The use of soil electrical resistivity to monitor plant and soil water relationships in vineyards

SOIL

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 273-286

  Brillante, L ^a   Mathieu, O ^a   Bois, B ^a,b   Van Leeuwen, C ^c   Leveque J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY; HETEROGENEITY; NUMERICAL MODEL; SOIL WATER; TOMOGRAPHY; VITICULTURE; WATER AVAILABILITY; WATER CONTENT; WATER UPTAKE;

BOURGOGNE; BOURGOGNE-FRANCHE-COMTE; FRANCE;

EID: 84969305535     PISSN: 21993971     EISSN: 2199398X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/soil-1-273-2015     Document Type: Article

References (112)

1. Amato, M., Basso, B., Celano, G., Bitella, G., Morelli, G., and Rossi, R.: In situ detection of tree root distribution and biomass by multi-electrode resistivity imaging, Tree Physiology, 28, 1441–1448, 2008.
2. Amato, M., Bitella, G., Rossi, R., Gómez, J. A., Lovelli, S., and Gomes, J. J. F.: Multi-electrode 3D resistivity imaging of alfalfa root zone, European J. Agronomy, 31, 213–222, doi:10.1016/j.eja.2009.08.005, 2009.
3. Amente, G., Baker, J., and Reece, C.: Estimation of soil solution electrical conductivity from bulk soil electrical conductivity in sandy soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 64, 1931–1939, 2000.
4. André, F., van Leeuwen, C., Saussez, S., Van Durmen, R., Bogaert, P., Moghadas, D., de Rességuier, L., Delvaux, B., Vereecken, H., and Lambot, S.: High-resolution imaging of a vineyard in South of France using ground-penetrating radar, electromagnetic induction and electrical resistivity tomography, J. Appl. Geophys., 78, 113–122, doi:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.08.002, 2012.
5. Andrenelli, M. C., Magini, S., Pellegrini, S., Perria, R., Vignozzi, N., and Costantini, E. A. C.: The use of the ARP© system to reduce the costs of soil survey for precision viticulture, J. Appl. Geophys., 99, 24–34, doi:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2013.09.012, 2013.
6. Archie, G. E.: The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics, Transactions of the AIME, 146, 54–62, 1942.
7. Attia Al Hagrey, S.: Geophysical imaging of root-zone, trunk, and moisture heterogeneity, J. Exp. Botany, 58, 839–854, doi:10.1093/jxb/erl237, 2007.
8. Basso, B., Amato, M., Bitella, G., Rossi, R., Kravchenko, A., Sar-tori, L., Carvahlo, L. M., and Gomes, J.: Two-dimensional spatial and temporal variation of soil physical properties in tillage systems using electrical resistivity tomography, Agronomy J., 102, 440, doi:10.2134/agronj2009.0298, 2010.
9. Bauerle, T. L., Smart, D. R., Bauerle, W. L., Stockert, C., and Eissenstat, D. M.: Root foraging in response to heterogeneous soil moisture in two grapevines that differ in potential growth rate, New Phytologist, 179, 857–866, doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02489.x, 2008.
10. Beff, L., Günther, T., Vandoorne, B., Couvreur, V., and Javaux, M.: Three-dimensional monitoring of soil water content in a maize field using Electrical Resistivity Tomography, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 595–609, doi:10.5194/hess-17-595-2013, 2013.
11. Bernard-Ubertosi, M., Dudoignon, P., and Pons, Y.: Characterization of structural profiles in clay-rich marsh soils by cone resistance and resistivity measurements, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 73, 46, doi:10.2136/sssaj2007.0347, 2009.
12. Besson, A., Cousin, I., Samouëlian, A., Boizard, H., and Richard, G.: Structural heterogeneity of the soil tilled layer as characterized by 2D electrical resistivity surveying, Soil Tillage Re., 79, 239–249, doi:10.1016/j.still.2004.07.012, 2004.
13. Besson, A., Cousin, I., Bourennane, H., Nicoullaud, B., Pasquier, C., Richard, G., Dorigny, A., and King, D.: The spatial and temporal organization of soil water at the field scale as described by electrical resistivity measurements, European J. Soil Sci., 61, 120–132, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.2009.01211.x, 2010.
14. Bodin, F. and Morlat, R.: Characterization of viticultural terroirs using a simple field model based on soil depth I. Validation of the water supply regime, phenology and vine vigour, in the Anjou vineyard (France), Plant Soil, 281, 37–54, doi:10.1007/s11104-005-3768-0, 2006.
15. Brevik, E. C., Fenton, T. E., and Horton, R.: Effect of daily soil temperature fluctuations on soil electrical conductivity as measured with the Geonics EM-38, Precision Agriculture, 5, 145–152, 2004.
16. Brevik, E. C., Cerdà, A., Mataix-Solera, J., Pereg, L., Quinton, J. N., Six, J., and Van Oost, K.: The interdisciplinary nature of SOIL, SOIL, 1, 117–129, doi:10.5194/soil-1-117-2015, 2015.
17. Brillante, L., Bois, B., Mathieu, O., Bichet, V., Michot, D., and Lévêque, J.: Monitoring soil volume wetness in heterogeneous soils by electrical resistivity. A field-based pedotransfer function, J. Hydrol., 516, 55–66, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.01.052, 2014a.
18. Brillante, L., Bois, B., Mathieu, O., and Leveque, J.: Spatio-temporal analysis of grapevine water behaviour in hillslope vineyards. The example of Corton Hill, Burgundy, in: Xth International Terroir Congress, p. 6, 2014b.
19. Brunet, P., Clément, R., and Bouvier, C.: Monitoring soil water content and deficit using Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) – A case study in the Cevennes area, France, J. Hydrol., 380, 146–153, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.10.032, 2010.
20. Calamita, G., Brocca, L., Perrone, A., Piscitelli, S., Lapenna, V., Melone, F., and Moramarco, T.: Electrical resistivity and TDR methods for soil moisture estimation in central Italy test-sites, J. Hydrol., 454–455, 101–112, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.06.001, 2012.
21. Campbell, R. B., Bower, C. A., and Richards, L. A.: Change of electrical conductivity with temperature and the relation of osmotic pressure to electrical conductivity and ion concentration for soil extracts, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc., 13, 66–69, 1948.
22. Celette, F., Ripoche, A., and Gary, C.: WaLIS – A simple model to simulate water partitioning in a crop association: The example of an intercropped vineyard, Agric. Water Manag., 97, 1749–1759, doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2010.06.008, 2010.
23. Chapman, D. M., Roby, G., Ebeler, S. E., Guinard, J.-X., and Matthews, M. A.: Sensory attributes of Cabernet Sauvignon wines made from vines with different water status, Australian J. Grape Wine Res., 11, 339–347, 2005.
24. Choné, X., Van Leeuwen, C., Chery, P., and Ribéreau-Gayon, P.: Terroir influence on water status and nitrogen status of non-irrigated cabernet sauvignon (Vitis vinifera). Vegetative development, must and wine composition (Example of a Medoc top estate vineyard, Saint Julien Area, Bordeaux, 1997), South African J. Enology Viticulture, 22, 8–26, 2001a.
25. Choné, X., van Leeuwen, C., Dubourdieu, D., and Gaudillère, J. P.: Stem water potential is a sensitive indicator of grapevine water status, Annals of Botany, 87, 477–483, doi:10.1006/anbo.2000.1361, 2001b.
26. Corwin, D. L. and Lesch, S. M.: Characterizing soil spatial variability with apparent soil electrical conductivity, Comput. Electr. Agriculture, 46, 135–152, doi:10.1016/j.compag.2004.11.003, 2005.
27. Costantini, E. A. C., Pellegrini, S., Bucelli, P., Storchi, P., Vignozzi, N., Barbetti, R., and Campagnolo, S.: Relevance of the Lin’s and Host hydropedological models to predict grape yield and wine quality, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 1635–1648, doi:10.5194/hess-13-1635-2009, 2009.
28. Costantini, E. A. C., Pellegrini, S., Bucelli, P., Barbetti, R., Campagnolo, S., Storchi, P., Magini, S., and Perria, R.: Mapping suitability for Sangiovese wine by means of δ13C and geophysical sensors in soils with moderate salinity, European J. Agronomy, 33, 208–217, doi:10.1016/j.eja.2010.05.007, 2010.
29. des Gachons, C. P., van Leeuwen, C., Tominaga, T., Soyer, J. P., Gaudillère, J. P., and Dubourdieu, D.: Influence of water and nitrogen deficit on fruit ripening and aroma potential ofVitis vinifera L cv Sauvignon blanc in field conditions, J. Sci. Food Agric., 85, 73–85, doi:10.1002/jsfa.1919, 2005.
30. Doussan, C. and Ruy, S.: Prediction of unsaturated soil hydraulic conductivity with electrical conductivity, Water Resour. Res., 45, 1–12, doi:10.1029/2008WR007309, 2009.
31. Dry, P., Loveys, B. R., Botting, D., and During, H.: Effects of partial root-zone drying on grapevine vigour, yeld, composition of fruit and use of water, in: Proceedings of the 9th Australian Wine Industry Technical Conference, pp. 126–131, 1996.
32. Dry, P. R., Loveys, B. R., and During, H.: Partial drying of the rootzone of grape. II. Changes in the pattern of root development, Vitis, 39, 9–12, 2000.
33. Fernández-Calviño, D., Garrido-Rodríguez, B., López-Periago, J. E., Paradelo, M., and Arias-Estévez, M.: Spatial distribution of copper fractions in a vineyard soil, Land Degradation Develop., 24, 556–563, doi:10.1002/ldr.1150, 2013.
34. Ferrandino, A. and Lovisolo, C.: Abiotic stress effects on grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.): Focus on abscisic acid-mediated consequences on secondary metabolism and berry quality, Environ. Exp. Botany, 103, 138–147, doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2013.10.012, 2014.
35. Friedman, S. P.: Soil properties influencing apparent electrical conductivity: a review, Comput. Electr. Agric., 46, 45–70, doi:10.1016/j.compag.2004.11.001, 2005.
36. Frohlich, R. K. and Parke, C. D.: The electrical resistivity of the vadose zone – Field Survey, Groundwater, 27, 524–530, 1989.
37. Garré, S., Javaux, M., Vanderborght, J., Pagès, L., and Vereecken, H.: Three-dimensional electrical resistivity tomography to monitor root zone water dynamics, Vadose Zone J., 10, 412–424, doi:10.2136/vzj2010.0079, 2011.
38. Garré, S., Coteur, I., Wongleecharoen, C., Kongkaew, T., Diels, J., and Vanderborght, J.: Noninvasive monitoring of soil water dynamics in mixed cropping systems: a case study in ratchaburi province, Thailand, Vadose Zone J., 12, 1–12, doi:10.2136/vzj2012.0129, 2013.
39. Guilioni, L. and Lhomme, J. P.: Modelling the daily course of capit-ulum temperature in a sunflower canopy, Agric. For. Meteorol., 138, 258–272, doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.05.010, 2006.
40. Gupta, S. C. and Hanks, R. J.: Influence of water content on electrical conductivity of the soil, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc., 36, 855–857, 1972.
41. Hadzick, Z. Z., Guber, A. K., Pachepsky, Y. A., and Hill, R. L.: Pedotransfer functions in soil electrical resistivity estimation, Geoderma, 164, 195–202, doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.06.004, 2011.
42. Hillel, D.: Environmental soil physics, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1998.
43. Hsiao, T. C. and Xu, L. K.: Sensitivity of growth of roots versus leaves to water stress: biophysical analysis and relation to water transport, J. Exp. Botany, 51, 1595–1616, 2000.
44. Illiceto, V.: Contribution à la prospection géophysique des sites archéologiques, PhD thesis, Université de Paris, 1969.
45. IUSS Working Group WRB: World reference base for soil resources 2014. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps, FAO, Rome, world soil edn., 2014.
46. Jaillon, O., Aury, J.-M., Noel, B., Policriti, A., Clepet, C., Casagrande, A., Choisne, N., Aubourg, S., Vitulo, N., Jubin, C., Vezzi, A., Legeai, F., Hugueney, P., Dasilva, C., Horner, D., Mica, E., Jublot, D., Poulain, J., Bruyère, C., Billault, A., Segurens, B., Gouyvenoux, M., Ugarte, E., Cattonaro, F., An-thouard, V., Vico, V., Del Fabbro, C., Alaux, M., Di Gaspero, G., Dumas, V., Felice, N., Paillard, S., Juman, I., Moroldo, M., Scalabrin, S., Canaguier, A., Le Clainche, I., Malacrida, G., Du-rand, E., Pesole, G., Laucou, V., Chatelet, P., Merdinoglu, D., Delledonne, M., Pezzotti, M., Lecharny, A., Scarpelli, C., Ar-tiguenave, F., Pè, M. E., Valle, G., Morgante, M., Caboche, M., Adam-Blondon, A.-F., Weissenbach, J., Quétier, F., and Wincker, P.: The grapevine genome sequence suggests ancestral hexaploidization in major angiosperm phyla, Nature, 449, 463–467, doi:10.1038/nature06148, 2007.
47. Jayawickreme, D. H., Jobbágy, E. G., and Jackson, R. B.: Geophysical subsurface imaging for ecological applications, New Phytologist, 201, 1170–1175, 2014.
48. Jaynes, D. B., Colvin, T. S., and Kaspar, T. C.: Identifying potential soybean management zones from multi-year yield data, Comput. Electronics Agric., 46, 309–327, doi:10.1016/j.compag.2004.11.011, 2005.
49. Kramer, P. and Boyer, J.: Water relations of plants and soils, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1995.
50. Lacape, M. J., Wery, J., and Annerose, D. J. M.: Relationships between plant and soil water status in five field-grown cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L .) cultivars, Field Crops Res., 57, 29–43, doi:10.1016/S0378-4290(97)00111-1, 1998.
51. Laloy, E., Javaux, M., Vanclooster, M., Roisin, C., and Bielders, C. L.: Electrical resistivity in a loamy soil: identification of the appropriate pedo-electrical model, Vadose Zone J., 10, 1023–1033, doi:10.2136/vzj2010.0095, 2011.
52. Lebon, E., Dumas, V., Pieri, P., and Schultz, H. R.: Modelling the seasonal dynamics of the soil water balance of vineyards, Functional Plant Biol., 30, 699–710, doi:10.1071/FP02222, 2003.
53. Lebon, E., Pellegrino, A., Louarn, G., and Lecoeur, J.: Branch development controls leaf area dynamics in grapevine (Vitis vinifera) growing in drying soil, Annals of Botany, 98, 175–185, doi:10.1093/aob/mcl085, 2006.
54. Lecoeur, J. and Guilioni, L.: Rate of leaf production in response to soil water deficits in field pea, Field Crops Res., 57, 319–328, doi:10.1016/S0378-4290(98)00076-8, 1998.
55. Lesch, S. M., Corwin, D. L., and Robinson, D. A.: Apparent soil electrical conductivity mapping as an agricultural management tool in arid zone soils, Comput. Electronics Agric., 46, 351–378, doi:10.1016/j.compag.2004.11.007, 2005.
56. Lieskovský, J. and Kenderessy, P.: Modelling the Effect of Vegetation Cover and Different Tillage Practices on Soil Erosion in Vineyards: a Case Study in Vráble (Slovakia) Using WA- TEM/SEDEM, Land Degradation Development, 25, 288–296, 2014.
57. Linde, N., Binley, A., Tryggvason, A., Pedersen, L. B., and Revil, A.: Improved hydrogeophysical characterization using joint inversion of cross-hole electrical resistance and ground-penetrating radar traveltime data, Water Resour. Res., 42, 1–16, doi:10.1029/2006WR005131, 2006.
58. Loke, M. H.: Tutorial 2-D and 3-D electrical imaging surveys, February, Geotomo Software, 2014.
59. Loveys, B. R., Dry, P. R., Stoll, M., and Mc Carthy, M. G.: Using plant physiology to improve the water use efficiency of horticultural crops, Acta Horticulturae, 537, 187–197, 2000.
60. Lovisolo, C., Perrone, I., Carra, A., Ferrandino, A., Flexas, J., Medrano, H., and Schubert, A.: Drought-induced changes in development and function of grapevine (Vitis spp.) organs and in their hydraulic and non-hydraulic interactions at the whole-plant level: a physiological and molecular update, Funct. Plant Biol., 37, 98–116, 2010.
61. Lu, Y., Equiza, M. A., Deng, X., and Tyree, M. T.: Recovery of Populus tremuloides seedlings following severe drought causing total leaf mortality and extreme stem embolism, Physiol. Plant., 140, 246–257, doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.2010.01397.x, 2010.
62. Martínez-Casasnovas, J. A., Ramos, M. C., and Benites, G.: Soil and water assessment tool soil loss simulation at the sub-basin scale in the alt penedès-anoia vineyard region (NE Spain) in the 2000s, Land Degradation Develop., published online first, doi:10.1002/ldr.2240, 2013.
63. Michot, D.: Intérêt de la géophysique de subsurface et de la télédé-tection multispectrale pour la cartographie des sols et le suivi de leur fonctionnement hydrique à l’échelle intraparcellaire, PhD thesis, Université Paris, 6, 2003.
64. Michot, D., Benderitter, Y., Dorigny, A., Nicoullaud, B., King, D., and Tabbagh, A.: Spatial and temporal monitoring of soil water content with an irrigated corn crop cover using surface electrical resistivity tomography, Water Resour. Res., 39, 14–1–14–20, doi:10.1029/2002WR001581, 2003.
65. Nadler, A.: Effect of soil structure on bulk soil electrical conductivity (ECa) using the TDR and 4P techniques, Soil Sci., 152, 199–203, 1991.
66. Neumann, R. B. and Cardon, Z. G.: The magnitude of hydraulic redistribution by plant roots: a review and synthesis of empirical and modeling studies, New Phytologist, 194, 337–352, doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04088.x, 2012.
67. Nijland, W., van der Meijde, M., Addink, E. A., and de Jong, S. M.: Detection of soil moisture and vegetation water abstraction in a Mediterranean natural area using electrical resistivity tomography, Catena, 81, 209–216, doi:10.1016/j.catena.2010.03.005, 2010.
68. Novara, A., Gristina, L., Saladino, S. S., Santoro, A., and Cerdà, A.: Soil erosion assessment on tillage and alternative soil managements in a Sicilian vineyard, Soil Tillage Res., 117, 140–147, doi:10.1016/j.still.2011.09.007, 2011.
69. Novara, A., Gristina, L., Guaitoli, F., Santoro, A., and Cerdà, A.: Managing soil nitrate with cover crops and buffer strips in Sicilian vineyards, Solid Earth, 4, 255–262, doi:10.5194/se-4-255-2013, 2013.
70. Ollat, N., Diakou-Verdin, P., Carde, J. P., Barrieu, F., and Gaudillère, J. P.: Grape berry development: a review, J. Int. Scie. Vigne Vin, 36, 109–131, 2002.
71. Parras-Alcántara, L., Martín-Carrillo, M., and Lozano-García, B.: Impacts of land use change in soil carbon and nitrogen in a Mediterranean agricultural area (Southern Spain), Solid Earth, 4, 167–177, doi:10.5194/se-4-167-2013, 2013.
72. Passioura, J. B.: Soil conditions and plant growth, Plant, Cell Environ., 25, 311–318, 2002.
73. Pellegrino, A., Lebon, E., Simonneau, T., and J, W.: Towards a simple indicator of water stress in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) based on the differential sensitivities of vegetative growth components, Aust. J. Grape Wine Res., 11, 306–315, doi:10.1111/j.1755-0238.2005.tb00030.x, 2005a.
74. Pellegrino, A., Lebon, E., Voltz, M., and Wery, J.: Relationships between plant and soil water status in vine (Vitis vinifera L.), Plant Soil, 266, 129–142, doi:10.1007/s11104-005-0874-y, 2005b.
75. Pellegrino, A., Gozé, E., Lebon, E., and Wery, J.: A model-based diagnosis tool to evaluate the water stress experienced by grapevine in field sites, European J. Agronomy, 25, 49–59, doi:10.1016/j.eja.2006.03.003, 2006.
76. Prieto, I., Armas, C., and Pugnaire, F. I.: Water release through plant roots: new insights into its consequences at the plant and ecosystem level, New Phytologist, 193, 830–841, doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.04039.x, 2012.
77. Revil, A., Cathles, L. M., Losh, S., and Nunn, J. A.: Electrical conductivity in shaly sands with geophysical applications, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 23925, doi:10.1029/98JB02125, 1998.
78. Revil, A., Linde, N., Cerepi, A., Jougnot, D., Matthai, S., and Finsterle, S.: Electrokinetic coupling in unsaturated porous media, J. Coll. Interface Sci., 313, 315–327, doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2007.03.037, 2007.
79. Richards, L. A. and Wadleigh, C. H.: Soil water and plant growth, in: Soil physical conditions and plant growth, Volume 2, edited by: Byron, T. S., p. 491, Academic Press, London UK, 1952.
80. Richards, L. A. and Weaver, L. R.: Moisture retention by some irrigated soils as related to soil-moisture tension, J. Agric. Res., 69, 215–235, 1944.
81. Ritchie, J. T.: Water dynamics in the soil-plant-atmosphere system, Plant Soil, 58, 81–96, doi:10.1007/BF02180050, 1981.
82. Robinson, D. A., Campbell, C. S., Hopmans, J. W., Hornbuckle, B. K., Jones, S. B., Knight, R., Ogden, F., Selker, J., and Wen-droth, O.: Soil moisture measurement for ecological and hydrological watershed – scale observatories: a review, Vadose Zone J., 7, 358–389, doi:10.2136/vzj2007.0143, 2008.
83. Rossi, R., Amato, M., Bitella, G., Bochicchio, R., Ferreira Gomes, J. J., Lovelli, S., Martorella, E., and Favale, P.: Electrical resistivity tomography as a non-destructive method for mapping root biomass in an orchard, European J. Soil Sci., 62, 206–215, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01329.x, 2011.
84. Sadras, V. O. and Schultz, H. R.: Grapevine, in: Crop yield response to water, edited by: Steduto, P., Hsiao, T., Fereres, E., and Raes, D., p. 501, FAO, Rome, Italy, 2012.
85. Samouelian, A., Cousin, I., Tabbagh, A., Bruand, A., and Richard, G.: Electrical resistivity survey in soil science: a review, Soil Tillage Res., 83, 173–193, doi:10.1016/j.still.2004.10.004, 2005.
86. Schultz, H. R. and Matthews, M. A.: Resistance to Water Transport in Shoots of Vitis vinifera L., Plant Physiology, 88, 718–724, doi:10.1104/pp.88.3.718, 1988.
87. Schultz, H. R. and Stoll, M.: Some critical issues in environmental physiology of grapevines: future challenges and current limitations, Aust. J. Grape Wine Res., 16, 4–24, doi:10.1111/j.1755-0238.2009.00074.x, 2010.
88. Schwartz, B. F., Schreiber, M. E., and Yan, T.: Quantifying field-scale soil moisture using electrical resistivity imaging, J. Hydrol., 362, 234–246, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.08.027, 2008.
89. Seguin, G.: Alimentation en eau de la vigne dans des sols du Haut-Médoc, Connaissance Vigne Vin, 2, 23–34, 1969.
90. Seguin, G.: Alimentation en eau de la vigne et composition chim-ique des mouts dans les grand crus du Médoc. Phénomènes de regulation, Connaissance Vigne Vin, 9, 23–34, 1975.
91. Shah, P. H. and Singh, D. N.: Generalized Archie’s law for estimation of soil electrical conductivity, J. ASTM Int., 2, 1–20, 2005.
92. Sinclair, T. R., Holbrook, N. M., and Zwieniecki, M. A.: Daily transpiration rates of woody species on drying soil, Tree Physiology, 25, 1469–1472, 2005.
93. Smart, D. R., Carlisle, E., Goebel, M., and Núñez, B. A.: Transverse hydraulic redistribution by a grapevine, Plant, Cell Environ., 28, 157–166, doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2004.01254.x, 2005.
94. Srayeddin, I. and Doussan, C.: Estimation of the spatial variability of root water uptake of maize and sorghum at the field scale by electrical resistivity tomography, Plant Soil, 319, 185–207, doi:10.1007/s11104-008-9860-5, 2009.
95. Stoll, M., Loveys, B., and Dry, P.: Hormonal changes induced by partial rootzone drying of irrigated grapevine, J. Exp. Botany, 51, 1627–1634, 2000.
96. Storchi, P., Constantini, E. A. C., and Buceli, P.: The influence of climate and soil on viticultural and enological parameters of Sangiovese grapevines under non-irrigated conditions, Acta Horticulturae, 689, 333–340, 2005.
97. Tabbagh, A., Dabas, M., Hesse, A., and Panissod, C.: Soil resistivity: a non-invasive tool to map soil structure horizonation, Geoderma, 97, 393–404, 2000.
98. Tarolli, P., Sofia, G., Calligaro, S., Prosdocimi, M., Preti, F., and Dalla Fontana, G.: Vineyards in terraced landscapes: new opportunities from Lidar data, Land Degradation Develop., 26, 92–102, 2015.
99. Tetegan, M., Pasquier, C., Besson, A., Nicoullaud, B., Bouthier, A., Bourennane, H., Desbourdes, C., King, D., and Cousin, I.: Field-scale estimation of the volume percentage of rock fragments in stony soils by electrical resistivity, Catena, 92, 67–74, doi:10.1016/j.catena.2011.09.005, 2012.
100. Tomasi, D., Gaiotti, F., and Jones, G. V.: The power of the terroir: the case study of Prosecco wine, Springer Basel, 2013.
101. Tramontini, S., Leeuwen, C., Domec, J.-C., Destrac-Irvine, A., Basteau, C., Vitali, M., Mosbach-Schulz, O., and Lovisolo, C.: Impact of soil texture and water availability on the hydraulic control of plant and grape-berry development, Plant Soil, 368, 215–230, doi:10.1007/s11104-012-1507-x, 2012.
102. Triantafilis, J. and Lesch, S. M.: Mapping clay content variation using electromagnetic induction techniques, Comput. Electronics Agric., 46, 203–237, doi:10.1016/j.compag.2004.11.006, 2005.
103. van Leeuwen, C.: Terroir: the effect of the physical environment on vine growth, grape ripening and wine sensory attributes, in: Managing Wine Quality. Volume 1: Viticulture and wine quality, edited by: Reynolds, A., chap. 9, p. 624, Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, UK, 1 edn., available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/book/9781845694845 (last access date: 12 March 2015), 2010.
104. van Leeuwen, C. and Seguin, G.: The concept of terroir in viticulture, J. Wine Res., 17, 1–10, doi:10.1080/09571260600633135, 2006.
105. van Leeuwen, C., Friant, P., Choné, X., Tregoat, O., Koundouras, S., and Dubourdieu, D.: Influence of climate, soil, and cultivar on terroir, Am. J. Enol. Viticulture, 55, 207–217, 2004.
106. van Leeuwen, C., Tregoat, O., and Choné, X.: Vine water status is a key factor in grape ripening and vintage quality for red bor-deaux wine. How can it be assessed for vineyard management purposes?, J. Int. Sci. Vigne Vin, 43, 121–134, 2009.
107. van Leeuwen, C., Pieri, P., and Vivin, P.: Comparison of three operational tools for the assessment of vine water status: stem water potential, carbon isotope discrimination measured on grape sugar and water balance, in: Methodologies and Results in Grapevine Research, edited by: Delrot, S., Medrano, H., Or, E., Bavaresco, L., and Grando, S., chap. 7, pp. 87–106, Springer Netherlands, 1 edn., doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9283-0, 2010.
108. Veihmeyer, F. J. and Hendrickson, A. H.: Soil moisture in relation to plant growth, Annu. Rev. Plant Physiology, 1, 285–305, 1950.
109. Waxman, M. H. and Smits, L. J. M.: Electrical conductivities in oil-bearing shaly sands, Soc. Pet. Eng. J., 8, 107–122, doi:10.2118/1863-A, 1968.
110. Werban, U., Attia al Hagrey, S., and Rabbel, W.: Monitoring of root-zone water content in the laboratory by 2D geo-electrical tomography, J. Plant Nut. Soil Sci., 171, 927–935, doi:10.1002/jpln.200700145, 2008.
111. Winsauer, W. O., Shearin, H. M., Masson, P. H., and Williams, M.: Resistivity of brine-saturated sands in relation to pore geometry, AAPG B., 36, 253–277, 1952.
112. Zsófi, Z., Gál, L., Szilágyi, Z., Szucs, E., Marschall, M., Nagy, Z., and Bálo, B.: Use of stomatal conductance and pre-dawn water potential to classify terroir for the grape variety Kékfrankos, Aust. J. Grape Wine Res., 15, 36–47, doi:10.1111/j.1755-0238.2008.00036.x, 2009.