Continuous noninvasive cardiac output determination using the CNAP system: evaluation of a cardiac output algorithm for the analysis of volume clamp method-derived pulse contour

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 487-493

  Wagner, Julia Y ^a   Grond, Julian ^b   Fortin, Jürgen ^b   Negulescu, Ileana ^c   Schöfthaler, Miriam ^c   Saugel, Bernd ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^b CNSystems   (Austria)

^c TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cardiac output; Hemodynamic monitoring; Intensive care unit; Pulse contour analysis; Vascular unloading technology

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; BIOMETRICS; ERRORS; HEMODYNAMICS; HOSPITAL DATA PROCESSING; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; PATIENT MONITORING; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; STATISTICS; UNLOADING;

ARTERIAL PRESSURES; CARDIAC OUTPUT; CARDIAC OUTPUT MEASUREMENTS; CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; PERCENTAGE ERROR; PULSE-CONTOUR ANALYSIS; STANDARD DEVIATION;

HEART;

HYPERTENSIVE FACTOR;

ADULT; AGED; APACHE; ARTERY CATHETER; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM EXAMINATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTINUOUS NONINVASIVE ARTERIAL PRESSURE SYSTEM; FEMALE; FIBEROPTIC OXIMETER CATHETER; HEART OUTPUT; HEART OUTPUT MEASUREMENT; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; INTRAVENOUS CATHETER; MALE; NON INVASIVE BLOOD PRESSURE MONITOR; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; PATIENT CODING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; THERMISTOR; THERMODILUTION; TRANSPULMONARY THERMODILUTION; VOLUME CLAMP METHOD DERIVED PULSE CONTOUR; ALGORITHM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CRITICAL ILLNESS; DEVICES; EVALUATION STUDY; INTENSIVE CARE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGIC MONITORING; PULSE WAVE; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; CARDIAC OUTPUT; CRITICAL CARE; CRITICAL ILLNESS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; PULSE WAVE ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; THERMODILUTION;

EID: 84938515702     PISSN: 13871307     EISSN: 15732614     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10877-015-9744-1     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Fortin J, Marte W, Grullenberger R, Hacker A, Habenbacher W, Heller A, Wagner C, Wach P, Skrabal F. Continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring using concentrically interlocking control loops. Comput Biol Med. 2006;36:941–57.
2. Saugel B, Dueck R, Wagner JY. Measurement of blood pressure. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2014;28:309–22.
3. Penaz J. Current photoelectric recording of blood flow through the finger. Cesk Fysiol. 1975;24:349–52.
4. Fortin J, Wellisch A, Maier K. CNAP—evolution of continuous non-invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring. Biomed Tech. 2013;. doi:10.1515/bmt-2013-4179 (Berl).
5. Jeleazcov C, Krajinovic L, Munster T, Birkholz T, Fried R, Schuttler J, Fechner J. Precision and accuracy of a new device (CNAPTM) for continuous non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring: assessment during general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2010;105:264–72.
6. Ilies C, Bauer M, Berg P, Rosenberg J, Hedderich J, Bein B, Hinz J, Hanss R. Investigation of the agreement of a continuous non-invasive arterial pressure device in comparison with invasive radial artery measurement. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108:202–10.
7. Kumar GA, Jagadeesh AM, Singh NG, Prasad SR. Evaluation of continuous non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring during induction of general anaesthesia in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Indian J Anaesth. 2015;59:21–5.
8. Wagner JY, Negulescu I, Schofthaler M, Hapfelmeier A, Meidert AS, Huber W, Schmid RM, Saugel B. Continuous noninvasive arterial pressure measurement using the volume clamp method: an evaluation of the CNAP device in intensive care unit patients. J Clin Monit Comput. 2015;. doi:10.1007/s10877-015-9670-2.
9. Jagadeesh AM, Singh NG, Mahankali S. A comparison of a continuous noninvasive arterial pressure (CNAP) monitor with an invasive arterial blood pressure monitor in the cardiac surgical ICU. Ann Card Anaesth. 2012;15:180–4.
10. Wagner JY, Prantner JS, Meidert AS, Hapfelmeier A, Schmid RM, Saugel B. Noninvasive continuous versus intermittent arterial pressure monitoring: evaluation of the vascular unloading technique (CNAP device) in the emergency department. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2014;22:8.
11. Saugel B, Kirsche SV, Hapfelmeier A, Phillip V, Schultheiss C, Schmid RM, Huber W. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit. J Crit Care. 2013;28(537):e531–9.
12. Saugel B, Phillip V, Gaa J, Berger H, Lersch C, Schultheiss C, Thies P, Schneider H, Hollthaler J, Herrmann A, Schmid RM, Huber W. Advanced hemodynamic monitoring before and after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: implications for selection of patients—a prospective study. Radiology. 2012;262:343–52.
13. Bland JM, Altman DG. Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual. J Biopharm Stat. 2007;17:571–82.
14. Critchley LA, Critchley JA. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput. 1999;15:85–91.
15. Marik PE. Noninvasive cardiac output monitors: a state-of the-art review. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013;27:121–34.
16. Monnet X, Teboul JL. Minimally invasive monitoring. Crit Care Clin. 2015;31:25–42.
17. Saugel B, Cecconi M, Wagner JY, Reuter DA. Noninvasive continuous cardiac output monitoring in perioperative and intensive care medicine. Br J Anaesth. 2014;114:562–75.
18. Alhashemi JA, Cecconi M, Hofer CK. Cardiac output monitoring: an integrative perspective. Crit Care. 2011;15:214.
19. Wagner JY, Saugel B. When should we adopt continuous noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring technologies into clinical routine? J Clin Monit Comput. 2014;29:1–3.
20. Peyton PJ, Chong SW. Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: a meta-analysis of accuracy and precision. Anesthesiology. 2010;113:1220–35.
21. Saugel B, Reuter DA. Are we ready for the age of non-invasive haemodynamic monitoring? Br J Anaesth. 2014;113:340–3.
22. Broch O, Renner J, Gruenewald M, Meybohm P, Schottler J, Caliebe A, Steinfath M, Malbrain M, Bein B. A comparison of the Nexfin(R) and transcardiopulmonary thermodilution to estimate cardiac output during coronary artery surgery. Anaesthesia. 2012;67:377–83.
23. Fischer MO, Avram R, Carjaliu I, Massetti M, Gerard JL, Hanouz JL, Fellahi JL. Non-invasive continuous arterial pressure and cardiac index monitoring with Nexfin after cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109:514–21.
24. Fischer MO, Coucoravas J, Truong J, Zhu L, Gerard JL, Hanouz JL, Fellahi JL. Assessment of changes in cardiac index and fluid responsiveness: a comparison of Nexfin and transpulmonary thermodilution. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013;57:704–12.
25. Hofhuizen C, Lansdorp B, van der Hoeven JG, Scheffer GJ, Lemson J. Validation of noninvasive pulse contour cardiac output using finger arterial pressure in cardiac surgery patients requiring fluid therapy. J Crit Care. 2014;29:161–5.
26. Bubenek-Turconi SI, Craciun M, Miclea I, Perel A. Noninvasive continuous cardiac output by the Nexfin before and after preload-modifying maneuvers: a comparison with intermittent thermodilution cardiac output. Anesth Analg. 2013;117:366–72.
27. Ameloot K, Van De Vijver K, Broch O, Van Regenmortel N, De Laet I, Schoonheydt K, Dits H, Bein B, Malbrain ML. Nexfin noninvasive continuous hemodynamic monitoring: validation against continuous pulse contour and intermittent transpulmonary thermodilution derived cardiac output in critically ill patients. Scientific World J. 2013;2013:519080.
28. Monnet X, Picard F, Lidzborski E, Mesnil M, Duranteau J, Richard C, Teboul JL. The estimation of cardiac output by the Nexfin device is of poor reliability for tracking the effects of a fluid challenge. Crit Care. 2012;16:R212.