The use of the ARP© system to reduce the costs of soil survey for precision viticulture

Journal of Applied Geophysics

Volumn 99, Issue , 2013, Pages 24-34

  Andrenelli, M C ^a   Magini, S ^a   Pellegrini, S ^a   Perria, R ^a   Vignozzi, N ^a   Costantini, E A C ^a  

^a ISTITUTO NAZIONALE DELLA NUTRIZIONE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Automatic Resistivity Profiling; Clay; ESAP software; Kappa accuracy analysis; Soil electrical resistivity

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ANALYSIS; AUTOMATIC RESISTIVITY PROFILING; SOIL ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITIES;

CLAY; GEOPHYSICS;

SOIL SURVEYS;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; CLAY; ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY; PARTICLE SIZE; SIZE DISTRIBUTION; SOFTWARE; SOIL PROFILE; SOIL PROPERTY; SOIL SURVEY; VITICULTURE;

ITALY; TUSCANY;

EID: 84885939230     PISSN: 09269851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2013.09.012     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Amezketa E. Soil salinity assessment using directed soil sampling from a geophysical survey with electromagnetic technology: a case study. Span. J. Agric. Res. 2007, 5:91-101.
2. Amezketa E., de Lersundi J.D.V. Soil classification and salinity mapping for determining restoration potential of cropped riparian areas. Land Degrad. Dev. 2008, 19:153-164.
3. Basso B., Amato M., Bitella G., Rossi R., Kravchenko A., Sartori L., Carvahlo L.M., Gomes J. Two-dimensional spatial and temporal variation of soil physical properties in tillage systems using electrical resistivity tomography. Agron. J. 2010, 102(2):440-449.
4. Bourennane H., Nicoullaud B., Couturier A., King D. Exploring the spatial relationships between some soil properties and wheat yields in two soil types. Precis. Agric. 2004, 5:521-536.
5. Bramley R.G.V. Lessons from nearly 20years of precision agriculture research, development, and adoption as a guide to its appropriate application. Crop Pasture Sci. 2009, 60:197-217.
6. Bramley R.G.V., Lamb D.W. Making sense of vineyard variability in Australia. Proceedings of an international symposium held as part of the IX Congreso Latinoamericano de Viticultura y Enologia, Chile 2003, 35-54. Centro de Agricultura de Precisión, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Facultad de Agronomía e Ingenería Forestal, Santiago, Chile. R. Ortega, A. Esser (Eds.).
7. Bramley R.G.V., Lamb D.W. Precision Viticulture - making sense of vineyard variability. Final Report on Project No. CRV99/5N to the Grape and Wine Research and Development Corporation 2006, Cooperative Research Centre for Viticulture/GWRDC, Adelaide, Australia.
8. Bramley R.G.V., Ouzman J., Boss P.K. Variation in vine vigour, grape yield and vineyard soils and topography as indicators of variation in the chemical composition of grapes, wine and wine sensory attributes. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2011, 17:217-219.
9. Bramley R.G.V., Trought M.C.T., Praat J.P. Vineyard variability in Marlborough, New Zealand: characterising variation in vineyard performance and options for the implementation of Precision Viticulture. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2011, 17:72-78.
10. Campana S., Marasco L., Pecci A., Barba L., Dabas M., Piro S., Zamuner D. Integration of ground remote sensing surveys and archaeological excavation to characterize the medieval mound (Scarlino,Tuscany, Italy). Archaeol. Prospect. 2009, 16:167-176.
11. Cassel F., Goorahoo S.D., Zoldoske D., Adhikari D. Mapping soil salinity using ground-based electromagnetic induction. Remote Sensing of Soil Salinization: Impact on Land Management 2008, 199-210. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL, USA. G. Metternicht, A. Zinck (Eds.).
12. Corwin D.L., Lesch S.M. Application of soil electrical conductivity to precision agriculture: theory, principles, and guidelines. Agron. J. 2003, 95:455-471.
13. Corwin D.L., Lesch S.M. Characterizing soil spatial variability with apparent soil electrical conductivity I. Survey protocols. Comput. Electron. Agric 2005, 46:103-133.
14. Corwin D.L., Lesch S.M. Apparent soil electrical conductivity measurements in agriculture. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2005, 46:11-44.
15. Costantini E.A.C., Pellegrini S., Bucelli P., Barbetti R., Campagnolo S., Storchi P., Magini S., Perria R. Mapping suitability for Sangiovese wine by means of δ13C and geophysical sensors in soils with moderate salinity. Eur. J. Agron. 2010, 33:208-217.
16. Dabas M. Theory and practice of the new fast electrical imaging system ARP©. Presented at the XV International Summer School in Archaeology, Geophysics for Landscape Archaeology, Grosseto, 10-18 July 2006.
17. Dabas M. Theory and practice of the new fast electrical imaging system ARP©. Geophysics and Landscape Archaeology 2009, 105-126. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, London, UK. Campana, Piro (Eds.).
18. Dabas M., Hesse A., Tabbagh J. Experimental resistivity survey at Wroxeter archaeological site with a fast and light recording device. Archaeol. Prospect. 2000, 7:107-118.
19. FAO Soil survey investigations for irrigation. FAO Soils Bulletin No. 42 1979, FAO, Rome, (188 p.).
20. FAO-ISRIC-IUSS World reference base for soil resources. World Soil Resources Report 2006, 106. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy.
21. Farahani H.J., Flynn R.L. Map quality and zone delineation as affected by width of parallel swaths of mobile agricultural sensors. Biosyst. Eng. 2007, 96(2):151-159.
22. Frogbrook Z.L., Oliver M.A. The effects of sampling on the accuracy of predictions of soils properties for precision agriculture. Accuracy 2000. Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on spatial accuracy assessment in natural resources and environmental sciences 2000, 225-232. Delft: Delft University Press, The Netherlands. G.B.M. Heuvelink, M.J.M. Lemmens (Eds.).
23. Frogbrook Z.L., Oliver M.A. Identifying management zones in agricultural fields using spatially constrained classification of soil and ancillary data. Soil Use Manag. 2007, 23(1):40-51.
24. I numeri del vino (verified 2012 July 17th). http://www.inumeridelvino.it/2008/03/la-dimensione-delle-aziende-vinicole-in-europa-dati-1990-2003.html.
25. Iqbal J., Thomasson J.A., Jenkins N.J., Owens R.P., Whisler D.F. Spatial variability analysis of soil physical properties of alluvial soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2005, 69:1338-1350.
26. ISTAT (verified 2012 July 17th). http://www3.istat.it/salastampa/comunicati/non_calendario/20110705_00/.
27. Johnson R.B., Zimmer W.J. A more powerful test for dispersion using distance measurements. Ecology 1985, 66:1669-1675.
28. Johnson C.K., Doran J., Duke H.R., Wienhold B.J., Eskridge K., Shanahan J.F. Field scale electrical conductivity mapping for delineating soil condition. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2001, 65(6):1829-1837.
29. Landis J.R., Koch G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977, 33:159-174.
30. Lesch S.M., Rhoades J.D., Corwin D.L. ESAP-95 version 2.01R: user manual and tutorial guide. USDA-ARS 2000, 146. Salinity Laboratory, Riverside, CA, USA. G.E. Brown (Ed.).
31. Morari F., Castrignanò A., Pagliarin C. Application of multivariate geostatistics in delineating management zones within a gravelly vineyard using geo-electrical sensors. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2009, 68:97-107.
32. Oline D.K., Grant M.C. Scaling patterns of biomass and soil properties: an empirical analysis. Landsc. Ecol. 2002, 17:13-26.
33. Oliver M.A., Frogbrook Z.L. Sampling to estimate soil nutrients for precision agriculture. Proceedings of the International Fertiliser Society, No. 417 1998.
34. Ortega R., Esser A., Santibañez O. Spatial variability of wine grape yield and quality in Chilean vineyards: economic and environmental impacts. Precision Agriculture, Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Precision Agriculture 2003, 499-506. Wageningen Academic Publishers, The Netherlands. J. Stafford, A. Werner (Eds.).
35. Rossi R., Pollice A., Diago M.P., Oliveira M., Millan B., Bitella G., Amato M., Tardaguila J. Using an automatic resistivity profiler soil sensor on-the-go in precision viticulture. Sensors 2013, 13:1121-1136.
36. Samouelian A., Cousin I., Tabbagh A., Bruand A., Richard G. Electrical resistivity survey in soil science: a review. Soil Tillage Res. 2005, 83(2):173-193.
37. Sobieraj J.A., Elsenbeer H., Cameron G. Scale dependency in spatial patterns of saturated hydraulic conductivity. Catena 2004, 55:49-77.
38. Soil Survey Staff Keys to Soil Taxonomy 2006, USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service, NY, USA. 10th ed.
39. Western A.W., Blöschl G. On the spatial scaling of soil moisture. J. Hydrol. 1999, 217:203-224.
40. Wienhold B.J., Doran J.W. Apparent electrical conductivity for delineating spatial variabilities in soil properties. Handbook of agricultural geophysics (211-215) 2008, CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL, USA. B.J. Allred (Ed.).
41. Wu S.D., Usery E.L., Finn M.P., Bosch D. Effects of sampling interval on spatial patterns and statistics of watershed nitrogen concentration. GIScience Remote Sens. 2009, 46(2):172-186.