Structure of the Active Subunit of the Yeast Exosome Core, Rrp44: Diverse Modes of Substrate Recruitment in the RNase II Nuclease Family

Molecular Cell

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 717-728

  Lorentzen, Esben ^b   Basquin, Jerome ^a,b   Tomecki, Rafal ^c   Dziembowski, Andrzej ^c   Conti, Elena ^a,b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF BIOCHEMISTRY   (Germany)

^b EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

Author keywords

RNA

Indexed keywords

NUCLEASE; NUCLEIC ACID BINDING PROTEIN; RIBONUCLEASE; RIBONUCLEASE II; RNA; RNASE R; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; ENZYME STRUCTURE; ENZYME SUBUNIT; EXOSOME; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FAMILY; RNA BINDING; RNA STRUCTURE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; EXORIBONUCLEASES; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN SUBUNITS; RNA, FUNGAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); EUKARYOTA;

EID: 40849106786     PISSN: 10972765     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.02.018     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Allmang C., Petfalski E., Podtelejnikov A., Mann M., Tollervey D., and Mitchell P. The yeast exosome and human PM-Scl are related complexes of 3′-> 5′ exonucleases. Genes Dev. 13 (1999) 2148-2158
2. Amblar M., and Arraiano C.M. A single mutation in Escherichia coli ribonuclease II inactivates the enzyme without affecting RNA binding. FEBS J. 272 (2005) 363-374
3. Baker R.E., Harris K., and Zhang K. Mutations synthetically lethal with cep1 target S. cerevisiae kinetochore components. Genetics 149 (1998) 73-85
4. Buttner K., Wenig K., and Hopfner K.P. Structural framework for the mechanism of archaeal exosomes in RNA processing. Mol. Cell 20 (2005) 461-471
5. Buttner K., Wenig K., and Hopfner K.P. The exosome: a macromolecular cage for controlled RNA degradation. Mol. Microbiol. 61 (2006) 1372-1379
6. Cannistraro V.J., and Kennell D. The processive reaction mechanism of ribonuclease II. J. Mol. Biol. 243 (1994) 930-943
7. CCP4 (Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4). The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 50 (1994) 760-763
8. Cheng Z.F., and Deutscher M.P. Purification and characterization of the Escherichia coli exoribonuclease RNase R. Comparison with RNase II. J. Biol. Chem. 277 (2002) 21624-21629
9. Cheng Z.F., and Deutscher M.P. An important role for RNase R in mRNA decay. Mol. Cell 17 (2005) 313-318
10. DeLano, W.L. (2002). The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System (http://www.pymol.org).
11. Dziembowski A., Lorentzen E., Conti E., and Seraphin B. A single subunit, Dis3, is essentially responsible for yeast exosome core activity. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14 (2007) 15-22
12. Emsley P., and Cowtan K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60 (2004) 2126-2132
13. Frazao C., McVey C.E., Amblar M., Barbas A., Vonrhein C., Arraiano C.M., and Carrondo M.A. Unravelling the dynamics of RNA degradation by ribonuclease II and its RNA-bound complex. Nature 443 (2006) 110-114
14. Glavan F., Behm-Ansmant I., Izaurralde E., and Conti E. Structures of the PIN domains of SMG6 and SMG5 reveal a nuclease within the mRNA surveillance complex. EMBO J. 25 (2006) 5117-5125
15. Gupta R.S., Kasai T., and Schlessinger D. Purification and some novel properties of Escherichia coli RNase II. J. Biol. Chem. 252 (1977) 8945-8949
16. Hernandez H., Dziembowski A., Taverner T., Seraphin B., and Robinson C.V. Subunit architecture of multimeric complexes isolated directly from cells. EMBO Rep. 7 (2006) 605-610
17. Houseley J., LaCava J., and Tollervey D. RNA-quality control by the exosome. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7 (2006) 529-539
18. Kabsch W. Automatic processing of rotation diffraction data from crystals of initially unknown symmetry and cell constants. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 26 (1993) 795-800
19. Kadaba S., Krueger A., Trice T., Krecic A.M., Hinnebusch A.G., and Anderson J. Nuclear surveillance and degradation of hypomodified initiator tRNAMet in S. cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 18 (2004) 1227-1240
20. Liu Q., Greimann J.C., and Lima C.D. Reconstitution, activities, and structure of the eukaryotic RNA exosome. Cell 127 (2006) 1223-1237
21. Liu Q., Greimann J.C., and Lima C.D. Erratum. Reconstitution, activities and structure of the eukaryotic RNA exosome. Cell 131 (2007) 188-189
22. Lorentzen E., and Conti E. Structural basis of 3′ end RNA recognition and exoribonucleolytic cleavage by an exosome RNase PH core. Mol. Cell 20 (2005) 473-481
23. Lorentzen E., and Conti E. The exosome and the proteasome: nano-compartments for degradation. Cell 125 (2006) 651-654
24. Lorentzen E., Walter P., Fribourg S., Evguenieva-Hackenberg E., Klug G., and Conti E. The archaeal exosome core is a hexameric ring structure with three catalytic subunits. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12 (2005) 575-581
25. Lorentzen E., Dziembowski A., Lindner D., Seraphin B., and Conti E. RNA channelling by the archaeal exosome. EMBO Rep. 8 (2007) 470-476
26. Mitchell P., Petfalski E., Shevchenko A., Mann M., and Tollervey D. The exosome: a conserved eukaryotic RNA processing complex containing multiple 3′→5′ exoribonucleases. Cell 91 (1997) 457-466
27. Murakami H., Goto D.B., Toda T., Chen E.S., Grewal S.I., Martienssen R.A., and Yanagida M. Ribonuclease activity of Dis3 is required for mitotic progression and provides a possible link between heterochromatin and kinetochore function. PLoS ONE 2 (2007) e317 10.1371/journal.pone.0000317
28. Murshudov G.N., Vagin A.A., and Dodson E.J. Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 53 (1997) 240-255
29. Murzin A.G. OB(oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide binding)-fold: common structural and functional solution for non-homologous sequences. EMBO J. 12 (1993) 861-867
30. Raijmakers R., Schilders G., and Pruijn G.J. The exosome, a molecular machine for controlled RNA degradation in both nucleus and cytoplasm. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 83 (2004) 175-183
31. Schilders G., van Dijk E., Raijmakers R., and Pruijn G.J. Cell and molecular biology of the exosome: how to make or break an RNA. Int. Rev. Cytol. 251 (2006) 159-208
32. Schneider T.R., and Sheldrick G.M. Substructure solution with SHELXD. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 58 (2002) 1772-1779
33. Schneider C., Anderson J.T., and Tollervey D. The exosome subunit Rrp44 plays a direct role in RNA substrate recognition. Mol. Cell 27 (2007) 324-331
34. Shiomi T., Fukushima K., Suzuki N., Nakashima N., Noguchi E., and Nishimoto T. Human Dis3p, which binds to either GTP- or GDP-Ran, complements Saccharomyces cerevisiae Dis3. J. Biochem. 123 (1998) 883-890
35. Singleton M.R., Dillingham M.S., and Wigley D.B. Structure and mechanism of helicases and nucleic acid translocases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 76 (2007) 23-50
36. Vanacova S., and Stefl R. The exosome and RNA quality control in the nucleus. EMBO Rep. 8 (2007) 651-657
37. Vincent H.A., and Deutscher M.P. Substrate recognition and catalysis by the exoribonuclease RNase R. J. Biol. Chem. 281 (2006) 29769-29775
38. Wang H.W., Wang J., Ding F., Callahan K., Bratkowski M.A., Butler J.S., Nogales E., and Ke A. Architecture of the yeast Rrp44 exosome complex suggests routes of RNA recruitment for 3′end processing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104 (2007) 16844-16849
39. Zuo Y., Vincent H.A., Zhang J., Wang Y., Deutscher M.P., and Malhotra A. Structural basis for processivity and single-stranded specificity of RNase II. Mol. Cell 24 (2006) 149-156