Jun-Mediated Changes in Cell Adhesion Contribute to Mouse Embryonic Stem Cell Exit from Ground State Pluripotency

Stem Cells

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 1213-1224

  Veluscek, Giulia ^a   Li, Yaoyong ^a   Yang, Shen Hsi ^a   Sharrocks, Andrew D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adhesion; Embryonic stem cells; Fibronectin; Jun

Indexed keywords

FIBRONECTIN; HEPATOCYTE NUCLEAR FACTOR 3BETA; MESSENGER RNA; NERVE CELL ADHESION MOLECULE; NESTIN; STRESS ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE; PROTEIN C JUN;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL JUNCTION; CELL MEMBRANE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE ONTOLOGY; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; MOUSE; MOUSE EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; NONHUMAN; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; RNA INTERFERENCE; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; TRANSCRIPTOMICS; UPREGULATION; ANIMAL; CYTOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; GENOME; GERM LAYER; METABOLISM; TIME FACTOR;

ANIMALS; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; FIBRONECTINS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; GENOME; GERM LAYERS; MICE; MOUSE EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; PROTO-ONCOGENE PROTEINS C-JUN; TIME FACTORS; UP-REGULATION;

EID: 84964951742     PISSN: 10665099     EISSN: 15494918     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/stem.2294     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Hanna J, Saha K, Jaenisch R,. Pluripotency and cellular reprogramming?: Facts, hypotheses, unresolved issues. Cell 2010; 143: 508-525.
2. Nichols J, Smith A,. Naive and primed pluripotent states. Cell Stem Cell 2009; 4: 487-492.
3. Chenoweth JG, McKay RDG, Tesar PJ,. Epiblast stem cells contribute new insight into pluripotency and gastrulation. Dev Growth Differ 2010; 52: 293-301.
4. Ying QL, Wray J, Nichols J, et al., The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nature 2008; 453: 519-523.
5. Ware CB, Nelson AM, Mecham B, et al., Derivation of naive human embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014; 111: 4484-4489.
6. Gafni O, Weinberger L, Mansour AA, et al., Derivation of novel human ground state naive pluripotent stem cells. Nature 2013; 504: 282-286.
7. Fang R, Liu K, Zhao Y, et al., Generation of naive induced pluripotent stem cells from rhesus monkey fibroblasts. Cell Stem Cell 2014; 15: 488-496.
8. Young RA,. Control of the embryonic stem cell state. Cell 2011; 144: 940-954.
9. Hu G, Kim J, Xu Q, et al., A Genome-wide RNAi screen identifies a new transcriptional module required for self-renewal. Genes Dev 2009; 23: 837-848.
10. Halley JD, Smith-Miles K, Winkler D, et al., Self-organizing circuitry and emergent computation in mouse embryonic stem cells. Stem Cell Res 2011; 8: 324-333.
11. Festuccia N, Osorno R, Wilson V, et al., The role of pluripotency gene regulatory network components in mediating transitions between pluripotent cell states. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2013; 23: 504-511.
12. Marks H, Stunnenberg H,. Transcription regulation and chromatin structure in the pluripotent ground state. Biochim Biophys Acta 2014; 1839: 129-137.
13. Collas P,. Epigenetic states in stem cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 2009; 1790: 900-905.
14. Marks H, Kalkan T, Menafra R, et al., The transcriptional and epigenomic foundations of ground state pluripotency. Cell 2012; 149: 590-604.
15. Pereira L, Yi F, Merrill BJ,. Repression of Nanog gene transcription by Tcf3 limits embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Mol Cell Biol 2006; 26: 7479-7491.
16. Betschinger J, Nichols J, Dietmann S, et al., Exit from pluripotency is gated by intracellular redistribution of the bHLH transcription factor Tfe3. Cell 2013; 153: 335-347.
17. Davies OR, Lin C-Y, Radzisheuskaya A, et al., Tcf15 primes pluripotent cells for differentiation. Cell Rep 2013; 3: 472-484.
18. Buecker C, Srinivasan R, Wu Z, et al., Reorganization of enhancer patterns in transition from naive to primed pluripotency. Cell Stem Cell 2014; 14: 838-853.
19. Yang SH, Kalkan T, Morissroe C, et al., Otx2 and Oct4 drive early enhancer activation during embryonic stem cell transition from naive pluripotency. Cell Rep 2014; 7: 1968-1981.
20. Yang SH, Kalkan T, Morrisroe C, et al., A Genome-wide RNAi screen reveals MAP kinase phosphatases as key ERK pathway regulators during embryonic stem cell differentiation. PLoS Genet 2012; 8: e1003112.
21. Shaulian E,. AP-1-The Jun Proteins: Oncogenes or tumor suppressors in disguise? Cell Signal 2010; 22: 894-899.
22. Jochum W, Passegué E, Wagner EF,. AP-1 in mouse development and tumorigenesis. Oncogene 2001; 20: 2401-2412.
23. de Groot RP, Auwerx J, Bourouis M, et al., Negative regulation of Jun/AP-1: Conserved function of glycogen synthase kinase 3 and the Drosophila kinase Shaggy. Oncogene 1993; 8: 841-847.
24. Nikolakaki E, Coffer PJ, Hemelsoet R, et al., Glycogen synthase kinase 3 phosphorylates Jun family members in vitro and negatively regulates their transactivating potential in intact cells. Oncogene 1993; 8: 833-840.
25. Tiwari VK, Stadler MB, Wirbelauer C, et al., A chromatin-modifying function of JNK during stem cell differentiation. Nat Genet 2011; 44: 94-100.
26. Wang J, Chen L, Ko CI, et al., Distinct signaling properties of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinases 4 (MKK4) and 7 (MKK7) in embryonic stem cell (ESC) differentiation. J Biol Chem 2012; 287: 2787-2797.
27. Hilberg F, Aguzzi A, Howells N, et al., C-Jun is essential for normal mouse development and hepatogenesis. Nature 1993; 365: 179-181.
28. Wagner EF,. Functions of AP1 (Fos/Jun) in bone development. Ann Rheum Dis 2002; 61: 40ii-42.
29. Behrens A, Haigh J, Mechta-Grigoriou F, et al., Impaired intervertebral disc formation in the absence of Jun. Development 2003; 130: 103-109.
30. Abujarour R, Efe J, Ding S,. Genome-wide gain-of-function screen identifies novel regulators of pluripotency. Stem Cells 2010; 28: 1487-1497.
31. Liu J, Han Q, Peng T, et al., The oncogene c-Jun impedes somatic cell reprogramming. Nat Cell Biol 2015; 17: 856-867.
32. Osorno R, Tsakiridis A, Wong F, et al., The developmental dismantling of pluripotency is reversed by ectopic Oct4 expression. Development 2012; 139: 2288-2298.
33. Marshall OJ,. PerlPrimer: Cross-platform, graphical primer design for standard, bisulphite and real-time PCR. Bioinformatics 2004; 20: 2471-2472.
34. Trapnell C, Hendrickson DG, Sauvageau M, et al., Differential analysis of gene regulation at transcript resolution with RNA-Seq. Nat Biotechnol 2013; 31: 46-53.
35. Trapnell C, Roberts A, Goff L, et al., Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-Seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat Protoc 2012; 7: 562-578.
36. Huang, DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA,. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc 2009; 4: 44-57.
37. Bailey L, Boden M, Buske, FA, et al., MEME SUITE: Tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res 2009; 37: W202-W208.
38. Heinz S, Benner S, Spann N, et al., Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime Cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol Cell 2010; 38: 576-589.
39. Lee TI, Johnstone SE, Young RA,. Chromatin immunoprecipitation and microarray-based analysis of protein location. Nat Protoc 2006; 1: 729-748.
40. O'Donnell A, Yang SH, Sharrocks AD,. MAP kinase-mediated c-fos regulation relies on a histone acetylation relay switch. Mol Cell 2008; 29: 780-785.
41. Untergasser A, Cutcutache I, Koressaar T, et al., Primer3-New capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40: e115.
42. Rogers MB, Hosler BA, Gudas LJ,. Specific expression of a retinoic acid-regulated, Zinc-Finger Gene, Rex-1, in preimplantation embryos, trophoblast and spermatocytes. Biol Chem 1991; 824: 815-824.
43. Chambers I, Colby D, Robertson M, et al., Functional expression cloning of Nanog, a pluripotency sustaining factor in embryonic stem cells. Cell 2003; 113: 643-655.
44. Sajini AA, Greder LV, Dutton JR, et al., Loss of Oct4 expression during the development of murine embryoid bodies. Dev Biol 2012; 371: 170-179.
45. Lowell S, Benchoua A, Heavey B, et al., Notch promotes neural lineage entry by pluripotent embryonic stem cells. PLoS Biol 2006; 4: e121.
46. Lendahl U, Zimmerman LB, McKay R,. CNS stem cells express a new class of intermediate filament protein. Cell 1990; 60: 585-595.
47. Chapman DL, Agulnik I, Hancock S, et al., Tbx6, a mouse T-Box gene implicated in paraxial mesoderm formation at gastrulation. Dev Biol 1996; 180: 534-542.
48. Li Z, Gadue P, Chen K, et al., Foxa2 and H2A.Z mediate nucleosome depletion during embryonic stem cell differentiation. Cell 2012; 151: 1608-1616.
49. Martello G, Sugimoto T, Diamanti E, et al., Esrrb is a pivotal target of the Gsk3/Tcf3 axis regulating embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Cell Stem Cell 2012; 11: 491-504.
50. Wray J, Kalkan T, Smith, AG,. The ground state of pluripotency. Biochem Soc Trans 2010; 38: 1027-1032.
51. Fässler R, Pfaff M, Murphy J, et al., Lack of beta 1 integrin gene in embryonic stem cells affects morphology, adhesion, and migration but not integration into the inner cell mass of blastocysts. J Cell Biol 1995; 128: 979-988.
52. Najm FJ, Chenoweth JG, Anderson PD, et al., Isolation of epiblast stem cells from preimplantation mouse embryos. Cell Stem Cell 2011; 8: 318-325.
53. Radice GL, Rayburn H, Matsunami H, et al., Developmental defects in mouse embryos lacking N-cadherin. Dev Biol 1997; 181: 64-78.
54. García-Castro MI, Vielmetter E, Bronner-Fraser M,. N-Cadherin, a cell adhesion molecule involved in establishment of embryonic left-right asymmetry. Science 2000; 288: 1047-1051.
55. Ying QL, Stavridis M, Griffiths D, et al., Conversion of embryonic stem cells into neuroectodermal precursors in adherent monoculture. Nat Biotechnol 2003; 21: 183-186.
56. Redmer T, Diecke S, Grigoryan T, et al., E-cadherin is crucial for embryonic stem cell pluripotency and can replace OCT4 during somatic cell reprogramming. EMBO Rep 2011; 12: 720-726.
57. Hawkins K, Mohamet L, Ritson S, et al., E-cadherin and, in its absence, N-cadherin promotes Nanog expression in mouse embryonic stem cells via STAT3 phosphorylation. Stem Cells 2012; 30: 1842-1851.
58. Arthur-Farraj PJ, Latouche M, Wilton, DK, et al., C-Jun reprograms Schwann cells of injured nerves to generate a repair cell essential for regeneration. Neuron 2012; 75: 633-647.
59. Li G, Gustafson-Brown C, Hanks SK, et al., C-Jun is essential for organization of the epidermal leading edge. Dev Cell 2003; 4: 865-877.
60. Rozario T, DeSimone DW,. The extracellular matrix in development and morphogenesis: A dynamic view. Dev Biol 2010; 341: 126-140.
61. Hayashi Y, Furue MK, Okamoto T, et al., Integrins regulate mouse embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Stem Cells 2007; 25: 3005-3015.
62. Barczyk M, Carracedo S, Gullberg D,. Integrins. Cell Tissue Res 2010; 339: 269-80.
63. Mittal A, Pulina M, Hou S-Y, et al., Fibronectin and integrin Alpha 5 play requisite roles in cardiac morphogenesis. Dev Biol 2013; 381: 73-82.
64. George EL, Georges-Labouesse EN, Patel-King RS, et al., Defects in mesoderm, neural tube and vascular development in mouse embryos lacking fibronectin. Development 1993; 119: 1079-1091.
65. Hunt GC, Singh P, Schwarzbauer JE,. Endogenous production of fibronectin is required for self-renewal of cultured mouse embryonic stem cells. Exp Cell Res 2012; 318: 1820-1831.
66. Yang JT, Hynes RO,. Fibronectin receptor functions in embryonic cells deficient in alpha 5 Beta 1 integrin can be replaced by alpha V integrins. Mole Biol Cell 1996; 7: 1737-1748.
67. Braam SR, Zeinstra L, Litjens S, et al., Recombinant vitronectin is a functionally defined substrate that supports human embryonic stem cell self-renewal via alphavbeta5 integrin. Stem Cells 2008; 26: 2257-2265.
68. Cattavarayane S, Palovuori R, Ramanathan JT, et al., α6β1- and αV-integrins are required for long-term self-renewal of murine embryonic stem cells in the absence of LIF. BMC Cell Biol 2015; 16: 3.
69. Baxter MA, Camarasa MV, Bates N, et al., Analysis of the distinct functions of growth factors and tissue culture substrates necessary for the long-term self-renewal of human embryonic stem cell lines. Stem Cell Res 2009; 3: 28-38.