Disciplinary insights into the study of epistemic cognition

Handbook of Epistemic Cognition

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 184-194

  Sandoval, William A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84967432118     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315795225     Document Type: Chapter

References (44)

1. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
2. Bendixen, L. (2016/this volume). Teaching for epistemic change in elementary classrooms. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of Epistemic Cognition (pp. 281-299). New York: Routledge.
3. Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Samuelstuen, M. S. (2008). Are sophisticated students always better? The role of topic-specific personal epistemology in the undertanding of multiple expository texts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 814-840.
4. Bricker, L. A. & Bell, P. (2016/this volume). Exploring images of epistemic cognition across contexts and over time. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of Epistemic Cognition (pp. 197-214). New York: Routledge.
5. Bromme, R. & Goldman, S.R. (2014). The public's bounded understanding of science. Educational Psychologist, 49(2), 59-69. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2014.921572
6. Bromme, R., Kienhues, D., & Porsch, T. (2010). Who knows what and who can we believe? Epistemological beliefs are beliefs about knowledge (mostly) to be attained from others. In L. D. Bendixen & F. C. Feucht (Eds.), Personal epistemology in the classroom: Theory, research, and implications for practice (pp. 163-193). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7. Chinn, C.A., Buckland, L.A., & Samarapungavan, A. (2011). Expanding the dimensions of epistemic cognition: Arguments from philosophy and psychology. Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 141-167.
8. Chinn, C. A., & Rinehart, R. W. (2016/this volume). Epistemic cognition and philosophy: Developing a new framework for epistemic cognition. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of Epistemic Cognition (pp. 460-478). New York: Routledge.
9. Collins, A., & Ferguson, W. (1993). Epistemic forms and epistemic games: Structures and strategies to guide inquiry. Educational Psychologist, 28(1), 25-42.
10. Depaepe, F., De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2016/this volume). Mathematical epistemological beliefs. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of Epistemic Cognition (pp. 147-164). New York: Routledge.
11. Duschl, R.A. (2008). Science education in 3 part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic and social goals. Review of Research in Education, 32, 268-291.
12. Elby, A. & Hammer, D. (2001). On the substance of a sophisticated epistemology. Science Education, 85, 554-567.
13. Elby, A., Macrander, C., & Hammer, D. (2016/this volume). Epistemic cognition in science. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of Epistemic Cognition (pp. 113-127). New York: Routledge.
14. Feinstein, N. (2014). Making sense of autism: Progressive engagement with science among parents of young, recently diagnosed autistic children. Public Understanding of Science, 23(5), 592-609. doi: 10.1177/0963662512455296
15. Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist 96(3), 606-633.
16. Greene, J.A., Azevedo, R., & Torney-Purta, J. (2008). Modeling epistemic and ontological cognition: Philosophical perspectives and methodological directions. Educational Psychologist, 43(3), 142-160. doi: 10.1080/00461520802178458
17. Hammer, D. & Elby, A. (2002). On the form of a personal epistemology. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 169-190). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Herrenkohl, L.R. & Cornelius, L. (2013). Investigating elementary students' scientific and historical argumentation. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(3), 413-461. doi: 10.1080/10508406.2013.799475
19. Hofer, B.K. (2000). Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(4), 378-405.
20. Hofer, B.K. & Bendixen, L.D. (2012). Personal epistemology: Theory, research, and future directions. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, C. B. McCormick, G. M. Sinatra, & J. Sweller (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook, vol. 1: Theories, constructs, and critical issues (pp. 227-256). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
21. Hofer, B.K. & Pintrich, P.R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88-140.
22. Kelly, G. (2016/this volume). Methodological considerations for the study of epistemic cognition in practice. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of Epistemic Cognition (pp. 393-408). New York: Routledge.
23. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. Kolstø, S.D., Bungum, B., Arnesen, E., Isnes, A., Kristensen, T., Mathiassen, K.,Ulvik, M. (2006). Science students' critical examination of scientific information related to socioscientific issues. Science Education, 90(4), 632-655.
25. Kuhn, D., Cheney, R., & Weinstock, M. (2000). The development of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development, 15, 309-328.
26. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27. Lave, J. (1997). The culture of acquisition and the practice of understanding. In D. Kirshner & J. A. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives (pp. 17-35). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
28. Leatherdale, W.H. (1974). The role of analogy, model, and metaphor in science. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
29. Lee, C. D., Goldman, S. R., Levine, S., & Magliano, J. (2016/this volume). Epistemic cognition in literary reasoning. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of Epistemic Cognition (pp. 165-183). New York: Routledge.
30. Moshman, D., & Tarricone, P. (2016/this volume). Logical and causal reasoning. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of Epistemic Cognition (pp. 54-67). New York: Routledge.
31. Muis, K.R. (2004). Personal epistemology and mathematics: A critical review and synthesis of research. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 317-377.
32. Nielsen, J.A. (2012). Co-opting science: A preliminary study of how students invoke science in value-laden discussions. International Journal of Science Education, 34(2), 275-299.
33. National Research Council (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
34. Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R.A. (2003). What "ideas-about-science" should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692-720.
35. Ryu, S. & Sandoval, W.A. (2012). Improvements to elementary children's epistemic understanding from sustained argumentation. Science Education, 96(3), 488-526.
36. Samarapungavan, A., Westby, E.L., & Bodner, G.M. (2006). Contextual epistemic development in science: A comparison of chemistry students and research chemists. Science Education, 90, 468-495.
37. Sandoval, W.A. (2005). Understanding students' practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89, 634-656.
38. Sandoval, W.A. (2012). Situating epistemological development. In J. van Aalst, K. Thompson, M. J. Jacobson, & P. Reimann (Eds.), The future of learning: Proceedings of the 10th international conference of the learning sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 347-354). Sydney: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
39. Sandoval, W.A. (2014). Science education's need for a theory of epistemological development. Science Education, 98(3), 383-387. doi: 10.1002/sce.21107
40. Sandoval, W.A. & Morrison, K. (2003). High school students' ideas about theories and theory change after a biological inquiry unit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(4), 369-392.
41. Scharrer, L., Bromme, R., Britt, M. A., & Stadtler, M. (2012). The seduction of easiness: How science depictions influence laypeople's reliance on their own evaluation of scientific information. Learning and Instruction, 22, 231-243.
42. Strømsø, H. I. & Kammerer, Y. (2016/this volume). Epistemic cognition and reading for understanding in the internet age. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of Epistemic Cognition (pp. 230-246). New York: Routledge.
43. VanSledright, B. & Maggioni, L. (2016/this volume). Epistemic cognition in history. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of Epistemic Cognition (pp. 128-146). New York: Routledge.
44. Wong, S.L. & Hodson, D. (2009). From the horse's mouth: What scientists say about scientific investigation and scientific knowledge. Science Education, 93, 109-130.