Mapping suitability for Sangiovese wine by means of δ13C and geophysical sensors in soils with moderate salinity

European Journal of Agronomy

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 208-217

  Costantini, Edoardo A C ^a   Pellegrini, Sergio ^a   Bucelli, Pierluigi ^a   Barbetti, Roberto ^a   Campagnolo, Stefano ^a   Storchi, Paolo ^b   Magini, Simona ^a   Perria, Rita ^b  

^a CRA Research Centre for Agrobiology and Pedology   (Italy)

^b CRA Research Unit for Viticulture   (Italy)

Author keywords

Carbon isotopic ratio; Electromagnetic conductivity; Electromagnetic resistivity; Hydropedology; NDVI; Terroir

Indexed keywords

CARBON ISOTOPE; ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GEOMORPHOLOGY; GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY; NDVI; PLANT WATER RELATIONS; REMOTE SENSING; SALINE SOIL; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SOIL DEPTH; SOIL QUALITY; SOIL WATER; VEGETATION MAPPING; VINEYARD; VITICULTURE;

VITACEAE;

EID: 77956180295     PISSN: 11610301     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2010.05.007     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Acevedo-Opazo C., Tisseyre B., Guillaume S., Ojeda H. The potential of high spatial resolution information to define within-vineyard zones related to vine water status. Precision Agric. 2008, 9:285-302.
2. Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D., Smith, M., 1998. Crop Evapotranspiration-Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements. FAO, Irrigation and Drainage, Paper 56, Rome.
3. Brancadoro L., Failla O., Tonnato L., Scienza A. Risultati di indagini di zonazione a diversa scala effettuate sul territorio toscano. Quad. vitic. enol. univ. Torino 2006, 28:281-291.
4. Caldano, G., Rossi, A., 2008. Codice Denominazioni di origine dei vini. Unione Italiana Vini (Ed.), Milano.
5. Choné X., Van Leeuwen C., Dubourdieu D., Gaudillere J.P. Stem water potential is a sensitive indicator for grapevine vine status. Ann. Bot. 2001, 4:477-483.
6. Corwin D.L., Lesch S.M. Apparent soil electrical conductivity measurements in agriculture. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2005, 46:11-43.
7. Corwin D.L., Plant R.E. Applications of apparent soil electrical conductivity in precision agriculture. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2005, 46:1-10.
8. Costantini E.A.C. Linee guida dei metodi di rilevamento e informatizzazione dei dati pedologici. CRA-ABP 2007, 296.
9. Costantini, E.A.C., Campostrini, F., Arcara, P.G., Cherubini, P., Storchi, P., Pierucci, M., 1996. Soil and climate functional characters for grape ripening and wine quality of " Vino Nobile di Montepulciano" Acta Hort., 427 ISHS, 45-55.
10. Costantini E.A.C., Barbetti R., Bucelli P., L'Abate G., Lelli L., Pellegrini S., Storchi P. Land Peculiarities of the vine cultivation areas in the province of Siena (Italy), with indications concerning the viticultural and oenological results of Sangiovese vine. Boll. Soc. Geol. It. 2006, 6:147-159.
11. Dabas M., Hesse A., Jolivet A., Tabbagh A. Intérêt de la cartographie de la résistivité électrique pour la connaissance du sol à grande échelle. Sci. Sol. 1989, 27(1):67-68.
12. Deering D.W., Rose J.W., Mass R.H., Schell J.A. Measuring forage production of grazing units from LANDSAT MSS data. Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment 1975, 1169-1178.
13. Deloire A., Carbonneau A., Wang Z., Ojeda H. Vine and water a short review. J. Int. Sci. Vigne Vin 2004, 38(1):1-13.
14. Deschepper G., Cassassolles X., Dabas M., Pernet D. Complémentarité des mesures de résistivité électrique des sols et du ΔC13 du moût dans l'étude et la valorisation des terroirs viticoles. VIth International Terroir Congress 2006, 232-236.
15. Di Stefano R., Ummarino I., Gentilini N. Alcuni aspetti del controllo di qualità nel campo enologico. Annali ISEN 1997, XXVIII:105-121.
16. F.A.O., I.U.S.S., I.S.R.I.C., 2006. World Reference Base for Soil Resource. World Soil Resource Report n. 103. F.A.O., Rome.
17. Farquhar G., Ehleringer J., Hibick K. Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1989, 40:503-537.
18. Faybishenko B.A. ydraulic behaviour of quasi-saturated soils in the presence of entrapped air: laboratory experiments. Water Resour. Res. 1995, 31(10):2421-2435.
19. Fregoni M. Effets du sol et de l'eau sur la qualité de la vendange. Proc. Symp. Int. sur la Qualité de la vendange, Cape Town 1997, 151-168.
20. Fregoni, M., Scienza, A., Miravalle, R., 1978. Évaluation précoce de la résistance des portes-greffes à la sécheresse. In: Génétique et Amélioration de la Vigne, INRA ed., pp. 287-297.
21. Gaudillère J.-P., Van Leeuwen C., Ollat N. Carbon isotope composition of sugars in grapevine, an integrated indicator of vineyard water status. J. Exp. Bot. 2002, 53(369):757-763.
22. Gee G.W., Or D. Particle-size analysis. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 4. SSSA Book Series No. 5 2002, 255-293. SSSA, Madison, WI. J.H. Dane, G.C. Topp (Eds.).
23. Guix-Hébrard N., Voltz M., Trambouze W., Garnier F., Gaudillère J.P., Lagacherie P. Influence of watertable depths on the variation of grapevine water status at the landscape scale. Eur. J. Agron. 2007, 27:187-196.
24. Intrieri C., Poni S., Lia G., Gomez del Campo M. Vine performance and leaf physiology of conventionally- and minimally pruned Sangiovese grapevines. Vitis 2001, 40:123-130.
25. Kassel, D.K., Nielsen, D.R., 1986. Field capacity and available water capacity. In: Klute, A. (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1, 2nd ed. Am. Soc. Agr., Madison, WI, pp. 901-926.
26. Lambert J.J., Anderson M.M., Wolpert J.A. Vineyard nutrient needs vary with rootstocks and soils. California Agric. 2008, 62(4):202-207.
27. Lanyon, D.M., Cass, A., Hansen, D., 2004. The effect of soil properties on vine performance. CSIRO Land and Water Technical Report No. 34/04.
28. MiPAF: Metodi di analisi chimica del suolo, Franco Angeli, Milan, Italy, 2000.
29. OIV, 2005. Recueil des methodes internationales d'analyse des vins et des mouts. Vol. 1, Paris, France.
30. Palliotti A., Silvestroni O., Petoumenou D., Vignaroli S., Berrios J.G. Evaluation of low-energy demand adaptive mechanisms in Sangiovese grapevine during drought. J. Int. Sci. Vigne Vin 2008, 42(1):41-47.
31. Paoletti, A., 1995. Sangiovese in Tuscany. In: J.M. Rantz (Ed.), Proc. Int. Symposium on Clonal Selection, Portland, Oregon, Am. Soc. for Oenology and Viticulture, Davis, pp. 60-69.
32. Priestley C.H.B., Taylor R.J. On the assessment of the surface heat flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters. Mon. Weather Rev. 1972, 100:81-92.
33. Rouse, J.W. Jr., Haas, R.H., Deering, D.W, Schell, J.A., Harlan J.C., 1974. Monitoring the vernal advancement and retrogradation (green wave effect) of natural vegetation. NASA/GSFC Type III Final Report, Greenbelt, MD, USA, p. 371.
34. Samouëlian A., Cousin I., Tabbagh A., Bruand A., Richard G. Electrical resistivity survey in soil science: a review. Soil Till. Res. 2005, 83(2):73-193.
35. SCS-CN USDA, 1969. Soil Conservation Service National Engineering Handbook, Section 4: Hydrology. Washington D.C.
36. Soil Survey Staff, 1998. Keys to Soil Taxonomy-SMSS Technical Monograph n.19, Pocahontas Press, Blacksburg, Virginia, U.S.A., p. 541.
37. Storchi P., Costantini E.A.C., Bucelli P. The influence of climate and soil on viticultural and oenological parameters of Sangiovese grapevine under non-irrigated conditions. Acta Horticulturae 2005, 689:333-340.
38. Thornthwaite C.W., Mather J.R. Instructions and tables for computing potential evapotranspiration and the water balance. Publicat. Climatol. 1957, 10(3):183-311.
39. Tisseyre B., Ojeda H., Taylor J. New technologies and methodologies for site-specific viticulture. J. Int. Sci. Vigne Vin 2007, 41(2):63-76.
40. Tomasi D., Calò A., Biscaro S., Vettorello G., Panero L., Di Stefano R. Influence des caractéristiques physiques du sol sur le développe de la vigne, dans la composition polyphénolique et anthocyanique des raisins et la qualité du vin de Cabernet sauvignon. Bull. O. I. V. 1999, 72:819-820.
41. Tregoat O., Van Leeuwen C., Choné X., Gaudillère J.P. The assessment of vine water and nitrogen uptake by means of physiological indicators influence on vine development and berry potential (Vitis vinifera L. cv merlot, 2000, Bordeaux). J. Int. Sci. Vigne Vin 2002, 36(3):133-142.
42. USDA, 1985. SCS National Engineering Handbook, Section 4: Hydrology. Washington D.C.
43. Van Leeuwen C., Seguin G. Incidences de l'alimentation en eau de la vigne, appréciée par l'état hydrique du feuillage sur le développement de l'appareil végetatif et la maturation du raisin. J. Int. Sci. Vigne Vin 1994, 2:81-110.
44. 13C. J. Int. Sci. Vigne Vin 2001, 4:195-205.
45. Van Leeuwen C., Tregoat O., Chone X., Jaeck M.E., Rabusseau S., Gaudillere J.P. Le suivi du régime hydrique de la vigne et son incidence sur la maturation du raisin. Bull. O. I. V. 2003, 867, 868:367-379.
46. Weiss J. Rating scales in the sensory analysis of foodstuffs. II. Paradigmatic application of a rating method with unstructured scale. Acta Aliment. 1981, 10(4):395-405.
47. White R.E. Soils for Fine Wines 2003, Oxford Univ. Press, p. 266.
48. Williams L.E., Araujo F.J. Correlations among predawn leaf, midday leaf and midday stem water potential and their correlations with other measures of soil and plant water status in Vitis vinifera. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 2002, 127(3):448-454.
49. Zufferey V., Murisier F. Appréciation de l'alimentation hydrique de la vigne dans divers terroirs viticoles vaudois (Suisse) Estimation of plant hydraulics of grapevine in various terroirs in the Canton of Vaud (Switzerland). VIth International Terroir Congress 2006.