Cardiac output monitoring: An integrative perspective

Critical Care

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2011, Pages

  Alhashemi, Jamal A ^a   Cecconi, Maurizio ^b   Hofer, Christoph K ^c  

^a KING ABDULAZIZ UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

^b ST GEORGE'S UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c TRIEMLI HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTERIAL PRESSURE; BLOOD FLOW; CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT; DENSITOMETRY; DOPPLER ECHOGRAPHY; HEART OUTPUT; HEART OUTPUT MEASUREMENT; OXYGEN SATURATION; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT MONITORING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULMONARY ARTERY CATHETER; PULSE PRESSURE; REVIEW; SKIN ELECTRODE; THERMODILUTION; TISSUE OXYGENATION; ALGORITHM; CRITICAL ILLNESS; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; HEART FUNCTION TEST; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; IMPEDANCE CARDIOGRAPHY; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; MONITOR; SWAN GANZ CATHETER;

ALGORITHMS; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORS; CARDIAC OUTPUT; CARDIOGRAPHY, IMPEDANCE; CATHETERIZATION, SWAN-GANZ; CRITICAL ILLNESS; DENSITOMETRY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; HEART FUNCTION TESTS; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS;

EID: 79953017467     PISSN: 13648535     EISSN: 1466609X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/cc9996     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Connors AF, Speroff T, Dawson NV, et al. The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. SUPPORT Investigators. JAMA 1996, 276:889-897. 10.1001/jama.276.11.889, 8782638.
2. Harvey S, Stevens K, Harrison D, et al. An evaluation of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheters in patient management in intensive care: a systematic review and a randomised controlled trial. Health Technol Assess 2006, 10:1-133.
3. Lees N, Hamilton M, Rhodes A. Clinical review: Goal-directed therapy in high risk surgical patients. Crit Care 2009, 13:231. 10.1186/cc8039, 2784362, 19863764.
4. Funk D, Sebat F, Kumar A. A systems approach to the early recognition and rapid administration of best practice therapy in sepsis and septic shock. Curr Opin Crit Care 2009, 15:301-307. 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32832e3825, 19561493.
5. Harvey S, Harrison DA, Singer M, et al. Assessment of the clinical effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheters in management of patients in intensive care (PAC-Man): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005, 366:472-477. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67061-4, 16084255.
6. Nishikawa T, Dohi S. Errors in the measurement of cardiac output by thermodilution. Can J Anaesth 1993, 40:142-153. 10.1007/BF03011312, 8443853.
7. Aranda M, Mihm FG, Garrett S, Mihm MN, Pearl RG. Continuous cardiac output catheters: delay in in vitro response time after controlled flow changes. Anesthesiology 1998, 89:1592-1595. 10.1097/00000542-199812000-00047, 9856744.
8. Leather HA, Vuylsteke A, Bert C, et al. Evaluation of a new continuous cardiac output monitor in off-pump coronary artery surgery. Anaesthesia 2004, 59:385-389. 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03668.x, 15023110.
9. Hamzaoui O, Monnet X, Richard C, et al. Effects of changes in vascular tone on the agreement between pulse contour and transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output measurements within an up to 6-hour calibration-free period. Crit Care Med 2008, 36:434-440. 10.1097/01.CCM.OB013E318161FEC4, 18091547.
10. Button D, Weibel L, Reuthebuch O, et al. Clinical evaluation of the FloTrac/Vigileo system and two established continuous cardiac output monitoring devices in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2007, 99:329-336. 10.1093/bja/aem188, 17631509.
11. Della Rocca G, Costa MG, Coccia C, et al. Cardiac output monitoring: aortic transpulmonary thermodilution and pulse contour analysis agree with standard thermodilution methods in patients undergoing lung transplantation. Can J Anaesth 2003, 50:707-711. 10.1007/BF03018714, 12944446.
12. Cecconi M, Fawcett J, Grounds RM, Rhodes A. A prospective study to evaluate the accuracy of pulse power analysis to monitor cardiac output in critically ill patients. BMC Anesthesiol 2008, 8:3. 10.1186/1471-2253-8-3, 2275227, 18282275.
13. Cecconi M, Dawson D, Grounds RM, Rhodes A. Lithium dilution cardiac output measurement in the critically ill patient: determination of precision of the technique. Intensive Care Med 2009, 35:498-504. 10.1007/s00134-008-1292-4, 18802681.
14. Pearse R, Dawson D, Fawcett J, Rhodes A, Grounds RM, Bennett ED. Early goal-directed therapy after major surgery reduces complications and duration of hospital stay. A randomised, controlled trial [ISRCTN38797445]. Crit Care 2005, 9:R687-R693. 10.1186/cc3887, 1414018, 16356219.
15. Mayer J, Boldt J, Poland R, Peterson A, Manecke GR. Continuous arterial pressure waveform-based cardiac output using the FloTrac/Vigileo: a review and meta-analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2009, 23:401-406. 10.1053/j.jvca.2009.03.003, 19464625.
16. Senn A, Button D, Zollinger A, Hofer CK. Assessment of cardiac output changes using a modified FloTrac/Vigileo algorithm in cardiac surgery patients. Crit Care 2009, 13:R32. 10.1186/cc7739, 2689464, 19261180.
17. Camporota L, Beale R. Pitfalls in haemodynamic monitoring based on the arterial pressure waveform. Crit Care 2010, 14:124. 10.1186/cc8845, 2887100, 20236463.
18. Mayer J, Boldt J, Mengistu AM, Rohm KD, Suttner S. Goal-directed intraoperative therapy based on autocalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis reduces hospital stay in high-risk surgical patients: a randomized, controlled trial. Crit Care 2010, 14:R18. 10.1186/cc8875, 2875533, 20156348.
19. Scolletta S, Romano SM, Biagioli B, Capannini G, Giomarelli P. Pressure recording analytical method (PRAM) for measurement of cardiac output during various haemodynamic states. Br J Anaesth 2005, 95:159-165. 10.1093/bja/aei154, 15894561.
20. Giomarelli P, Biagioli B, Scolletta S. Cardiac output monitoring by pressure recording analytical method in cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004, 26:515-520. 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.05.025, 15302045.
21. Stover JF, Stocker R, Lenherr R, et al. Noninvasive cardiac output and blood pressure monitoring cannot replace an invasive monitoring system in critically ill patients. BMC Anesthesiol 2009, 9:6. 10.1186/1471-2253-9-6, 2766368, 19821993.
22. Lefrant JY, Bruelle P, Aya AG, et al. Training is required to improve the reliability of esophageal Doppler to measure cardiac output in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 1998, 24:347-352. 10.1007/s001340050578, 9609413.
23. Valtier B, Cholley BP, Belot JP, et al. Noninvasive monitoring of cardiac output in critically ill patients using transesophageal Doppler. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998, 158:77-83.
24. Abbas SM, Hill AG. Systematic review of the literature for the use of oesophageal Doppler monitor for fluid replacement in major abdominal surgery. Anaesthesia 2008, 63:44-51. 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05233.x, 18086070.
25. Chan JS, Segara D, Nair P. Measurement of cardiac output with a non-invasive continuous wave Doppler device versus the pulmonary artery catheter: a comparative study. Crit Care Resusc 2006, 8:309-314.
26. Thom O, Taylor DM, Wolfe RE, et al. Comparison of a supra-sternal cardiac output monitor (USCOM) with the pulmonary artery catheter. Br J Anaesth 2009, 103:800-804. 10.1093/bja/aep296, 19864307.
27. Gueret G, Kiss G, Rossignol B, et al. Cardiac output measurements in off-pump coronary surgery: comparison between NICO and the Swan-Ganz catheter. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2006, 23:848-854. 10.1017/S0265021506000573, 16953944.
28. Tachibana K, Imanaka H, Takeuchi M, Takauchi Y, Miyano H, Nishimura M. Noninvasive cardiac output measurement using partial carbon dioxide rebreathing is less accurate at settings of reduced minute ventilation and when spontaneous breathing is present. Anesthesiology 2003, 98:830-837. 10.1097/00000542-200304000-00007, 12657842.
29. Hofer CK, Buhlmann S, Klaghofer R, Genoni M, Zollinger A. Pulsed dye densitometry with two different sensor types for cardiac output measurement after cardiac surgery: a comparison with the thermodilution technique. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2004, 48:653-657. 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2004.00371.x, 15101865.
30. Ball TR, Culp BC, Patel V, et al. Comparison of the endotracheal cardiac output monitor to thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc 2010, 24:762-766.
31. Gujjar AR, Muralidhar K, Banakal S, et al. Non-invasive cardiac output by transthoracic electrical bioimpedence in post-cardiac surgery patients: comparison with thermodilution method. J Clin Monit Comput 2008, 22:175-180. 10.1007/s10877-008-9119-y, 18418719.
32. Squara P, Denjean D, Estagnasie P, Brusset A, Dib JC, Dubois C. Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring (NICOM): a clinical validation. Intensive Care Med 2007, 33:1191-1194. 10.1007/s00134-007-0640-0, 17458538.
33. Raval NY, Squara P, Cleman M, Yalamanchili K, Winklmaier M, Burkhoff D. Multicenter evaluation of noninvasive cardiac output measurement by bioreactance technique. J Clin Monit Comput 2008, 22:113-119. 10.1007/s10877-008-9112-5, 18340540.
34. Boldt J, Lenz M, Kumle B, Papsdorf M. Volume replacement strategies on intensive care units: results from a postal survey. Intensive Care Med 1998, 24:147-151. 10.1007/s001340050536, 9539072.
35. Hofer CK, Furrer L, Matter-Ensner S, et al. Volumetric preload measurement by thermodilution: a comparison with transoesophageal echocardiography. Br J Anaesth 2005, 94:748-755. 10.1093/bja/aei123, 15790674.
36. Kumar A, Anel R, Bunnell E, et al. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit Care Med 2004, 32:691-699. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000114996.68110.C9, 15090949.
37. Goepfert MS, Reuter DA, Akyol D, et al. Goal-directed fluid management reduces vasopressor and catecholamine use in cardiac surgery patients. Intensive Care Med 2007, 33:96-103. 10.1007/s00134-006-0404-2, 17119923.
38. Sakka SG, Klein M, Reinhart K, Meier-Hellmann A. Prognostic value of extravascular lung water in critically ill patients. Chest 2002, 122:2080-2086. 10.1378/chest.122.6.2080, 12475851.
39. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 2009, 37:2642-2647. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a590da, 19602972.
40. Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest 2008, 134:172-178. 10.1378/chest.07-2331, 18628220.
41. Monnet X, Teboul JL. Passive leg raising. Intensive Care Med 2008, 34:659-663. 10.1007/s00134-008-0994-y, 18214429.
42. Marx G, Reinhart K. Venous oximetry. Curr Opin Crit Care 2006, 12:263-268. 10.1097/01.ccx.0000224872.09077.dc, 16672787.
43. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001, 345:1368-1377. 10.1056/NEJMoa010307, 11794169.
44. Dueck MH, Klimek M, Appenrodt S, Weigand C, Boerner U. Trends but not individual values of central venous oxygen saturation agree with mixed venous oxygen saturation during varying hemodynamic conditions. Anesthesiology 2005, 103:249-257. 10.1097/00000542-200508000-00007, 16052106.