Evaluation of a noninvasive continuous cardiac output monitoring system based on thoracic bioreactance

American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology

Volumn 293, Issue 1, 2007, Pages

  Keren, Hanan ^a   Burkhoff, Daniel ^b   Squara, Pierre ^c  

^a Cheetah Medical Limited   (Israel)

^b Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^c Clinique Ambroise Pare   (France)

Author keywords

Noninvasive monitoring

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE;

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTERY CATHETER; ARTICLE; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HEART EJECTION FRACTION; HEART OUTPUT MEASUREMENT; HEART RATE; HUMAN; INTRACELLULAR RECORDING; MEMBRANE CURRENT; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SWINE; TRANSCUTANEOUS CARBON DIOXIDE MONITORING;

ANIMALS; BLOOD VOLUME DETERMINATION; CARDIAC OUTPUT; CARDIOGRAPHY, IMPEDANCE; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SWINE;

EID: 34547132055     PISSN: 03636135     EISSN: 15221539     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00195.2007     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Albert NM, Hail MD, Li J, Young JB. Equivalence of the bioimpedance and thermodilution methods in measuring cardiac output in hospitalized patients with advanced, decompensated chronic heart failure. Am J Crit Care 13: 469-479, 2004.
2. Barin E, Haryadi DG, Schookin SI. Evaluation of a thoracic bioimpedance cardiac output monitor during cardiac catheterization. Crit Care Med 28: 698-702, 2000.
3. Bernstein DP. A new stroke volume equation for thoracic bioimpedance: theory and rationale. Crit Care Med 14: 904-909, 1986.
4. Boldt J, Menges T, Wollbruck M, Hammermann H, Hempelmann G. Is continuous cardiac output measurement using thermodilution reliable in the critically ill patient? Crit Care Med 22: 1913-1918, 1994.
5. Engoren M, Baebee D. Comparison of cardiac output determined by bioimpedance, thermodilution, and the Fick method. Am J Crit Care 14: 40-45, 2005.
6. Fuller HD. The validity of cardiac output measurement by cardiothoracic impedance: a meta-analysis. Clin Invest Med 15: 103-112, 1992.
7. Haller M, Zollner C, Briegel J, Forst H. Evaluation of a new continuous thermodilution cardiac output monitor in critically ill patients: a prospective criterion standard study. Crit Care Med 23: 860-866, 1995.
8. Jensen L, Yakimets J, Teo KK. A review of impedance cardiography. Heart Lung 24:183-193, 1995.
9. Leslie S, McKee S, Newby D, Webb D, Denvir M. Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output in patients with chronic heart failure. Blood Press Monit 9: 277-280, 2004.
10. Mihm FG, Gettinger A, Hanson CW, Gilbert HC, Stover EP, Vender JS, Beerle B, Haddow G. A multicenter evaluation of a new continuous cardiac output pulmonary artery catheter system. Crit Care Med 26: 1346-1350, 1998.
11. Moshkovitz Y, Kaluski E, Milo O, Vered Z, Cotter G. Recent developments in cardiac output determination by bioimpedance; comparison with invasive cardiac output and potential cardiovascular applications. Curr Opin Cardiol 19: 229-237, 2004.
12. Nelson LD. The new pulmonary artery catheters: continuous venous oximetry, right ventricular ejection fraction, and continuous cardiac output. New Horiz 5: 251-258, 1997.
13. Packer M, Abraham WT, Mehra MR, Yancy CW, Lawless CE, Mitchell JE, Smart FW, Bijou R, O'Connor CM, Massie BM, Pina IL, Greenberg BH, Young JB, Fishbein DP, Hauptman PJ, Bourge RC, Strobeck JE, Murali S, Schocken D, Teerlink JR, Levy WC, Trupp RJ, Silver MA, Prospective Evaluation and Identification of Cardiac Decompensation by ICG Test (PREDICT) Study Investigators and Coordinators. Utility of impedance cardiography for the identification of short-term risk of clinical decompensation in stable patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 47: 2245-2252, 2006.
14. Peacock WF, Summers RL, Vogel J, Emerman CE. Impact of impedance cardiography on diagnosis and therapy of emergent dyspnea: the ED-IMPACT Trial. Acad Emerg Med 13: 365-371, 2006.
15. Sandham JD, Hull RD, Brant RF, Knox L, Pineo GF, Doig CJ, Laporta DP, Viner S, Passerini L, Devitt H, Kirby A, Jacka M, Canadian Critical Care Clinical Trials Group. A randomized, controlled trial of the use of pulmonary-artery catheters in high-risk surgical patients. N Engl J Med 348: 5-14, 2003.
16. Schmidt C, Theilmeier H, Van Aken H, Korsmeier P, Wirtz SP, Berendes E, Hoffmeier A, Meissner A. Comparison of electrical velocimetry and transoesophageal Doppler echocardiography for measuring stroke volume and cardiac output. Br J Anaesth 95: 603-610, 2005.
17. Spiess BD, Patel MA, Soltow LO, Wright IH. Comparison of bioimpedance versus thermodilution cardiac output during cardiac surgery; evaluation of a second-generation bioimpedance device. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 15: 567-573, 2001.
18. Van De Water JM, Miller TW, Vogel RL, Mount BE, Dalton ML. Impedance cardiography: the next vital sign technology? Chest 123: 2028-2033, 2003.