Patient Risk Factors– Influence on Survival of Posterior Composites

Journal of Dental Research

Volumn 92, Issue , 2013, Pages S78-S83

  Van de Sande, F H ^a   Opdam, N J ^b   da Rosa Rodolpho, P A ^a   Correa, M B ^a   Demarco, F F ^a   Cenci, M S ^a  

^a Federal University   (Brazil)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

bruxism; dental restoration failure; permanent dental restoration; permanent dentition; retrospective study; risk assessment

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM HYDROXIDE; DENTAL MATERIAL; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRUXISM; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PERMANENT DENTAL RESTORATION; PERMANENT DENTITION; PHYSIOLOGY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICS; SURVIVAL; TOOTH; TOOTH ARCH; TOOTH OCCLUSION; TOOTH PULP;

BRUXISM; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; PERMANENT DENTAL RESTORATION; PERMANENT DENTITION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ADULT; AGED; BRUXISM; CALCIUM HYDROXIDE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL ARCH; DENTAL CARIES SUSCEPTIBILITY; DENTAL CAVITY LINING; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL OCCLUSION, TRAUMATIC; DENTAL PULP; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RESIN CEMENTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TOOTH; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84883030663     PISSN: 00220345     EISSN: 15440591     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022034513484337     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bartlett D Sundaram G (2006). An up to 3-year randomized clinical study comparing indirect and direct resin composites used to restore worn posterior teeth. Int J Prosthodont 19: 613-617.
2. Bernardo M Luis H Martin MD Leroux BG Rue T Leitao J. (2007). Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc 138: 775-783.
3. Burke FJ Lucarotti PS Holder RL (2005). Outcome of direct restorations placed within the general dental services in England and Wales (Part 2): variation by patients' characteristics. J Dent 33: 817-826.
4. Da Rosa Rodolpho PA Donassollo TA Cenci MS Loguercio AD Moraes RR Bronkhorst EM. (2011). 22-year clinical evaluation of the performance of two posterior composites with different filler characteristics. Dent Mater 27: 955-963.
5. Demarco FF Correa MB Cenci MS Moraes RR Opdam NJ (2012). Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials. Dent Mater 28: 87-101.
6. Ferrari M Vichi A Fadda GM Cagidiaco MC Tay FR Breschi L. (2012). A randomized controlled trial of endodontically treated and restored premolars. J Dent Res 91(7 Suppl):72S-78S.
7. Habekost LV Camacho GB Azevedo EC Demarco FF (2007). Fracture resistance of thermal cycled and endodontically treated premolars with adhesive restorations. J Prosthet Dent 98: 186-192.
8. Hamburger JT Opdam NJ Bronkhorst EM Kreulen CM Roeters JJ Huysmans MC (2011). Clinical performance of direct composite restorations for treatment of severe tooth wear. J Adhes Dent 13: 585-593.
9. Hickel R Peschke A Tyas M Mjör I Bayne S Peters M. (2010). FDI World Dental Federation: clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations—update and clinical examples. Clin Oral Investig 14: 349-366.
10. Isokangas P Alanen P Tiekso J (1993). The clinician's ability to identify caries risk subjects without saliva tests—a pilot study. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 21: 8-10.
11. Kohler B Rasmusson CG Odman P (2000). A five-year clinical evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations. J Dent 28: 111-116.
12. Koyano K Tsukiyama Y Ichiki R Kuwata T (2008). Assessment of bruxism in the clinic. J Oral Rehabil 35: 495-508.
13. Kramer N Garcia-Godoy F Reinelt C Feilzer AJ Frankenberger R (2011). Nanohybrid vs. fine hybrid composite in extended Class II cavities after six years. Dent Mater 27: 455-464.
14. Lindberg A van Dijken JW Lindberg M (2007). Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities. J Dent 35: 124-129.
15. Lucarotti PS Holder RL Burke FJ (2005). Outcome of direct restorations placed within the general dental services in England and Wales (Part 3): variation by dentist factors. J Dent 33: 827-835.
16. Lundin SA Koch G (1999). Class I and II posterior composite resin restorations after 5 and 10 years. Swed Dent J 23: 165-171.
17. Manfredini D Winocur E Guarda-Nardini L Lobbezoo F (2012). Self-reported bruxism and temporomandibular disorders: findings from two specialised centres. J Oral Rehabil 39: 319-325.
18. Manhart J Chen H Hamm G Hickel R (2004). Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent 29: 481-508.
19. Mjör IA (2007). Practice-based dental research. J Oral Rehabil 34: 913-920.
20. Mjör IA Gordan VV Abu-Hanna A Gilbert GH (2005). Research in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand 63: 1-9.
21. Moher D Hopewell S Schulz KF Montori V Gotzsche PC Devereaux PJ. (2010). CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Clin Epidemiol 63: e1-e37.
22. Nagasiri R Chitmongkolsuk S (2005). Long-term survival of endodontically treated molars without crown coverage: a retrospective cohort study. J Prosthet Dent 93: 164-170.
23. Opdam NJ Bronkhorst EM Loomans BA Huysmans MC (2010). 12-year survival of composite vs. amalgam restorations. J Dent Res 89: 1063-1067.
24. Pintado MR Anderson GC DeLong R Douglas WH (1997). Variation in tooth wear in young adults over a two-year period. J Prosthet Dent 77: 313-320.
25. Raskin A Michotte-Theall B Vreven J Wilson NH (1999). Clinical evaluation of a posterior composite 10-year report. J Dent 27: 13-19.
26. van Dijken JW (2000). Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up. J Dent 28: 299-306.
27. van Dijken JW Pallesen U (2011). Clinical performance of a hybrid resin composite with and without an intermediate layer of flowable resin composite: a 7-year evaluation. Dent Mater 27: 150-156.
28. van Dijken JW Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K (2006). Fiber-reinforced packable resin composites in Class II cavities. J Dent 34: 763-769.
29. Van Nieuwenhuysen JP D'Hoore W Carvalho J Qvist V (2003). Long-term evaluation of extensive restorations in permanent teeth. J Dent 31: 395-405.
30. Vandenbroucke JP von Elm E Altman DG Gotzsche PC Mulrow CD Pocock SJ. (2007). Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 4: e297.