Impact of analytic provenance in genome analysis

BMC Genomics

Volumn 15, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Morrison, Shatavia S ^a   Pyzh, Roman ^a   Jeon, Myung S ^a   Amaro, Carmen ^b   Roig, Francisco J ^b   Baker Austin, Craig ^c   Oliver, James D ^d   Gibas, Cynthia J ^a  

^a University of North Carolina at Charlotte   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^c CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENT   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AB INITIO CALCULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; GENOME ANALYSIS; GENOMICS; NONHUMAN; OVERLAPPING GENE; VIBRIO VULNIFICUS; WORKFLOW; BACTERIAL GENE; BACTERIAL GENOME; BIOLOGY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; MOLECULAR GENETICS;

BACTERIAL DNA;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DNA, BACTERIAL; GENES, BACTERIAL; GENOME, BACTERIAL; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANNOTATION; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; VIBRIO VULNIFICUS;

EID: 84965184790     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-S8-S1     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Zerbino DR, Birney E: Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res 2008, 18(5):821-829.
2. Luo R, Liu B, Xie Y, Li Z, Huang W, Yuan J, He G, Chen Y, Pan Q, Liu Y, et al: SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. GigaScience 2012, 1(1):18.
3. Butler J, MacCallum I, Kleber M, Shlyakhter IA, Belmonte MK, Lander ES, Nusbaum C, Jaffe DB: ALLPATHS: de novo assembly of whole-genome shotgun microreads. Genome Res 2008, 18(5):810-820.
4. Parra G, Bradnam K, Ning Z, Keane T, Korf I: Assessing the gene space in draft genomes. Nucleic acids research 2009, 37(1):289-297.
5. Baker M: De novo genome assembly: what every biologist should know. Nature Methods 2012, 9:333-337.
6. Salzberg SL, Phillippy AM, Zimin A, Puiu D, Magoc T, Koren S, Treangen TJ, Schatz MC, Delcher AL, Roberts M, et al: GAGE: A critical evaluation of genome assemblies and assembly algorithms. Genome Res 2012, 22(3):557-567.
7. Earl D, Bradnam K, St John J, Darling A, Lin D, Fass J, Yu HO, Buffalo V, Zerbino DR, Diekhans M, et al: Assemblathon 1: a competitive assessment of de novo short read assembly methods. Genome Res 2011, 21(12):2224-2241.
8. Magoc T, Pabinger S, Canzar S, Liu X, Su Q, Puiu D, Tallon LJ, Salzberg SL: GAGE-B: An Evaluation of Genome Assemblers for Bacterial Organisms. Bioinformatics 2013.
9. Rawat A, Elasri MO, Gust KA, George G, Pham D, Scanlan LD, Vulpe C, Perkins EJ: CAPRG: sequence assembling pipeline for next generation sequencing of non-model organisms. PloS one 2012, 7(2):e30370.
10. Barriuso J, Valverde JR, Mellado RP: Estimation of bacterial diversity using next generation sequencing of 16S rDNA: a comparison of different workflows. BMC Bioinformatics 2011, 12:473.
11. Miller JR, Koren S, Sutton G: Assembly algorithms for next-generation sequencing data. Genomics 2010, 95(6):315-327.
12. Zhang W, Chen J, Yang Y, Tang Y, Shang J, Shen B: A practical comparison of de novo genome assembly software tools for next-generation sequencing technologies. PloS one 2011, 6(3):e17915.
13. Salzberg SL, Delcher AL, Kasif S, White O: Microbial gene identification using interpolated Markov models. Nucleic Acids Res 1998, 26(2):544-548.
14. Lukashin AV, Borodovsky M: GeneMark.hmm: new solutions for gene finding. Nucleic acids research 1998, 26(4):1107-1115.
15. Genome Annoucements. Genome Annoucements 2013, 1.
16. Begley CG, Ellis LM: Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature 2012, 483(7391):531-533.
17. Nekrutenko A, Taylor J: Next-generation sequencing data interpretation: enhancing reproducibility and accessibility. Nature reviews Genetics 2012, 13(9):667-672.
18. Leser SC-BaU: Next generation data integration for Life Sciences. IEEE 27th International Conference on Data Engineering 2011, 1366-1369.
19. Sandve GK, Nekrutenko A, Taylor J, Hovig E: Ten simple rules for reproducible computational research. PLoS Comput Biol 2013, 9(10): e1003285.
20. Deelman E, Gannon D, Shields M, Taylor I: Workflows and e-Science: An overview of workflow system features and capabilities. Future Generation Computer Systems 2009, 25(5):528-540.
21. Goecks J, Nekrutenko A, Taylor J: Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences. Genome biology 2010, 11(8):R86.
22. Oinn T, Addis M, Ferris J, Marvin D, Senger M, Greenwood M, Carver T, Glover K, Pocock MR, Wipat A, et al: Taverna: a tool for the composition and enactment of bioinformatics workflows. Bioinformatics 2004, 20(17):3045-3054.
23. Byelas HV MD, Swertz MA: Introducing Data Provenance and Error Handling For NGS Workflows Within the Molgenis Computational Framework. International Conference on Bioinformatics Models, Methods and Algorithms 2012.
24. Kim HU, Kim SY, Jeong H, Kim TY, Kim JJ, Choy HE, Yi KY, Rhee JH, Lee SY: Integrative genome-scale metabolic analysis of Vibrio vulnificus for drug targeting and discovery. Mol Syst Biol 2011, 7:460.
25. Jones MK, Oliver JD: Vibrio vulnificus: disease and pathogenesis. Infect Immun 2009, 77(5):1723-1733.
26. Hall BG, Ehrlich GD, Hu FZ: Pan-genome analysis provides much higher strain typing resolution than multi-locus sequence typing. Microbiology 2010, 156(Pt 4):1060-1068.
27. Kim YR, Lee SE, Kim CM, Kim SY, Shin EK, Shin DH, Chung SS, Choy HE, Progulske-Fox A, Hillman JD, et al: Characterization and pathogenic significance of Vibrio vulnificus antigens preferentially expressed in septicemic patients. Infection and immunity 2003, 71(10):5461-5471.
28. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, et al: The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC genomics 2008, 9:75.
29. Li L, Stoeckert CJ, Roos DS: OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res 2003, 13(9):2178-2189.
30. Lander ES, Waterman MS: Genomic mapping by fingerprinting random clones: a mathematical analysis. Genomics 1988, 2(3):231-239.
31. Delcher AL, Salzberg SL, Phillippy AM: Using MUMmer to identify similar regions in large sequence sets. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 2003, Chapter 10(Unit 10):13.
32. Nielsen P, Krogh A: Large-scale prokaryotic gene prediction and comparison to genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2005, 21(24):4322-4329.
33. Cain AA, Kosara R, Gibas CJ: GenoSets: visual analytic methods for comparative genomics. PloS one 2012, 7(10):e46401.
34. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, et al: Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nature genetics 2000, 25(1):25-29.
35. Harris MA, Clark J, Ireland A, Lomax J, Ashburner M, Foulger R, Eilbeck K, Lewis S, Marshall B, Mungall C, et al: The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource. Nucleic acids research 2004, 32(Database): D258-261.
36. Bauer S, Gagneur J, Robinson PN: GOing Bayesian: model-based gene set analysis of genome-scale data. Nucleic acids research 38(11):3523-3532.
37. Wright AC, Simpson LM, Oliver JD: Role of iron in the pathogenesis of Vibrio vulnificus infections. Infection and immunity 1981, 34(2):503-507.
38. Amaro C, Biosca EG, Fouz B, Toranzo AE, Garay E: Role of iron, capsule, and toxins in the pathogenicity of Vibrio vulnificus biotype 2 for mice. Infection and immunity 1994, 62(2):759-763.
39. Morrison SS, Williams T, Cain A, Froelich B, Taylor C, Baker-Austin C, Verner-Jeffreys D, Hartnell R, Oliver JD, Gibas CJ: Pyrosequencing-based comparative genome analysis of Vibrio vulnificus environmental isolates. PLoS One 2012, 7(5):e37553.
40. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen MJ, Angiuoli SV, et al: The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol 2008, 26(5):541-547.
41. Edgar R, Domrachev M, Lash AE: Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository. Nucleic acids research 2002, 30(1):207-210.
42. Haiminen N, Kuhn DN, Parida L, Rigoutsos I: Evaluation of methods for de novo genome assembly from high-throughput sequencing reads reveals dependencies that affect the quality of the results. PloS one 2011, 6(9): e24182.
43. Huang W, Li L, Myers JR, Marth GT: ART: a next-generation sequencing read simulator. Bioinformatics 2012, 28(4):593-594.
44. Andrews S: FastQC 2010.
45. Conesa A, Gotz S, Garcia-Gomez JM, Terol J, Talon M, Robles M: Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics 2005, 21(18):3674-3676.