Low-cost glass ionomer cement as ART sealant in permanent molars: a randomized clinical trial

Brazilian Oral Research

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 1-9

  Hesse, Daniela ^a   Bonifácio, Clarissa Calil ^b   Guglielmi, Camila De Almeida Brandão ^a   da Franca, Carolina ^c   Mendes, Fausto Medeiros ^a   Raggio, Daniela Prócida ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PERNAMBUCO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Dental Atraumatic Restorative Treatment; Glass Ionomer Cements; Pit and Fissure Sealants

Indexed keywords

FISSURE SEALANT; GLASS IONOMER;

AGE; ATRAUMATIC RESTORATIVE TREATMENT; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTITION; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MALE; MOLAR TOOTH; MULTICENTER STUDY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TIME; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGE FACTORS; CHILD; DENTAL ATRAUMATIC RESTORATIVE TREATMENT; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTITION, PERMANENT; FEMALE; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; MALE; MOLAR; OBSERVER VARIATION; PIT AND FISSURE SEALANTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84964697751     PISSN: 18068324     EISSN: 18073107     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2015.vol29.0063     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. 1. Frencken JE, Makoni F, Sithole WD. Atraumatic restorative treatment and glass-ionomer sealants in a school oral health programme in Zimbabwe: evaluation after 1 year. Caries Res. 1996;30(6):428-33.
2. 2. Frencken JE, Makoni F, Sithole WD, Hackenitz E. Three-year survival of one-surface ART restorations and glass-ionomer sealants in a school oral health programme in Zimbabwe. Caries Res. 1998;32(2):119-26.
3. 3. Frencken JE, Makoni F, Sithole WD. ART restorations and glass ionomer sealants in Zimbabwe: survival after 3 years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1998 Dec;26(6):372-81.
4. 4. Frencken JE, Holmgren CJ. Caries management through the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) approach and glass-ionomers: update 2013. Braz Oral Res. 2014 Jan-Feb;28(1):5-8.
5. 5. Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V, Banerjee A. Atraumatic restorative treatment versus amalgam restoration longevity: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Jun;14(3):233-40.
6. 6. van ‘t Hof MA, Frencken JE, van Palenstein Helderman WH, Holmgren CJ. The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach for managing dental caries: a meta-analysis. Int Dent J. 2006 Dec;56(6):345-51.
7. 7. de Amorim RG, Leal SC, Frencken JE. Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Apr;16(2):429-41.
8. 8. Bonifácio CC, Kleverlaan CJ, Raggio DP, Werner A, de Carvalho RC, van Amerongen WE. Physical-mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements indicated for atraumatic restorative treatment. Aust Dent J. 2009 Sep;54(3):233-7.
9. 9. Bonifácio CC, Hesse D, Raggio DP, Bönecker M, van Loveren C, van Amerongen WE. The effect of GIC-brand on the survival rate of proximal-ART restorations. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2013 Jul;23(4):251-8.
10. 10. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística [homepage]. Brasília (DF): Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística; 2010 [cited 2014 Jun 24]. Available from: http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/default.php.
11. 11. Ismail AI, Sohn W, Tellez M, Amaya A, Sen A, Hasson H, et al. The International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS): an integrated system for measuring dental caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007 Jun;35(3):170-8.
12. 12. Nyvad B, Machiulskiene V, Baelum V. Reliability of a new caries diagnostic system differentiating between active and inactive caries lesions. Caries Res. 1999 Jul-Aug;33(4):252-60.
13. 13. Frencken JE, Songpaisan Y, Phantumvanit P, Pilot T. An atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique: evaluation after one year. Int Dent J. 1994 Oct;44(5):460-4.
14. 14. Oba AA, Dülgergil T, Sönmez IS, Doğan S. Comparison of caries prevent ion with glass ionomer and composite resin fissure sealants. J Formos Med Assoc. 2009 Nov;108(11):844-8.
15. 15. Franca C, Colares V, van Amerongen E. Two-year evaluation of the atraumatic restorative treatment approach in primary molars class I and II restorations. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2011 Jul;21(4):249-53.
16. 16. Mickenautsch S. How well are GIC product labels related to current systematic review evidence? Dent Update. 2011 Nov;38(9):634-8, 641-2, 644.
17. 17. Shintome LK, Nagayassu MP, Di Nicoló R, Myaki SI. Mic roh a rd ne s s of gla s s ionome r ceme nt s indicated for the ART technique according to surface protection treatment and storage time. Braz Oral Res. 2009 Oct-Dec;2(4):439-45.
18. 18. van Gemert-Schriks MC, van Amerongen WE, ten Cate JM, Aartman IH. Three-year survival of single-and two-surface ART restorations in a high-caries child population. Clin Oral Investig. 2007 Dec;11(4):337-43.
19. 19. Raggio DP, Hesse D, Lenzi TL, Guglielmi CAB, Braga MM. Is Atraumatic restorative treatment an option for restoring occlusoproximal caries lesions in primary teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2013 Nov;23(6):435-43.
20. 20. Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia [homepage]. Brasília (DF): Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia; 2010 [cited 2014 Jul 13]. Available from: http://www.inmet.gov.br/sim/gera_graficos.php
21. 21. Wilson AD, Prosser H, Powis DM. Mechanism of adhesion of polyelectrolyte cements to hydroxyapatite. J Dent Res. 1983 May;62(5):590-2.
22. 22. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde [homepage]. SB Brasil: Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde Bucal 2010 – resultados principais. Ministério da Saúde; 2010 [cited 2014 Dec 5] Available from: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/pesquisa_nacional_saude_bucal.pdf
23. 23. van de Sande FH, Opdam NJ, Rodolpho PA, Correa MB, Demarco FF, Cenci MS. Patient risk factors’ influence on survival of posterior composites. J Dent Res. 2013 Jul;92(7 Suppl):78S-83S.
24. 24. CorreaMB,PeresMA,PeresKG,HortaBL,BarrosAJ,DemarcoFF. Do socioeconomic determinants affect the quality of posterior dental restorations? A multilevel approach. J Dent. 2013 Nov;41(11):960-7.
25. 25. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística [homepage]. Censo Demográfico 2000 e Pesquisa de Orçamentos Familiares - POF 2008/2009. [cited 2014 Dec 5]. Available from: http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/populacao/condicaodevida/pof/2008_2009_analise_consumo/pofanalise_2008_2009.pdf
26. 26. Méjàre I, Mjör IA. Glass ionomer and resin-based fissure sealants: a clinical study. Scand J Dent Res. 1990 Aug;98(4):345-50.
27. 27. Mjör IA, Gordan VV. A review of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART). Int Dent J. 1999 Jun;49(3):127-31.
28. 28. Vieira ALF, Zanella NLM, Bresciani E, Barata TJ, Silva SM, Machado MA, et al. Evaluation of glass ionomer sealants placed according to the ART approach in a community with high-caries experience: 1-year follow-up. J Appl Oral Sci. 2006 Aug;14(4):270-5.
29. 29. Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V. Validity of sealant retention as surrogate for caries prevention—a systematic review. PLoS One. 2013 Oct;23;8(10):e77103.
30. 30. Kemoli AM, Opinya GN, van Amerongen WE, Mwalili SM. Two-year survival rates of proximal atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in relation to glass ionomer cements and Postrestoration meals consumed. Pediatr Dent. 2011 May-Jun;33(3):246-51.