Daily transpiration rates of woody species on drying soil

Tree Physiology

Volumn 25, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 1469-1472

  Sinclair, Thomas R ^a   Holbrook, N Michelle ^b   Zwieniecki, Maciej A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Acer rubrum; Hibiscus sp.; Ibex aquifolium; Robinia pseudoacacia; Thuja plicata; Water deficit

Indexed keywords

SOIL MOISTURE; TRANSPIRATION; WATER STRESS;

ACER; ACER RUBRUM; CAPRA IBEX; HIBISCUS; ROBINIA; ROBINIA PSEUDOACACIA; THUJA; THUJA PLICATA;

EID: 28444484247     PISSN: 0829318X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/treephys/25.11.1469     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bernier, P.Y., N. Breda, A. Granier, F. Raulier and F. Mathieu. 2002. Validation of a canopy gas exchange model and derivation of a soil water modifier for transpiration for sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.) using sap flow density measurements. For. Ecol. Manage. 163:185-196.
2. Bindi, M., S. Bellesi, S. Orlandini, L. Fibbi, M. Moriondo and T. Sinclair. 2005. Influence of water deficit stress on leaf area development and transpiration of Sangiovese grapevines grown in pots. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 5:68-72.
3. Colman, E.A. 1947. A laboratory procedure for determining the field capacity of soils. Soil Sci. 63:277-283.
4. Girona, J., M. Mata, E. Fereres, D.A. Goldhamer and M. Cohen. 2002. Evapotranspiration and soil water dynamics of peach trees under water deficits. Agric. Water Manage. 54:107-122.
5. Granier, A., P. Biron and D. Lemoine. 2000. Water balance, transpiration and canopy conductance in two beech stands. Agric. For. Meteorol. 100:291-308.
6. Gollan, T., N.C. Turner and E.-D. Schulze. 1985. The responses of stomata and leaf gas exchange to vapor pressure deficits and soil water content III. In the sclerophyllous woody species Nerium oleander. Oecologia 65:356-362.
7. Irvine, J., M.P. Perks, F. Magnani and J. Grace. 1998. The response of Pinus sylvestris to drought: stomatal control of transpiration and hydraulic conductance. Tree Physiol. 18:393-402.
8. Kramer, P.J. 1944. Soil moisture in relation to plant growth. Bot. Rev. 10:525-559.
9. Lagergren, F. and A. Lindroth. 2002. Transpiration response to soil moisture in pine and spruce trees in Sweden. Agric. For. Meteorol. 112:67-85.
10. Martin, E.V. 1940. Effect of soil moisture on growth and transpiration of Helianthus annuus. Plant Physiol. 14:449-466.
11. Ratliff, L.F., J.T. Ritchie and D.K. Cassel. 1983. Field-measured limits of soil water availability as related to laboratory-measured properties. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 47:770-775.
12. Richards, L.A. and L.R. Weaver. 1943. Fifteen-atmosphere percentage as related to the permanent wilting percentage. Soil Sci. 56:331-339.
13. Ritche, J.T. 1981. Water dynamics in the soil-plant-atmosphere system. Plant Soil 58:81-96.
14. Sadras, V.O. and S.P. Milroy. 1996. Soil-water thresholds for the responses of leaf expansion and gas exchange: a review. Field Crop Res. 47:253-266.
15. Sinclair, T.R., L.C. Hammond and J. Harrison. 1998. Extractable soil water and transpiration rate of soybean on sandy soils. Agron. J. 90:363-368.
16. Sinclair, T.R. and M.M. Ludlow. 1986. Influence of soil water supply on the plant water balance of four tropical grain legumes. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 13:329-341.
17. Sinclair, T.R. and R.C. Muchow. 2001. System analysis of plant traits to increase grain yield on limited water supplies. Agron. J. 93:263-270.