The Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) approach for managing dental caries: A meta-analysis

International Dental Journal

Volumn 56, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 345-351

  Van 't Hof, Martin A ^a   Frencken, Jo E ^a,b   Van Palenstein Helderman, Wim H ^a   Holmgren, Christopher J ^a  

^a College of Dental Sciences ^*

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

ART; Atraumatic restorative treatment; Glass ionomer; Restorations; Sealants; Survival

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845696018     PISSN: 00206539     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1875-595x.2006.tb00339.x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Frencken JE, Pilot T, Songpaisan Y et al. Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART): rationale, technique and development. J Public Health Dent 1996 56: 135-140.
2. Ziraps A, Honkala E. Clinical trial of a new glass ionomer for an Atraumatic Restorative Treatment technique in Class I restorations placed in Latvian school children. Med Principles Pract 2002 11: 44-47.
3. Honkala E, Behbehani J, Ibricevic H et al. The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach to restoring primary teeth in a standard dental clinic. Int J Paediat Dent 2003 13: 172-179.
4. Burke FJ, McHugh S, Shaw L et al. UK dentists' attitudes and behaviour towards Atraumatic Restorative Treatment for primary teeth. Br Dent J 2005 199: 365-369.
5. Czarnecka B. The use of ART technique in modern dental practice: A personel view. J Dent 2006 34: 620
6. Seale NS, Casamassimo PS. Access to dental care for children in the United States. A survey of general practitioners. JADA 2003 134: 1630-1640.
7. Tyas MJ, Anusavice KJ, Frencken JE et al. Minimal intervention dentistry - a review. FDI commission project 1-97. Int Dent J 2000 50: 1-12.
8. Rahimtoola S, Van Amerongen WE. Comparison ot two tooth saving preparation techniques for one surface cavities. J Dent Child 2002 69: 16-26.
9. Schriks MCM, Van Amerongen WE. Atraumatic perspective of ART. Psychological and physiological aspects of treatment with and without rotary instruments. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2003 31: 15-20.
10. Phantumvanit P, Songpaisan Y, Pilot T et al. Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART). Survival of one-surface restorations in the permanent dentition. J Public Health Dent 1996 56: 141-145.
11. Frencken JE, Makoni F, Sithole WD et al. Three-year survival of one-surface ART restorations and glass-ionomer sealants in a school oral health programme in Zimbabwe. Caries Res 1998 32: 119-126.
12. Ho TFT, Smales RJ, Fang DKS. A 2-year clinical study of two glass ionomer cements used in the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1999 27: 195-201.
13. Mickenautsch S, Rudolph MJ, Ogunbodede EO et al. The impact of the ART approach on the treatment profile in a Mobile Dental System (MDS) in South Africa. Int Dent J 1999 49: 132-138.
14. Lo ECM, Holmgren CJ. Provision of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) restorations to Chinese pre-school children - a 30 month evaluation. Int J Paed Dent 2001 11: 3-10.
15. Taifour D, Frencken JE, Beiruti N et al. Effectiveness of glass-ionomer (ART) and amalgam restorations in the deciduous dentition - results after 3 years. Caries Res 2002 36: 437-444.
16. Louw AJ, Sarvan I, Chikte UME et al. One-year evaluation of atraumatic restorative treatment and minimal intervention techniques on primary teeth. S Afr Dent J 2002 57: 366-371.
17. Eden E, Topaloglu-Ak A, Frencken JE et al. Two-year survival of composite ART and traditional restorations. Am J Dent 2007 20: in print
18. Mejàre I, Mjör IA: Glass ionomer and resin-based fissure sealants: a clinical study. Scand J Dent Res 1990 98: 345-350.
19. Williams B, Laxton L, Holt RD et al. Fissure sealants: a 4-year clinical trial comparing an experimental glass polyalkenoate cement with a bis glycidyl methacrylate resin used as fissure sealants. Brit Dent J 1996 180: 104-108.
20. Beiruti N, Frencken JE, Van 't Hof MA et al. Caries preventive effect of resin-based and glass ionomer sealants over time: A systematic review. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2006 34: 403-409.
21. Weerheijm KL, Kreulen CM, Gruythuisen RJ. Comparison of retentative qualities of two glass-ionomer cements used as fissure sealants. J Dent Child 1996 63: 265-267.
22. Smith AJE, Chimimba PD, Kalf-Scholte S et al. Clinical pilot study on new dental filling materials and preparation procedures in developing countries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1990 18: 309-312.
23. Holmgren CJ, Lo ECM, Hu DY et al. ART restorations and sealants placed in Chinese school children - results after three years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2000 28: 314-320.
24. Loh KH. An ART technique in the mobile dental squad in Malaysia: A four-year review. Malaysian Dent J 2003 24: 95-101.
25. Frencken JE, Taifour D, Van't Hof MA. Survival of ART and amalgam restorations in permanent teeth after 6.3 years. J Dent Res 2006 85: 622-626.
26. Lo ECM, Holmgren CJ, Hu D et al. A six-year study of ART restorations placed in Chinese school children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2007 in print
27. Mandari GJ, Truin GJ, Van't Hof MA et al. Effectiveness of three minimal intervention approaches for managing dental caries: Survival of restorations after 2 years. Caries Res 2001 35: 90-94.
28. Mandari GJ, Frencken JE, Van't Hof MA. Six-year success rates of occlusal amalgam and glass-ionomer restorations placed using three minimal intervention approaches. Caries Res 2003 37: 246-253.
29. Kalf-Scholte SM, Van Amerongen WE, Smith AJE et al. Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART): a three-year clinical study in Malawi - comparison of conventional amalgam and ART restorations. J Public Health Dent 2003 63: 99-103.
30. Frencken JE, Songpaisan Y, Phantumvanit P et al. Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) technique: Evaluation after one year. Int Dent J 1994 44: 460-464.
31. Yip HK, Smales RJ, Ngo HC et al. Selection of restorative materials for the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach: a review. Spec Care Dentist 2001 21: 216-221.
32. Mallow PK, Durward CS, Klaipo M. Restoration of permanent teeth in young rural children in Cambodia using atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique and Fuji II glass ionomer cement. Int J Paediat Dent 1998 8: 35-40.
33. Motsei SM, Kroon J, Holtshousen WS. Implementation of the ART approach in South Africa: an activity report. S Afr Dent J 2001 56: 327-329.
34. Abid A, Chkir F, Ben Salem K et al. Atraumatic restorative treatment and glass ionomer sealants in Tunesian children: survival after 3 years. East Mediter Health J 2002 8: 315-323.
35. De Souza EM, Cefaly DF, Terada RS et al. Clinical evaluation of the ART technique using high density and resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Oral Health Prev Dent 2003 1: 201-207.
36. Wang L, Lopes LG, Bresciani E et al. Evaluation of Class I ART restorations in Brazilian schoolchildren three-year results. Spec Care Dentist 2004 24: 28-33.
37. Van Den Dungen GM, Huddleston Slater AE et al. ART of conventioneel? Onderzoeksresultaten van proximale restauraties in tijdelijke molaren. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd 2004 111: 345-349.
38. Yip HK, Smales RJ, Yu C et al. Comparison of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results. Quintessence Int 2002 33: 17-21.
39. Yu C, Gao X-J, Deng D-M et al. Survival of glass ionomer restorations placed in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and conventional cavity preparations: 2-year results. Int Dent J 2004 54: 42-46.
40. Luo Y, Wei SHY, Fan MW et al. Clinical investigation of a high-strength glass ionomer restorative used with the ART technique in Wuhan, China: One-year results. Chin J Dent Res 1999 2: 73-78.
41. Lo ECM, Luo Y, Fan MW et al. Clinical investigation of two glass-ionomer restoratives used with the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment approach in China: Two-years results. Caries Res 2001 35: 458-463.
42. Yee R. An ART field study in western Nepal. Int Dent J 2001 51: 103-108.
43. Frencken JE, Makoni F, Sithole WD. ART restorations and glass ionomer sealants in Zimbabwe: survival after 3 years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1998 26: 372-381.
44. Kikwilu EN, Mandari GJ, Honkala E. Survival of Fuji IX fillings in permanent teeth of primary school children in Tanzania. East Afr Med J 2001 78: 19-21.
45. Yip KH-K, Smales RJ, Gao W et al. The effects of two cavity preparation methods on longevity of glass ionomer cement restorations. An evaluation after 12 months. J Am Dent Assoc 2002 133: 744-751.
46. Gao W, Peng D, Smales R et al. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: Evaluation after 30 months. Quintessence Int 2003 34: 31-37.
47. Hickel R, Kaaden C, Paschos E et al. Longevity of occlusally-stressed restorations in posterior primary teeth. Am J Dent 2005 18: 198-211.
48. Rutar J, McAllan L, Tyas MJ. Three-year clinical performance of glass ionomer cement in primary molars. Int J Paediatr Dent 2002 12: 146-147.
49. Manhart J, Chen HY, Hamm G et al. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent 2004 29-5: 481-508.
50. Taifour D, Frencken JE, Beiruti N et al. Comparison between restorations in the permanent dentition produced by hand and rotary instrumentation -survival after 3 years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2003 31: 122-128.
51. Frencken JE, Makoni F, Sithole WD. Atraumatic restorative treatment and glass-ionomer sealants in a school oral health programme in Zimbabwe: Evaluation after 1 year. Caries Res 1996 30: 428-433.