Asymmetric cell division during T cell development controls downstream fate

Journal of Cell Biology

Volumn 210, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 933-950

  Pham, Kim ^a,b,g,h   Shimoni, Raz ^a,b   Charnley, Mirren ^a,b   Ludford Menting, Mandy J ^a,b   Hawkins, Edwin D ^a,i   Ramsbottom, Kelly ^a   Oliaro, Jane ^a,c   Izon, David ^d   Ting, Stephen B ^a,j   Reynolds, Joseph ^e   Lythe, Grant ^e   Molina Paris, Carmen ^e   Melichar, Heather ^f,k   Robey, Ellen ^f   Humbert, Patrick O ^a,c   Gu, Min ^b   Russell, Sarah M ^a,b,c  

^a PETER MACCALLUM CANCER CENTRE   (Australia)

^b SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^d ST VINCENT'S INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL RESEARCH   (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^g WALTER AND ELIZA HALL INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL RESEARCH   (Australia)

^h UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

ⁱ IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^j MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^k UNIVERSITY OF MONTREAL   (Canada)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALPHA ADAPTIN; PROTEIN; PROTEIN KINASE C; PROTEIN NUMB; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CHEMOKINE RECEPTOR CXCR4; CXCR4 PROTEIN, HUMAN; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; NERVE PROTEIN; NUMB PROTEIN, MOUSE; PKC-3 PROTEIN; SCRIBBLE PROTEIN, MOUSE; SIGNAL PEPTIDE;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; ASYMMETRIC CELL DIVISION; CELL DEATH; CELL FATE; CELL INTERACTION; CELL MATURATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SELF-RENEWAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAUGHTER CELL; EMBRYO; ENZYME PHOSPHORYLATION; FETUS; INHERITANCE; INTERPHASE; LYMPHOCYTE DIFFERENTIATION; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; POLARIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STROMA CELL; T LYMPHOCYTE; THYMOCYTE; THYMUS; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; C57BL MOUSE; CELL COMMUNICATION; CELL CULTURE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL POLARITY; COCULTURE; CYTOLOGY; DEFICIENCY; GENETIC TRANSFECTION; GENETICS; IMMUNOLOGY; KNOCKOUT MOUSE; METABOLISM; PHOSPHORYLATION; TIME; TUMOR MICROENVIRONMENT;

ADAPTOR PROTEIN COMPLEX ALPHA SUBUNITS; ANIMALS; ASYMMETRIC CELL DIVISION; CELL COMMUNICATION; CELL DEATH; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL POLARITY; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELLS, CULTURED; CELLULAR MICROENVIRONMENT; COCULTURE TECHNIQUES; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MICE, KNOCKOUT; MODELS, IMMUNOLOGICAL; NERVE TISSUE PROTEINS; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN KINASE C; RECEPTORS, CXCR4; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STROMAL CELLS; THYMOCYTES; THYMUS GLAND; TIME FACTORS; TRANSFECTION;

EID: 84965185497     PISSN: 00219525     EISSN: 15408140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201502053     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Aguado, R., N. Martin-Blanco, M. Caraballo, and M. Canelles. 2010. The endocytic adaptor Numb regulates thymus size by modulating pre-TCR signaling during asymmetric division. Blood. 116:1705-1714. http://dx.doi. org/10.1182/blood-2009-10-246777
2. Aguet, F., C.N. Antonescu, M. Mettlen, S.L. Schmid, and G. Danuser. 2013. Advances in analysis of low signal-to-noise images link dynamin and AP2 to the functions of an endocytic checkpoint. Dev. Cell. 26:279-291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2013.06.019
3. Aifantis, I., M. Mandal, K. Sawai, A. Ferrando, and T. Vilimas. 2006. Regulation of T-cell progenitor survival and cell-cycle entry by the pre-T-cell receptor. Immunol. Rev. 209:159-169. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.0105-2896.2006.00343.x
4. Albertson, R., and C.Q. Doe. 2003. Dlg, Scrib and Lgl regulate neuroblast cell size and mitotic spindle asymmetry. Nat. Cell Biol. 5:166-170. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb922
5. + T lymphocyte fates during adaptive immunity revealed by single-cell gene-expression analyses. Nat. Immunol. 15:365-372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ni.2842
6. Barnett, B.E., M.L. Ciocca, R. Goenka, L.G. Barnett, J. Wu, T.M. Laufer, J.K. Burkhardt, M.P. Cancro, and S.L. Reiner. 2012. Asymmetric B cell division in the germinal center reaction. Science. 335:342-344. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1213495
7. Berdnik, D., T. Török, M. González-Gaitán, and J.A. Knoblich. 2002. The endocytic protein α-Adaptin is required for numb-mediated asymmetric cell division in Drosophila. Dev. Cell. 3:221-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S1534-5807(02)00215-0
8. Blanpain, C., and E. Fuchs. 2014. Plasticity of epithelial stem cells in tissue regeneration. Science. 344:1242281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/ science.1242281
9. + T cell immunity. Science. 340:630- 635. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1235454
10. Chang, J.T., V.R. Palanivel, I. Kinjyo, F. Schambach, A.M. Intlekofer, A. Banerjee, S.A. Longworth, K.E. Vinup, P. Mrass, J. Oliaro, et al. 2007. Asymmetric T lymphocyte division in the initiation of adaptive immune responses. Science. 315:1687-1691. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/ science.1139393
11. Chang, J.T., M.L. Ciocca, I. Kinjyo, V.R. Palanivel, C.E. McClurkin, C.S. Dejong, E.C. Mooney, J.S. Kim, N.C. Steinel, J. Oliaro, et al. 2011. Asymmetric proteasome segregation as a mechanism for unequal partitioning of the transcription factor T-bet during T lymphocyte division. Immunity. 34:492-504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2011.03.017
12. Ciofani, M., and J.C. Zúñiga-Pflücker. 2005. Notch promotes survival of pre-T cells at the ß-selection checkpoint by regulating cellular metabolism. Nat. Immunol. 6:881-888. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ni1234
13. Ciofani, M., T.M. Schmitt, A. Ciofani, A.M. Michie, N. Cuburu, A. Aublin, J.L. Maryanski, and J.C. Zúñiga-Pflücker. 2004. Obligatory role for cooperative signaling by pre-TCR and Notch during thymocyte differentiation. J. Immunol. 172:5230-5239. http://dx.doi.org/10.4049/ jimmunol.172.9.5230
14. Cotton, M., N. Benhra, and R. Le Borgne. 2013. Numb inhibits the recycling of Sanpodo in Drosophila sensory organ precursor. Curr. Biol. 23:581-587. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.02.020
15. Couturier, L., N. Vodovar, and F. Schweisguth. 2012. Endocytosis by Numb breaks Notch symmetry at cytokinesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 14:131-139. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2419
16. Couturier, L., K. Mazouni, and F. Schweisguth. 2013. Numb localizes at endosomes and controls the endosomal sorting of notch after asymmetric division in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 23:588-593. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. cub.2013.03.002
17. Day, D., K. Pham, M.J. Ludford-Menting, J. Oliaro, D. Izon, S.M. Russell, and M. Gu. 2009. A method for prolonged imaging of motile lymphocytes. Immunol. Cell Biol. 87:154-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ icb.2008.79
18. Dose, M., I. Khan, Z. Guo, D. Kovalovsky, A. Krueger, H. von Boehmer, K. Khazaie, and F. Gounari. 2006. c-Myc mediates pre-TCR-induced proliferation but not developmental progression. Blood. 108:2669-2677. http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2006-02-005900
19. Edgar, B.A. 2012. Intestinal stem cells: no longer immortal but ever so clever. EMBO J. 31:2441-2443. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2012.133
20. Gérard, A., A.E. Mertens, R.A. van der Kammen, and J.G. Collard. 2007. The Par polarity complex regulates Rap1- and chemokine-induced T cell polarization. J. Cell Biol. 176:863-875. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/ jcb.200608161
21. + T cells. Science. 340:635-639. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1235487
22. Hawkins, E.D., J. Oliaro, A. Kallies, G.T. Belz, A. Filby, T. Hogan, N. Haynes, K.M. Ramsbottom, V. Van Ham, T. Kinwell, et al. 2013. Regulation of asymmetric cell division and polarity by Scribble is not required for humoral immunity. Nat. Commun. 4:1801. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ ncomms2796
23. Heng, T.S., M.W. Painter, Immunological Genome Project Consortium, K. Elpek, V. Lukacs-Kornek, N. Mauermann, S.J Turley, D. Koller, F.S Kim, A.J Wagers, et al. 2008. The Immunological Genome Project: networks of gene expression in immune cells. Nat. Immunol. 9:1091-1094. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ni1008-1091
24. Janas, M.L., G. Varano, K. Gudmundsson, M. Noda, T. Nagasawa, and M. Turner. 2010. Thymic development beyond ß-selection requires phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activation by CXCR4. J. Exp. Med. 207:247-261. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1084/jem.20091430
25. Kee, B.L. 2009. E and ID proteins branch out. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 9:175-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nri2507
26. King, C.G., S. Koehli, B. Hausmann, M. Schmaler, D. Zehn, and E. Palmer. 2012. T cell affinity regulates asymmetric division, effector cell differentiation, and tissue pathology. Immunity. 37:709-720. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.immuni.2012.06.021
27. Knoblich, J.A. 2010. Asymmetric cell division: recent developments and their implications for tumour biology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11:849-860. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm3010
28. Koch, U., and F. Radtke. 2011. Mechanisms of T cell development and transformation. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 27:539-562. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-cellbio-092910-154008
29. Kreslavsky, T., M. Gleimer, M. Miyazaki, Y. Choi, E. Gagnon, C. Murre, P. Sicinski, and H. von Boehmer. 2012. ß-Selection-induced proliferation is required for αß T cell differentiation. Immunity. 37:840-853. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2012.08.020
30. Li, R. 2013. The art of choreographing asymmetric cell division. Dev. Cell. 25:439-450. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2013.05.003
31. Losick, V.P., L.X. Morris, D.T. Fox, and A. Spradling. 2011. Drosophila stem cell niches: a decade of discovery suggests a unified view of stem cell regulation. Dev. Cell. 21:159-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. devcel.2011.06.018
32. Ludford-Menting, M.J., J. Oliaro, F. Sacirbegovic, E.T. Cheah, N. Pedersen, S.J. Thomas, A. Pasam, R. Iazzolino, L.E. Dow, N.J. Waterhouse, et al. 2005. A network of PDZ-containing proteins regulates T cell polarity and morphology during migration and immunological synapse formation. Immunity. 22:737-748. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2005.04.009
33. Mandal, M., C. Borowski, T. Palomero, A.A. Ferrando, P. Oberdoerffer, F. Meng, A. Ruiz-Vela, M. Ciofani, J.C. Zuniga-Pflucker, I. Screpanti, et al. 2005. The BCL2A1 gene as a pre-T cell receptor-induced regulator of thymocyte survival. J. Exp. Med. 201:603-614. http://dx.doi.org/10.1084/ jem.20041924
34. Martin-Belmonte, F., and M. Perez-Moreno. 2012. Epithelial cell polarity, stem cells and cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 12:23-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ nrc3169
35. Martins, V.C., E. Ruggiero, S.M. Schlenner, V. Madan, M. Schmidt, P.J. Fink, C. von Kalle, and H.R. Rodewald. 2012. Thymus-autonomous T cell development in the absence of progenitor import. J. Exp. Med. 209:1409- 1417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1084/jem.20120846
36. Martins, V.C., K. Busch, D. Juraeva, C. Blum, C. Ludwig, V. Rasche, F. Lasitschka, S.E. Mastitsky, B. Brors, T. Hielscher, et al. 2014. Cell competition is a tumour suppressor mechanism in the thymus. Nature. 509:465-470. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature13317
37. + T lymphocyte fate specification by protein kinase Cζ and protein kinase Cλ/ι. J. Immunol. 194:2249-2259. http:// dx.doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1401652
38. Morin, X., and Y. Bellaïche. 2011. Mitotic spindle orientation in asymmetric and symmetric cell divisions during animal development. Dev. Cell. 21:102- 119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2011.06.012
39. Oliaro, J., A. Pasam, N.J. Waterhouse, K.A. Browne, M.J. Ludford-Menting, J.A. Trapani, and S.M. Russell. 2006. Ligation of the cell surface receptor, CD46, alters T cell polarity and response to antigen presentation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103:18685-18690. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.0602458103
40. Oliaro, J., V. Van Ham, F. Sacirbegovic, A. Pasam, Z. Bomzon, K. Pham, M.J. Ludford-Menting, N.J. Waterhouse, M. Bots, E.D. Hawkins, et al. 2010. Asymmetric cell division of T cells upon antigen presentation uses multiple conserved mechanisms. J. Immunol. 185:367-375. http://dx.doi. org/10.4049/jimmunol.0903627
41. Orgogozo, V., F. Schweisguth, and Y. Bellaïche. 2002. Binary cell death decision regulated by unequal partitioning of Numb at mitosis. Development. 129:4677-4684.
42. Paridaen, J.T., and W.B. Huttner. 2014. Neurogenesis during development of the vertebrate central nervous system. EMBO Rep. 15:351-364. http://dx.doi. org/10.1002/embr.201438447
43. Pearson, H.B., P.A. Perez-Mancera, L.E. Dow, A. Ryan, P. Tennstedt, D. Bogani, I. Elsum, A. Greenfield, D.A. Tuveson, R. Simon, and P.O. Humbert. 2011. SCRIB expression is deregulated in human prostate cancer, and its deficiency in mice promotes prostate neoplasia. J. Clin. Invest. 121:4257- 4267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI58509
44. Peaudecerf, L., S. Lemos, A. Galgano, G. Krenn, F. Vasseur, J.P. Di Santo, S. Ezine, and B. Rocha. 2012. Thymocytes may persist and differentiate without any input from bone marrow progenitors. J. Exp. Med. 209:1401- 1408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1084/jem.20120845
45. Petrie, H.T., M. Tourigny, D.B. Burtrum, and F. Livak. 2000. Precursor thymocyte proliferation and differentiation are controlled by signals unrelated to the pre-TCR. J. Immunol. 165:3094-3098. http://dx.doi.org/10.4049/ jimmunol.165.6.3094
46. Pham, K., R. Shimoni, M.J. Ludford-Menting, C.J. Nowell, P. Lobachevsky, Z. Bomzon, M. Gu, T.P. Speed, C.J. McGlade, and S.M. Russell. 2013. Divergent lymphocyte signalling revealed by a powerful new tool for analysis of time-lapse microscopy. Immunol. Cell Biol. 91:70-81. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1038/icb.2012.49
47. Pham, K., F. Sacirbegovic, and S.M. Russell. 2014. Polarized cells, polarized views: asymmetric cell division in hematopoietic cells. Front. Immunol. 5:26. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2014.00026
48. Pike, K.A., S. Kulkarni, and T. Pawson. 2011. Immature T-cell clustering and efficient differentiation require the polarity protein Scribble. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 108:1116-1121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.1018224108
49. Plotkin, J., S.E. Prockop, A. Lepique, and H.T. Petrie. 2003. Critical role for CXCR4 signaling in progenitor localization and T cell differentiation in the postnatal thymus. J. Immunol. 171:4521-4527. http://dx.doi. org/10.4049/jimmunol.171.9.4521
50. Real, E., S. Faure, E. Donnadieu, and J. Delon. 2007. Cutting edge: atypical PKCs regulate T lymphocyte polarity and scanning behavior. J. Immunol. 179:5649-5652. http://dx.doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.179.9.5649
51. Reichardt, I., and J.A. Knoblich. 2013. Cell biology: Notch recycling is numbed. Curr. Biol. 23:R270-R272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.03.013
52. Rothenberg, E.V. 2014. Transcriptional control of early T and B cell developmental choices. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 32:283-321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-immunol-032712-100024
53. Schmitt, T.M., and J.C. Zúñiga-Pflücker. 2002. Induction of T cell development from hematopoietic progenitor cells by delta-like-1 in vitro. Immunity. 17:749-756. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1074-7613(02)00474-0
54. Shimoni, R., K. Pham, M. Yassin, M. Gu, and S.M. Russell. 2013. TACTICS, an interactive platform for customized high-content bioimaging analysis. Bioinformatics. 29:817-818. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/ btt035
55. Shimoni, R., K. Pham, M. Yassin, M.J. Ludford-Menting, M. Gu, and S.M. Russell. 2014. Normalized polarization ratios for the analysis of cell polarity. PLoS ONE. 9:e99885. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0099885
56. Simons, B.D., and H. Clevers. 2011. Strategies for homeostatic stem cell self-renewal in adult tissues. Cell. 145:851-862. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. cell.2011.05.033
57. Smith, C.M., and M. Chircop. 2012. Clathrin-mediated endocytic proteins are involved in regulating mitotic progression and completion. Traffic. 13:1628-1641. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tra.12001
58. Thaunat, O., A.G. Granja, P. Barral, A. Filby, B. Montaner, L. Collinson, N. Martinez-Martin, N.E. Harwood, A. Bruckbauer, and F.D. Batista. 2012. Asymmetric segregation of polarized antigen on B cell division shapes presentation capacity. Science. 335:475-479. http://dx.doi. org/10.1126/science.1214100
59. Ting, S.B., E. Deneault, K. Hope, S. Cellot, J. Chagraoui, N. Mayotte, J.F. Dorn, J.P. Laverdure, M. Harvey, E.D. Hawkins, et al. 2012. Asymmetric segregation and self-renewal of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells with endocytic Ap2a2. Blood. 119:2510-2522. http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/ blood-2011-11-393272
60. Tourigny, M.R., S. Mazel, D.B. Burtrum, and H.T. Petrie. 1997. T cell receptor (TCR)-ß gene recombination: dissociation from cell cycle regulation and developmental progression during T cell ontogeny. J. Exp. Med. 185:1549-1556. http://dx.doi.org/10.1084/jem.185.9.1549
61. Trampont, P.C., A.C. Tosello-Trampont, Y. Shen, A.K. Duley, A.E. Sutherland, T.P. Bender, D.R. Littman, and K.S. Ravichandran. 2010. CXCR4 acts as a costimulator during thymic beta-selection. Nat. Immunol. 11:162-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ni.1830
62. Verzi, M.P., and R.A. Shivdasani. 2010. Stem cells: The intestinal-crypt casino. Nature. 467:1055-1056. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/4671055a
63. Voll, R.E., E. Jimi, R.J. Phillips, D.F. Barber, M. Rincon, A.C. Hayday, R.A. Flavell, and S. Ghosh. 2000. NF-κ B activation by the pre-T cell receptor serves as a selective survival signal in T lymphocyte development. Immunity. 13:677-689. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S1074-7613(00)00067-4
64. Wu, M., H.Y. Kwon, F. Rattis, J. Blum, C. Zhao, R. Ashkenazi, T.L. Jackson, N. Gaiano, T. Oliver, and T. Reya. 2007. Imaging hematopoietic precursor division in real time. Cell Stem Cell. 1:541-554. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.stem.2007.08.009
65. Xavier, R., S. Rabizadeh, K. Ishiguro, N. Andre, J.B. Ortiz, H. Wachtel, D.G. Morris, M. Lopez-Ilasaca, A.C. Shaw, W. Swat, and B. Seed. 2004. Discs large (Dlg1) complexes in lymphocyte activation. J. Cell Biol. 166:173-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200309044
66. Yamamoto, R., Y. Morita, J. Ooehara, S. Hamanaka, M. Onodera, K.L. Rudolph, H. Ema, and H. Nakauchi. 2013. Clonal analysis unveils self-renewing lineage-restricted progenitors generated directly from hematopoietic stem cells. Cell. 154:1112-1126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell .2013.08.007
67. Yui, M.A., and E.V. Rothenberg. 2014. Developmental gene networks: a triathlon on the course to T cell identity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 14:529-545. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nri3702
68. Zimdahl, B., T. Ito, A. Blevins, J. Bajaj, T. Konuma, J. Weeks, C.S. Koechlein, H.Y. Kwon, O. Arami, D. Rizzieri, et al. 2014. Lis1 regulates asymmetric division in hematopoietic stem cells and in leukemia. Nat. Genet. 46:245- 252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.2889