CryoEM structure of yeast cytoplasmic exosome complex

Cell Research

Volumn 26, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 822-837

  Liu, Jun Jie ^a,b   Niu, Chu Ya ^a   Wu, Yao ^c   Tan, Dan ^c   Wang, Yang ^a   Ye, Ming Da ^a   Liu, Yang ^b,d   Zhao, Wenwei ^d   Zhou, Ke ^e   Liu, Quan Sheng ^e   Dai, Junbiao ^b   Yang, Xuerui ^d   Dong, Meng Qiu ^c   Huang, Niu ^c   Wang, Hong Wei ^a  

^a Tsinghua University   (China)

^b TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES   (China)

^d Tsinghua University   (China)

^e INSTITUTE OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS   (China)

Author keywords

cryo EM; exosome; RNA decay; Rrp6; Ski7

Indexed keywords

EXOSOME MULTIENZYME RIBONUCLEASE COMPLEX; PROTEIN BINDING; RNA; RRP6 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; SIGNAL TRANSDUCING ADAPTOR PROTEIN; SKI7 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CHEMISTRY; CONFORMATION; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; EXOSOME; GENETICS; IMAGE PROCESSING; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR MODEL; MUTAGENESIS; PROTEIN QUATERNARY STRUCTURE; RNA-BINDING DOMAIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ADAPTOR PROTEINS, SIGNAL TRANSDUCING; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; EXOSOME MULTIENZYME RIBONUCLEASE COMPLEX; EXOSOMES; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MUTAGENESIS; NUCLEIC ACID CONFORMATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, QUATERNARY; RNA; RNA-BINDING MOTIFS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 84968547855     PISSN: 10010602     EISSN: 17487838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/cr.2016.56     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Mitchell P, Petfalski E, Shevchenko A, Mann M, Tollervey D. The exosome: a conserved eukaryotic RNA processing complex containing multiple 3′ 5′ exoribonucleases. Cell 1997; 91:457-466.
2. Doma MK, Parker R. RNA quality control in eukaryotes. Cell 2007; 131:660-668.
3. Garneau NL, Wilusz J, Wilusz CJ. The highways and byways of mRNA decay. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007; 8:113-126.
4. Schneider C, Kudla G, Wlotzka W, Tuck A, Tollervey D. Transcriptome-wide analysis of exosome targets. Mol Cell 2012; 48:422-433.
5. Houseley J, LaCava J, Tollervey D. RNA-quality control by the exosome. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006; 7:529-539.
6. Liu Q, Greimann JC, Lima CD. Reconstitution, activities, and structure of the eukaryotic RNA exosome. Cell 2006; 127:1223-1237.
7. Shi Z, Yang WZ, Lin-Chao S, Chak KF, Yuan HS. Crystal structure of Escherichia coli PNPase: central channel residues are involved in processive RNA degradation. RNA 2008; 14:2361-2371.
8. Bonneau F, Basquin J, Ebert J, Lorentzen E, Conti E. The yeast exosome functions as a macromolecular cage to channel RNA substrates for degradation. Cell 2009; 139:547-559.
9. Lorentzen E, Conti E. Crystal structure of a 9-subunit archaeal exosome in pre-catalytic states of the phosphorolytic reaction. Archaea 2012; 2012:721869.
10. Lorentzen E, Basquin J, Tomecki R, Dziembowski A, Conti E. Structure of the active subunit of the yeast exosome core, Rrp44: diverse modes of substrate recruitment in the RNase II nuclease family. Mol Cell 2008; 29:717-728.
11. Lebreton A, Tomecki R, Dziembowski A, Seraphin B. Endonucleolytic RNA cleavage by a eukaryotic exosome. Nature 2008; 456:993-996.
12. Schaeffer D, Tsanova B, Barbas A, et al. The exosome contains domains with specific endoribonuclease, exoribonuclease and cytoplasmic mRNA decay activities. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2009; 16:56-62.
13. Wang H-W, Wang J, Ding F, et al. Architecture of the yeast Rrp44-exosome complex suggests routes of RNA recruitment for 3' end processing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104:16844-16849.
14. Makino DL, Baumgartner M, Conti E. Crystal structure of an RNA-bound 11-subunit eukaryotic exosome complex. Nature 2013; 495:70-75.
15. Makino DL, Schuch B, Stegmann E, Baumgartner M, Basquin C, Conti E. RNA degradation paths in a 12-subunit nuclear exosome complex. Nature 2015; 524:54-58.
16. Januszyk K, Lima CD. Structural components and architectures of RNA exosomes. RNA exosome: Springer 2010:9-28.
17. Liu JJ, Bratkowski MA, Liu X, Niu CY, Ke A, Wang HW. Visualization of distinct substrate-recruitment pathways in the yeast exosome by EM. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2014; 21:95-102.
18. Butler JS, Mitchell P. Rrp6, rrp47 and cofactors of the nuclear exosome. Adv Exp Med Biol 2010; 702:91-104.
19. Wasmuth EV, Januszyk K, Lima CD. Structure of an Rrp6-RNA exosome complex bound to poly(A) RNA. Nature 2014; 511:435-439.
20. Schaeffer D, Clark A, Klauer AA, Tsanova B, van Hoof A. Functions of the cytoplasmic exosome. Adv Exp Med Biol 2010; 702:79-90.
21. Araki Y, Takahashi S, Kobayashi T, Kajiho H, Hoshino Si, Katada T. Ski7p G protein interacts with the exosome and the Ski complex for 3′-to-5′ mRNA decay in yeast. EMBO J 2001; 20:4684-4693.
22. Halbach F, Reichelt P, Rode M, Conti E. The yeast ski complex: crystal structure and RNA channeling to the exosome complex. Cell 2013; 154:814-826.
23. Kowalinski E, Schuller A, Green R, Conti E. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ski7 Is a GTP-binding protein adopting the characteristic conformation of active translational GTPases. Structure 2015; 23:1336-1343.
24. Lee G, Bratkowski MA, Ding F, Ke A, Ha T. Elastic coupling between RNA degradation and unwinding by an exoribonuclease. Science 2012; 336:1726-1729.
25. Shoemaker CJ, Green R. Translation drives mRNA quality control. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2012; 19:594-601.
26. van Hoof A, Frischmeyer PA, Dietz HC, Parker R. Exosome-mediated recognition and degradation of mRNAs lacking a termination codon. Science 2002; 295:2262-2264.
27. Klauer AA, van Hoof A. Degradation of mRNAs that lack a stop codon: a decade of nonstop progress. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA 2012; 3:649-660.
28. Becker T, Armache JP, Jarasch A, et al. Structure of the no-go mRNA decay complex Dom34-Hbs1 bound to a stalled 80S ribosome. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2011; 18:715-720.
29. Januszyk K, Liu Q, Lima CD. Activities of human RRP6 and structure of the human RRP6 catalytic domain. RNA 2011; 17:1566-1577.
30. Brachmann CB, Davies A, Cost GJ, et al. Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: a useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR-mediated gene disruption and other applications. Yeast 1998; 14:115-132.
31. Tang G, Peng L, Baldwin PR, et al. EMAN2: an extensible image processing suite for electron microscopy. J Struct Biol 2007; 157:38-46.
32. van Heel M, Harauz G, Orlova EV, Schmidt R, Schatz M. A new generation of the IMAGIC image processing system. J Struct Biol 1996; 116:17-24.
33. Liu X, Wang HW. Single particle electron microscopy reconstruction of the exosome complex using the random conical tilt method. J Vis Exp 2011; 49:e2574.
34. Li X, Zheng S, Agard DA, Cheng Y. Asynchronous data acquisition and on-the-fly analysis of dose fractionated cryoEM images by UCSFImage. J Struct Biol 2015; 192:174-178.
35. Mindell JA, Grigorieff N. Accurate determination of local defocus and specimen tilt in electron microscopy. J Struct Biol 2003; 142:334-347.
36. Scheres SH. RELION: implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination. J Struct Biol 2012; 180:519-530.
37. Yang B, Wu YJ, Zhu M, et al. Identification of cross-linked peptides from complex samples. Nat Medthods 2012; 9:904-906.
38. Trabuco LG, Villa E, Mitra K, Frank J, Schulten K. Flexible fitting of atomic structures into electron microscopy maps using molecular dynamics. Structure 2008; 16:673-683.
39. Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC et al. UCSF Chimera - a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 2004; 25:1605-1612.
40. MacKerell AD, Bashford D, Bellott M et al. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J Phys Chem B 1998; 102:3586-3616.
41. MacKerell AD, Feig M, Brooks CL. Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: Limitations of gas-phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations. J Comput Chem 2004; 25:1400-1415.
42. Phillips JC, Braun R, Wang W, et al. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J Comput Chem 2005; 26:1781-1802.
43. Feller SE, Zhang Y, Pastor RW, Brooks BR. Constant pressure molecular dynamics simulation: the Langevin piston method. J Chem Phys 1995; 103:4613-4621.
44. Eswar N, Webb B, Marti-Renom MA, et al. Comparative protein structure modeling using Modeller. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 2006; Chapter 5:Unit 5.6.
45. Jacobson MP, Pincus DL, Rapp CS, et al. A hierarchical approach to all-atom protein loop prediction. Proteins 2004; 55:351-367.
46. Kelley LA, Gardner SP, Sutcliffe MJ. An automated approach for clustering an ensemble of NMR-derived protein structures into conformationally related subfamilies. Protein Eng 1996; 9:1063.
47. McGuffin LJ, Bryson K, Jones DT. The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server. Bioinformatics 2000; 16:404-405.