Two-year survival rates of proximal atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in relation to glass ionomer cements and postrestoration meals consumed

Pediatric Dentistry

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 246-251

  Kemoli, Arthur Musakulu ^a   Opinya, Gladys N ^a   Amerongen, Willem Evert Van ^b   Mwalili, Samuel M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI   (Kenya)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c JOMO KENYATTA UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Kenya)

Author keywords

Cariolo gy; Dental education; Dental material S Biomaterial S

Indexed keywords

FUJI IX; GLASS IONOMER; KETAC MOLAR APLICAP; KETAC MOLAR EASYMIX; KETAC-MOLAR APLICAP;

ARTICLE; ATRAUMATIC RESTORATIVE TREATMENT; CHEMISTRY; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECIDUOUS TOOTH; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FOOD; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; PATHOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURVIVAL; TEMPERATURE; TIME; VISCOSITY;

CHILD; DENTAL ATRAUMATIC RESTORATIVE TREATMENT; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FOOD; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MALE; MOLAR; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TEMPERATURE; TIME FACTORS; TOOTH, DECIDUOUS; VISCOSITY;

EID: 79959228203     PISSN: 01641263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Tinanoff N. Dental caries risk assessment and prevention. Dent Clin North Am 1995;39:709-19.
2. Seiham A. Changing trends in dental caries. Int J Epidemiol 1984;13:142-7.
3. Verdonschot EH, Angmar-Mansson B, ten Bosch JJ, et al. Developments in caries diagnosis and their relationship to treatment decisions and quality of care. ORCA Saturday afternoon symposium 1997. Caries Res 1999;33: 32-40.
4. Hussein I, Kershaw AE, Tahmassebi JF, Fayle SA. The management of drooling in children with mental and physical disabilities: A literature review. Int Paediatr Dent 1998;8:3-11. (Pubitemid 128506656)
5. van Gemert-Schriks MCM, van Amerongen WE, ten Cate JM, Aartman IHA. Three-year survival of single- and 2-surface ART restorations in a high-caries child population. Clin Oral Investig 2007;11:37-43.
6. Holmgren CJ, Frencken JE. Painting the future for ART. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1999;27:449-53.
7. Nomoto R, Komoriyama M, McCabe JF, Hiranos S. Effect of mixing method on the porosity of incorporated glass ionomer cements. Dent Mater 2004;20:972-8. (Pubitemid 40146127)
8. Billington RW, Williams JA, Pearson GJ. Variation in powder/liquid ratio of a restorative glass ionomer cement used in dental practice. Br Dent J 1990;169:164-7.
9. Nomoto R, McCabe JF. The effect of mixing methods on the compressive strength of glass ionomer cement. J Dent 2001;29:205-10. (Pubitemid 33660560)
10. Williams JH, Billington RW. Changes in compressive strength of glass ionomer restorative materials with respect to time periods of 24 hours to 4 months. J Oral Rehabil 2007;18:163-8.
11. Mjör AI, Dahl JE, Moorhead JE. Age of restorations at placement in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand 2000;58:97-101.
12. van Duinen RNB. A Study Into the Prospects of Traditional Glass Ionomer Cements on Universal Direct Restorative Material [thesis]. Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press, 2005.
13. Frencken JE, Holmgren CJ. Atraumatic Restorative Treatment for Dental Caries. The Netherlands, Nijmegen STI Book; 1999.
14. Frencken JE, Holmgren C, Mikx F. Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) for Tooth Decay: A Global Initiative 1998-2000. Oral Health Unit, WHO, Geneva.
15. Landis RJ, Koch CC. The measurement of observed agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1997;33: 159-74.
16. Frankenberg R, Sindel J, Krämer N. Viscous glass ionomer cements: A new alternative to amalgam in the primary dentition? Quintessence Int 1997;28:667-76. (Pubitemid 127712097)
17. Mandari GJ, Frencken JE, Vant't Hof MA. Six-year success rate of occlusal amalgam and glass ionomer restorations placed using three minimal intervention approaches. Caries Res 2003;37:246-53. (Pubitemid 37026198)
18. Taifour D, Frencken JE, Beiruti N, van't Hof MA, Truin GJ. Effectiveness of glass ionomer (ART) and amalgam restorations in the deciduous dentition: Results after 3 years. Caries Res 2002;36:437-44.
19. Lo ECM, Luo Y, Fan MW, Wei SHY. Clinical investigation of two glass ionomer restoratives used with the atraumatic restorative treatment approach in China: Two-year results. Caries Res 2001;35:458-563.
20. Honkala E, Behbehani J, Inbricevic H, Kerosuo E, Al- Jame G. The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach to restoring primary teeth in a standard dental clinic. Int J Pediatr Dent 2003;13:172-9. (Pubitemid 37255688)
21. van den Dungen GM, Huddleston Slater AE, van Amerongen WE. ART or conventional restorations? A final examination of proximal restorations in deciduous molars. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd 2004;111:345-9.
22. Grossman ES, Mackenautsch S. Microscopic observations of ART excavated cavities and restorations. SADJ 2002; 57:359-63.
23. Billington RW, Williams JA, Pearson GJ. Variation in powder/liquid ratio of a restorative glass ionomer cement used in dental practice. Br Dent J 1990;169:164-7.
24. Safar JA, Davis RD, Overton JD. Effect of saliva contamination on the bond of dentin to resin-modified glassionomer cement. Oper Dent 1999;24:351-7.
25. Prentice L, Tyas M, Burrow M. The effect of mixing time on the handling and compressive strength of an encapsulated glass ionomer cement. Dent Mater 2006;21: 704-8.
26. Algera TJ, Kleverlaan CJ, de Gee AJ, Prahl-Andersen B, Feilzer AJ. The influence of accelerating the setting rate of ultrasound or heat on the bond strength of glass ionomers used as orthodontic brackets cements. Eur J Orthod 2005;27:472-6. (Pubitemid 41442937)