The virtual-hand illusion: Effects of impact and threat on perceived ownership and affective resonance

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 4, Issue SEP, 2013, Pages

  Ma, Ke ^a   Hommel, Bernhard ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Affective responses; Body awareness; Body ownership; Rubber hand illusion; Threat; Vibrotactile stimulation; Virtual hand illusion

Indexed keywords

EID: 84885363378     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00604     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Armel, K. C., and Ramachandran, V. S. (2003). Projecting sensations to external objects:evidence from skin conductance response. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 270, 1499-1506. doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2364.
2. Botvinick, M., and Cohen, J. (1998). Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature 391, 756. doi:10.1038/35784.
3. Boucsein, W. (2011). Electrodermal Activity. Heidelberg:Springer.
4. Deutch, A. Y., and Roth, R. H. (1990). The determinants of stress-induced activation of the prefrontal cortical dopamine system. Prog. Brain Res. 85, 367-403. doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(08)62691-6.
5. Figner, B., and Murphy, R. O. (2010). "Using skin conductance in judgment and decision making research," in A Handbook of Process Tracing Methods for Decision Research:A Critical Review and User's Guide, eds M. Schulte-Mecklenbeck, A. Küehberger, and R. Ranyard (New York, NY:Psychology Press), 163-184.
6. Gallese, V., Keysers, C., and Rizzolatti, G. (2004). A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 396-403. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.07.002.
7. Hommel, B., Colzato, L. S., and van den Wildenberg, W. P. M. (2009). How social are task representations? Psychol. Sci. 20, 794-798. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02367.x.
8. Keysers, C. (2011). The Empathic Brain. Social Brain Press.
9. LeDoux, J. (1998). The Emotional Brain. New York, NY:Simon and Schuster.
10. Morrison, I., Lloyd, D., di Pellegrino, G., and Roberts, N. (2004). Vicarious responses to pain in anterior cingulate cortex:is empathy a multisensory issue? Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 4, 270-278.
11. Murphy, B. L., Arnsten, A. F. T., Goldman-Rakic, P. S., and Roth, R. H. (1996). Increased dopamine turnover in the prefrontal cortex impairs spatial working-memory performance in rats and monkeys. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93, 1325-1329. doi:10.1073/pnas.93.3.1325.
12. Padilla, M. A., Pabon, S., Frisoli, A., Sotgiu, E., Loconsole, C., and Bergamasco, M. (2010). "Hand and arm ownership illusion through virtual reality physical interaction and vibrotactile stimulations," in Haptics:Generating and Perceiving Tangible Sensations, eds A. M. L. Kappers, J. B. F. van Erp, W. M. Bergmann Tiest, and F. C. T. van der Helm (Heidelberg:Springer), 194-199.
13. Sanchez-Vives, M. V., Spanlang, B., Frisoli, A., Bergamasco, M., and Slater, M. (2010). Virtual hand illusion induced by visuomotor correlations. PLoS ONE 5:e10381. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010381.
14. Singer, T., Seymour, B., O'Doherty, J., Kaube, H., Dolan, R. J., and Frith, C. D. (2004). Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science 303, 1157-1162. doi:10.1126/science.1093535.
15. Slater, M., Perez-Marcos, D., Ehrsson, H. H., and Sanchez-Vives, M. V. (2008). Towards a digital body:the virtual arm illusion. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2:6. doi:10.3389/neuro.09.006.2008.
16. Tsakiris, M., and Haggard, P. (2005). The rubber hand illusion revisited:visuotactile integration and self-attribution. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 31, 80-91. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.1.80.
17. Yuan, Y., and Steed, A. (2010). "Is the rubber hand illusion induced by immersive virtual reality?" in IEEE Virtual Reality conference, VR 2010, eds B. Lok, G. Klinker, and R. Nakatsu (Waltham, MA:IEEE Computer Soc), 95-102.