The role of agency for perceived ownership in the virtual hand illusion

Consciousness and Cognition

Volumn 36, Issue , 2015, Pages 277-288

  Ma, Ke ^a   Hommel, Bernhard ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Active operated; Body awareness; Body ownership; Non corporeal; Rubber hand illusion; Sense of agency; Virtual hand illusion

Indexed keywords

RUBBER;

ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HAND MOVEMENT; HAND PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NEUROMODULATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; SELF CONCEPT; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION; AWARENESS; ELECTRODERMAL RESPONSE; HAND; ILLUSION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROPRIOCEPTION; TOUCH; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AWARENESS; FEMALE; GALVANIC SKIN RESPONSE; HAND; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MALE; PROPRIOCEPTION; SELF CONCEPT; TOUCH PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84965081602     PISSN: 10538100     EISSN: 10902376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.07.008     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Armel K.C., Ramachandran V.S. Projecting sensations to external objects: Evidence from skin conductance response. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 2003, 270(1523):1499-1506.
2. Botvinick M., Cohen J. Rubber hands' feel' touch that eyes see. Nature 1998, 391(6669):756.
3. Boucsein W. Electrodermal activity 1992, Springer, Heidelberg.
4. Braun N., Thorne J.D., Hildebrandt H., Debener S. Interplay of agency and ownership: The intentional binding and rubber hand illusion paradigm combined. PLoS One 2014, 9(11):e111967.
5. Burin D., Livelli A., Garbarini F., Fossataro C., Folegatti A., Gindri P., et al. Are movements necessary for the sense of body ownership? Evidence from the rubber hand illusion in pure hemiplegic patients. PLoS One 2015, 10(3):e0117155.
6. Caspar E.A., De Beir A., Magalhaes de Saldanha da Gama P.A., Yernaux F., Cleeremans A., et al. New frontiers in the rubber hand experiment: When a robotic hand becomes one's own. Behavior Research Methods 2014, 46(2).
7. Costantini M., Haggard P. The rubber hand illusion: Sensitivity and reference frame for body ownership. Consciousness and Cognition 2007, 16:229-240.
8. De Vignemont F. Embodiment, ownership and disownership. Consciousness and Cognition 2011, 20:82-93.
9. Dummer T., Picot-Annand A., Neal T., Moore C. Movement and the rubber hand illusion. Perception 2009, 38:271-280.
10. Ehrsson H.H., Spence C., Passingham R.E. That's my hand! Activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb. Science 2004, 305(5685):875-877.
11. Ernst M.O., Banks M.S. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 2002, 415(6870):429-433.
12. Farmer H., Tajadura-Jiménez A., Tsakiris M. Beyond the colour of my skin: How skin colour affects the sense of body-ownership. Consciousness and Cognition 2012, 21:1242-1256.
13. Figner B., Murphy R.O. Using skin conductance in judgment and decision making research. A handbook of process tracing methods for decision research 2011, 163-184. Psychology Press, New York, NY. M. Schulte-Mecklenbeck, A. Kuehberger, R. Ranyard (Eds.).
14. Gallagher S. Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4:14-21.
15. Guterstam A., Gentile G., Ehrsson H.H. The invisible hand illusion: Multisensory integration leads to the embodiment of a discrete volume of empty space. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2013, 25:1078-1099.
16. Haans A., IJsselsteijn W.A., de Kort Y.A. The effect of similarities in skin texture and hand shape on perceived ownership of a fake limb. Body Image 2008, 5(4):389-394.
17. Holmes N.P., Snijders H.J., Spence C. Reaching with alien limbs: Visual exposure to prosthetic hands in a mirror biases proprioception without accompanying illusions of ownership. Perception and Psychophysics 2006, 68:685-701.
18. Hommel, B. (in press). Action control and the sense of agency. In B. Eitam & P. Haggard (Eds.), Human agency: Functions and mechanisms. New York: Oxford University Press.
19. Jeannerod M. The mechanism of self-recognition in humans. Behavioural Brain Research 2003, 142:1-15.
20. Kalckert A., Ehrsson H.H. Moving a rubber hand that feels like your own: A dissociation of ownership and agency. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2012, 6:40.
21. Kalckert A., Ehrsson H.H. The moving rubber hand illusion revisited: Comparing movements and visuotactile stimulation to induce illusory ownership. Consciousness and Cognition 2014, 26:117-132.
22. Kammers M.P., de Vignemont F., Verhagen L., Dijkerman H.C. The rubber hand illusion in action. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:204-211.
23. Kokkinara E., Slater M. Measuring the effects through time of the influence of visuomotor and visuotactile synchronous stimulation on a virtual body ownership illusion. Perception 2014, 43:43-58.
24. Lloyd D.M. Spatial limits on referred touch to an alien limb may reflect boundaries of visuo-tactile peripersonal space surrounding the hand. Brain and Cognition 2007, 64:104-109.
25. Longo M.R., Schüür F., Kammers M.P., Tsakiris M., Haggard P. Self awareness and the body image. Acta Psychologica 2009, 132:166-172.
26. Ma K., Hommel B. The virtual-hand illusion: Effects of impact and threat on perceived ownership and affective resonance. Frontiers in Psychology 2013, 4:604.
27. Ma K., Hommel B. Body-ownership for actively operated non-corporeal objects. Consciousness and Cognition 2015, 36:75-86.
28. Makin T.R., Holmes N.P., Ehrsson H.H. On the other hand: Dummy hands and peripersonal space. Behavioural Brain Research 2008, 191:1-10.
29. Maravita A., Spence C., Driver J. Multisensory integration and the body schema: Close to hand and within reach. Current Biology 2003, 13:R531-R539.
30. Padilla, M. A., Pabon, S., Frisoli, A., Sotgiu, E., Loconsole, C., & Bergamasco, M. (2010). Hand and arm ownership illusion through virtual reality physical interaction and vibrotactile stimulations. In A. M. L. Kappers, J. B. VanErp, W. M. B. Tiest, & F. C. Van Der Helm (Eds.), Haptics: Generating and perceiving tangible sensations, Part II. Book series: Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 6192, pp. 194-199).
31. Pavani F., Zampini M. The role of hand size in the fake-hand illusion paradigm. Perception 2007, 36:1547.
32. Perez-Marcos D., Sanchez-Vives M.V., Slater M. Is my hand connected to my body? The impact of body continuity and arm alignment on the virtual hand illusion. Cognitive Neurodynamics 2012, 6:295-305.
33. Riemer M., Kleinböhl D., Hölzl R., Trojan J. Action and perception in the rubber hand illusion. Experimental Brain Research 2013, 229:383-393.
34. Rohde M., Di Luca M., Ernst M.O. The rubber hand illusion: Feeling of ownership and proprioceptive drift do not go hand in hand. PLoS One 2011, 6(6):e21659.
35. Sanchez-Vives M.V., Spanlang B., Frisoli A., Bergamasco M., Slater M. Virtual hand illusion induced by visuomotor correlations. PLoS One 2010, 5(4):e10381.
36. Schütz-Bosbach S., Tausche P., Weiss C. Roughness perception during the rubber hand illusion. Brain and Cognition 2009, 70:136-144.
37. Slater M., Perez-Marcos D., Ehrsson H.H., Sanchez-Vives M.V. Towards a digital body: The virtual arm illusion. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2008, 2:6.
38. Synofzik M., Vosgerau G., Newen A. Beyond the comparator model: A multifactorial two-step account of agency. Consciousness and Cognition 2008, 17:219-239.
39. Tsakiris M. My body in the brain: A neurocognitive model of body-ownership. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:703-712.
40. Tsakiris M., Carpenter L., James D., Fotopoulou A. Hands only illusion: Multisensory integration elicits sense of ownership for body parts but not for non-corporeal objects. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 204:343-352.
41. Tsakiris M., Haggard P. The rubber hand illusion revisited: Visuotactile integration and self-attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31:80-91.
42. Tsakiris M., Prabhu G., Haggard P. Having a body versus moving your body: How agency structures body-ownership. Consciousness and Cognition 2006, 15:423-432.
43. Tsakiris M., Schütz-Bosbach S., Gallagher S. On agency and body-ownership: Phenomenological and neurocognitive reflections. Consciousness and Cognition 2007, 16:645-660.
44. Walsh L.D., Moseley G.L., Taylor J.L., Gandevia S.C. Proprioceptive signals contribute to the sense of body ownership. Journal of Physiology 2011, 589(12):3009-3021.
45. Wegner D.M. The mind's best trick: How we experience conscious will. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003, 7:65-69.
46. White R.C., Davies A.M.A., Halleen T.J., Davies M. Tactile expectations and the perception of self-touch: An investigation using the rubber hand paradigm. Consciousness and Cognition 2010, 19:505-519.