Van Lieshout EJ, de Mol BA, van Goudoever J, Westerhof BE, van Lieshout JJ. Pulse contour cardiac output derived from non-invasive arterial pressure in cardiovascular disease. Anaesthesia 2010;65:1119-25
12. Eeftinck Schattenkerk DW, van Lieshout JJ, van den Meiracker AH, Wesseling KR, Blanc S, Wieling W, van Montfrans GA, Settels JJ, Wesseling KH, Westerhof BE. Nexfn noninvasive continuous blood pressure validated against Riva-Rocci/Korotkoff. Am J Hypertens 2009;22:378-83
13. Imholz BP, Wieling W, van Montfrans GA, Wesseling KH. Fifteen years experience with fnger arterial pressure monitoring: assessment of the technology. Cardiovasc Res 1998;38:605-16
14. Wesseling KH, Jansen JR, Settels JJ, Schreuder JJ. Computation of aortic fow from pressure in humans using a nonlinear, three-element model. J Appl Physiol 1993;74:2566-73
15. Cecconi M, Parsons AK, Rhodes A. What is a fuid challenge? Curr Opin Crit Care 2011;17:290-5
16. Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D, Anguel N, Richard C, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL. Passive leg raising predicts fuid responsiveness in the critically ill. Crit Care Med 2006;34:1402-7
17. Cecconi M, Rhodes A, Poloniecki J, Della Rocca G, Grounds RM. Bench-to-bedside review: the importance of the precision of the reference technique in method comparison studies-with specifc reference to the measurement of cardiac output. Crit Care 2009;13:201
18. Critchley LA, Yang XX, Lee A. Assessment of trending ability of cardiac output monitors by polar plot methodology. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2011;25:536-46
19. Critchley LA. Validation of the MostCare pulse contour cardiac output monitor: beyond the Bland and Altman Plot. Anesth Analg 2011;113:1292-4
20. Critchley LA, Critchley JA. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput 1999;15:85-91
21. Ospina-Tascón GA, Cordioli RL, Vincent JL. What type of monitoring has been shown to improve outcomes in acutely ill patients? Intensive Care Med 2008;34:800-20
22. Miller TE, Roche AM, Gan TJ. Poor adoption of hemodynamic optimization during major surgery: are we practicing substandard care? Anesth Analg 2011;112:1274-6
23. Martina JR, Westerhof BE, van Goudoever J, de Beaumont EM, Truijen J, Kim YS, Immink RV, Jöbsis DA, Hollmann MW, Lahpor JR, de Mol BA, van Lieshout JJ. Noninvasive continuous arterial blood pressure monitoring with Nexfn®. Anesthesiology 2012;116:1092-103
24. Chen G, Chung E, Meng L, Alexander B, Vu T, Rinehart J, Cannesson M. Impact of non invasive and beat-to-beat arterial pressure monitoring on intraoperative hemodynamic management. J Clin Monit Comput 2012;26:133-40
25. Stover JF, Stocker R, Lenherr R, Neff TA, Cottini SR, Zoller B, Béchir M. Noninvasive cardiac output and blood pressure monitoring cannot replace an invasive monitoring system in critically ill patients. BMC Anesthesiol 2009;9:6
26. Sokolski M, Rydlewska A, Krakowiak B, Biegus J, Zymlinski R, Banasiak W, Jankowska EA, Ponikowski P. Comparison of invasive and non-invasive measurements of haemodynamic parameters in patients with advanced heart failure. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2011;12:773-8
27. Broch O, Renner J, Gruenewald M, Meybohm P, Schöttler J, Caliebe A, Steinfath M, Malbrain M, Bein B. A comparison of the Nexfn® and transcardiopulmonary thermodilution to estimate cardiac output during coronary artery surgery. Anaesthesia 2012;67:377-83
28. Chen G, Meng L, Alexander B, Tran NP, Kain ZN, Cannesson M. Comparison of noninvasive cardiac output measurements using the Nexfn monitoring device and the esophageal Doppler. J Clin Anesth 2012;24:275-83
29. van der Spoel AG, Voogel AJ, Folkers A, Boer C, Bouwman RA. Comparison of noninvasive continuous arterial waveform analysis (Nexfn) with transthoracic Doppler echocardiogra-phy for monitoring of cardiac output. J Clin Anesth 2012;24: 304-9
30. Meng L, Tran NP, Alexander BS, Laning K, Chen G, Kain ZN, Cannesson M. The impact of phenylephrine, ephedrine, and increased preload on third-generation Vigileo-FloTrac and esophageal doppler cardiac output measurements. Anesth Analg 2011;113:751-7
31. Eleftheriadis S, Galatoudis Z, Didilis V, Bougioukas I, Schön J, Heinze H, Berger KU, Heringlake M. Variations in arterial blood pressure are associated with parallel changes in FlowTrac/Vigileo-derived cardiac output measurements: a prospective comparison study. Crit Care 2009;13:R179
32. Phan TD, Kluger R, Wan C, Wong D, Padayachee A. A comparison of three minimally invasive cardiac output devices with thermodilution in elective cardiac surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care 2011;39:1014-21
33. Hadian M, Kim HK, Severyn DA, Pinsky MR. Cross-comparison of cardiac output trending accuracy of LiDCO, PiCCO, FloTrac and pulmonary artery catheters. Crit Care 2010;14:R212
34. Monnet X, Anguel N, Jozwiak M, Richard C, Teboul JL. Third-generation FloTrac/Vigileo does not reliably track changes in cardiac output induced by norepinephrine in critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth 2012;108:615-22
35. Cannesson M, Pestel G, Ricks C, Hoeft A, Perel A. Hemodynamic monitoring and management in patients undergoing high risk surgery: a survey among North American and European anesthesiologists. Crit Care 2011;15:R197
36. Parker SJ, Boyd O. Haemodynamic optimisation: are we dynamic enough? Crit Care 2011;15:1003
37. Peyton PJ, Chong SW. Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: a meta-analysis of accuracy and precision. Anesthesiology 2010;113: 1220-35
38. Bajorat J, Hofmockel R, Vagts DA, Janda M, Pohl B, Beck C, Noeldge-Schomburg G. Comparison of invasive and less-invasive techniques of cardiac output measurement under different haemodynamic conditions in a pig model. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2006;23:23-30
39. Yang XX, Critchley LA, Joynt GM. Determination of the precision error of the pulmonary artery thermodilution catheter using an in vitro continuous fow test rig. Anesth Analg 2011;112:70-7