Reaching with alien limbs: Visual exposure to prosthetic hands in a mirror biases proprioception without accompanying illusions of ownership

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 68, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 685-701

  Holmes, Nicholas P ^a,c   Snijders, Hendrikus J ^a,b   Spence, Charles ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c INSERM   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LIMB; LIMB PROSTHESIS; MALE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROPRIOCEPTION; VISION; VISUAL ILLUSION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; EXTREMITIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; OWNERSHIP; PROPRIOCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33748871739     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03208768     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. ALTSCHULER, E. L., WISDOM, S. B., STONE, L., FOSTER, C., GALASKO, D., LLEWELLYN, D. M., & RAMACHANDRAN, V. S. (1999). Rehabilitation of hemiparesis after stroke with a mirror. Lancet, 353, 2035-2036.
2. ARMEL, K. C., & RAMACHANDRAN, V. S. (2003). Projecting sensations to external objects: Evidence from skin conductance response. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 270, 1499-1506.
3. AUSTEN, E. L., SOTO-FARACO, S., ENNS, J. T., & KINGSTONE, A. (2004). Mislocalizations of touch to a fake hand. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 4, 170-181.
4. BÉDARD, P., & PROTEAU, L. (2001). On the role of static and dynamic visual afferent information in goal-directed aiming movements. Experimental Brain Research, 138, 419-431.
5. BOTVINICK, M., & COHEN, J. (1998). Rubber hands "feel" touch that eyes see. Nature, 391, 756.
6. BURNETT, C. T. (1904). Studies in the influence of abnormal position upon the motor impulse. Psychological Review, 11, 370-394.
7. CONNOLLY, J. D., ANDERSEN, R. A., & GOODALE, M. A. (2003). fMRI evidence for a "parietal reach region" in the human brain. Experimental Brain Research, 153, 140-145.
8. DESMURGET, M., ROSSETTI, Y. K. K., JORDAN, M., MECKLER, C., & PRABLANC, C. (1997). Viewing the hand prior to movement improves accuracy of pointing performed toward the unseen contralateral hand. Experimental Brain Research, 115, 180-186.
9. EHRSSON, H. H., SPENCE, C., & PASSINGHAM, R. E. (2004). That's my hand! Activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb. Science, 305, 782-783.
10. FARNÈ, A., PAVANI, F., MENEGHELLO, F., & LÀDAVAS, E. (2000). Left tactile extinction following visual stimulation of a rubber hand. Brain, 123, 2350-2360.
11. FRANZ, E. A., & PACKMAN, T. (2004). Fooling the brain into thinking it sees both hands moving enhances bimanual spatial coupling. Experimental Brain Research, 157, 174-180.
12. GHILARDI, M. F., GORDON, J., & GHEZ, C. (1995). Learning a visuomotor transformation in a local area of workspace produces directional biases in other areas. Journal of Neurophysiology, 73, 2535-2539.
13. GRAZIANO, M. S. A., COOKE, D. F., & TAYLOR, C. S. R. (2000). Coding the location of the arm by sight. Science, 290, 1782-1786.
14. HAGGARD, P., NEWMAN, C., BLUNDELL, J., & ANDREW, H. (2000). The perceived position of the hand in space. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 363-377.
15. HOLMES, N. P., CROZIER, G., & SPENCE, C. (2004). When mirrors lie: "Visual capture" of arm position impairs reaching performance. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 4, 193-200.
16. HOLMES, N. P., & SPENCE, C. (2005). Visual bias of unseen hand position with a mirror: Spatial and temporal factors. Experimental Brain Research, 166, 489-497.
17. JACKSON, C. V., & ZANGWILL, O. L. (1952). Experimental finger dyspraxia. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 1-10.
18. KENNETT, S., TAYLOR-CLARKE, M., & HAGGARD, P. (2001). Noninformative vision improves the spatial resolution of touch in humans. Current Biology, 11, 1188-1191.
19. LLOYD, D. M., SHORE, D. I., SPENCE, C., & CALVERT, G. A. (2003). Multisensory representation of limb position in human premotor cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 17-18.
20. NEWPORT, R., HINDLE, J. V., & JACKSON, S. R. (2001). Links between vision and somatosensation: Vision can improve the felt position of the unseen hand. Current Biology, 11, 975-980.
21. NIEBAUER, C. L., ASELAGE, J., & SCHUTTE, C. (2002). Hemispheric interaction and consciousness: Degree of handedness predicts the intensity of a sensory illusion. Laterality, 7, 85-96.
22. NIELSEN, T. I. (1963). Volition: A new experimental approach. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 4, 225-230.
23. PAVANI, F., SPENCE, C., & DRIVER, J. (2000). Visual capture of touch: Out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves. Psychological Science, 11, 353-359.
24. PELED, A., PRESSMAN, A., GEVA, A. B., & MODAI, I. (2003). Somatosensory evoked potentials during a rubber-hand illusion in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 64, 157-163.
25. PELED, A., RITSNER, M., HIRSCHMANN, S., GEVA, A. B., & MODAI, I. (2000). Touch feel illusion in schizophrenic patients. Biological Psychiatry, 48, 1105-1108.
26. RAMACHANDRAN, V. S., & ROGERS-RAMACHANDRAN, D. (1996). Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 263, 377-386.
27. RAMACHANDRAN, V. S., ROGERS-RAMACHANDRAN, D., & COBB, S. (1995). Touching the phantom limb. Nature, 377, 489-490.
28. RO, T., WALLACE, R., HAGEDORN, J. C., FARNÈ, A., & PIENKOS, E. (2004). Visual enhancing of tactile perception in posterior parietal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 24-30.
29. RORDEN, C. R., HEUTINK, J., GREENFIELD, E., & ROBERTSON, I. H. (1999). When a rubber hand "feels" what the real hand cannot. NeuroReport, 10, 135-138.
30. ROSSETTI, Y. K. K., DESMURGET, M., & PRABLANC, C. (1995). Vectorial coding of movement: Vision, proprioception, or both? Journal of Neurophysiology, 74, 457-463.
31. ROSSETTI, Y. K. K., STELMACH, G. E., DESMURGET, M., PRABLANC, C., & JEANNEROD, M. (1994). The effect of viewing the static hand prior to movement onset on pointing kinematics and variability. Experimental Brain Research, 101, 323-330.
32. SARLEGNA, F., BLOUIN, J., BRESCIANI, J., BOURDIN, C., VERCHER, J., & GAUTHIER, G. M. (2004). Target and hand position information in the online control of goal-directed arm movements. Experimental Brain Research, 151, 524-535.
33. SATHIAN, K., GREENSPAN, A. I., & WOLF, S. L. (2000). Doing it with mirrors: A case study of a novel approach to neurorehabilitation. Neurorehabilitation & Neural Repair, 14, 73-76.
34. SULLIVAN, R. (1969). Experimentally induced somatagnosia. Archives of General Psychiatry, 20, 71-77.
35. TASTEVIN, J. (1937). En partant de l'expérience d'Aristotle: Les déplacements artificiels des parties du corps ne sont pas suivis par le sentiment de ces parties ni par les sensations qu'on peut y produire [Starting from Aristotle's experiment: Artificial displacements of parts of the body are not followed by feelings in these parts or by the sensations which can be produced in them]. L'Encephale, 1, 57-84, 140-158.
36. TSAKIRIS, M., & HAGGARD, P. (2005). The rubber hand illusion revisited: Visuotactile integration and self-attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 80-91.
37. VAN BEERS, R. J., WOLPERT, D. M., & HAGGARD, P. (2002). When feeling is more important than seeing in sensorimotor adaptation. Current Biology, 12, 834-837.
38. WANN, J. P., & IBRAHIM, S. F. (1992). Does limb proprioception drift? Experimental Brain Research, 91, 162-166.