Physical-mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements indicated for atraumatic restorative treatment

Australian Dental Journal

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 233-237

  Bonifacio C C ^a,b   Kleverlaan, C J ^b   Raggio, D P ^a   Werner, A ^b   De Carvalho, R C R ^a   Van Amerongen, W E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Compressive strength; Flexural strength; Glass ionomer cement; Hardness; Wear

Indexed keywords

GLASS IONOMER;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; HARDNESS; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; TIME;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HARDNESS; MATERIALS TESTING; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 70350154483     PISSN: 00450421     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2009.01125.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Wilson AD, Kent BE. A new translucent cement for dentistry. The glass ionomer cement. Br Dent J 1972;132:133-135.
2. Mount GJ. A colour atlas of glass-ionomer cements. 2nd edn. London: Martin Dunitz, 1994.
3. Imparato JCP, Garcia A, Bonifacio CC, Raggio DP, Mendes FM, Vedovello Filho M. Color stability of esthetic ion-releasing restorative materials subjected to pH variation. ASDC J Dent Child 2007;74:189-193.
4. van Duinen RN, Kleverlaan CJ, de Gee AJ, Werner A, Feilzer AJ. Early and long-term wear of 'fast-set' conventional glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater 2005;21:716-720.
5. AB-Ghani Z, Ngo H, McIntyre J. Effect of remineralization / demineralization cycles on mineral profiles of Fuji IX fast in vitro using electron probe microanalysis. Aust Dent J 2007;52: 276-281.
6. Scholtanus JD, Huysmans MC. Clinical failure of class-II restorations of a highly viscous glass-ionomer material over a 6-year period: a retrospective study. J Dent 2007;35:156-162.
7. Frencken JE, van't Hof MA, van Amerongen WE, Holmgren CJ. Effectiveness of single-surface ART restorations in the permanent dentition: a meta-analysis. J Dent Res 2004;83:120-123.
8. van't Hof MA, Frencken JE, van Palenstein Helderman WH, Homgren CJ. The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach for managing dental caries: a meta-analysis. Int Dent J 2006;56:345-351.
9. Yip HK, Smales RJ, Ngo HC, Tay FR, Chu FC. Selection of restorative materials for the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach: a review. Spec Care Dentist 2001;21:216-221.
10. van Gemert-Schriks MCM, van Amerongen WE, ten Cate JM, Aartman IHA. Three-year survival of single- and two-surface ART restorations in a high-caries child population. Clin Oral Invest 2007;11:337-343.
11. Berg JH. Glass ionomer cements. Pediatr Dent 2002;24:430-438.
12. Mickenautsch S, Rudolph MJ, Ogunbodede EO, Frencken JE. The impact of the ART approach on the treatment profile in a mobile dental system (MDS) in South Africa. Int Dent J 1999;49:132-138.
13. Taifour D, Frencken JE, Beiruti N, van't Hof MA, Truin GJ. Effectiveness of glass ionomer (ART) and amalgam restorations in the deciduous dentition: results after 3 years. Caries Res 2002;36:437-444.
14. Yip KH, Smales RJ, Gao W, Peng D. The effects of two cavity preparation methods on the longevity of glass ionomer cement restorations: an evaluation after 12 months. J Am Dent Assoc 2002;133:744-751.
15. de Gee AJ, van Duinen RN, Werner A, Davidson CL. Early and long-term wear of conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cements. J Dent Res 1996;75:1613-1619.
16. Xie D, Brantley WA, Culbertson BM, Wang G. Mechanical properties and microstructures of glass ionomer cements. Dent Mater 2000;16:129-138.
17. Kleverlaan CJ, van Duinen RNB, Feilzer AJ. Mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements affected by curing methods. Dent Mater 2004;20:45-50.
18. van de Hoef N, van Amerongen E. Influence of local anesthesia on the quality of class II glass ionomer restorations. Int J Paediatr Dent 2007;17:239-247.
19. Algera TJ, Kleverlaan CJ, Prahl-Andersen B, Feilzer AJ. The influence of environmental conditions on the material properties of setting glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater 2006;22:852-856.
20. Peez R, Frank S. The physical-mechanical performance of the new Ketac™ Molar Easymix compared to commercially available glass ionomer restoratives. J Dent 2006;34:582-587.
21. Mitra SB, Kedrowski BL. Long-term mechanical properties of glass ionomers. Dent Mater 1994;10:78-82.
22. Peutzfeldt A. Compomers and glass ionomers: bond strength to dentin and mechanical properties. Am J Dent 1996;9:259-263.
23. Yap AU. Effects of storage, thermal and load cycling on a new reinforced glass-ionomer cement. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:40-44.
24. Yap AU, Teo JC, Teoh SH. Comparative wear resistance of reinforced glass ionomer restorative materials. Oper Dent 2001; 26:343-348.
25. Anusavice KJ. Does ART have a place in preservative dentistry? Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1999;27:442-448.