Body-ownership for actively operated non-corporeal objects

Consciousness and Cognition

Volumn 36, Issue , 2015, Pages 75-86

  Ma, Ke ^a   Hommel, Bernhard ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Body ownership; Non corporeal object; Rubber hand illusion; Sense of agency; Virtual hand illusion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY IMAGE; BODY OWNERSHIP; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; ILLUSION; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; SKIN CONDUCTANCE; VIRTUAL REALITY; HAND; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TOUCH; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; BODY IMAGE; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TOUCH PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84937551942     PISSN: 10538100     EISSN: 10902376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.06.003     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Armel K.C., Ramachandran V.S. Projecting sensations to external objects: Evidence from skin conductance response. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 2003, 270(1523):1499-1506. 10.1098/rspb.2003.2364.
2. Botvinick M., Cohen J. Rubber hands' feel' touch that eyes see. Nature 1998, 391(6669). 756-756. 10.1038/35784.
3. Boucsein W. Electrodermal activity 2011, Springer, Heidelberg.
4. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 1988, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey. 2nd ed.
5. Costantini M., Haggard P. The rubber hand illusion: Sensitivity and reference frame for body ownership. Consciousness & Cognition 2007, 16:229-240.
6. De Vignemont F. Embodiment, ownership and disownership. Consciousness and Cognition 2011, 20(1):82-93.
7. Dummer T., Picot-Annand A., Neal T., Moore C. Movement and the rubber hand illusion. Perception 2009, 38(2):271-280.
8. Ehrsson H.H., Rosén B., Stockselius A., Ragnö C., Köhler P., Lundborg G. Upper limb amputees can be induced to experience a rubber hand as their own. Brain 2008, 131(12):3443-3452.
9. Ehrsson H.H., Spence C., Passingham R.E. That's my hand! Activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb. Science 2004, 305(5685):875-877.
10. Farmer H., Tajadura-Jiménez A., Tsakiris M. Beyond the colour of my skin: How skin colour affects the sense of body-ownership. Consciousness and Cognition 2012, 21(3):1242-1256.
11. Faul F., Erdfelder E., Buchner A., Lang A.G. Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods 2009, 41(4):1149-1160.
12. Figner, B., & Murphy, R. O. (2010). Using skin conductance in judgment and decision making research. In A handbook of process tracing methods for decision research: A critical review and user's guide (pp. 163-184).
13. Graziano M.S., Cooke D.F., Taylor C.S. Coding the location of the arm by sight. Science 2000, 290:1782-1786.
14. Guterstam A., Gentile G., Ehrsson H.H. The invisible hand illusion: Multisensory integration leads to the embodiment of a discrete volume of empty space. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2013, 25(7):1078-1099.
15. Haans A., IJsselsteijn W.A., de Kort Y.A. The effect of similarities in skin texture and hand shape on perceived ownership of a fake limb. Body Image 2008, 5(4):389-394.
16. Holmes N.P., Snijders H.J., Spence C. Reaching with alien limbs: Visual exposure to prosthetic hands in a mirror biases proprioception without accompanying illusions of ownership. Perception and Psychophysics 2006, 68:685-701.
17. Hommel B. Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding). Psychological Research 2009, 73:512-526.
18. Hommel, B. (in press). Action control and the sense of agency. In B. Eitam & P. Haggard (Eds.), Human agency: Functions and mechanisms. New York: Oxford University Press.
19. Hommel B., Colzato L.S., van den Wildenberg W.P.M. How social are task representations?. Psychological Science 2009, 20:794-798.
20. Hommel B., Elsner B. Acquisition, representation, and control of action. Oxford Handbook of Human Action 2009, 371-398.
21. Hommel B. Ideomotor action control: On the perceptual grounding of voluntary actions and agents. Action science: Foundations of an emerging discipline 2013, 113-136. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. W. Prinz, M. Beisert, A. Herwig (Eds.).
22. Kalckert A., Ehrsson H.H. The moving rubber hand illusion revisited: Comparing movements and visuotactile stimulation to induce illusory ownership. Consciousness and Cognition 2014, 26:117-132.
23. Kammers M.P., de Vignemont F., Verhagen L., Dijkerman H.C. The rubber hand illusion in action. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:204-211.
24. Kokkinara E., Slater M. Measuring the effects through time of the influence of visuomotor and visuotactile synchronous stimulation on a virtual body ownership illusion. Perception 2014, 43(1):43-58.
25. Lloyd D.M. Spatial limits on referred touch to an alien limb may reflect boundaries of visuo-tactile peripersonal space surrounding the hand. Brain and Cognition 2007, 64(1):104-109.
26. Longo M.R., Schüür F., Kammers M.P., Tsakiris M., Haggard P. Self awareness and the body image. Acta Psychologica 2009, 132(2):166-172.
27. Ma K., Hommel B. The virtual-hand illusion: Effects of impact and threat on perceived ownership and affective resonance. Frontiers in Psychology 2013, 4:604. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00604.
28. Makin T.R., Holmes N.P., Ehrsson H.H. On the other hand: Dummy hands and peripersonal space. Behavioural Brain Research 2008, 191(1):1-10.
29. Maravita A., Spence C., Driver J. Multisensory integration and the body schema: Close to hand and within reach. Current Biology 2003, 13:R531-R539.
30. Pavani F., Zampini M. The role of hand size in the fake-hand illusion paradigm. Perception 2007, 36(10):1547.
31. Perez-Marcos D., Sanchez-Vives M.V., Slater M. Is my hand connected to my body? The impact of body continuity and arm alignment on the virtual hand illusion. Cognitive Neurodynamics 2012, 6(4):295-305.
32. Sanchez-Vives M.V., Spanlang B., Frisoli A., Bergamasco M., Slater M. Virtual hand illusion induced by visuomotor correlations. PLoS ONE 2010, 5(4):e10381. 10.1371/journal.pone.0010381.
33. Schütz-Bosbach S., Tausche P., Weiss C. Roughness perception during the rubber hand illusion. Brain and Cognition 2009, 70(1):136-144.
34. Sforza A., Bufalari I., Haggard P., Aglioti S.M. My face in yours: Visuo-tactile facial stimulation influences sense of identity. Social Neuroscience 2010, 5(2):148-162.
35. Short F., Ward R. Virtual limbs and body space: Critical features for the distinction between body space and near-body space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2009, 35:1092-1103.
36. Slater M., Perez-Marcos D., Ehrsson H.H., Sanchez-Vives M.V. Towards a digital body: The virtual arm illusion. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2008, 2:6. 10.3389/neuro.09.006.2008.
37. Sternberg R. Cognitive psychology 2003, Thomson Wadsworth. 3rd ed.
38. Synofzik M., Vosgerau G., Newen A. Beyond the comparator model: A multifactorial two-step account of agency. Consciousness and Cognition 2008, 17:219-239.
39. Tsakiris M. My body in the brain: A neurocognitive model of body-ownership. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:703-712.
40. Tsakiris M., Carpenter L., James D., Fotopoulou A. Hands only illusion: Multisensory integration elicits sense of ownership for body parts but not for non-corporeal objects. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 204(3):343-352.
41. Tsakiris M., Haggard P. The rubber hand illusion revisited: Visuotactile integration and self-attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 2005, 31:80-91.
42. Tsakiris M., Haggard P., Franck N., Mainy N., Sirigu A. A specific role for efferent information in self-recognition. Cognition 2005, 96(3):215-231.
43. Tsakiris M., Prabhu G., Haggard P. Having a body versus moving your body: How agency structures body-ownership. Consciousness and Cognition 2006, 15(2):423-432.
44. Tsakiris M., Schütz-Bosbach S., Gallagher S. On agency and body-ownership: Phenomenological and neurocognitive reflections. Consciousness and Cognition 2007, 16:645-660.
45. White R.C., Davies A.M.A., Halleen T.J., Davies M. Tactile expectations and the perception of self-touch: An investigation using the rubber hand paradigm. Consciousness and Cognition 2010, 19(2):505-519.