How do jurors argue with one another?

Judgment and Decision Making

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 64-71

  Warren, Joshua ^a   Kuhn, Deanna ^a   Weinstock, Michael ^b  

^a Columbia University ^*  (United States)

^b BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Discourse; Epistemology; Jurors; Reasoning

Indexed keywords

EID: 77449095904     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19302975     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Felton, M., & Kuhn, D. (2001). The development of argument discourse skill. Discourse Processes 32(2&3), 135-153.
2. Gilbert, M. (1997). Coalescent argumentation. Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Greene, J., Azevedo, R., & Torney-Purta, J. (2008). Modeling epistemic and ontological cognition: Philosophical perspectives and methodological directions. Educational Psychologist, 43, 142-160.
4. Hofer, B., & Pintrich, P. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67, 88-140.
5. Hofer, B., & Pintrich, P. (2002). Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Kuhn, D., & Weinstock, M. (2002). What is epistemological thinking and why does it matter? In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 121-144). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Kuhn, D., Cheney, R., & Weinstock, M. (2000). The development of epistemological understanding,. Cognitive Development, 15(3), 309-328.
8. Kuhn, D., Weinstock, M., & Flaton, R. (1994). How well do jurors reason? Competence dimensions of individual variation in a juror reasoning task. Psychological Science, 5, 289-296.
9. Moshman, D. (2008). Epistemic development and the perils of Pluto. In M. Shaughnessy, M. Vennman & C. K. Kennedy (Eds.), Metacognition: A recent review of research, theory and perspectives (pp. 161-174). Hauppauge, NY: Nova.
10. Oaksford, M., Chater, N., & Hahn, U. (2008). Human reasoning and argumentation: The probabilistic approach. In J. Adler & L. Rips (Eds.), Reasoning: Studies of human inference and its foundations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. Rozin, P. (2009). What kind of empirical research should we publish, fund, and reward? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 435-439.
12. Weinstock, M., & Cronin, M. (2003). The everyday production of knowledge: Individual differences in episte-mological understanding and juror-reasoning skill. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 161-181.